PLO Bestows Award Upon Helen Thomas


From the Jerusalem Post:

PLO bestows journalism award on Helen Thomas

By JTA
04/03/2012 01:17

US reporter, forced into retirement after controversial remarks about Jews, hailed for “supporting Palestine in the West.”

NEW YORK (JTA) – Longtime White House reporter Helen Thomas received a prize in journalism from a representative of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas.

Thomas, 91, who was forced into retirement two years ago after making controversial remarks about Jews and Israel, was recognized for her journalism career and commitment to the Palestinian cause. Hanan Ashrawi, a member of the Executive Committee of the PLO, presented Thomas with the award on behalf of Abbas, who is also head of the PLO.

I think this speaks for itself. And further, I’ll bet Thomas and any number of DC Leftists are proud of her “accomplishment.”

BZ

P.S.
Helen Thomas is Lebanese.

Eric Holder: “No Voter Fraud.” Really? Some white kid then votes under YOUR name and address?

First, enjoy the video:

Of course not, Mr Holder, there simply cannot be any voter fraud in the United States allowed by poll workers — until there is.

From Breitbart.com:

In a shocking new video, James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas demonstrates to the Attorney General of the United States, Eric Holder, just why he should be concerned about lack of voter ID laws – by walking into Holder’s voting precinct and showing the world that anyone can obtain Eric Holder’s ballot. Literally.

The video shows a young man entering a Washington, DC polling place at 3401 Nebraska Avenue, NW, on primary day of this year – April 3, 2012 – and giving Holder’s name and address. The poll worker promptly offers the young man Holder’s ballot to vote.

Holder has maintained that voter fraud is not a major problem in the United States, and that voter ID would not curb voter fraud in any case.

Go ahead, proles, groundlings and serfs. Keep your faith in government.

Good little prole; here are more lies, now digest them.

BZ

Teens: Not Interested In Driving?

It was recently discussed on my local terrestrial radio stations, and amongst other adults I know (most of them parents), that there seems to be a trend developing in teens. One that I find interesting on any number of levels that, as contrasted to my generation, flies in the face of what I consider to be an extremely important goal in growing up.

And that is independence.

I was listening to parents in their 30s indicate that their teens tended to pass on taking driver training classes and were disinterested in acquiring a car of their own.

For a first stunning few seconds, I was shocked. Following those scant seconds, I began to assemble an understanding rather rapidly.

But let me digress for a moment.

When I was in my single digits, I couldn’t wait to learn to ride a bicycle. I learned with training wheels (Anyone remember those?) as Dad initially insisted on my riding over the thick grass of our back yard. I can only guess that he placed the thick grass friction obstacle in my way in lieu of my bailing off and smacking my dome.

I quickly learned that it was a lot more fun to ride on our concrete back yard patio, our side walkway and the front driveway. From there I graduated to my brother Don’s red-and-black Schwinn with the broken frame, Truxel seat and huge balloon tires.

A bicycle yielded my first true bit of semi-independence. It also yielded my second job as a paperboy, after my first job of mowing lawns. I can remember riding miles and miles on my bicycle, with my friend Rick Back to an aquarium store in Foothill Farms. I also rode to Ancil Hoffman Park, where we played solider in the park with plastic guns, rifles, machine guns and WWII surplus equipment to include helmet liners, canteens, web belts, suspenders and ammo pouches, purchased from the Metropolitan Army& Navy store at Marconi and Fair Oaks Boulevard.

The bicycle was my first key to independence.

I learned to drive in Ohio, in high school. We had ancient and huge Ford Galaxy driver training cars. They were brand new then, spotless, but cut roadway paths like massive, wave-ploughing battleships on soft springs and much body lean. I wore a special set of sneakers for driver training; I secretly called them my Ford Shoes. I only wore them when I would drive the big green Galaxy. I was very strange that way.

My first car was a very clean white 1966 Ford Fairlane four-door sedan, with a blue cloth interior, a loud and scrunchy set of front shocks, and the fuel-inefficient 289 V8. Dad helped me buy the car, used. Its original factory price was $2,385. We paid a lot less. I had to promise to continue to work at Chatham Village (mowing lawns, painting, general maintenance), in order to pay my father. Gas, incidentally, was 35-cents a gallon. I could buy a lot of gas, then.

The car, however, was my badge of independence. It was earned and I had won it. I also had a succession of mini-bikes, starting with the Honda Mini-Trail 50 and step-through Trail 90 with conversion kit.

I absolutely thirsted for independence and, at the same time, cars allowed me to work various jobs all over.

Bicycles and cars: actual independence. And, of course, a lot of chicks.

Fast forward to the original discussion: why is it that teens eschew cars?

Moreover: do they really?

There is evidence to indicate this is true:

I have some very salient theories.

What are yours?

BZ

P.S.
I don’t “do” public transportation. As I wrote here, regarding my last new car purchase (a Toyota RAV4):

I’ve budgeted for $7-a-gallon gas and, until it reaches that point, I’m not much concerned. I’m getting a pay raise in June. My retirement system is stuffed. I’ve planned well. I’m sufficiently old that I shall NEVER be riding “public” transport. Far as I’m thinking, “public systems” are for nothing but losers, drunks, druggies and those sucking from the welfare teat. I don’t “do” buses or “light rail” or “The El” or “the subway” or any of that low-class crap.

It’s Only $15,617,723,000,000.00

From the Associated Press:

WASHINGTON (AP) —

Figures on government spending and debt (last six digits are eliminated). The government’s fiscal year runs Oct. 1 through Sept. 30.
Total public debt subject to limit April 4 15,574,371
Statutory debt limit 16,394,000
Total public debt outstanding April 4 15,617,723
Operating balance April 4 56,774
Interest fiscal year 2012 through February 99,386
Interest same period 2011 94,459
Deficit fiscal year 2012 through February 580,830
Deficit same period 2011 641,264
Receipts fiscal year 2012 through February 893,169
Receipts same period 2011 869,003
Outlays fiscal year 2012 through February 1,473,999
Outlays same period 2011 1,510,266
Gold assets in March 11,041

[LAST SIX DIGITS ARE ELIMINATED!]

Just try wrapping your Brain Housing Group around that.

BZ

Printing Shop Horrors:


A Kentucky printing/embroidery shop (who identify themselves as Christian) is under fire for declining to print a gay pride T-shirt. From TheNewAmerican.com:

A T-shirt company in Lexington, Kentucky, is facing the wrath of a local homosexual activist contingent after the business politely passed on producing T-shirts for the city’s “gay pride” festival. On March 26, Lexington’s Gay and Lesbian Services Organization (GLSO) filed a discrimination complaint against the family-owned company, Hands On Originals, alleging that the firm had bid on producing the shirts, but when it was selected its owners changed their minds, explaining that their Christian values made them unable to fill the order for the “gay”-themed apparel.

“This wouldn’t be acceptable to do to a black group,” Paul Brown, chairman of Lexington’s Pride Festival, told the community’s local NBC news affiliate. “This wouldn’t be acceptable to do to a Jewish group, and because of the fairness ordinance it’s unacceptable to do it to a gay group.”

The official discrimination complaint filed with the Lexington-Fayette Urban County Human Rights Commission reads: “On or about March 8, 2012, members of the GLSO were told that our Pride Festival t-shirt printing quote would not be honored due to the fact that the t-shirt company is a Christian organization. We were told that our t-shirts would not be printed. We believe that we have been discriminated against in violation of Local Ordinance 201-99, based on sexual orientation.”

Kent Ostrander, executive director of the Family Foundation of Kentucky, explained that the owners of Hands On Originals were not immediately aware that they were bidding on a project that violated their values. What they told the homosexual group “in a very kind way was, ‘This is against our conscience. We don’t want to be a part of the gay-pride parade.’” Ostrander added that the business owners had located another T-shirt business that would honor their low quote, so no one was harmed.

As the result of this, a number of things occurred:

  • A complaint was filed with the Lexington human rights commission;
  • 60 homosexual activists picketed the business;
  • The Lexington School District has stopped purchasing from the business;
  • The City of Lexington and University of Kentucky are considering pulling business;
  • Lexington Mayor Jim Gray publicly stated “people don’t have patience for this sort of attitude today”;
  • Local comments have indicated they simply want to bankrupt or eliminate the business wholesale;
  • One group is trying to buy the company’s mortgage for the purpose of evicting them;

So there you have it: the peace, understanding and kind tolerance of today’s Leftists.

Kind of reminds me a tad bit of my last post.

Continuing:

Focus on the Family president Jim Daly has warned of the danger of labeling an individual, group, or business as hateful and intolerant just because “they think differently about some issues than you do. Believing what the Bible says about human sexuality is a personal conviction, not an act of persecution.” But homosexual activists have made it clear that their intent is to damage and destroy those who insist on taking a firm stand against efforts to normalize homosexual behavior and force it upon the culture at large.

Because here is how the transition regarding homosexuality has progressed:

  • From Tolerance;
  • To Acceptance;
  • To ADVOCACY

Meaning, now, that if you aren’t an absolute ADVOCATE for homosexuality and the LGBTQ minions (that last initial now means “Questioning“), you are unalterably homophobic and subject to excoriation, suit and possible criminal prosecution.

That is where this is leading in our country: to criminal prosecution.

With this one notation: why is it then, perhaps, that Mr Obama — for example — hasn’t come out clearly and unequivocally FOR homosexual marriage?

Because the bulk of voting blacks in this country do not condone homosexuality. Plain and simple. See the The Atlantic article by Josh Kraushaar here. Mr Obama needs the votes. There are more black than homosexual voters. Numbers. And race. Mr Obama is black. And Victimhood. Apparently blacks still trump homosexuals in the loving consideration of Mr Obama. Take the back of the Obama Leftist Bus, homosexuals.

But moreover, let’s do what I call the “Logical Extension,” shall we? How about a bit of substitution? Let’s swap the shop owners’ religion of Christianity with that of Islam.

They are now Muslim business owners.

Do you think the City of Lexington and gay advocates would have a bit of a go with that business?

You and I both know the answer: not just no, but hell no. GOWPs won’t touch Islam in this country and, further, they have in the backs of their minds (And they will never, NEVER admit it!): those crazy fuckers could come back at me, you, us, and try to kill us. Fear on many levels has now entered into the equation. A “racist” and “judgmental” fear, as they would quantify.

Which is why I just step back and let Bill Maher speak for the situation now, from his OpEd article in the New York Times:

If it weren’t for throwing conniption fits, we wouldn’t get any exercise at all.

I have a better idea. Let’s have an amnesty — from the left and the right — on every made-up, fake, totally insincere, playacted hurt, insult, slight and affront. Let’s make this Sunday the National Day of No Outrage. One day a year when you will not find some tiny thing someone did or said and pretend you can barely continue functioning until they apologize.

If that doesn’t work, what about this: If you see or hear something you don’t like in the media, just go on with your life. Turn the page or flip the dial or pick up your roll of quarters and leave the booth.

I don’t want to live in a country where no one ever says anything that offends anyone. That’s why we have Canada.

Now apply Mr Maher to this situation. The gay union didn’t have a T-shirt printed by one business. No one was hurt. No one got a nosebleed. No one’s ass was kicked.

Yet, that’s how far we’ve sunk from tolerance to ADVOCACY.

BZ