Rubio: Legalize Illegal Immigrants So They Can Fund Border Security

Legalization For AllHonest.  I swear.  I had another post envisioned for Saturday but, when I came across this article at Breitbart.com, it got kicked to the curb because — in concert with my Thursday post — Republicans seem to be displaying the intelligence contained within the pot of an average houseplant this week.

To wit:

On Thursday, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) said one reason illegal immigrants must be legalized as soon as possible is so they can help fund border security measures by paying taxes and fines. 

During an interview on “The Andrea Tantaros Show,” Rubio, as Byron York points out, first said there was no choice but to legalize at least 11 million illegal immigrants because he said the country “cannot wait another four years” to enact immigration reform.

He then said illegal immigrants needed to be registered “as soon as possible” so the fines they pay into the system help fund border security programs. 

“We need to register them as soon as possible, not just to keep the problem from getting worse, but we’re going to require them to pay a fine, and that’s the money that we are going to use to pay for the border security,” Rubio, said, according to York. “If we don’t get that fine money from the people that have violated our immigration laws, then the American taxpayer is going to have to pay for border security.”

Does anyone besides the ol’ BZ see any kind of a problem with this urgent registration?

For those amongst us who need a bit of a nudge and a prompt, let me suggest this:

Illegal immigrants are, by their very nature, law breakers.  It’s why they fall under the category of, uh, “illegal.”  Hello?  Definitions?  Words?  Actual meanings?

So what it is about the nature of Illegal immigrants that Mr Rubio thinks will somehow suddenly yield lawful activity?

As in, magically willing to be “fined”?

Because here’s the alternative to “fined:” they can simply continue to do what they currently do best.  Exist as illegals under the radar and still stay in the country to work or conduct illegal activities or stick their proboscis into the vital and nutrient-rich streams of social welfare.

In conclusion, allow me to refine the words Mr Rubio leaves unrefined: illegal Mexicans.  Mexicans are from Mexico, a nation conquered by Spain, which is why they speak Spanish and not Urdu or Swahili.  The United States is not suffering from an illegal tide of French or, say, those from Eritrea or Luxembourg or Vatican City.  Mexicans.  Illegal Mexicans.

So let’s just do what I call the Logical Extension, Mr Rubio.  Illegal Mexicans have no real motivation to “pay fines” if the status quo does not change.  And where will you get these fines, pray tell, when lawbreakers decide it’s not in their best fiscal interest to “obey” said laws?

With finality: yes.  The American Taxpayer.

BZ

 

FBI Director Mueller on the IRS scandal: an ignorant and overpaid fop

FBI Director Robert Mueller GraphicCheck out this video.  I’d wager Mueller has the average intelligence of a tape dispenser.  Perhaps the tape dispenser even has better-informed advisers and an Assistant Director.  Because whoever allowed this man to appear in public without an actual adult supervisor needs to be fired with prejudice.

That said, I’d wager Mueller knows how to cash his paycheck but — wait!  Likely his paycheck is already installed via direct deposit.  Thank God.  It can be so confusing.  In 2000, FBI Director Louis Freeh made $141,300.  You can double that salary for Mr Mueller today — a nice quarter of a million dollars.  Conservatively.

He makes me ashamed to have ever worked with his organization.

Paid to be stupid.  It doesn’t get any better than that.

You bleeding Zero.

BZ

 

 

Coulter: “IF THE GOP IS THIS STUPID, IT DESERVES TO DIE”

Jindal's Stupid PartyFrom Ann Coulter’s column:

Democrats terrify Hispanics into thinking they’ll be lynched if they vote for Republicans, and then turn around and taunt Republicans for not winning a majority of the Hispanic vote. This line of attack has real resonance with our stupidest Republicans. (Proposed Republican primary targets: Sens. Kelly Ayotte, Jeff Flake, Lindsey Graham and Marco Rubio.) Which explains why Republicans are devoting all their energy to slightly increasing their share of the Hispanic vote while alienating everyone else in America.

It must be fun for liberals to manipulate Republicans into focusing on hopeless causes. Why don’t Democrats waste their time trying to win the votes of gun owners?

As journalist Steve Sailer recently pointed out, the Hispanic vote terrifying Republicans isn’t that big. It actually declined in 2012. The Census Bureau finally released the real voter turnout numbers from the last election, and the Hispanic vote came in at only 8.4 percent of the electorate — not the 10 percent claimed by the pro-amnesty crowd.

Read the rest of the article here.

It puzzled me years ago and it puzzles me now; why is it Republicans believe that in order to win votes they must abandon their Conservative principles, cede power and then refuse to wield said power when they find themselves in the majority of Congress?

Has Ann Coulter nailed the issue?

BZ

P.S.
Be sure to read her final paragraph.

 

 

ObamaKare: so good for us ALL

obamacare-cartoon-2-aSo good, in fact, that Politico spouts this headline:

Obamacare? We were just leaving …

Dozens of lawmakers and aides are so afraid that their health insurance premiums will skyrocket next year thanks to Obamacare that they are thinking about retiring early or just quitting.

The fear: Government-subsidized premiums will disappear at the end of the year under a provision in the health care law that nudges aides and lawmakers onto the government health care exchanges, which could make their benefits exorbitantly expensive.

Clearly, from this, the authors of ObamaKare have made a large mistake: they didn’t exempt nearly enough people in DC.

BZ

 

Continuing to lose freedoms: “N.J. Bill Seeks Crackdown On Distracted Driving By Forcing Drivers To Hand Over Phones”

WarrantFrom CBSNewsNewYork:

Legal Experts See Possible Showdown Pitting Safety Vs. Fourth Amendment

TRENTON, N.J. (CBSNewYork) — License, registration and your cellphone, please.

Police in New Jersey may soon be allowed to search your cellphone after an accident.

A bill proposed Monday in the New Jersey State Senate would require drivers involved in an accident to hand over their phones — no warrant necessary.

Motorists were mixed on the proposal aimed at cracking down on distracted driving.

To this I say: WRONG.

Let there be no mistake: it’s no secret that I’m a cop.  And I value my precious American freedoms like — I would hope — everyone else.  I also value my very precious ass on vehicle stops and contacts with suspects and inmates.

That said, this bill is wrong.  Red light cameras are wrong.  Cops Tasing grandmothers are wrong.  Cameras on every corner are wrong.  Cop drones over our cities are wrong.  A “Surveillance State” is wrong.  Abrogating the 4th Amendment is wrong.  Let me make this abundantly clear for those of you who just tuned in: abrogating the 4th Amendment is WRONG.

If I find your cell phone in a search incident to arrest, and the case is major, then I would be wise to acquire a warrant.  My DA would want that.

But to suggest that on something as minor as a traffic stop?  That cops can literally confiscate your cellular telephone with no warrant?

Luckily, apparently, that is not YET the case.

BZ