The truth about Fukushima — not then, but now

That in mind, let there be no mistake: I am not an abolisher of nuclear power.  I believe that nuclear power is but one in a series of major steps that can be made in assuring our electrical generation future.

You just have to be smart about it.

Because there is no “one” solution for electrical generation, save that of fusion, which is not yet embraced or technologically viable in a mass fashion.  Yet.

And “smart” about nuclear power includes not placing plants on fault lines, in areas of known tsunami paths or at the bottom of avalanche sites.

At one very brief point I worked for Vanguard Security in the 70s at the Rancho Seco nuclear complex.  It was a Babcock & Wilcox design similar to Three Mile Island.  My fellow guards and I would plan and identify points of assault and weakness.  It was our job.  The one that management didn’t want to admit existed.

We were armed with .38 caliber revolvers carrying high-efficacy round-nosed lead bullets and supplanted with our grim miens.  We wore roentgen badges for personal dosimetry.  Our graveyard perimeter vehicle was a cheap-ass Chevrolet LUV pickup.  The low areas of various metal industrial water lines were tagged for collective points of radioactivity.  I actually stood and looked into the moon pool within the containment building.  I paged through industry magazines that identified suits for safely “diving” the moon pool.  I thought that was insane.

I carried a round security guard’s tour verification watchman’s clock where the keys were inserted for time validation.  I stood on the upper turbine deck and watched the hair on my head and arms stand on end as I neared the sight portal.  I identified a young female security guard with large breasts who drove an elder Chrysler product and we rampantly enjoyed frequent fornication.  Great fun.  I found that my Lieutenant wanted me to stay and apply for a supervisory position.  I left two weeks later when I found another job in actual law enforcement.  You do what you can when you can and why you must in order to keep the paychecks coming.

I, in retrospect, didn’t really wonder why I never had children; I suspect I was manually rendered sterile via my associations with nuclear power and to the massive amount of RF emanating from the Walnut Grove radio tower when I worked for the 50,000-watt AM flamethrower KFBK and climbed said tower, exposing myself there for hours.  Truly, I threw my sperm far and wide into an extended spectrum of females, as an idiot, and was never made to pay.  Except in later years with cancer.  Now I know why.

A Fukushima revelation:

And there you have it.  Nuclear power was a God-send and now it’s not.  But here’s the difference: when Rancho Seco was powered down, it was due to the incompetence of SMUD and systems unrelated to the nuclear aspect.  Control room operators smoked dope.  That was proven.  Why else did we check the briefcases and bags and purses of the civilians who entered and left the facility?

The people of Sacramento County voted to keep or dismiss their nuclear plant.  I worked there.  I voted no.  Not because of the nuclear aspect, but because of the incompetent administrative aspect.

You have to be smarter than the rads.

BZ

 

 

Fed’s Tarullo details plans to counter bank runs

Berlin, Bankenkrach, Andrang bei der SparkasseFrom CNBC.com:

Global regulators need more policy tools to counter the risk of devastating bank runs and should have powers over a wide array of market participants, U.S. Federal Reserve Governor Dan Tarullo said on Friday.

“There is a need to supplement prudential bank regulation with a third set of policy options in the form of regulatory tools that can be applied on a market-wide basis,” Tarullo said at a conference on shadow banking.

I can see the statement formulating in your brain even as I write.

And that is this: why would such a regulation be needed unless there were a serious chance of bank runs globally?

Further: why might there be global bank runs?

Answer: because it is recognized that the American economy will crash sooner than most believe, and the waves created by that will affect the economies of every country on the planet.

Plans are being made, ladies and gentlemen, by the banking industry, to keep you from your money when that crash occurs.

Not if, when.

BZ

 

 

Who killed JFK?

Fifty years on, November 22nd, 1963:

JFK - Oswald With Cops JFK Casings in SBD JFK Diagram In Dallas JFK Hit JFK In Limo, Close Up JFK Landing In Dallas JFK Painting JFK Procession JFK SBD 2 JFK School Book Depository JFK, 11-22-1963

JFK3[Not an official JFK photograph.]

jfk 335Weigh in.

Who killed JFK?

BZ

 

 

A WWII sailor’s dying wish:

From idrivewarships.com:

After signing my Pop, EM2 Bud Cloud (circa Pearl Harbor) up for hospice care, the consolation prize I’d given him (for agreeing it was OK to die) was a trip to “visit the Navy in San Diego.”

Bud Cloud, USNI emailed my friend and former Marine sergeant, Mrs. Mandy McCammon, who’s currently serving as a Navy Public Affairs Officer, at midnight on 28 May. I asked Mandy if she had enough pull on any of the bases in San Diego to get me access for the day so I could give Bud, who served on USS Dewey (DD-349), a windshield tour.

And from there, the reality occurred.

The next day she sent me an email from the current USS Dewey (DDG 105)’s XO, CDR Mikael Rockstad, inviting us down to the ship two days later.

We linked up with Mandy outside Naval Base San Diego and carpooled to the pier where we were greeted by CMDCM Joe Grgetich and a squad-sized group of Sailors. Bud started to cry before the doors of the van opened. He’d been oohing and pointing at the cyclic rate as we approached the pier, but when we slowed down and Mandy said, “They’re all here for you, Bud,” he was overwhelmed.

The USS Dewey site is here.

After we were all out of the van directly in front of the Dewey, shaking hands and exchanging pleasantries, Petty Officer Simon introduced himself and said as the ship’s Sailor of the Year he had the honor of pushing Bud’s wheelchair for the day. Unbeknownst to us, they’d decided to host Bud aboard the Dewey, not at the Dewey. And so they carried him aboard. None of us expected him to go aboard the ship. I’d told him we were going down to the base and would have the chance to meet and greet a few of the Sailors from the new Dewey. He was ecstatic. The day before, he asked every few hours if we were “still going down to visit the boys from the Dewey,” and “do they know I was on the Dewey, too?”

If this isn’t bringing a tear to your eye right now, then I submit that you aren’t quite human.

Saluting BudOnce aboard, we were greeted by the CO, CDR Jake Douglas, the XO and a reinforced platoon-sized group of Sailors. To say it was overwhelming is an understatement. These men and women waited in line to introduce themselves to Bud. They shook his hand, asked for photos with him, and swapped stories. It was simply amazing.

They didn’t just talk to him, they listened.

And listening isn’t just suggestive, it’s mandatory.  If you wish to actually immure and archive history.

Bud’s voice was little more than a weak whisper at this point and he’d tell a story and then GMC Eisman or GSCS Whynot would repeat it so all of the Sailors on deck could hear. In the midst of the conversations, Petty Officer Flores broke contact with the group. Bud was telling a story and CMDCM Grgetich was repeating the details when Flores walked back into view holding a huge photo of the original USS Dewey. That moment was priceless. Bud stopped mid-sentence and yelled, “There she is!” They patiently stood there holding the photo while he told them about her armament, described the way it listed after it was hit, and shared other details about the attacks on Pearl Harbor.

Bud finally admitted how tired he was after more than an hour on deck. While they were finishing up goodbyes and taking last minute photographs, GMC Eisman asked if it’d be OK to bring Sailors up to visit Bud in a few months after a Chief’s board. I hadn’t said it yet because I didn’t want it to dampen the spirit of the day, but I quietly explained to GMC Eisman the reason we’d asked for the visit was simple: Bud was dying.

Yes he was.

I told him they were welcome to come up any time they wanted, but I suspected Bud had about a month left to live. Almost without hesitation, he asked if the crew could provide the burial honors when the time came. I assured him that’d be an honor we’d welcome.

Leaving the ship was possibly more emotional than boarding.

They piped him ashore.

CMDCM Grgetich leaned in and quietly told me how significant that honor was and who it’s usually reserved for as we headed towards the gangplank. Hearing “Electrician’s Mate Second Class William Bud Cloud, Pearl Harbor Survivor, departing” announced over the 1MC was surreal.

But no less deserved.

He died 13 days later. For 12 of those 13 days he talked about the Dewey, her Sailors and his visit to San Diego. Everyone who came to the house had to hear the story, see the photos, hold the coins, read the plaques.

There you go.  A real American.

True to his word, GMC Eisman arranged the details for a full honors burial. The ceremony was simple yet magnificent. And a perfect sendoff for an ornery old guy who never, ever stopped being proud to be a Sailor. After the funeral, the Sailors came back to the house for the reception and spent an hour with the family. This may seem like a small detail, but it’s another example of them going above and beyond the call of duty, and it meant more to the family than I can explain.

William Cloud said: “This is the best day of my life, daughter. I never in my whole life dreamed I’d step foot on the Dewey again or shake the hand of a real life Sailor.”

Please check the iDriveWarships site here.

Fair winds and following seas, sir.

BZ

Bud Cloud Departing

Actress Tweets Gun Safety Instead of Gun Control, Loses Half Her Twitter Followers

Oddly enough, from Breitbart’s BigHollywood.com:

On June 10 Battlestar Galactica actress Katee Sackhoff tweeted about gun safety and countered a follower’s pro-gun control tweet–as a result she lost half of her Twitter followers–or about 100,000 people.

And, further, her current job on Longmire.

Sackhoff’s original gun safety tweet was in response to a story CNN carried about a 4-year old Arizona boy who fatally shot his father by accident. The boy apparently found a handgun lying in a home he and his father were visiting, picked it up and pulled the trigger. 

Sackhoff tweeted: “Please practice gun safety! This is horrible!”

After this, one of Sackhoff’s followers tweeted for more and more gun control. The actress responded: “Never going to happen in the U.S. Proper gun safety is a necessity though.”

As Reason.com reports, after a couple of hours Sackhoff had lost approximately 100,000 followers, but she did not give in. Instead she tweeted: “Well I guess just learned talking about #GunSafety inspires a massive debate. Pro-gun or Anti-gun SAFETY should be unanimous!”

And there you go.  Common sense over sensationalism, and over rampant and idiotic emotions.

God bless Katee Sackhoff.

BZ