Hillary cannot tell the truth. She simply doesn’t possess the gene. So the obfuscating answer she provides to the question of her lies should not surprise.
Justice Department May Probe Alleged Bergdahl Ransom Payment
by Shane Harris
The department’s top watchdog is considering whether to review allegations that the U.S. paid for the soldier’s freedom, and what role the FBI played in his release.
The Justice Department’s top watchdog is considering whether to review the legality of any payments that the U.S. government may have made for the release of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl and what role the FBI played in efforts to free the soldier from captivity in Pakistan, The Daily Beast has learned.
The department’s inspector general, Michael Horowitz, wrote a letter to a member of Congress this month saying that he had opened a “preliminary inquiry” into the matter, which concerns allegations that the U.S. government paid a ransom for Bergdahl’s freedom, and that in February 2014 the FBI sent a representative to the border region of Afghanistan and Pakistan expecting Bergdahl to be released.
Anyone besides me think this is insanity inside of insanity? The DOJ investigating the FBI for a “payoff” involving Bergdahl?
This is Kabuki Theatre writ large.
Ask yourself: WHY would this occur?
Answer: because the FBI is considering the recommendation of an indictment against Hillary Clinton.
A “preliminary investigation” of the FBI on this ridiculous issue is a proverbial “shot across the bow” to FBI Director James Comey. Because a source indicates the FBI is going to ask for a Hillary indictment.
Mr Obama can’t stand it that Republicans are indicating they may filibuster any Obama nominee until after November’s election.
How dare they?
Some Republicans have made it clear they believe the next president, Republican or Demorat, should be the one making such a nomination — with the full power of the electorate behind them.
Mr Obama lies once again when he states there is a constitutional requirement to make such an appointment. There is no constitutional “requirement” for the president to immediately replace a Supreme Court justice.
The American Media Maggots — and Mr Obama himself — seem to mostly so conveniently minimize the fact that Obama filibustered Samuel Alito when he was nominated by a Republican president.
As you can see, Mr Obama verbally tapdances around the question — as he must, because he has been caught. Having been caught, he says he “regrets” his actions back then.
Uh, no. He only “regrets” it because he doesn’t want done to him what he did to the Republicans.
Hypocrisy, thy name continues to be Obama.
BZ
P.S.
The Perfect Storm of nominees for Obama, Demorats and Leftists? That would be Loretta Lynch for SCOTUS and then Kamala Harris to replace Lynch as AG.