Progressive Insurance: “Snapshot” = Big Brother

Progressive Snapshot Big BrotherI happened to be watching a commercial today involving Progressive Insurance and decided that it was time to call bull___ on its “wonderful” Snapshot hardware piece which is, in fact, nothing more than one further step into the implantation of an RFID chip under your skin, beyond your vehicle’s.

Cutting to the chase: “Snapshot” uses your automobile’s electronics to testify against your driving habits should they stray one molecule from strictly lawful parameters.  Parameters that will be constantly monitored via the loving “Snapshot.”

Big Brother B&WNewer automobiles already possess their own version of an airliner’s “black box” — an EDR — which records various forms of input and can be accessed following a traffic collision, as it logs up to 15 to 30 seconds of input prior to impact, manufacturer-dependent.  First, very few people realize these devices exist in their cars.  Second, that data should belong to you and no one elseThird, the computer codes in those devices are not open source.  They are proprietary.  Fourth, can you tinker with or disable your EDR?  Even the ACLU raises these very important issues.  Once.

One thing you need to realize: Progressive Insurance came upon that name for a very specific reason.  It is the third largest auto insurer in the United States.  Its revenues top $13 billion dollars per year.

Peter Lewis, former CEO and now Chairman of the Board, inherited cash from his father who co-created Progressive in 1937.  Lewis has a wealth rating of one billion dollars.  It is no shock that he has contributed $7 million and $8 million to the ACLU in 2001 and 2003.

It is also no shock that he contributed $3 million to America Coming Together and $2.5 million to MoveOn.org.  That is your Progressive Insurance — being, in fact, progressive — another word for Leftist.

Progressive buys ads on, say, Fox News, and makes additional millions from these ads.  Flo is cute; her company is not.  Their ads are, however, extremely well planned and effective.  How could you not like her, no matter what she suggests?

That said, focus closely on Snapshot.

Some excellent questions and issues from CannonFire:

The question is: How much info are you sending to them? Are they tracking your location via GPS? Are they keeping track of how fast you go?

Progressive insists that they don’t collect location and speed info. In the video embedded above, you’ll see a Progressive commercial in which the lady with the stoplight lips assures you that the company doesn’t want to know where you go or how fast you get there. All they want to know is the amount of driving you do, how hard you hit the brakes, and what time of day you travel.

 

But here is the crux of the biscuit:

Even if that were all there were to it, I still would advise you to steer clear of Snapshot. Insurance companies have a financial incentive to deny claims. The more info you give them, the more reasons they have for issuing a denial.

But the real problem is this: I’ve uncovered evidence that Progressive Insurance is lying about Snapshot.

I’m sure that Ms. StoplightLips — whose real name is Stephanie Courtney, and who is surely a decent and well-meaning person — would not knowingly tell lies. Nevertheless, there are strange discrepancies between the things that lovely Stephanie is being paid to say on TV and the things we learn if we do a little research.

The small print says:

Data We Collect

The Snapshot device records vehicle speed and time of day, and when the device is connected and disconnected from the vehicle. It also records the Vehicle Identification Number upon installation. Other information, such as miles driven and rates of acceleration and braking, is derived from the speed and time information recorded by the device.

Data We Don’t Collect

Snapshot focuses on how safely, how often, how far, and when you drive, NOT where you drive. The Snapshot device does not contain GPS technology and does not track vehicle location or whether you’re exceeding the speed limit.

But wait; there’s more!

A close reading of the above text reveals the truth: Of course Snapshot transmits info about “vehicle speed.” The device simply doesn’t reveal whether or not you were exceeding the speed limit at any given time.

But if the company collects speed data, investigators can easily discover whether you were going over the limit after the fact. They may even be able to do so in real time. (Has someone written software which collates the speed limits on all of America’s roads? I don’t know, but I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that the insurance companies have an app for that.)

So: If you put in a claim, Progressive will know if you were traveling 42 miles per hour in a 40 mph zone. Claim denied!

Please read the rest of the article.

Stupid Americans are signing up for Progressive’s “Snapshot.”  They apparently want their privacy violated on not just a daily basis but a second-by-second basis.

Because Snapshot isn’t tracking you.  Except:

Snapshot is an example of what the industry calls a telematics device, defined here as…

…a type of machine-to-machine (M2M) communication that combines GPS, mobile computing and cellular communication.

Hmm. If telematics involve GPS by definition, can we trust Progressive?

Drivers plug a device, the “Snapshot,” into the car’s onboard diagnostic port, or OBD-II, typically found near the steering wheel. [The OBD-II is a standardized digital communications port which was made mandatory in 1996 for all cars sold in the United States.] Using telematics and mobile technology, as they drive, information is shared wirelessly, via AT&T’s network, with Progressive.

(Emphasis in original.) If the company uses ATT’s network, then they can triangulate location. That’s the key part they’re not telling you.

Further:

Moreover, Progressive’s claim that Snapshot contains no GPS data is in direct conflict with what we read in this Wikipedia article on telematics:

Telematic auto insurance was independently invented and patented[12] by a major U.S. auto insurance company, Progressive Auto Insurance U.S. Patent 5,797,134 and a Spanish independent inventor, Salvador Minguijon Perez (European Patent EP0700009B1). The Progressive patents cover the use of a cell phone and GPS to track movements of a car. The Perez patents cover monitoring the car’s engine control computer to determine distance driven, speed, time of day, braking force, etc. Ironically, Progressive is developing the Perez technology in the US and European auto insurer Norwich Union is developing the Progressive technology for Europe.

Imagine that.  An insurance company lying to you in order to — in the end game — deny claims and save money.  The ultimate End Game?

Progressive is not the only company getting into the telematics business. Pretty soon, these devices will be standard.

Welcome to the new world of Big Brother climbing up your arshole and invading your car.

BZ

 

 

Abolish the IRS now

The IRS has proven, time and again, that not only cannot it be trusted in any fashion, that it spends with profligacy, that it is not accountable, that it — itself — does not have to provide any receipts for the wastrel-like and over-the-top parties it hosts for its own employees.  The arrogance of the IRS is now legion, with no end in sight.

Just this week, most recently, the IRS frakked up by exposing THOUSANDS of social security numbers to the internet for roughly 24 hours.

Repeated: insanity with no consequences whatsoever.  The IRS is proving, time and again and again that it needs to be shuttered and those oppressive employees cast to the four winds to find REAL work.

I say: abolish the IRS now.  Eliminate the IRS code, its thousands and thousands of pages that few — including the IRS — cannot consistently interpret.

Bring in a flat tax.  Set a percentile.  Create a one page form.   ___% of your gross wages = send it in.  Period.

The most logical and the most fair.  No exceptions, no exemptions.  For no one or any thing.

Ted Cruz is about to become my favorite politician — if there can actually be such a thing — via this article from The Washington Post:

Ted Cruz: ‘Abolish the IRS’

Hours before the House Appropriations Committee held a hearing on political targeting at the Internal Revenue Service, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) had a simple solution to the agency’s problems — get rid of it altogether.

Ted Cruz Tweet in re IRS“I think we ought to abolish the IRS and instead move to a simple flat tax where the average American can fill out taxes on postcard,” he explained in a Fox News interview over the weekend. “Put down how much you earn, put down a deduction for charitable contributions, home mortgage and how much you owe. It ought to be a simple one-page postcard, and take the agents, the bureaucracy out of Washington and limit the power of government.”

And the “necessity” for another 14,000 blood-sucking IRS agents would be null and void.

Simple and elegant.

BZ

P.S.
More:

 

 

Frog will remove 2 MILLION acres of California land from public access

[And thanks to the Sanger Paranormal Society for the h/t.]

From SierraTrails.com:

2 million acres in California

While this is a bit out of character for us (usually posting feel-good trail information), we felt the need to make folks aware of an issue that has recently affected our local Forest Service. In a 2011 settlement agreement, the US Fish and Wildlife Service agreed to evaluate a certain number per year of 479 requests to list different species of animals and plant as endangered. The USFWS is moving forward on two of these: certain variety of frogs and toads covering 2 million more acres of California’s forests.

As in:

“Human Activities That Will Be Restricted Or Forbidden: 2 million more acres of California’s forests will be sealed off to recreational photography, off-road vehicles, packstock use, hiking, mountain biking, banning of pets, grazing, timber harvest, fire management, farming and ranching, mining…… the list goes on.”

And where?

“14 Counties: Alpine, Amador, El Dorado, Fresno, Inyo, Madera, Mariposa, Mono, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sierra, Tulare, and Tuolumne. This is an area covering 2/3 of Sierra and Plumas Counties.”

Red Frog Forbidden Areas, FornicaliaDo we have a map?  Check the above.

However:

Certain science indicates the single most effective approach is the elimination of trout from areas they are historically not native to. This action does not require a critical habitat designation. Studies have shown as high as a 10,000% increase in populations if amphibians when non-native trout are removed from their habitat.

Imagine that.  Logic.  Not proscription.

Yet, let not your hearts be troubled, the federal government intends to double-down on removing the human salient from the equation entirely.

An “eco-friendly” site suggests:

This is happening in our community and will greatly affect areas located in Plumas and Sierra Counties (an area covering 2/3 of Sierra and Plumas Counties), including the Lakes Basin Recreation Area. If granted, here is what human activities could possibly be restricted on more than 2 million acres throughout the Sierra Nevada in California: recreational photography, off-road vehicles, packstock use, hiking, mountain biking, banning of pets, grazing, timber harvest, fire management, farming and ranching, mining…… the list goes on.

In the meantime, the Obama Administration wishes nothing more than to restrict human beings to the smallest footprint possible, in high-rises, in cramped conditions, away from suburbs, into cardboard box housing with the greatest amount of governmental control possible.

Including the impetus to not seek solace in our wilderness areas.  Those areas are for animals and plants, not people.

BZ

 

 

 

Clapper: I gave ‘erroneous’ answers because I forgot about the Patriot Act

Right.

You “equivocated.”  You “parsed.”

I submit, sir, you bald-faced LIED.  And you need to be PROSECUTED and tried CRIMINALLY.  You are the Director of National Intelligence, confirmed in 2010.

Clapper’s incompetence first here.

Question: “Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?”

James Clapper needs to be fired and to have his pension completely eradicated.

At worst, truly, he will be rolled into ObakaKare and have to face the same consequences you and I now face.  What an onerous price to pay!  Horrible!  Terrible!

From the GuardianUK.com (again, UK media vs US media):

The most senior US intelligence official told a Senate oversight panel that he “simply didn’t think” of the National Security Agency’s efforts to collect the phone records of millions of Americans when he testified in March that it did “not wittingly” snoop on their communications.

James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, made the comments in a letter to the Senate intelligence committee, released in full for the first time on Tuesday.

Portions of the letter, in which Clapper apologised for giving “clearly erroneous” testimony at a March hearing of the committee, were first reported by the Washington Post on Monday. Clapper had previously said that his answer to the committee was the “least untruthful” one he could publicly provide.

In the full letter, Clapper attempted to explain the false testimony by saying that his recollection failed him. “I simply didn’t think of Section 215 of the Patriot Act,” he wrote to committee chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (Democrat, California) on 21 June, referring to the legal provision cited to justify the mass collection of Americans’ phone data, first disclosed by the Guardian.

Summary: LIES.

BZ