Off The Map


This post is highly unusual for me; it has broached and addressed issues I’d either purposely not wanted to deal with, or merely treated prior with indifference.

I had occasion on Saturday to watch a number of John Edward Cross Country programs.

For those not familiar, John Edward (John Edward McGee) is a medium of sorts who happens to perform public “readings” for an audience on television. He will receive vibes or clues or signals, and then focuses in on a specific person or persons and barrages them with various questions as he narrows down the situation. He provides himself as a conduit of sorts between the living and the dead.

At first blush he appears to be a second milennium version of a cheap parlor trick, whereupon he is attempting to “outguess” or “suss out” the true circumstances of those he has targeted. In other words, he provides persons he chooses with revealing information about their loved ones who have died.

His “targets,” his “marks” then release more information for him to use and/or manipulate and, with that, he manages to focus even more closely on individual or family issues. John Edward is nothing if not astoundingly intelligent, extremely sensitive with regard to persons’ emotions, and possessed of a human radar for truth and fabrication second to none. I would want him, for example, as the ultimate instructor for my Interview & Interrogation classes. He is more attuned to the human mind and its workings than most anyone I’ve ever seen — Good guy or Bad guy. He would put the incisive abilities of Hannibal Lecter to shame.

To say that I am extremely skeptical of such a thing in general is to be very kind. In today’s environment, there are numerous technological advantages to be enjoyed by such a man as Edward, as opposed to the time of, say, Harry Houdini — who discovered most all if not all of the secrets held by those who offered themselves as “mediums.” Houdini lived to debunk the mediums of his time — until the passing of his mother, whereupon he seemed to make a complete 180.

As an aside, an excellent book I am currently reading is “The Secret Life of HOUDINI: The Making of America’s First Superhero” by William Kalush and Larry Sloman.

This is not to say that those credited with supernatural or unusual powers are not unique individuals unto themselves. Only after his passing was it realized that, for example, Harry Houdini was a remarkably physical specimen of a human being, able to twist, turn, contort, unhinge and dislocate various joints and then replace them when it suited. He had and exhibited not only a physical genius, but a mental genius as well, coupled with the ability to portray himself as a likeable character on a one-on-one and a larger scale. He was all showman and manipulator.

Is this John Edward the same kind of person, albeit circa 2007? I wonder.

He performs nothing physically, so we may eliminate that challenge. He must therefore rely upon his emotive, empathetic and likeability scale. I suggest it is no small thing that the bulk of his audience consists of women.

Like any good businessman or woman, one must know one’s target audience; I would also suggest that Edward has his scope firmly and most specifically set.

And then further I would ask: who attends a John Edward show, and what is their inherent proclivity? Is his audience comprised primarily of skeptics? Or does it consist of those who wish, somehow, if but for a moment, for a connection between themselves and their loved ones who have, under a myriad of circumstances, passed this mortal plane? Of women? Whose seeming Job One is to believe, to believe him in the first place — because they oh-so-want-to?

How much easier does that make one’s “conduit” task from the get-go?

I submit: so much easier.

Penn & Teller, in their very first Showtime program entitled Penn & Teller’s Bullshit, targeted Edward and others in terms of “talking to the dead,” and indicated their fecundity lies in what is termed “cold reading.”

Oddly enough, Edward will provide “private” readings, though only when his current list is exhausted. His website makes no mention of cost or place. I might think that a private reading would run to the five-figures. But this is apparently a well-kept secret. You pays your money, and you takes your chances.

And strangely, you can also purchase “appreciation pins,” books and journals from his website. An “appreciation pin” is $7.00; a bookmark is $3.00; his Crossing Over book is $13.00. Other books are $10.00 and $29.00.

A marketer? Clearly. He seems to have most venues covered: radio, television, books and, of course, his website.

And yet, when I watched his show, he seemed all at once prescient, fallible, human, connected, insightful, concerned, in control and command, driven and, also, subject to the prairie winds of The Dead.

Who is he? What is he?

After watching, I honestly do not know. There is that kernel, that small kernel . . .

BZ

Box Of Rocks

1. MOONBAT OF THE WEEK:
DemoRAT Representative Pete Stark made an absolutely, resoundingly, irredeemably ridiculous, offensive and despicable comment recently. Though that comment shall be reproduced in a moment, I offer: how low, how base, how completely Off The Reservation, how mindless, how nonsensical, how swept up in you or your party’s megalomania, how incredibly stupid can you be to say, in public, as a representative of an official American party:

Where are you (President Bush) going to get that money? Are you going to tell us lies like you’re telling us today? Is that how you’re going to fund the war? You don’t have money to fund the war or children. But you’re going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president’s amusement?”

Stark was speaking in reference to Bush’s veto of the SCHIP expansion bill, when the House failed to override that veto. Stark then went into another dimension entirely. If you were to search for the definition of “feckless” in any dictionary, you would find Stark’s outline drawing.

While members of Congress are passionate about their views, what Congressman Stark said during the debate was inappropriate and distracted from the seriousness of the subject at hand—providing health care for America’s children,” Pelosi said.

And please understand: though this Moonbat, this miniscule Demorat molecule named Stark spewed this verbal vomit, many or most on The Left truly believe that the Demorat Party has stepped away from them — that is to say, the Demorats are Insufficiently Left for The Left. And trust me, The Left are pushing and driving and shoving and pulling for the Demorat Party to lean further left. And with each push, they are driving wedges between themselves and the Electorate, insofar as we witness the General Betray-Us issue, Hillary’s $5,000 Per Child, ad nauseum.

There is a reason the approval rating of Congress rests at 11% — lower than Bush — and the lowest approval rating ever.
Stark deserves two words: Vile. Obscene.

2. CHINA GROWS:

And sucks resources at a prodigious rate. And is predicted to outstrip the USA shortly, in terms of production:

For the first time in modern history, China will next year contribute more to global economic growth than the United States.

While China’s economy is still far smaller than America’s, it has overtaken the UK as the world’s fourth biggest economy. With the IMF projecting 10% growth this year, the country will pump more new money into the global system next year than the US, which is expected to grow by just 1.9%.

Of course, it helps if you have 1.4 billion people at hand, a full 20% of the entire world’s population. And you pay laborers next to nothing. And they’re as plentiful as dust mites — and as disposable as well.
By the way, you’ll be seeing Chinese Cars marketed on American soil shortly.

3. DIRECT FROM YOUR WORST DREAMS:

I have dreams; sometimes recurring dreams. Sometimes I have the Flying Dream. Sometimes I have the Snakes Dream. Sometimes I have the I Can’t Pull The Trigger Dream. I have also had (gulp!) the Snake Emerges From The Toilet Dream.

This ain’t no dream, and just in time for Halloween:

There was no Halloween bogeyman in the closet for one Brooklyn woman — just a 7-foot-long python in her toilet.

Nadege Brunacci was washing her hands in her bathroom before dawn Monday when she glanced back and saw the slithering serpent peeking out from her toilet, most of its body hidden in the pipes.

See the movie Snakes On A Plane?

Anyone with phobias?

Check out some photos:


BZ

The Law of the Sea Treaty

This treaty would allow the UN to be on steroids.

This would mandate, essentially, that the US would bend over for Kyoto protocols, via the back door.

International judges and bureaucrats would be deciding the future of THIS nation if the treaty is ratified. These judges and bureaucrats are lining up, rubbing their hands, suits ready.

We could see our Constitutional form of government eroded by treaties. With scarcely any debate.

Go there now!

Reject the Law of the Sea Treaty. Because if not exposed to the light of day it shall be passed in the dark, quickly, shoved and rammed through by agendist forces. From the site:

The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea – commonly known at the Law of the Sea Treaty, or LOST – is the darling project of the transnational progressives, or “transies.”

Their goal is nothing less than the establishment of world government at the expense of traditional sovereignty.

Unfortunately, the Bush Administration has decided to push for immediate ratification of this fatally-flawed accord. This is a monumental and dangerous policy shift.

Though the website is broken down into a number of different divisions, if you can spare the time, please try to understand the depth and breadth of this Globalist document.

Once signed, the document turns over a massive amount of authority from our own internal government to a global body which considers not any amount of individual national need.

This is simply another attempt to completely equalize every nation on the planet. As if, for example, the United States is the equivalent of, say, Burundi or Sierra Leone.

The Globalists are attempting, once again, to count on your collective ignorance. After all, how could something entitled “The Law Of The Sea Treaty” be anything but effective, proper and sensible?
Col. Jessep: You want answers?
Kaffee: I think I’m entitled.
Col. Jessep: You want answers?
Kaffee: I want the truth.
Col. Jessep: You can’t handle the truth.
The truth is the LAST thing the Demorats and Globalists want exposed to the Light of Day.

BZ

Moonbat of the Week Award: Rep. Stark (D)

Sometimes I create a post and then, standing back, I reflect on the post.

This would be a post under those criteria.

Where are you going to get that money? Are you going to tell us lies like you’re telling us today? Is that how you’re going to fund the war? You don’t have money to fund the war or children. But you’re going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president’s amusement.”

How much farther off the Reservation can one deviate?

How can I even formulate the words to equal = despicable? Or worse?

Leader Boehner Calls on Democratic Rep. Stark to Retract Statement, Apologize to American Troops and their Families

Thu Oct 18 2007 14:11:42 ET

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: October 18, 2007
CONTACTS: Brian Kennedy, Kevin Smith, Steve Forde Ð (202) 225-4000
WASHINGTON, D.C.

House Republican Leader John Boehner (R-OH) today issued the following statement regarding remarks made on the House floor by Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA) during the debate on the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP):
“Our troops in Iraq are fighting against al-Qaeda and other radical jihadists hell-bent on killing the people we are sent here to represent. Congressman Stark’s statement dishonors not only the Commander-in-Chief, but the thousands of courageous men and women of America’s armed forces who believe in their mission and are putting their lives on the line for our freedom and security. Congressman Stark should retract his statement and apologize to the House, our Commander-in-Chief, and the families of our soldiers and commanders fighting terror overseas.”
During debate on the SCHIP children’s health care legislation today, Rep. Stark stated:
“You don’t have money to fund the war or children. But you’re going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the President’s amusement.”
No one — me, you — can begin to have an honest discussion of reality until we agree to some precepts — and those are: let’s leave the oppressive and stupid rhetoric back at the bus stop.
Unless, of course, the ridiculous rhetoric is all that one has. . .

BZ