CISPA passed the House of Representatives, on Thursday, April 26th.
CISPA (Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act) or HR 3523:
To provide for the sharing of certain cyber threat intelligence and cyber threat information between the intelligence community and cybersecurity entities, and for other purposes. – H.R. 3523
My 4th District Congressman Tom McClintock weighs in:
Mr McClintock said, on April 27th, in his allotted minute on the floor:
Mr. Speaker:
Under the Fourth Amendment, if the Government wants to snoop through a person’s email, it must first convince a judge that there is probable cause to believe that person has committed a crime and it must specify the documents it believes are relevant to that charge.
Yesterday the House passed a measure that makes a mockery of this cherished protection.
Under the guise of cyber security it allows the government to pressure and cajole internet providers to turn over their subscribers’ data and for the government then to use that data — without the consent or even knowledge of the individuals affected — for a wide variety of vague purposes unrelated to cyber security. All without warrant.
This is a truly Orwellian measure that our Bill of Rights was specifically written to prevent. I hope the House will have second thoughts as it reflects on the ramifications of this act.
Passed the House. Next to the Senate. The bulk of Republicans voted for it. They’re wrong.
In my opinion — as with Mr McClintock’s — this needs to die. HR 3523 opens up a door we need not open. Because, once opened, it cannot be closed.
And my e-mails will be read. And yours. And if you dissent with the current government?
What of that?
BZ
PS:
In my state:
California | |||
D | Thompson, Michael “Mike” | CA 1st | |
R | Herger, Walter “Wally” | CA 2nd | |
R | Lungren, Daniel | CA 3rd | |
R | McClintock, Tom | CA 4th | |
D | Matsui, Doris | CA 5th | |
D | Woolsey, Lynn | CA 6th | |
D | Miller, George | CA 7th | |
D | Pelosi, Nancy | CA 8th | |
D | Lee, Barbara | CA 9th | |
D | Garamendi, John | CA 10th | |
D | McNerney, Jerry | CA 11th | |
D | Speier, Jackie | CA 12th | |
D | Stark, Fortney “Pete” | CA 13th | |
D | Eshoo, Anna | CA 14th | |
D | Honda, Michael “Mike” | CA 15th | |
D | Lofgren, Zoe | CA 16th | |
D | Farr, Sam | CA 17th | |
D | Cardoza, Dennis | CA 18th | |
R | Denham, Jeff | CA 19th | |
D | Costa, Jim | CA 20th | |
R | Nunes, Devin | CA 21st | |
R | McCarthy, Kevin | CA 22nd | |
D | Capps, Lois | CA 23rd | |
R | Gallegly, Elton | CA 24th | |
R | McKeon, Howard “Buck” | CA 25th | |
R | Dreier, David | CA 26th | |
D | Sherman, Brad | CA 27th | |
D | Berman, Howard | CA 28th | |
D | Schiff, Adam | CA 29th | |
D | Waxman, Henry | CA 30th | |
D | Becerra, Xavier | CA 31st | |
D | Chu, Judy | CA 32nd | |
D | Bass, Karen | CA 33rd | |
D | Roybal-Allard, Lucille | CA 34th | |
D | Waters, Maxine | CA 35th | |
D | Hahn, Janice | CA 36th | |
D | Richardson, Laura | CA 37th | |
D | Napolitano, Grace | CA 38th | |
D | Sánchez, Linda | CA 39th | |
R | Royce, Edward “Ed” | CA 40th | |
R | Lewis, Jerry | CA 41st | |
R | Miller, Gary | CA 42nd | |
D | Baca, Joe | CA 43rd | |
R | Calvert, Ken | CA 44th | |
R | Bono Mack, Mary | CA 45th | |
R | Rohrabacher, Dana | CA 46th | |
D | Sanchez, Loretta | CA 47th | |
R | Campbell, John | CA 48th | |
R | Issa, Darrell | CA 49th | |
R | Bilbray, Brian | CA 50th | |
D | Filner, Bob | CA 51st | |
R | Hunter, Duncan | CA 52nd | |
D | Davis, Susan | CA 53rd | |
If Lungren voted AYE, it’s not as evil as it sounds…. or I’d be VERy surprised.
Makes you wonder, eh?
I’ll make no bones: this is my PRIVATE Libertarian portion coming out.
BZ
First off, I always read the damn things for myself.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/hr3523/text
What troubles me is that this bill indirectly establishes a legal cyber information sharing ring totally outside the government.
Also, If you share with the government(say the FBI), the info automatically gets sent to DHS, BUT not the other way. DHS can gather info on other agencies or keep them in the dark if they choose.
A provision suggests that sharing information between agencies may undermine the purpose for which the information was provided.
This is internal spy vs. spy.
No bueno.
We are looking, once again, at a network potentially designed to circumvent and control the Constitutional Government of the U.S.A.
We need to pull the plug on Homeland Security before they pull the plug on us.
First you have to think that you actually had any privacy in that area….which is just an allusion.
Take it from the ‘ol IT man here….anybody can see your business. One doesn’t have to be some hacking nerd to ferret out information.
This is NOT good, and is a total infringement on 4A!
You’re all correct, but even more troubling:
Look how many REPUBLICANS voted FOR the bill!
BZ
Talk about invading our privacy. I don’t like this one little bit.
What happened to our constitutional rights to privacy?