WHITES FOR ROMNEY:

Posted on by

How far do you think that would go, now, in this country?

Please click on the below video:

African Americans for Obama? Specifically: blacks for Obama? Only one group for Obama?

  • No Estonians for Obama?
  • No Mexicans for Obama?
  • No Tongans for Obama?
  • No Filipinos for Obama?
  • No Muslims for Obama?
  • No LGBTWs for Obama?
  • No Paralyzed for Obama?
  • No Dwarves for Obama?
  • No Poor for Obama?
  • No Minority Women for Obama?
  • No Psychics for Obama?

How about: RACISTS for Obama?

Because I’m sure, after all, if you replaced BLACKS with WHITES and OBAMA with ROMNEY, you’d all be completely smeared as Caucasoid Racist Caspar Crackers.

When, in fact, the above video and the man himself — for portraying himself in that fashion in such a strata — has been revealed, again, as a racist. Because he’s black when he wants to be black, white when he wants to be white (and sound “black” or sound “white”), and plays off the guilt of ignorant GOWPs.

Audience-dependent.

Do the math, America. Open your blinded eyes.

And, quite frankly, let’s sink this racist, stratifying, classless and class-war-promoting asshole come November.

Of course, I mean this in the nicest, most understanding way possible.

BZ

 Share
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

12 thoughts on “WHITES FOR ROMNEY:”

  2. Think you are mainly preaching to the choir. You may make a few of the liberal lurkers think.

    What gets to me is, win or lose, we taxpayers will be funding his lavish lifestyle for as long as he lives.

  3. Comment moderation is back on because, as TF pointed out, I needed to take out the trash. I had hoped the trash wouldn’t sink to the subterranean levels but, of course, as Leftists, they did.

    I weeded out the biggest bad. But one troll got in when they didn’t attack personally — until they did.

    TF: HUMANS against Obama — I can get behind that. But damned near too logical for most EMOs to comprehend.

    WSF: yeah, guilty. I am.

    But, true, the Funding Continues Ever On.

    No matter WHAT I write or say.

    BZ

  5. Racist is as racist does. Perfect example of the “divide and conquer” strategy of the Dems. You can see why the Democrats oppose equal rights and opportunity for all. They get some political ground by dividing people up and seeking to foment conflict and devision… and thus zeal from voters who will make sure to vote for Obama because he is “on their side” against the whatever precenters, those who have the wrong skin color, religion, or whatever.

    It gets votes, for sure. But at what cost? It could turn the country into another Somalia.

  6. It’s racist for Obama!!! I have blogged about this before. Open racism is OK because he is black!!!The blacks love this and will never let go of the race card!!!

  7. Would you expect anything different from this President? He has done almost everything possible to alienate every ethnic group except Black and Muslims (if you want to consider Muslims as an ethnic group). He needs to appeal to a large group to be reelected.

  8. Many think that Obama is the first black president. They couldn’t be more wrong. Stop and think about it; he talks white, he acts white he is half-white, he was raised by whites. The only time he’s black is election time. He’s fooled the ghetto gang and the liberal crowd. The only things black about Barack Obama are his hoop shots and singing voice. He’s not fooling me he’s America’s first half-white president.

  9. ∞ ≠ ø: right. They’ll wait for the courts before they do their jobs.

    dmarks: “divide and conquer” is what you do when you have no objective, logical and non-emotive argument or plans.

    RR: not just limited to Obama, but most every issue involving blacks and racism: their melanin somehow refutes their ability to be racist. I say: WRONG.

    Tom: he needs to divide and conquer, and does that by pitting group against group, race against race.

    Ron: correct; he’s a “black” as he wishes to be, WHEN he wishes to be, when it is conVENient to push a race-driven agenda.

    BZ

  11. The riots will start when the Judge throws out the Trayvon Martin case for lack of evidence.
    (Or, alternatively, it goes to trial and he’s found not guilty for the same reason.)
    Will that be the start of the war, or will something else be the eventual trigger?
    I don’t know.
    But there is so much resentment of those that can succeed by those that cannot, the war WILL start at some point.
    So as most who frequent here already know…
    Be prepared for that eventuality.

Comments are closed.