Obama: who needs Article 1 anyway?

Obama Crime Spree PresidencyI’ll just do it all my own self, Mr Obama says.  I shall rule from on high via executive fiat.

Marco Rubio says, “Barack Obama is obsessed with undermining the Second USAmendment.”

Let’s watch Mr Obama’s condescending and tearful lecture to law-abiding Americans, shall we?

Obama wants:

  Licensing requirements for smaller-scale gun sellers.
The hiring of an additional 230 FBI employees to process background checks 24/7
Provisions enabling states to share mental health information
Dollars for research into “gun safety technology.”  I.E., “smart guns”

The truth is that currently 38 states submit less than 80% of their felony convictions into the background check system.  DC won’t even repair the current system.  Now they want to expand it.  Nonsense.  All you have to do is ENFORCE the federal gun laws currently on the books.

This isn’t so much about the “gun control” EO as it is about Mr Obama’s continuing disregard for the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Obama American CRAZIESFor the ignorant amongst us — that would include you, Millennials — here is what Article 1 of the US Constitution says.  In a nutshell.

Article 1 of the U.S. Constitution gives Congress its powers and limits. Congress is the legislative branch of the government, meaning they are the ones to make laws for the United States of America. The article also creates the two sections of Congress, which is called a bicameral legislature.

Meaning: Congress creates laws, not the president.

But here’s the truth: federal firearms convictions under Obama have fallen 15.5% in the past five years, and 34.8% in the past ten years.  Yes, that IS under Mr Obama’s rule.  Those stats are from the Syracuse University TRAC Project.

Meaning: again Mr Obama is two-faced, duplicitous and a LIAR.  He could direct his AGs to go after gun crime tenaciously BUT — here is the further truth — the suspects would be predominantly BLACK and from large urban areas like Detroit, DC, Chicago, Atlanta.  Mr Obama certainly cannot have that.

Sure.  Violent felons and gang members buy all their guns online and in gun stores and at gun shows.  There’s nothing more satisfying to a dealer with an FFL than selling an AK-47 to a tatted-up MS-13 gang member or a frothing nutcase holding a stuffed toy who walks up to their counter.

A further lie: yes, you can purchase a firearm online.  But to whom does it go and where?  Oh yes.  Your local dealer who has an FFL and must then run a background check before physically handing the gun over to you.

Sometimes the FBI and the DOJ actually miss those few felons who attempt to purchase handguns.  That’s not a local problem, that’s a federal problem.  As in: just enforce what’s on the books with more efficiency.

Obama Gun Sales Soar 1-5-2016Plus: now you’re a single mother.  You suffer from post-partum depression.  You want a firearm for protection because your apartment complex is rife with drug dealers and you want to protect your child.  Is your doctor now mandated to contact the FBI?  Under this EO your doctor is mandated to go around HIPAA privacy laws to rat you out.  But who truly is “fit to own a firearm”?  No one in the federal government can answer that question.

Second Amendment Gun NUTSIdeology doesn’t just stop at the Spite House.  It can surely exist in your doctors office.  What will you say?  What can you say?

Further you cannot wrap suicide numbers in with the homicide numbers in terms of “gun violence.”  But of course Mr Obama does that very same thing.  The vast majority of gun deaths stem from suicide.

Gun Crime STATISTICSBackground checks will not solve the issue of gun suicide.  Those who are intent on suicide will simply transition from guns to rocks to pills to knives to state-sponsored death.

Will you “commit” anyone who mentions depression, anxiety, who has talked about giving up?  How will that affect civil liberties?

AGAIN, Republicans miss a golden opportunity to state the OBVIOUS: Mr Obama couldn’t care less about our foundational documents and, instead, issues laws by imperial fiat, completely bypassing an entire THIRD branch of government.

And if you don’t know the three branches of government, then you are a massive part of the problem in America.

Because you are incompetent.

BZ

 

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

11 thoughts on “Obama: who needs Article 1 anyway?

  1. “Will you “commit” anyone who mentions depression, anxiety, who has talked about giving up? How will that affect civil liberties?”
    How many people will, as a result of this, now NOT seek treatment for potential psychological/psychiatric issues? How many will be afraid to be open and candid with their health care provider due to fear of being reported? And where will THAT lead?

    And where will it end? For example, if I write this: ‘With the advent of electronic health records how easy would it be to ‘modify’ someone’s HR should the govt decide to target an individual?’ Would writing this make me a conspiracy theorist and therefore potentially an unstable person? Would this be enough to get me ‘banned’ from gun ownership?
    Is this a two-fer: curtail the 2nd amendment and then start to work on stifling speech?

    • That is the POINT. Now people may decide not to report. PLUS yes, electronically it would be kid’s play to FUCK with your medical records. Ah, the BLISS of Obamacare.

      Further, like 1984, what DOES constitute mental instability? Those who MAKE those determinations have the power. If you LIKE guns, that could be considered an instability. If you believe in minimal government, that could be considered an instability. When you are not mainstream THAT could be considered an instability — by those who grasp the reins of POWER.

      Just ask any Leftist about those two topics. They think you ARE crazy.

      BZ

  2. The problem with the Republicans isn’t that they missed a golden opportunity to point out obozo’s hypocrisy, the problem is that they are in lockstep with him in the process that’s occuring.

    The Constitution has no weight now, for those in deecee. It still has weight for those of us that understand it, which is to our advantage. Rule of Law is all but buried, but it can be Restored. Yet that process will not be pleasant.

    The next two months will be the most critical, for the rest of the year.

    Off topic, another excellent picture on the header. 🙂

    • Yes Grog, the Constitution has no weight and, further, so few people are OBJECTING. The media isn’t, the People aren’t, the Congress isn’t. What the hell? HOWEVER, this president has set PRECEDENT for the NEXT president to do the VERY SAME THING.

      BZ

  3. I bought a rifle and 1000 rounds of ammo on line yesterday during his pissant speech. My way of protesting. Screw Obama. Trump 2016!

  4. Hi BZ. Quick question, has anyone asked Trump (or Cruz) if elected, will they initiate criminal investigations into the wrong doings by either/both parties?
    Will anyone?

    • Dave, politicians, at least in DC, are very hesitant to do things like that because they mostly ALL have corruption scandals in their own closets and don’t want the Light of Truth shined too brightly back at THEM some day, for having participated in a Uncovering.

      Cockroaches.

      Truism.

      BZ

  5. This was an Executive ACTION, and NOT an Executive ORDER.
    People get this mixed up.
    An EA does not have any power in it. A recommendation is all it amounts to..
    An EO is different, and he did not do this.,,,,,
    Just a recommendation is all it is.

Comments are closed.