Demorats threaten Demorats: vote or else

From the NYPost.com:

Democrats: vote or we’ll kick your ass

by Carl Campanile and Natalie O’Neill

Democrats are telling voters that they had better head to the polls — or else.

The New York State Democratic Committee is bullying people into voting next week with intimidating letters warning that it can easily find out which slackers fail to cast a ballot next Tuesday.

Who you vote for is your secret. But whether or not you vote is public record,” the letter says.

“We will be reviewing voting records . . . to determine whether you joined your neighbors who voted in 2014.”

It ends with a line better suited to a mob movie than a major political party: “If you do not vote this year, we will be interested to hear why not.”

The letter and accompanying post card was criticized even by party members, with one Democratic consultant saying it was the wrong way to inspire votes.

“It’s a threatening letter. It’s a scare piece that is unnecessary and inappropriate,” the insider said.

Brooklyn and Manhattan residents who received the note Wednesday were furious, calling it an attempt to browbeat them into showing up at the polls.

“I’m outraged. Whether I vote or not is none of your business!” said a Manhattan voter, who was so incensed that she complained to a local Democratic leader.

“The letter is ludicrous and menacing,” said the voter, who requested anonymity.

The woman also received a report card of her voting record, pointing out that she had failed to vote in two of the last four elections.

Overall, the notices were sent out to 1 million registered Democrats who had failed to vote in previous midterm elections, according to the group.

The committee — chaired by former Gov. David Paterson — defended the scare tactic, calling it standard practice throughout the country.

“This flier is part of the nationwide Democratic response to traditional Republican voter-suppression efforts, because Democrats believe our democracy works better when more people vote, not less,” said Peter Kauffmann, a committee spokesman.

Trust me, ladies and gentlemen, the Demorats are pissing their pants over the upcoming election results, as in: they’re going to lose both the House and the Senate.

Harry Reid is begging for support.

The Washington Post indicates there is a 95% chance the Republicans will take the Senate, and a 99% chance Republicans will take the House.

BZ

 

Driving Miss Romney

Mitt Romney's Losing Presidential ThanksgivingNo, no, no, he says, Mitt Romney isn’t running for president.

Though, of course, he’s been on the Hugh Hewitt show recently and been boxed into the “running corner” by Mr Hewitt himself — and somewhat embarrassingly so.  At the conclusion of that radio segment, I thought Mr Romney had made things pretty clear: he isn’t running for president.

Then there’s this, from the WeeklyStandard.com:

Romney: ‘No Question’ I’d Be a Better President Than Hillary

by Daniel Halper

This morning on Fox News Sunday, former Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said there’s “no question” that he’d be a better president than Hillary Clinton.

“You mentioned Hillary Clinton,” said host Chris Wallace. “Do you think you’d make a better president than Hillary Clinton?”

“No question about that, in my mind,” Romney said. “The American people may disagree with me. You’ve got to get this economy going. You have to have people who understand what it takes to create jobs and to help people come out of poverty, to help the middle class have a better and more prosperous future. You’ve got to have that understanding.

“You’ve also got to have people who’ve actually run something. The government of the United States is the largest enterprise in the world. You watched a president who just doesn’t understand how to make an administration work, how to interact with Congress, how to get things done.

The intimation being: I do.

From the Wall Street Journal: “Romney on 2016: ‘I’m Not Planning on Running.”

Then why, sir, are you making noise and wasting air as if you might, pray tell?  Why are some in the blogosphere pushing you?

And considering the revelation to his son, Tagg, that Mitt’s heart really wasn’t into running for president back then.

Are you serious?

With that, and your actions (or inactions) during the last campaign, you’re even remotely thinking of expecting me to support you for another run?

Frankly, you’ve proven you don’t have it in you, sir.  I gave Sarah Palin a brief consideration until she excused herself from the governor’s chair and went home.  From that point on she became, to me, no longer viable in any way.  She had no fight.

You, also, proved to me you have no fight.  You were handed any number of select, greasy, tempting, taste-sensational points you could have unleashed upon Mr Obama, but you decided to “play nice” in the octagon.  You don’t play nice in the octagon, sir; you go for the throat and spill blood.  That’s why it’s the octagon and why only those who are willing to shed blood play there and win.

Mr Romney, I’m sure you’re a nice fellow and quite schooled in the business side of the world, but as a presidential candidate — well, I’d rather vote for one of my fellow Sergeants on the night shift, who is infinitely more squared-away than you are, sir.  For one, he’s not a flake.  Secondly, he has more real-world common sense than all of the empty suits and skirts in DC combined.

Either declare or go someplace else, Mr Romney, so you’re not a distraction and I can begin to consider whom I may seriously support for president in 2016.  It won’t be you in any eventuality.

I placed my trust in you only to discover you didn’t even trust yourself.

BZ

 

Donors Weigh Jilting Christie for Jeb Bush

Jeb BushFrom the NYTimes.com:

Jeb Bush’s increasingly serious and public examination of a run for president has shaken the ranks of establishment Republican donors and fund-raisers who had planned to back Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey in 2016, forcing many of them to rethink their allegiance to the embattled governor.

In private conversations that are now seeping into public view, some of them are signaling to Mr. Christie’s camp that, should Mr. Bush enter the race, their first loyalty would be to him, not to Mr. Christie, according to interviews with more than two dozen of them.

It is now time for me to make this statement — so that those from the GOP who may occasionally cruise by make no mistake whatsoever:

I will not vote for Jeb Bush.  End of statement.  If I have to write in my preference, I will.  But I will not vote for Jeb Bush for president.  No more Clintons, no more Bushes.

Period.

BZ