Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said on Thursday, at a New York University Law School forum, that there is no logic in profiling Muslim men under the age of 35.
. . . what . . . ?
Yes. There is no logic in profiling Muslim men under the age of 35.
Thank God; it’s about time someone in a high profile authority stated the obvious. It’s clearly way past time to focus our profiling measures on Caucasoid grandmothers, paraplegics, the deaf, the blind, crazed Albanian dwarves, Alfred E. Neuman, US military personnel and children under the age of 10. And infants. Let’s not forget the damage that infants can inflict.
You’re not using good logic there. You’ve got to use actual intelligence that you received. And, so, you might — all you’ve given me is a kind of status. You have not given me a technique for tactic or behavior. Something that would suggest somebody is not Muslim, but Islamic, that has actually moved into the category of violent extremists,” Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said at a forum on U.S. security and preventing terrorist attacks.
“We have ways to make some of those cuts. And they involve the intel that comes in, the analysis that goes on. For example, we often times, for travelers entering the United States, we won’t not do what is called a secondary inspection just because they are a 35-year- old male who appears to be Muslim, whatever that means. But we know from intelligence that if they have a certain travel pattern over a certain period of time, that should cause us to ask some more significant questions than if we don’t.”
This is the same person who, after the system failed, said the “system worked.”
BZ
Ya know Bz, It would be rude to profile young muslim jihadi’s with explosives. besides, we need to try to be aware of ALL potential threats, don’t be so narrow minded! you never know what that baby is trying to smuggle in that diaper! or what grandma has stashed in her pantyhose. just focusing on young muslims that have sworn themselves to Israel and the US’s extinction would be terribly impolite!
Mark, yes, sir, it would be SO rude to profile those poor Muslims.
Babies are RESPONSIBLE, as I SAID! Don’t let infants OUT OF YOUR SIGHT, if you’re awaiting a flight!
You NEVER know when a formula bottle will EXPLODE!!
BZ
Janet Napolitano is the reason I won’t get on an airplane any more. She doesn’t know who the enemy is.
BTW: can anybody make sense of any of the sentences in her response?
“–all you’ve given me is a kind of status.”
What does that even mean?
There’s only so many face plants that one can do a day, I’m way past my quota!
Hasn’t it been proven that 99% of all terrorists are middle aged caucasian women? Why on earth would you want hassle young muslims?
THE BITCH IS WHACKED OUT…
Really? Not Muslim, but Islamic? Is that like, not square but made up only of four equal sides and four equal right angles?
She ain’t insane, she just stupid.
Like Curly said, “I keep tryin’ to think, but nuthin’s happening!”
I always knew that Napolitano had a screw loose somewhere. Are there any libs who are able to see the threat of Islam?
Grandma, babies and next on the list cats and dogs will be terrorist suspects.
Ridiculous nonsense.
Joe: trust me, she does NOT know what it means; it’s verbal goo-goo pablum for the MSM/DEM.
Scotty: thank you. I prefer you healthy and reading my blog.
BAA: and that’s my point! Don’t think that because you’re an old white guy in a wheelchair that you’ll escape the scope and power of the TSA, mister! You’re the kinda guy on which they need to FOCUS like a laser beam!!
Tim, with regard to her, nothin’ was EVER happening. . .
BZ
check out this link, yeah, why single out the Muslims indeed…..
http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/wanted_terrorists/@@wanted-group-listing
Wonder if she is capable of a single, coherent, sentence?
Mark, thanks for providing that link. It’s clear that American grandmothers ARE indeed some MASSIVE culprits in terrorism as WELL as hordes of infants and quadriplegics. Don’t be fooled, ladies and gentlemen, just because people are in a wheelchair doesn’t mean that they can’t kill you with their pinkie or a boxcutter!
WSF: she’s a politician. It’s her job to be completely incoherent and make tons of YOUR taxpayer dollars doing it.
BZ
Case in point:
http://articles.ocregister.com/2011-06-11/news/29654409_1_tsa-agents-security-questions-hammer
Sad. But it does remind me of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dX3ePAOUK7U
There is no logic in profiling Muslim men under the age of 35.
After today’s incident at the Pentagon, Napolitano should be rethinking her position on this matter. She won’t do so, of course.