Author Archives: BZ

Welcome to Monday: “Illegal immigrants who commit crimes face lesser punishment than U.S. citizens”

Posted on by

From the WashingtonExaminer.com:

BY: GABRIELLA MORRONGIELLO JUNE 24, 2013 | 11:06 AM

According to Sen. John McCain, a member of the Senate’s Gang of Eight, criminals will not be legalized under the proposed bipartisan immigration bill.

“Anyone who has committed crimes in this country is going to be deported,” the Arizona Republican declared on the Senate floor last week.

However, as Washington Examiner columnist Byron York recently reported, “the bottom line is an immigrant could have more than three misdemeanor convictions in his background check and still qualify for legalization.”

Wonderful.  We need more drunk drivers.  In Fornicalia, drunk driving is a male Mexican misdemeanor mainstay.  14601 CVC, or driving on a suspended license, used to warrant bail in Fornicalia jails.  Now, absent a felony warrant, fresh felony or misdemeanor commitment warrant, 14601 individuals receive a cite and a court date.  So, yes, Fornicalia certainly needs even more of its own male Mexican drunk drivers.  There are many multiply-convicted illegal Mexicans puttering around on Fornicalia highways with suspended licenses — drunk — just waiting to become “introduced” to you or your family via 4,000 pounds of metal.  That’s just one instance of popular crime.

The Gang of Eight’s bill would allow illegal immigrants who entered the country before Dec. 31, 2011, and committed up to three misdemeanor offenses including but not limited to assault, battery, identity or document fraud, tax evasion, to remain eligible for Registered Provisional Status. Meanwhile, U.S. citizens and persons who entered the country legally could incur up to $100,000 in fines,15 years of imprisonment, or be prohibited to reenter the country for up to 10 years.

Now, you have to admit, that’s wonderful news for a Monday.  It simply follows up on free tuition for illegal Mexicans in Fornicalia’s universities.

How many people have said illegal Mexicans are here to only work, not to acquire Free Cheese?  Here’s an ad that screams for free healthcare, in Fornicalia, for illegals:

C’mon, ladies and gentlemen, she’s just “undocumented,” not illegal.

Wrong is now right, down is now up.

BZ

 

 

 Share

The best of PilotsEye.tv videos:

Posted on by

Airbus_A380_CockpitI find myself absolutely fascinated with what occurs in the cockpit of airplanes, the cockpit of racing cars, the cab of locomotives, the bridge of ocean-going vessels.

In that vein, I first connected with Airbus here, regarding their then-new A380.  It was “do or die” for Airbus and its parent company, the Euro consortium EADS.  They’ve pulled it out; for now.

I then posted this incredible video from PilotsEye.tv regarding an Airbus A380 landing on Sunday, June 9th.

Now, I proffer this wonderful video (a bit long at 24 minutes but truly worth every second) which is a compilation of the German website PilotsEye.tv “best of.”

You’ll no doubt notice that, involving Airbus aircraft, “joysticks” are substituted for the traditional “yokes” once centrally placed before the pilot and co-pilot.

That said, one of the largest gripes about Airbus control systems involved pilots who were right-hand dominant.  They had to “re-learn” how to yield critical and very detailed aircraft input from their left hands on the left-mounted command pilot joystick controller.  No small deal, but your very life depends on the ability of the pilot you drew on your Airbus flight to have transitioned from his right hand in detail to his left hand.

Innocent Question: do most co-pilots therefore make landings on Airbuses?  It would, after all, make them more valuable as potential pilots, would it not?

And I’ll wager the bulk of you couldn’t tell an Airbus from a Boeing and the major difference it makes.

Check out this typical Airbus A380 cockpit:

Airbus A380 Glass Cockpit With JoysticksNote the far-left and far-right pilot and co-pilot joystick control columns.

Detail of an Airbus co-pilot joystick controller here:

Airbus Co-Pilot Controller Joystick Let’s make a comparison, shall we?  A Boeing 787 Dreamliner cockpit below:

Boeing 787 Dreamliner CockpitNotice a difference?

Finally, for those interested in commercial aircraft photographs, there is a wonderful website for civilian airline photos here: AirLiners.net.

Boeing commercial website here.  Airbus commercial aircraft website here.

Hope you enjoy the video as much as I did.

BZ

P.S.
When you hear the cockpit command audio module in Airbus aircraft state :”RETARD RETARD RETARD,” it is referring to throttle input.

 

 

 Share

Corker Amendment Permanently Offers Citizenship to Those Overstaying Their Visa

Posted on by

Corker HoevenFrom Breitbart.com:

by Mike Flynn 21 Jun 2013, 3:35 PM PDT 82 post a comment

Just as public anxiety about the weak border security provisions in the Senate immigration bill was building, GOP Sen. Bob Corker stepped forward with an amendment to “fix” the problem. The result of his efforts, however, has been a “christmas tree” measure, covering items far beyond border security. Breitbart News has learned exclusively that one provision of Corker’s amendment will allow workers who stay in the country past their visa will remain on the “path to citizenship.”

Really? Lawbreakers given an edge?

Even in the future, breaking the law won’t stop progress on what VP Joe Biden calls the “unfettered path” to citizenship. 

The Corker Amendment ostensibly addresses measures to beef up border security. It, however, is also likely to be the last amendment considered on the immigration bill. As such, it has become a 1,000+ page amendment to supplant the current proposal and provide multiple new provisions. It has become the vehicle for ObamaCare 2.0.

Buried within the text of the Amendment is a seemingly innocuous provision:

(f) APPLICABILITY OF CERTAIN GROUNDS OF INADMISSIBILITY.—In determining an alien’s inadmissibility under this section, section 212(a)(9)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(9)(B)) shall not apply.

What does that mean? 

Current law states that those applying for green cards are ineligible if they are either “illegally present” at any point or overstay the terms of their work visa. Such an immigrant, in current law, would have to return to their home country and restart the immigration process. The Corker Amendment wipes away that enforcement mechanism.

As I am frequently wont to say: “you ever read or hear of this on any other media, alternative or otherwise?”

Uh, no.  You won’t.

BZ

 

 Share

“Free at last, free at last, thank God almighty we are free at last.”

Posted on by

And with that comes new Republican Elbert Guillory.

Elbert Guillory: “Why I Am a Republican”

Because he realizes the history inherent in the Republican party.

Not now.  But then.

And I ask:

Which party is the party of corruption, of slavery, of Free Cheese, of catering to the worst of human interests?

Yes.  The Demorat Party.

Let us allow Martin Luther King to speechify us all:

The truth hurts.  [And who was the white officer who protected MLK during that speech?]

And the truth is that the Republican Party was the party of freedom, of independence, of goodness, of moral certainty, of the rights of individuals.

Now?

BZ

 

 

 Share