Demorat Debate


PART I:
Uh-oh. BZ’s thoughts and whispers seem to be making print:

WASHINGTON — Despite Democrats’ excitement over the presidential nomination battle between Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton, both candidates would lose to presumptive Republican nominee John McCain if the general election were held today, a new Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll has found.

I’d heard from little birdies that some Demorats are quietly asking: “do we have the New McGovern on our hands?”

How massively disspiriting if another Republican inhabited the White House.

PART II:
The debate began on MSNBC at 6pm Pacific, and it was a full sixteen minutes before the whining commenced: Hillary was asked the second question — firstagain, and she wondered aloud why she always got asked a question first, instead of Obama, making a reference to the SNL skit where the media asks Barack Obama if he’d like another pillow for his chair.

Suffice to say, that didn’t play well in the audience and, once more, showed viewers that Hillary was more than willing to play the Victim Card.

[Aside: twice on Tuesday, February 26th, while stumping for his wife’s candidacy, former President William J. Clinton said to audiences: “When I’m elected president. . .”]

Overall, 90 minutes later, Barack Obama simply then and now comes off as a more affable, genuinely “likeable” individual than Hillary Clinton. More controlled. Less vindictive. More a gentleman than she is a lady. Neither of them spoke in great detail per se (as expected) but Hillary came across again as sarcastic, bordering on arrogance.

One can see, in the face of Clinton as Obama answered questions, that she is upset at having to be demeaned by having to take the time to be measured, repeatedly, under hot lights and by questioners and scrutinizers against a young upstart black man who very well could remove this next presidency from her grasp.

The presidency of which she is simply due, plain and simple.

In the end, Obama is simply a more likeable character and, if he wins in the end as I believe, it will be solely because of this aspect; not because of his programs or content of his plans or thoughts — but, quite frankly, whom does that surprise?

No major scores were made on either side; however, the overall winner? Barack Hussein Obama.

BZ

P.S.

MSNBC’s poll can be taken here to indicate the debate’s winners. As of midnight, the poll indicated:

Who won the debate? * 83089 responses
Hillary Clinton won.22%
Barack Obama won.65%
Neither won.13%
Did the debate help you decide who to vote for? * 80877 responses
Yes, my mind’s made up.51%
No, I still can’t decide.4.5%
It made me lean toward Hillary Clinton.11%
It made me lean toward Barack Obama.30%
It made me want to look elsewhere.2.9%
Will Ralph Nader’s entrance into the presidential race hurt the Democrats? * 81069 responses
Yes, once again Nader could siphon off just enough votes to hurt the Democrats.21%
No, Nader doesn’t have the sway he once had.79%
Will Obama and Clinton combine forces to create a “Dream Team”? * 81811 responses
Yes, Obama-Clinton.10%
Yes, Clinton-Obama.9.3%
No, there’s no way either of them would bow to accept the other as running mate.81%

Your Socially-Engineered Future

Pray for peace, but prepare for war.

What would you get with a Demorat-controlled White House, Senate and House of Representatives?

Complete and total “Social Engineering.”

You would get this and more:

Christian Photographer Hauled before Commission for
Refusing Same-Sex Job
By John Jalsevac
New Mexico, January 30, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) – The case of a Christian photographer who refused to photograph a same-sex “commitment ceremony”, was heard before the New Mexico Human Rights Division on Monday.

A same-sex couple asked Elaine Huguenin, co-owner with her husband of Elane Photography, to photograph a “commitment ceremony” that the two women wanted to hold. Huguenin declined because her Christian beliefs are in conflict with the message communicated by the ceremony.

The same-sex couple filed a complaint with the New Mexico Human Rights Division, which is now trying Elane Photography under state antidiscrimination laws for sexual orientation discrimination.

Do you understand the components of this issue?
  • This is a private business.
  • Not a government-run entity.
  • Not a government-funded or supported entity.
  • This is a state-run commission making the decision, not the federal government.

Does the 10th Amendment hold here?

More:

On Monday we defended Elane Photography in court, saying basically that no person should be required to help others advance a message that they disagree with,” ADF Senior Counsel and Senior Vice-President of the Office of Strategic Initiatives, Jordan Lorence, told LifeSiteNews in an interview today. “That’s a basic First Amendment principle. The government is punishing Elaine photography for refusing to take photos which obviously advance the messages sent by the same-sex ceremony – that marriage can be defined as two women or two men.”

In their complaint the homosexual couple has sought for an injunction against Elane Photography that will forbid them from ever again refusing to photograph a same-sex ceremony. They have also requested attorney’s fees.

“Depending on how far up the ladder this goes of appeal that could be a lot of money,” said Lorence. “Hundreds of thousands of dollars.”

Could this also not be a Fifth Amendment issue as well? Why should it potentially cost a small business “hundreds of thousands of dollars” to hold to their religious beliefs?

Heard of this case? I’d wager not.

Do the Logical Extension: Clear and obvious social engineering. Coming soon more directly, more openly, more arrogantly, to a court and political system near you.
BZ

Spoiler

Nader hates that term. But the truth is the truth.
Ralph Nader has (ho-hum) thrown his hat into the Presidential Ring for, what, the fourth time? Fifth time? Who knows? Who much cares?
Here’s the only factor involved:
He won’t steal votes from the GOP; that’s a given.
I say he won’t steal votes from Obama.
I say Hillary has the greatest number of votes to lose from Nader’s inclusion.
BZ

Global Warming?

The Canadian National Post writes:

Snow cover over North America and much of Siberia, Mongolia and China is greater than at any time since 1966.

The U.S. National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) reported that many American cities and towns suffered record cold temperatures in January and early February. According to the NCDC, the average temperature in January “was -0.3 F cooler than the 1901-2000 (20th century) average.”

Of course, the global cooling will be attributed to global warming. That’s what’s so great about the religion of Global Warming: if it’s actually warm on a given day? Global Warming! If it’s cool on a given day? Global Warming again, causing the global cooling!

And remember the Arctic Sea ice? The ice we were told so hysterically last fall had melted to its “lowest levels on record? Never mind that those records only date back as far as 1972 and that there is anthropological and geological evidence of much greater melts in the past.

The ice is back.

Gilles Langis, a senior forecaster with the Canadian Ice Service in Ottawa, says the Arctic winter has been so severe the ice has not only recovered, it is actually 10 to 20 cm thicker in many places than at this time last year.

Article author Lorne Gunter is going straight to Liberal Hell for daring to write:

OK, so one winter does not a climate make. It would be premature to claim an Ice Age is looming just because we have had one of our most brutal winters in decades.

But if environmentalists and environment reporters can run around shrieking about the manmade destruction of the natural order every time a robin shows up on Georgian Bay two weeks early, then it is at least fair game to use this winter’s weather stories to wonder whether the alarmist are being a tad premature.

And it’s not just anecdotal evidence that is piling up against the climate-change dogma.

According to Robert Toggweiler of the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory at Princeton University and Joellen Russell, assistant professor of biogeochemical dynamics at the University of Arizona — two prominent climate modellers — the computer models that show polar ice-melt cooling the oceans, stopping the circulation of warm equatorial water to northern latitudes and triggering another Ice Age (a la the movie The Day After Tomorrow) are all wrong.

“We missed what was right in front of our eyes,” says Prof. Russell. It’s not ice melt but rather wind circulation that drives ocean currents northward from the tropics. Climate models until now have not properly accounted for the wind’s effects on ocean circulation, so researchers have compensated by over-emphasizing the role of manmade warming on polar ice melt.

Oh crap! Facts! RUNNNNNNN! RUN AWAAAAAY!!

BZ

Consuming Demorats

The two Demorat presidential contenders, Barack HUSSEIN Obama and Hillary RODHAM Clinton continue, much to my public glee, delight and perpetual entertainment, to slash, hack, stab, parry and thrust knives into their opponent’s soft white (hey, Barack isn’t 100% “street cred,” say a percentile of blacks) underbelly:

Here, the Clinton Camp emphasizes the HUSSEIN aspect of Obama.

Here, the Obama Camp fires back, accusing the CC of “”shameful offensive fear-mongering” by circulating the photo as a clear attempt to point out Obama’s Muslim background (as an aside, anyone have any doubt that Obama will be sworn in on a family Koran?).

Some think that Hillary is running a series of last-ditch efforts to somehow connect or re-connect with a Demorat electorate that seems to be favoring Obama.

Bob Novak seems to think that, for the Good Of The Order, Hillary needs to go — but who will tell her?

Even before Sen. Barack Obama won his ninth straight contest against Sen. Hillary Clinton, in Wisconsin last Tuesday, wise old heads in the Democratic Party were asking this question: Who will tell her that it’s over, that she cannot win the presidential nomination and that the sooner she leaves the race, the more it will improve the party’s chances of defeating Sen. John McCain in November?

ABC News says Hillary has eight days to pull the rug out from under Obama, or face annihilation.

After shoving the photo of Obama about, The New York Times seems to think Clinton has left her Angry Place for her new Sarcastic Place.

From NBC News:

The latest NBC News delegate hard count:
DEMOCRATS
Obama 1,192
Clinton 1,036
There are 16 delegates unallocated, including 10 in Colorado, 2 in Maryland and one each in Hawaii, Abroad, New York, Tennessee.

Superdelegate Count
Clinton 257
Obama 194
(Obama has gained 24 publicly declared superdelegates since Super Tuesday, Feb. 5. Clinton has lost a net of three.)
GRAND TOTAL
Obama 1,386
Clinton 1,293
REPUBLICANS
McCain 930
(AP allocates 102 more for McCain to bring total to 1,032 — just 159 short of nomination)Romney 293
Huckabee 246
There are 35 unallocated, including 20 in Louisiana, 5 from WA caucus, 5 from WA primary, 3 from WI, 2 from TN.

Romney, though “out,” is still ahead of Huckabee who is “in.”
Me?

I think Clinton made one of her final missteps by releasing the new Obama photo. This plays well with me and my ilk, of course, in an entertaining vein (as opposed to, say, her slit vein) but won’t play well with any number of Demorats. The Daily Kos wrote:

So this picture of Obama in Somali (or Kenyan) garb has everyone in a tizzy right now. Me, I think it’s kind of cool to see Obama in tribal clothing.

Meaning: the photo isn’t Playing In Poughkeepsie — or anywhere else for that matter. Naturally, in a standard style, Kos cozys back up to the Clintonistas by saying, hey, they didn’t really mean it and, after all, how can anyone keep track of 700 staffers?

Hillary The Unbeatable, Hillary The Dues-Payer, Hillary The Anointed, may just have her ass handed to her in the next month or so. It’s not a pretty picture — on any number of levels. She and/or her Campaignistas do not understand the tenets of Political Marketing 101:

1. Attack ads and strategies do not work and they never will.
2. Keep on track: what can you do that is positive?
3. Be consistent, not confusing; these days one asks: which Hillary Clinton are we programmed to see this week? Crying Hillary? Confused Hillary? Strident Hillary? Attacking Hillary? Angry Hillary? Sarcastic Hillary?

Hillary’s Theme: there is no theme —
Barack’s Theme: “Change.” Beautiful. Empty but brilliant because you can feature Obama as whatever you wish, in your own mind.

I’ve written that I believe Obama could beat McCain handily; now there are little covert whispers on, amazingly, the Demorat side wondering: “This Obama — is he another McGovern?”

What say you?

BZ