Houston, we have a Pope:

Jorge Bergoglio Pope FrancisHe is from Argentina, and he is 76-year-old Jorge Bergoglio, who wishes to be called Pope Francis.

The Catholic church is at a crossroads; Pope Benedict stepped down in a move not seen for 598 years.  As with Pope Gregory XII, it was and is a time of division, corruption and discontent.  It’s no secret that the Vatican is a seething cauldron of power struggles, infighting, fiscal corruption and scandals.

Can Pope Francis take control, throttle his Cardinals and administrators, and get the church back on track?

BZ

 

 

After Aurora: How Mayor Bloomberg Planned to Make the Next Massacre Count

Crisis An Op To PlunderThe blood of Aurora hadn’t even stopped flowing, and NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg was already prepared to blast the media and airwaves with his millions of dollars of anti-gun pap.

He took a page from the Leftist Playbook of Rahm Emanual: “You never want a serious crisis go to waste.”

Clearly, the Bill of Rights can go straight to hell.  As can the dead people who became Useful Tools for Mr Mayor.

Never been to NYC, never will.

BZ

 

 

Feds Spend $1.5 Million to Study Why Lesbians Are Fat

FatLesbiansSee the article at CNSNews.com.

Answer: 1) because they eat too much, and/or 2) have terrible self-esteem.

My, that was difficult.

Can I get my $1.5 million dollars now?  Because those are the conclusions the study will make.

I mean, seriously — and the Demorats absolutely INSIST there’s no “fat” to cut, eh?

BZ

 

 

Schakowsky: Assault Weapons Ban ‘Just the Beginning’

From Breitbart’s Big Government:

Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), a member of the Democratic Party’s leadership in the House of Representatives, suggested to Jason Mattera at a Feb. 13 women’s rights rally that plans for an assault weapons ban and private-sales background checks were only the beginning of a broader gun control agenda extending to handguns as well.

Schakowsky evidently did not recognize Mattera, a conservative video journalist and senior investigative reporter for Talk Radio Network, who infamously confronted Vice President Joe Biden in the Capitol. (Mattera introduced himself to Schakowsky by name but did not indicate that he was filming or that he is conservative.) She spoke to Mattera as if he were a fellow gun control enthusiast–and Mattera played along, eliciting answers about Schakowsky’s enthusiasm for gun control.

It’s no surprise that Demorats, Leftists, Progressives and the Obama Regime wish to abrogate the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights, particularly the 2nd Amendment because — once the 2nd falls — the 1st Amendment is up for bid.

And then the individual has no control, and Government ultimate control.  One then becomes a Prole, a Groundling, a Serf, a Subject to the King.

In the exchange:

Schakowsky: We’re on a roll now, and I think we’ve got to take the–you know, we’re gonna push as hard as we can and as far as we can.

Mattera: So the assault weapons ban is just the beginning?

Schakowsky: Oh absolutely. I mean, I’m against handguns. We have, in Illinois, the Council Against Handgun… something [Violence]. Yeah, I’m a member of that. So, absolutely.

Mattera: We’ll never get a handgun ban with the Second Amendment as stated.

Schakowsky: I don’t know. I don’t know that we can’t. And there may be an allowance, once again, for communities–I have communities in my district that prohibited handguns within their borders. The rights of municipalities and states to view that as a sensible way to keep people safe–I don’t think it’s precluded.

Clear evidence, in my book.

This is nothing new.  Mr Obama himself quite clearly stated that no one should own firearms.

From Gregory Gwyn-Williams, Jr. at CNSNews.com:

In his new book, At the Brink, economist and author John R. Lott Jr., assesses the presidency of Barack Obama and recalls conversations regarding gun laws they had while working at the University of Chicago.

In Chapter Three, Mr. Lott discusses gun-control and takes the reader back to his time at the University of Chicago, where he and then-professor Barack Obama spoke on numerous occasions about guns in America.

“I don’t believe people should be able to own guns,” Obama told Lott one day at the University of Chicago Law School.

(A) chapter (of the book) documents the actions that Obama has taken on guns, citing the following:

  • In 1996, Obama supported a ban on handguns
  • In 1998, he supported a ban on the sale of all semi-automatic guns
  • In 2004, he advocated banning gun sales within five miles of a school or park, which would have shut down nearly all gun stores

Mr Obama has spoken many times.  His original words are clear and undiluted: he’s coming for your American rights.  He fervently believes that no individual should own any kind of firearm.

As far as Mr Obama in concerned: no American civilian is responsible or can be trusted.  No one.  Not you.  Not me.

BZ

 

 

Former employee: the TSA is a fraud

TSA Adept AgentsRight-thinking individuals already knew this.  It’s not in any form news of an actual kind.

The article, here from the New York Post, does — however — affirm what we already knew about the TSA: it’s all “style” (and I utilize that word so rather loosely) over substance because the TSA is completely style and class-less.

Salient snippets include:

A LOT of what we do is make-believe.

But since most TSA supervisors are too daft to actually supervise, bending the rules is easy to do.

[I like this guy already; I enjoy utilizing the word “daft” as well. -BZ]

Did you know you don’t need a high-school diploma or GED to work as a security screener? These are the same screeners that TSA chief John Pistole and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano refer to as a first-class first line of defense in the war on terror.

These are the employees who could never keep a job in the private sector. I wouldn’t trust them to walk my dog.

Most TSA screeners know their job is a complete joke. Their goal is to use this as a stepping stone to another government agency.

We work in a culture where common sense has no place. All but a very few TSA personnel know they’re employed by a bottom-of-the-barrel agency.

Every time you read about a TSA horror story, it’s usually about a screener doing what he or she is instructed to do.

Supervisors play absolutely no role in day-to-day functions except to tell you not to chew gum. Gum chewing is a huge issue with management. I once saw a supervisor make an officer open his mouth to prove he had a mint and not a piece of gum.

One screener didn’t come to work for four weeks. When he finally reappeared, he asked for another week off. The answer was no. So what did this brainiac decide to do? He took another week off — and didn’t get terminated.

People have been caught falling asleep on the job. They get written up, it’s put in their file, and that’s it.

New hires see how bad it is working there, and, believe it or not, TSA does manage to hire some pretty decent people. They just don’t last because they can get a normal job.

Best line of the entire article?

Anyone boarding an aircraft should feel maybe only a teeny tiny bit safer than if there were no TSA at all.

There!  Now, ladies and gentlemen, don’t you feel absolutely buoyed by the incredibly diligent, pertinent, logical and safe application of the TSA authorities as applied to the screening of American citizens on aircraft throughout the United States?

Anyone need a colonoscopy?  I know where you can get them, cheap.

Muslims, al Qaeda, Pakistanis, young Middle Eastern men with a terrorist history need not apply.

BZ

P.S.

— TSA scanner fraud here.
— The TSA itself is a fraud.
— General TSA fraud.
— TSA incompetence on video.
— Searching grandma; finding nothing.

The list is endless.