Either unfortunately or thankfully the Leftists, Demorats and American Media Maggots seem to forget that something called the “internet” exists.
Despite their best intentions and the focus of Google and other fact-eliminating social media Mega-Censors, some videos and facts have managed to escape complete and utter digital liquidation.
You see, it would appear that House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry “The Hutt” Nadler has called for and acquired committee contempt orders for Attorney General William Barr despite those orders being illegal and, well, in direct contravention of what he precisely wanted in a prior situation involving a Demorat.
Let’s check our internet on this for comparison, shall we? Because, as we shall hear, “flip-flopping for abject political line purposes, thy name is Nadler.”
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, thankfully the genius named Hank Johnson weighed in and revealed the true intentions of the Demorats, Leftists and American Media Maggots. By the way, what the hell happened to Johnson’s lower jaw? Bad gauze? A serious Band-Aid accident? Shaving?
Just asking: did Hank Johnson happen to pass a few years ago, and was subsequently replaced by a Disney Audioanimatronics robot that still somehow can’t pronounce the English ranguage or, minimally, the word “obfuscation”?
Let’s not forget that this is the same Hank Johnson who called President Trump a white supremacist, a Nazi, and compared him to Hitler.
And let us not forget that this is the same Hank Johnson who — thank God — forewarned us about the island nation of Guam because he was sniffing paint out of a paper bag that day.
And who could forget this wonderful HJ video (H/T to Rick!) about helium:
So please, let’s attempt to acquire a semblance of a perspective. It is the Leftists, Demorats and American Media Maggots who couldn’t care less about
Facts
Logic
Rationality
Prorportion
Common sense
Context, or
History
Until it uplifts and furthers their own narrative. Period.
Of all the things that you can say about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), one of them isn’t that she’s stupid. Or is she?
Wait; I can hear you now: “Oh no BZ, how can you say that, you’ve previously stated her IQ is on par with a potted ficus!”
Well, yes it is. She is ill-educated, ignorant, unenlightened and, truly, a sad product of New York public schools that fail to teach anything of significance about history. That’s what I term “Historical Alzheimers.”
“Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” –George Santayana
Yet: she isn’t. Completely stupid, that is. Oh, wait.
She is, however, calculated and orchestrated. She is actually a puppet, but she doesn’t believe it. Back to that in a bit. The puppet aspect.
Roll with me here for a moment. She truly is a Democratic Socialist (one of the first two ever in Congress; the other is freshman Rashida Tlaib, Michigan) — she just has no idea what that really means or entails. To her, it’s just a cool word that rolls off the tongue with edgy intrigue.
Alexandria, You ARe A Liar
You Don’t Know What You Are Talking About @AOC
You Have Never Lived Under Socialism To Know How Trouble It Is.
If you are in the hospital waiting for government paid surgeries or medicines, you are going to die waiting…pic.twitter.com/vhDL96PCL0
Her deal is “climate change” or “Global Warming” or whatever phrase is most convenient at the time it’s spoken, in order to conform to the, well, seasons. (Strange notation: more scientists are indicating that weather is cyclical — imagine that — and that we’re heading towards cooling rather than more warming.) She is part of the Religious Left — where faith is required to believe the world is falling apart at our feet and in the skies. So let’s begin with her “we’re all going to die in 12 years” thingie.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wants a 70% marginal tax rate on the rich.
Let’s talk about her “Green New Deal.” In truth, it was a green new abortion on toast when one began to actually read it.
Among the most prominent, the deal calls for “meeting 100 percent of the power demand in the United States through clean, renewable, and zero-emission energy sources.” The ultimate goal is to stop using fossil fuels entirely, Ocasio-Cortez’s office told NPR, as well as to transition away from nuclear energy.
According to an initial outline of the measure, the freshman Democrat and Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) said they “set a goal to get to net-zero, rather than zero emissions, in 10 years because we aren’t sure that we’ll be able to fully get rid of farting cows and airplanes that fast.”
Verbiage was subsequently shifted most rapidamento:
The language was later changed to “emissions from cows.”
You wouldn’t want to offend COWPAC 2019.
And all this in just three months.
But wait. What’s in the Green New Deal? What are the particulars?
The bill calls for a “10-year national mobilizations” toward accomplishing a series of goals that the resolution lays out.
Among the most prominent, the deal calls for “meeting 100 percent of the power demand in the United States through clean, renewable, and zero-emission energy sources.” The ultimate goal is to stop using fossil fuels entirely, Ocasio-Cortez’s office told NPR, as well as to transition away from nuclear energy.
Ban affordable energy. GND calls for the elimination of all fossil fuel energy production, the lifeblood of American industry and life, which includes not only all oil but also natural gas — one of the cheapest sources of American energy, and one of the reasons the United States has been able to lead the world in carbon-emissions reduction.
Eliminate nuclear energy. The GND also calls for eliminating all nuclear power, one of the only productive and somewhat affordable “clean” energy sources available to us, in 11 years. This move would purge around 20 percent of American energy generation so you can rely on intermittent wind for your energy needs.
Eliminate 99 percent of cars. To be fair, under the GND, everyone will need to retrofit their cars with Flintstones-style foot holes or pedals for cycling. The authors state that the GND would like to replace every “combustion-engine vehicle” — trucks, airplanes, boats, and 99 percent of cars — within ten years. Charging stations for electric vehicles will be built “everywhere,” though how power plants will provide the energy needed to charge them is a mystery.
Gut and rebuild every building in America. Markey and Cortez want to “retrofit every building in America” with “state of the art energy efficiency.” I repeat, “every building in America.” That includes every home, factory, and apartment building, which will all need, for starters, to have their entire working heating and cooling systems ripped out and replaced with…well, with whatever technology Democrats are going invent in their committee hearings, I guess.
Eliminate air travel. GND calls for building out “high speed rail at a scale where air travel stops becoming necessary.” Good luck Hawaii. Or any other island. California’s high-speed boondoggle is already in $100 billion dollars of debt, and looks to be one of the state’s biggest fiscal disasters ever. Amtrak runs billions of dollars in the red (though, as we’ll see, trains that run on fossil fuels will also be phased out). Imagine growing that business model out to every state in America? Stop. Name me ONE passenger rail system on the planet that makes money. Not one? You would be correct. Even in Europe. All financed at a loss by governments.
A government-guaranteed job. The bill promises the United States government will provide every single American with a job that includes a “family-sustaining wage, family and medical leave, vacations, and a pension.” You can imagine that those left in the private sector would be funding these through some unspecified “massive” taxation. On the bright side, when you’re foraging for food, your savings will be worthless.
Free education for life. GND promises free college or trade schools for every American.
A salubrious diet. The GND promises the government will provide “healthy food” to every American (because there are no beans or lettuce in your local supermarket, I guess).
A house. The GND promises that the government will provide, “safe, affordable, adequate housing” for every American citizen. I call dibs on an affordable Adams Morgan townhouse. Thank you, Ocasio-Cortez.
Free money. The GND aims to provide, and I am not making this up, “economic security” for all who are “unable or unwilling” to work. Just to reiterate: if you’re unwilling to work, the rest of us will have your back.
Bonus insanity: Ban meat. Ocasio-Cortez admits that we can’t get zero emissions in 10 years “because we aren’t sure that we’ll be able to fully get rid of farting cows and airplanes that fast.” The only way to get rid of farting cows is to get rid of beef.
Ben Shapiro weighed in on the Green New Deal.
Remember: the spectacular Green New Deal is available in three easy payments of only $200,000, for each citizen of the United States. Come on. Chump change.
The sweeping “Green New Deal” proposed by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., could cost as much as $93 trillion, or approximately $600,000 per household, according to a new study co-authored by the former director of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.
The sobering and staggering cost estimate came as Democratic presidential hopeful Kamala Harris pointedly declined in an interview broadcast Sunday to put a price tag on the Green New Deal and “Medicare-for-all,” saying “it’s not about a cost,” but rather return on investment. The Green New Deal’s botched rollout included the release of an official document by Ocasio-Cortez’s office that promised economic security even for those “unwilling to work,” and called for the elimination of “farting cows” and air travel.
Think about it. Who wouldn’t want a “Green New Deal”? Sounds great. Certainly everyone on today’s college campuses. Except: the devil is in the details, is it not?
Commensurate with her Demorat Socialist pap. . . well, wait a minute. What is Socialism? Why wouldn’t we want it?
As I was saying, commensurate with her Demorat Socialist pap, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez concurrently began to implode from a massive sense of, well, I can think of no other word than “entitlement.” And perhaps the phrase “working the system.” Two things she swore to never do — because I suppose she lacked the capability — but to which she can now, due to an open and easy access. You know. To Free Cheese.
“Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” -John Dalberg-Acton
First: her digs, because she complained of having no place to live. Wait. Do I detect an impending Hypocrisy Alert?
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the youngest woman ever elected to Congress—she still can’t afford an apartment in D.C.
by Abigail Hess
One year ago, you could find Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez working behind the bar at Flats Fix, a small taqueria near Union Square. Come January, you will find her in Washington D.C., representing New York’s 14th District as the youngest woman ever elected to Congress.
But just because she is making history, doesn’t mean she is making money. Ocasio-Cortez recently revealed that she is currently unable to rent a D.C. apartment.
So sorry. You evidently didn’t understand the “you won’t be making bank until you’re actually sworn in” aspect.
Swamp’s gold: 6 of 10 richest counties in America are DC suburbs, 10 of the top 20
by Paul Bedard
The Washington, D.C. area, home to the federal government and noted for “double-dipping” salaries, is the wealthiest region in the country, according to new Census Bureau reporting.
In 2017, the top five richest counties were Washington suburbs and the top 10 list included a sixth Washington suburb, at the No. 10 bookend.
The No. 1 richest county in America is Loudoun County, Va., home to Dulles International Airport and hundreds of federal contractors and agencies. It is also the site of several mega data centers helped into the county by former Gov. Terry McAuliffe and current Gov. Ralph Northam.
Gosh. Wonder how that happened? But again, hold that thought and keep the Hypocrisy Alert at the ready; that bell is about to ding. Like right now.
Then she did it. Went out and acquired a luxury apartment. From the WashingtonExaminer.com:
Poor people not allowed in AOC’s luxury apartment complex
by Alana Goodman
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., recently moved into a luxury apartment complex in Washington, D.C. that does not offer the affordable housing units that were a key plank in the New York congresswoman’s campaign platform.
The freshman congresswoman, a self-described socialist, campaigned on a platform to expand affordable housing, and her controversial Green New Deal proposal promises “Safe, affordable, adequate housing” for all.
Ocasio-Cortez, commonly referred to as “AOC,” repeatedly criticized luxury real estate developers during her campaign, claiming that their buildings hiked up rent prices and pushed low-income residents out of their neighborhoods.
She said:
“We need to kick luxury real estate lobbyists to the curb and defend working people’s way of life,” Ocasio-Cortez said last March. “Skyrocketing cost of living is a national crisis that CAN be addressed. It’s not just an NYC issue – it’s happening in every US metro area.”
Apartments in the building currently start at $1,840 per month for a 440 square foot studio, and range up to $5,200 for a three-bedroom. The average rent in Washington D.C. is $1,340 for a one-bedroom apartment and $1,550 for a two-bedroom, according to the most recent data from Apartment List.
A few points come to mind.
When was the last time you made $174,000 a year?
Am I staring to identify a trend here?
And isn’t another quote emerging from the brilliant book by Eric Arthur Blair, otherwise known as George Orwell?
Uh-oh. Temerity happened. Some people began to point out aforementioned hypocrisy. Damn their eyes! Must be #BecauseFoxNews!
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez scolded media outlets for reporting that she lives in a luxury high-rise building in Washington, DC, around the time she and other high-profile Democrats appeared on a hit list compiled by a Maryland man arrested for allegedly planning a mass terror attack.
For her, that wasn’t the point. It was an excuse. She felt “doxxed” though she wasn’t. On the other hand, “doxxing” is a very important and salient tactic utilized by her ilk on the Left. It’s just nifty to reveal the address of Tucker Carlson. It’s BAD to reveal HER address. Or even hint that she lives in one of the more tony locations in DC, the Navy Yard.
It’s also worse to point out her hypocrisy. That’s the issue here.
The articles pointed out Ocasio-Cortez’s platform as a champion of the poor and took her to task for living in an upscale building that they claimed didn’t offer affordable housing.
But wait. Speaking of addresses, there seems to be another issue. Did she even live in her district? From the NYPost.com:
US Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez scrambled Sunday to explain why neighbors at her listed Bronx address never saw her there — and ended up claiming she recently relocated to a larger place nearby.
The day after The Post reported that residents said they had never seen her around — and she ducked questions about it after an appearance — her spokesman said the Democratic freshman congresswoman now lives with her boyfriend in a two-bedroom apartment “a block and a half away.’’
The recent move still didn’t explain why residents at her previous digs — a one-bedroom Bronx condo owned by her mom — insisted they had never seen her there.
Members of Congress are required to have a residence in the state they represent.
Hello? Trend? Pattern? Even Bueller?
Ocasio-Cortez, a former bartender-turned-progressive pacesetter, ducked questions about her residence after an appearance Saturday in Queens. She told The Post to wait for her to pose for a photograph — then slipped out a back door and into a waiting SUV.
You mean an SUV the likes of which she proscribes for YOU but deems necessary for HER? No “fossil fuel gas guzzlers” for YOU but they’re just fine for HER?
The Green New Deal advocated for the entire elimination of internal combustion engines. And with the myriad of options available to her — including Toyota, Nissan, GM, Ford and Chrysler hybrids — she still chose a massive SUV with two people aboard? Her and the driver? At minimum? With at least SIX other seats available? Prove otherwise.
Yet she chose an SUV? Sure smacks of elitism and hypocrisy to me.
The star freshman Democrat – along with other lawmakers – had strongly criticized the planned opening of Amazon’s second headquarters in New York.
So, after Jeff Bezos’ tech giant announced Thursday it was pulling the plug on its proposed Long Island City location, the Bronx native had something to celebrate.
Of course. The loss of what is estimated to be between 24,000 to 25,000 new jobs.
“Anything is possible: today was the day a group of dedicated, everyday New Yorkers & their neighbors defeated Amazon’s corporate greed, its worker exploitation, and the power of the richest man in the world,” she tweeted.
It came after Amazon said in a statement that pushback from New York lawmakers was a key factor in the decision to cancel its plans.
“After much thought and deliberation, we’ve decided not to move forward with our plans to build a headquarters for Amazon in Long Island City, Queens,” the statement read.
“For Amazon, the commitment to build a new headquarters requires positive, collaborative relationships with state and local elected officials who will be supportive over the long-term.
Evil Amazon with its evil jobs and evil tax revenue!
Earlier this month, Ocasio-Cortez trashed the plan – which had promised to create 25,000 jobs and over $27.5 billion in tax revenue in 25 years – and called on “everyday people” to “effectively organize against creeping overreach of one of the world’s biggest corporations.”
And all this in just three months.
Why stop there? AOC decided it was time to drop her snout into the trough of Free Cheese. Free Cheese for her and hers, though, not for you.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez faces questions after her boyfriend gets congressional email account
by Lukas Mikelionis
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is facing ethics questions after revelations the freshman lawmaker’s office gave her boyfriend a congressional email account.
The democratic socialist waded into the issue in response to a tweet alleging boyfriend Riley Roberts had been put on staff. The tweet included a screenshot of an official House email address. Ocasio-Cortez insisted that he was only given the email account so he could access her calendar.
What’s wrong with that?
Asked about the arrangement, David O’Boyle, the spokesperson for the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer, told Fox News: “From time to time, at the request of members, spouses and partners are provided House email accounts for the purposes of viewing the member’s calendar.”
But Jason Chaffetz, former chairman of the House Oversight Committee, said Ocasio-Cortez’ claims don’t stack up.
“It’s totally naïve and inappropriate – you wouldn’t allow it in most companies, let alone the House of Representatives. There should be real consequences,” Chaffetz told Fox News.
Considering his history and tenure, it would seem that Chaffetz might know a thing or three.
Chaffetz said that Roberts having email access could also create other security issues and the matter should be referred to the Capitol Police for further investigation.
“Being given a password to get into the House computer system has other potentially problematic issues,” he said.
Remember this line, though:
Saikat Chakrabarti, the congresswoman’s chief of staff, insisted that the boyfriend isn’t on the payroll and that he’s not doing any work related to the government.
The storm was beginning to brew. We started to see whitecaps. Meanwhile, back at the ranch:
Ocasio-Cortez Says White People Are Racist Because They All Inherit Houses From Their Parents
Ocasio-Cortez went on to argue that a lack of understanding of the policies behind white wealth helps promote racism against African-Americans and other minorities.
“When people are not educated about the tools and the systems that created racial wealth gap disparities or other wealth gap disparities … you create this gaping maw in which someone can tell a racist story that kind of tells people why a certain community is poor.”
“They’re poor because they’re lazy. They’re poor because they’re uneducated. They’re poor because this,” Ocasio-Cortez continued, mimicking a racist. “Where no ones say they’re poor because they’re redlining and everyone else inherited a house except for people of color.”
I got a free house. Didn’t you inherit one also? Shhh, don’t tell anyone, but everyone is automatically granted one free house from an inheritance.
You see, she doesn’t want you to know that her own mother left the state of New York for Florida because of the ridiculously-exorbitant taxes in New York. She also doesn’t want you do know that her actually living in New York — is in question.
Ocasio-Cortez previously claimed that she has lived since 2011 in a mortgage-free, fourth-floor condo in Parkchester, which according to records was bought by her dad, Sergio Ocasio, who died in 2008.
After The Post reported a next-door neighbor and another fourth-floor resident saying they have never seen the self-proclaimed socialist living there, Trent denied the residents’ claims, saying her family’s apartment “was home, period, for her,’’ according to the Daily Mail.
Read that again. If this isn’t an “inherited house,” then I don’t know what is:
Ocasio-Cortez previously claimed that she has lived since 2011 in a mortgage-free, fourth-floor condo in Parkchester, which according to records was bought by her dad, Sergio Ocasio, who died in 2008.
Yeah, it’s another Hypocrisy Alert. And all this in just three months.
The actual work is terrible! She had no idea this was going to be so much work! Egads! This was supposed to be easy! I was supposed to sweep in, say a few things, they’d happen, I’d be worshiped and adored for my striking jaw line, great skin and overall cuteness — then I could par-tay at the new digs!
Just after midnight Friday, the Democratic darling tweeted a clip of Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern saying that her “thoughts” were with the victims and families of the shooting in Christchurch.
“At 1st I thought of saying, ‘Imagine being told your house of faith isn’t safe anymore.’ But I couldn’t say ‘imagine.’ Because of Charleston. Pittsburgh. Sutherland Springs,” Ocasio-Cortez wrote. “What good are your thoughts & prayers when they don’t even keep the pews safe?”
Good to know you’re a typical Leftist, dear.
Of course, AOC took umbrage in the overall reaction to her questioning of Wells Fargo CEO Timothy Sloan, which was an abortive word salad of non-sequiturish gurp in her attempt to make Wells Fargo responsible for, well, anything and everything she doesn’t like. She thinks it’s their job to care one tinker’s tit for “climate justice,” whatever the hell that may be.
Ocasio-Cortez Melts Down Amid Mockery Of Her Wells Fargo Questions
During a House Financial Services Committee meeting hosted by Chairwoman Maxine Waters on Tuesday, democratic socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY) attempted to take down Wells Fargo CEO Timothy Sloan on the issue of climate change — and ended up inspiring widespread backlash for her non sequitur questions. Amid the wave of criticism for her performance at the hearing, the freshman representative and former bartender issued a series of tweets pushing back against those poking holes in her global warming logic.
At the hearing, titled “Holding Megabanks Accountable: An Examination of Wells Fargo’s Pattern of Consumer Abuses,” Ocasio-Cortez launched into a series of causally problematic accusations, attempting to blame the bank for the “caging of children” at the border, hypothetical “spills,” and “when we have to reinvest in infrastructure building sea walls from the erosion of … infrastructure or cleanups, wildfires.”
Then shite started to get real. And we found out that, yeah, AOC got her beak wet early.
And all this in just three months.
But here’s what you’re not seeing and hearing. Remember that guy Saikat Chakrabarti?
A conservative government watchdog group filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission accusing Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s top aide of funneling $1 million in donations into his private accounts in a possible violation of the law, according to a report.
The transfers were made by Saikat Chakrabarti, Ocasio-Cortez’s chief of staff, and may have run afoul of the Federal Election Campaign Act that places a limit of $5,000 on contributions from political action committees to candidates, the Washington Examiner reported Tuesday.
The complaint, filed Monday by the National Legal and Policy Center, said the transfers violated the law because PACs must disclose what those funds were used for — such as advertisements, payments to vendors and donations to candidates.
Former FEC Commissioners Say Ocasio-Cortez Could Face Serious Prison Time For FEC Violation
by Carmine Sabia
New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and her chief of staff Saikat Chakrabarti could be facing prison time for a major campaign finance violation.
The two were running a PAC that supported her campaign in the 2018 election which is a major no no and now they could be forced to pay the consequences, The Daily Caller reported.
Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and her chief of staff Saikat Chakrabarti obtained majority control of Justice Democrats PAC in December 2017, according to archived copies of the group’s website, and the two appear to retain their control of the group, according to corporate filings obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation. If the Federal Election Commission (FEC) finds that the New York Democrat’s campaign operated in affiliation with the PAC, which had raised more than $1.8 million before her June 2018 primary, it would open them up to “massive reporting violations, probably at least some illegal contribution violations exceeding the lawful limits,” former FEC commissioner Brad Smith said.
Ocasio-Cortez never disclosed to the FEC that she and Chakrabarti, who served as her campaign chair, controlled the PAC while it was simultaneously supporting her primary campaign, and former FEC commissioners say the arrangement could lead to multiple campaign finance violations. The group backed 12 Democrats during the 2018 midterms, but Ocasio-Cortez was the only one of those to win her general election.
Former FEC Commissioner Hans von Spakovsky told The Daily Caller News Foundation “If the facts as alleged are true, and a candidate had control over a PAC that was working to get that candidate elected, then that candidate is potentially in very big trouble and may have engaged in multiple violations of federal campaign finance law, including receiving excessive contributions.”
And another former commissioner of the FEC, Brad Smith, said if “a complaint were filed, I would think it would trigger a serious investigation.”
Ocasio-Cortez and top aide officially removed from board of Justice Democrats PAC after FEC complaint
Democratic Rep. Alexandria-Ocasio Cortez and her top aide are no longer board members of the outside PAC credited with orchestrating her political rise, according to a corporate document filed Friday to a Washington, D.C. agency.
The New York Democrat and her chief of staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, who served as her campaign chair, joined the board of Justice Democrats in December 2017, according to the political action committee’s website. It also said the two held “legal control over the entity” at the same time it was playing a key role in supporting Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign prior to her shock victory over incumbent Democratic Rep. Joe Crowley in June 2018.
But wait; there’s more.
It’s unclear why it took Justice Democrats more than eight months to formally remove Ocasio-Cortez from its board. The PAC did not respond to a request for comment.
Ocasio-Cortez never disclosed to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) that she and Chakrabarti controlled Justice Democrats while it simultaneously supported her primary campaign.
It went from emails to outright fraud. And all this in just three months.
With some blowback as well, in just three months of her sweetness and innocent joy. Innocent joy in getting her beak wet early.
Ocasio-Cortez’s ‘unfavorable’ rating skyrockets, with most people viewing her negatively: poll
by Lukas Mikelionis
U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s unfavorable rating has spiked after just months in Congress, with most of the public viewing her negatively rather than favorably, a new poll shows.
The New York Democrat shot to fame amid the party’s lurch to the left and embracement of socialist policies such as the Green New Deal, yet the more people learned about the 29-year-old freshman congresswoman, the more they were turned off by her.
Imagine that. This freshman Congresscritter that was embracing the most transparent House seat in the history of history (sound familiar?) is now attempting to be the one with the largest potential crash in history. And all this in just three months.
A Gallup poll released Friday shows that Ocasio-Cortez’s unfavorable rating has risen by 15 points since last September, when she had yet to win the general election, increasing from 26 percent to 41 percent of the American adults polled.
But wait. It gets even stranger. Is Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez nothing more than someone who answered a casting call for someone to play the part of a New York Congresscritter. This is documented by her as well as others on audio and video.
Wait again. The people who brought her in — the Justice Democrats — just kicked her out. From today:
Ocasio-Cortez de-listed from board of Justice Democrats after controversy
by Adam Shaw
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., reportedly has been de-listed from the board of left-wing activist group Justice Democrats, following legal and ethical questions about her affiliation with the group.
The Daily Caller reported that Ocasio-Cortez, along with chief of staff and former campaign chair Saikat Chakrabarti, have been removed from the board of the political action committee after previously holding “legal control over the entity” in late 2017 and early 2018.
You see how it fits together now?
And doesn’t it make you ask: is she anything more than a puppet? Are the Tweets really hers? Is the script really hers? Is she fed her opinions and speeches?
You might want to rethink that position because, well, he’ll have ready police protection to defend himself. But you won’t. Law enforcement won’t either.
Gillum: Police Are Going ‘Too Far’ if They Pull Out Gun, Baton, Taser in Line of Duty
by Cameron Cawthorne
Andrew Gillum, the Democratic nominee in Florida’s gubernatorial race, said Wednesday that police are going “too far” if they have to pull out a gun, baton, or taser when approaching a potential suspect.
Gillum made the comment on the liberal podcast “Pod Save America,” where he pushed back against his Republican critics who believe he is an anti-police candidate.
Here’s the money quote, right off the bat.
“All this stuff that they say, I’ve got to let them know, anti-police? No. I’m for police accountability, but law enforcement society cannot work and, quite frankly, law enforcement cannot do its job if it does not have a trusting relationship with the community,” Gillum said.
“At the time that a law enforcement official has to go to a weapon, to a gun, to a baton, to a taser, then they have already have to go too far by their very presence,” he continued. “By the very trust that they inspire in community and in society, they are supposed to be able to bring most situations to heel.”
Because kind, loving and softly-spoken words work so well in any given critical incident.
Let’s listen to Gillum:
Let us not forget this is the same Andrew Gillum referenced in an article from RealClearPolitics.com:
Gillum’s Anti-Law Enforcement Agenda for Florida
by Steve Hantler
The past several years have witnessed the radical left using law enforcement as a political target, which has increased the risks for those in uniform and hurt public safety. Andrew Gillum, the so-called “democratic socialist” candidate for governor of Florida, represents the triumph of the progressive left’s approach to law enforcement, and a victory by him in November would lead to a statewide increase in crime.
That Florida would see such a rise under Gillum is not fanciful speculation but an obvious inference from his tenure as mayor of Tallahassee. On his watch, the city/Leon County metro area has had the highest crime rate in the state for four years running.
Stop. Let’s read that again.
On his watch, the city/Leon County metro area has had the highest crime rate in the state for four years running. Last year, Tallahassee had the highest number of murders in the city’s history.
Then, in a wee bit of irony and what I can “schadenfreude,” there was this:
Incredibly, Gillum’s former chief of staff, Dustin Daniels, who is running to succeed him as mayor, is campaigning aggressively against Gillum’s failed leadership. “Tallahassee had the highest number of murders in history last year,” Daniels wrote in a campaign mailer, “and we top the state for the highest crime rate. WE MUST DO BETTER.”
Look, if you can’t sit on the bank of the river and watch the bodies of your enemy float serenely by, then what’s the point of any victory?
It is simply inarguable that Gillum has failed to keep the city of Tallahassee safe.
Given his ideological radicalism, it is not surprising that he has failed so spectacularly. In fact, Gillum is the most anti-law-enforcement candidate to be nominated by a major party in modern Florida history.
But wait; there’s more as BZ is wont to say.
Take, for example, his strong support for the radical group Dream Defenders. During a Democratic gubernatorial primary debate, Gillum endorsed the agenda of the Dream Defenders from the stage, gushing that he was “pleased and proud” to “stand up for” and “stand beside” the group, which has, among other stances, likened Israel’s treatment of Palestinians to the apartheid system.
Gillum received the endorsement of the Dream Defenders and promised to support the group’s manifesto, The Freedom Papers, which denounce law enforcement as “racist” and liken the police to “slave catchers.” The manifesto calls for the abolishment of the police and prisons, asserting that “police and prisons have no place in ‘justice.’” Accordingly, the Freedom Papers call for a radical reduction in law enforcement funding, demanding “reinvestment … into social services in our community.”
I say to the state of Florida: if you want your state to be devoid of taxpayers and normal people, keep this up. Regular humans are fleeing the state if for no other reason that all of Florida’s animals seem to wish to kill humans — its snakes, alligators, constrictors and the like — and the weather exists to wipe everyone out.
This manifesto slanders all those in Florida who don the uniform to protect and serve their communities, which, of course, includes law enforcement personnel of all races, colors and creeds. By sliming law enforcement as racist and by likening police officers to slave catchers, the Gillum-endorsed Freedom Papers place a target on the backs of officers.
What’s more, enacting the call for massive reductions in funding for law enforcement would virtually guarantee a crime wave in Florida. Outside of Tallahassee, crime has dropped dramatically in the state over that past 20 years, yet this decline was achieved through hard work and support for law enforcement by elected officials. Combining funding cuts with a governor who is antagonistic to law enforcement would spell disaster for the safety of Florida’s communities.
Add that Andrew Gillum wants to kill you if you’re Conservative or a Caucasoid? Pull the ripcord. He’s not speaking to you Caspars. He’s speaking to followers of Ray Nagin.
Of course, Gillum not only supports the “abolish ICE” movement but would make Florida, like California, a sanctuary state. He has pledged not to cooperate with the Trump administration regarding the removal of illegal aliens from the state, which will place the people of Florida at risk of criminal activity committed by illegal aliens who should have been removed from the United States. This will only lead to the creation of more “angel moms” – mothers who have lost children to illegal alien crime.
Andrew Gillum is another in a continuing series of boring racist progressive Socialist yada yada yada black men who, well, hate Caucasoids but couch their ranguage in gutterspeak, pablumspeak, racespeak and simpspeak.
As opposed to perhaps some other Republicans, I’m not remotely interested in attempting to “reason” with Gillum or “reach across the aisle” to him.
Oh no. I’m here to demolish him and his ideologies.
There’s no reasoning with insanity and frothing sociopathic word bubbles.
Make no mistake. I couldn’t proffer one fresh, steaming turd about Gillum’s melanin count. I only care that he’s dangerously stupid and, frankly, insane.
Disarming law enforcement. Now there’s a great idea.
The LDAMM understand only one thing:
Power. Naked power.
Let’s show them that on November 6th.
This election is ours to lose, not theirs to win.
BZ
P.S.
Oh wait. With one tiny exception: the detail that protects Andrew Gillum himself. They’ll still be keeping their firearms and Tasers.
We know that, according to the LDAMM — Leftists, Demorats and the American Media Maggots — Judge Brett Kavanaugh is nothing short of the Devil’s Spawn due to his alleged sexual misconduct 36 years ago whilst a high schooler.
A little tough to prove. But who cares? It’s all about the process of destruction.
However, much, much easier to prove are recent allegations of sexual misconduct involving two darker Demorat brethren, specifically Corey Booker, he of the googly eyes, and good Muslim Keith Ellison.
IN COLLEGE COLUMN, CORY BOOKER REVEALED TIME HE GROPED FRIEND, AND SHE RESISTED
by Charles C. Johnson
Writing for his college paper, Cory Booker once admitted that he groped a friend when he was 15 years old.
Now the mayor of Newark and a candidate for New Jersey’s open Senate seat, a college-aged Booker described the experience of grabbing the girl’s breast and having his hand pushed away.
“Telling one’s own personal story is often the most powerful way to make a point, or, more importantly, to make people think,” Booker wrote in the February 19, 1992 column for the Stanford Daily, under the headline “So Much for Stealing Second.”
Stop. Let’s recognize this as what it is: a tacit admission of guilt gone so far as to have been printed boldly and cavalierly in black ink. Thinking, I suppose, that no one important is involved and, well, it’s only a little girl so “who cares,” right?
“New Year’s Eve 1984,” Booker recalled. “I will never forget. I was 15. As the ball dropped, I leaned over to hug a friend and she met me instead with an overwhelming kiss.”
Things apparently moved very quickly for the young man, who recalled thinking of sex as a “game.”
“As we fumbled upon the bed, I remember debating my next ‘move’ as if it were a chess game. With the ‘Top Gun’ slogan ringing in my head, I slowly reached for her breast. After having my hand pushed away once, I reached my ‘mark,’” Booker wrote.
Was the female victim awake and cognizant of what was happening? Apparently not.
“Our grouping ended soon and while no ‘relationship’ ensued, a friendship did,” he wrote. “You see, the next week in school she told me she was drunk that night and didn’t really know what she was doing.”
In my state, that’s called rape under PC 261(a)(4):
261. (a) Rape is an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a
person not the spouse of the perpetrator, under any of the following
circumstances:
(4) Where a person is at the time unconscious of the nature of the
act, and this is known to the accused. As used in this paragraph,
"unconscious of the nature of the act" means incapable of resisting
because the victim meets one of the following conditions:
(A) Was unconscious or asleep.
(B) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant that the act
occurred.
(C) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant of the
essential characteristics of the act due to the perpetrator's fraud
in fact.
(D) Was not aware, knowing, perceiving, or cognizant of the
essential characteristics of the act due to the perpetrator's
fraudulent representation that the sexual penetration served a
professional purpose when it served no professional purpose.
This isn’t “theoretical” or therapy-derivative. It’s an admission by Booker of a series of events. Quite completely unlike the Kavanaugh situation.which, unless God magically intervenes, cannot be proven in any way, shape or form. Then:
Booker wrote about how alcohol lubricated those relations: “Another friend in high school counseled me on the importance of drinking,” he wrote, detailing the slogans he had heard from friends. Booker listed them: “‘With liquor you’ll get to bed quicker,’ … ‘What do you think happened? She invited me back to her room at 3 a.m.’ … ‘I’ve got to find a way to snatch that snatch.’ … ‘The best thing for that girl would be to be tied down and screwed.’”
Then there is the hypocrisy of Muslim Keith Ellison, who is alleged to have abused his girlfriend in a domestic violence situation. Karen Monahan posted her medical record detailing her injuries this past Wednesday.
Keith Ellison’s ex-girlfriend shares medical record detailing abuse allegation. Karen Monahan posted the document on Twitter Wednesday.
by Adam Uren
Karen Monahan has released one of her medical records that shows she discussed the alleged domestic abuse by Rep. Keith Ellison with her doctor.
Ellison’s ex-girlfriend posted the document from Park Nicollet Clinic, dated November 28, 2017 on Twitter Wednesday.
It records that she had presented symptoms of anemia, and that she told her doctor “she was in a very stressful environment for years, emotional and physical abuse by a partner from whom she is now separated.”
It then goes on to say: “She identifies the individual she was involved with as congressman Ellison, and she is now worried about retribution if she identifies him publicly.”
But wait; I thought Demorats insist that every woman’s allegation of abuse should be believed.
As the document is dated last November, this is 9 months before Monahan went public with her allegation against Ellison, which happened a few days ahead of the Minnesota DFL primaries in August. This came after the alleged domestic abuse was initially revealed in a post by her son on Facebook.
Her son said Ellison had subjected her to “pure hell” during the two year relationship that end in 2016, with Monahan herself saying she was a victim of “narcissist abuse.”
She also says she has a 2-minute video showing Ellison physically and verbally abusing her, including pulling her off a bed by her feet. This footage has not been released, with Monahan saying she doesn’t intend to and that it’s packed up on a flash drive somewhere in storage.
It doesn’t end there, of course. The Demorats themselves have taken it upon themselves to accuse the victim in this case. From the DailyCaller.com:
WOMAN ACCUSING DNC CO-CHAIR OF ABUSE DESCRIBE HOW DEMOCRATS ‘SMEARED, THREATENED, ISOLATED’ HER
by Benny Johnson
DNC Deputy Chair and Minnesota Congressman Keith Ellison has been accused domestic abuse by former girlfriend Karen Monahan. Monahan broke her story earlier in the year, claiming to have video evidence of Ellison physically abusing her and using sexist slurs toward her.
Monahan has been slowly telling her story through Twitter, explaining how Democrats in her state attempted to silence her and “isolate” her. When a follower asked if Democrats believed her claims, Monahan said, “I’ve been smeared, threatened, isolated from my own party.”
Monahan alleges she provided medical records to back up her claims of abuse, but state Democrats did nothing: “I provided medical records from 2017, stating on two different Dr. Visits, I told them about the abuse and who did it. My therapist released records stating I have been dealing [with] and healing from the abuse.”
“I knew I wouldn’t be believed,” Monahan said of her Democratic colleagues.
Isn’t it odd how two males are accused, yet nothing happens to them? There is a difference, though. They are black, and they are Demorats. Aha. There’s your difference.
Demorats, you are what you embrace. And you continue to embrace serial rapists, misogynists, serial sexual harassers, gropers, semen-spreaders and all of their powerful female enablers.
Let’s be honest. Hillary Clinton put up with all of Bill’s serial sexual abuse because she was promised that, one day, should would hold the reins of presidential power. It was her “turn” in 2008 — only to have some fresh uppity black man interfere — and in 2016, only to have — OMG, even worse! — some guy with a dead orange cat on his head kick her fainting arse to the electoral and popular voting curb. But wait. It’s said that Hillary took the “popular vote” by two million. Uh, yeah. About that. A minimum of two million illegals from California and other states cast their ballots but, due to checks and balances, the Orange Guy won.
We’ll place credence in you, Demorats, when you start to clean up your own house.
Figure 1:One of the greatest separators of children from families in the history of California: 53-year-old Kamala Devi Harris, admitted career prosecutor.
Because once again they fail to ask the truly salient question. We’ll get to that in a moment. It’s all just more melodramatic Kabuki Theater, distractions, bread and circuses.
Official White House Twitter account blasts Dem senators critical of ICE
by Brett Samuels
The official White House Twitter account targeted Democratic senators on Monday who have voiced support for abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Over the course of Monday afternoon, the government account accused Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) of supporting gang members and criminals because of their opposition to the immigration agency’s methods.
“@SenKamalaHarris, why are you supporting the animals of MS-13? You must not know what ICE really does. Here is a link to help you out,” the White House tweeted, along with a link to a government press release about two deportations earlier this month.
But let’s back up that car wash for a moment or three, shall we?
There was the Tweet and the White House response. They were accurate. Kamala Harris lied like hell by a determined omission. Here is why.
Second, she purposely failed to tell you that, “as a career prosecutor,” when she “went after gangs and transnational criminal organizations” that didn’t occur in a vacuum.
All of these people at one time or another were arrested with mothers and families present — who’s not to say that some of them weren’t female in the first place? — and by dint of that fact multiple families were in fact separated because of the very nature of an arrest itself.
Males (or in some cases females) are taken to local jails — in her case the San Francisco County Jail — where men are taken to male facilities and women to female facilities. Children do not accompany either by California law. Juveniles cannot be mixed with adults in custody by law. They are separated from their families by force. The force utilized by Kamala Harris under her authority and her direction.
MS-13 and gangs and transnational criminal organizations are run by men who create babies carried by women directly or indirectly involved in these groups. Most know precisely what it is that their men are doing. Some are dupes, some are raped, all have created a family unit of some sort willingly or unwillingly.
Children ripped from mother, fathers, parents, became wards of the County of San Francisco system that, by definition, fails to provide fully for these children. They become governmental numbers and statistics. To be fudged by bureaucrats.
Kamala Harris is proud that, “as a career prosecutor,” she separated these families.
Meaning: she did more personal damage to once-intact families than President Trump ever has. Hell. She made a career of it. For not just weeks or months but years. Which is how she became the California Attorney General and then a California Senator — again separating every family she prosecuted — and proudly saying so.
Stop with your bleeding blubbering, TheHill.com. Your umbrage is noted but is about as genuine as tears from Hannibal Lecter.
Jabba or Jerry? Which is the true Hutt?
Of all the things that you can say about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), one of them isn’t that she’s stupid. Or is she?
Roll with me here for a moment. She truly is a 
Uh-oh. Temerity happened. Some people began to point out aforementioned hypocrisy. Damn their eyes! Must be #BecauseFoxNews!
You mean an SUV the likes of which she proscribes for YOU but deems necessary for HER? No “fossil fuel gas guzzlers” for YOU but they’re just fine for HER?
You might want to rethink that position because, well, he’ll have ready police protection to defend himself. But you won’t. Law enforcement won’t either.
We know that, according to the LDAMM — Leftists, Demorats and the American Media Maggots — Judge Brett Kavanaugh is nothing short of the Devil’s Spawn due to his alleged sexual misconduct 36 years ago whilst a high schooler.
Then there is the hypocrisy of Muslim Keith Ellison, who is alleged to have abused his girlfriend in a domestic violence situation. 
But wait; I thought Demorats insist that every woman’s allegation of abuse should be believed.
There was the Tweet and the White House response. They were accurate. Kamala Harris lied like hell by a determined omission. Here is why.