Let me make one observation that will not be obvious to you. UK people refer to those from Islamic countries in the Middle East and North Africa as “Asian.” No. I am not making this up. It is either a mistake or a purposeful misnomer. Listen and become educated. Then read this.
But wait. Wasn’t the clarion call throughout all of Europe, from Brussels, from Norway, from Sweden, from France, from the UK, from Deutschland that “there is no such thing as a ‘no-go’ zone” in any of these countries?
Why? Because it would fly in the face of what GOWPs have insisted, wrongly, for years. There is no difference between cultures. All are good. Most any culture than a Western Culture was better yet. No difference between Islam and Western Civilization whatsoever — though they’ve been at war with Western Civilization for thousands of years. Damn. That ugly history thingie.
Angela Merkel admits there ARE ‘no-go’ areas in Germany that ‘nobody dares’ to enter
by Sebastian Murphy-Bates
Chancellor said there are parts of her country police and others fear going to
She argued a zero-tolerance approach to crime must not tolerate such areas
Her spokesman Steffen Seibert declined to name the specific locations today
He said Merkel’s words speak for themselves, leaving some officials speechless
Let’s examine the situation a bit more closely. Are these dangerous no-go zones due to Buddhists? Christians? Shinto priests? Catholics? Atheist enclaves? The Illuminati? Uh, no.
Muslims.
Chancellor Angela Merkel has claimed there are ‘no-go areas’ in Germany, leaving ministers speechless.
Officials have previously dismissed the notion there are places in the country that police and other outsiders can’t visit.
But Merkel said she favours a zero-tolerance policy on crime that includes preventing no-go areas, which she called ‘areas where nobody dares to go’ in an interview with n-tv on Monday.
You can imagine the PSH that occurred from the hallowed halls of Brussels right to the Storting in Oslo.
‘There are such areas and one has to call them by their name and do something about them,’ she said.
Asked to name the areas, Merkel’s spokesman Steffen Seibert told reporters today ‘the chancellor’s words speak for themselves.’
Interior Ministry spokesman Johannes Dimroth likewise declined to identify no-go areas, saying security was a matter for local not federal authorities.
Of course they wouldn’t identify specific areas. It’s embarrassing as hell when you’re caught in an abject lie which is harmful to your very own citizens.
Let me also point out that Snopes indicates there is no such thingie as a “no go zone.”
Rumor: Several European and Americans cities have been designated Islamic ‘no-go zones’ where Sharia law prevails.
CLAIM
A number of localities in the United States, France, and Britain are considered Muslim “no-go zones” (operating under Sharia Law) where local laws are not applicable.
RATING
FALSE
This is another in a continuing series of entries indicating Snopes is as honorable and truthful as an 1800s snake oil salesman, Tammany Hall or Boss Tweed.
I cannot for the life of me understand how people still refuse to realize that one can jump onto a thing called “the internet” and find, for example, this bit of buttery political goodness from the BBC which has Angela Merkel saying roughly the same thing in 2010.
Merkel says German multicultural society has failed
Attempts to build a multicultural society in Germany have “utterly failed”, Chancellor Angela Merkel says.
She said the so-called “multikulti” concept – where people would “live side-by-side” happily – did not work, and immigrants needed to do more to integrate – including learning German.
Hold on with that car wash mister. Angela Merkel hinting that immigrants should “learn German” and “assimilate”? Oh hell no. Way too judgmental.
Unless.
Even back then she saw a problem.
Mrs Merkel told a gathering of younger members of her conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party on Saturday that at “the beginning of the 60s our country called the foreign workers to come to Germany and now they live in our country.”
She added: “We kidded ourselves a while, we said: ‘They won’t stay, sometime they will be gone’, but this isn’t reality.”
The money shot.
“And of course, the approach [to build] a multicultural [society] and to live side-by-side and to enjoy each other… has failed, utterly failed.”
This, of course, is a massive, massive issue in Germany and all of Europe. Angela Merkel outright lied to Germany and the rest of the EU about the problem though she knew the truth back in 2010 and dared to speak it at that point.
The final question: why would Merkel have done this?
The answer is multi-faceted yet fundamental. Merkel leans Left and, like many Germans, still feels she must somehow “atone” for Germany’s role in WWII. She is the quintessential GOWP — Guilty Overeducated White Person. She feels pain. Therefore Germany and by dint of that, the rest of Europe, must suffer along with her. There must be penance and an accounting.
Let’s not forget that Merkel won Time magazine’s “Person of the Year Award” in 2015 for opening her borders to Syrian “refugee” Muslims.
Further, in a way, it was a popular concept with fellow GOWPs, certainly in the elitist political classes. She also had to “compete” politically with the other German parties. Like the US, Leftists like the votes and others enjoy the cheap labor.
So why admit it now?
Politics, of course. She is teetering on the edge.
As Frank Underwood said.
She must regain power.
She, like politicians, like governments, will lie when those in power benefit.
Actions such as this do nothing but embolden the Muslim elements in UK cities. Cowardice in the face of Islam is like staring into the eyes of a junkyard dog. Islam respects nothing but the proverbial “strong horse” as practiced in the Middle East. As with any bully Muslims feed and grow on this kind of spineless behavior.
UK, you are in serious, serious trouble if these are the people allegedly “protecting” you. You purposely fail to arm your police forces with the most basic of self defense tools to include large batons, chemical weapons and quite necessary firearms. Each officer must now be armed. To not do so in these times, in the face of Islamic terror, is unconscionable.
BZ
P.S.
Please read the following two books if you truly wish to understand the mindset of Islam in the Middle East.
Watch and then answer: who “wins”? Or, perhaps, more importantly, who allows whom to speak despite the fact that Tommy Robinson is a “guest” on Good Morning Britain.
Tommy Robinson, by the way, is former leader of the English Defense League, a group standing up to the steamrollering affects of Islam in the United Kingdom.
Morgan hates to lose an argument and strangely enough has no reply to the very specific individuals names, circumstances and instances cited by Robinson in concert with the mosque in question and Islam. When Robinson hones in on his point he is cut off by Morgan who raises his vocal volume and changes questions. This is nothing more than a base hatchet job exposed. Embarrassing to say the least.
This is what passes for discourse in the UK now, a once proud nation toppled, like many other GOWP-helmed Western nations, by political correctness, guilt and fear. These sentiments and positions have bled over into the very forces that would literally and physically defend the UK to include its military forces and civilian law enforcement. To even attempt to discuss the issue results in labeling, derision and worse, perhaps even charges and prosecution.
An example is this: EDL Radio, the internet broadcasting of the English Defense League, originates in the United States because to do otherwise — having it originate in the UK — would draw, at minimum, not just fire and hatred but the potential for complete censorship and/or formal charges of hate speech.
Why? Because GOWPs (Guilty Overeducated White Persons), Leftists, Progressives and the like cannot deal with the truth when it clashes against their worldview. Statistics and truth must inherently take a back seat to emotion and victimhood.
Report: Islamists from Across Europe Moving to UK for ‘Freedom’ to Practice Radical Islam
by Virginia Hale
A growing number of radical Muslims are flocking to move from France to Britain, where generous welfare payments, lack of scrutiny from the authorities, and the ease with which families can practice strict Islam have earned the UK a reputation as a halal paradise for Salafists who are unable to secure visas for Saudi Arabia.
Why might that be?
But for Salafists wanting to live in accordance with strict Islamic teachings, “there is nothing easier for [Muslims with European passports] than to settle in Britain” where there is “a generous welfare package, public services delivered free, plenty of available work, and all with no visa or residence permit required”. according to L’Obs.
Leftists have conveniently lost sight of the fact that the UK is now home to 23,000 Jihadists whose mindset doesn’t favor the United Kingdom or Western civilization in the slightest.
Leftists have lost sight of the fact that the UK’s hands-off policy to Salifists and other Muslim hardliners is inviting not fewer but greater amounts of actual terrorists and Jihadis
Leftists have lost sight of the fact that hate crimes against Jews are rocketing up and cannot possibly understand why UK citizens feel as if they have their literal backs against the wall whilst their neighborhoods are being transformed into enclaves of Muslims where UK citizens are not only not welcome but face the real chance of violence against them. Official Home Office documents quote statistics but purposely fail to list in these news releases the actual breakdown of those impacted, such as Jews, Muslims, etc.
Here’s the deal: this interview is not unlike Wikileaks. People aren’t shouting from the rooftops that Wikileaks publishes false material. The same here. If Robinson were full of utter shite Morgan would gladly have let Robinson tighten the verbal noose unrestrained. An accomplished interviewer would have done straight so. This speaks, of course, more about Morgan than it does Robinson. And about the truth.
It should come as no shock that the video has been removed around any number of social media sites. Why might that be, do you suppose?
Until they are axed, two additional videos are available on YouTube of the “interview,” Part One and Part Two.
We’ll see how long these stand before being removed from the internet.