From DailyCaller.com:

In the progressive future, men will not be able to look at women’s bodies because that is a terrible thing to do — and science says so.

Researchers have offered a definitive report into the science of the male “objectifying gaze” in the December 2013 volume of “Sex Roles: A Journal of Research” (Volume 69, Issue 11-12, pp 557-570).

“Although objectification theory suggests that women frequently experience the objectifying gaze with many adverse consequences, there is scant research examining the nature and causes of the objectifying gaze for perceivers. The main purpose of this work was to examine the objectifying gaze toward women via eye tracking technology,” according to the abstract of “My Eyes Are Up Here: The Nature of the Objectifying Gaze Toward Women” by Sarah J. Gervais, Arianne M. Holland, and Michael D. Dodd.

In other words, attractive women get “looked at” more than unattractive women. Boo-frakking-hoo. The same is true for men.

Now: men “checking out” women should be illegal, Leftists believe.

First: the Speech Police
Second: the Thought Police
Next: the Eye Police

Sad thing: these Leftists are actually serious.

That men “objectify” women in some cases is true. It is also true that women objectify themselves as frequently — or more.

From a UKDailyMailOnline article:

Women spend more time checking out OTHER WOMEN than they do men (and it’s their clothes, figures and hair we’re most interested in)

Ever get the feeling your boyfriend is looking at other women as you walk down the street?

Well, perhaps he’s picking up the habit from you.

Women spend more time checking out other women than they do checking out men, keen to see what ‘the opposition’ is wearing, how much cellulite they have, what their hair looks like and how thin they are, according to a new study.

Let’s also get into some stats that your local police and sheriff departments will absolutely refuse to reveal:

1. Close to half of the reported rapes to LE agencies are false;
2. Women strike men only slightly less than men strike women. The difference exists regarding the disparity in physical size between men and women, and the fact that men predominantly refuse to report physical abuse due to such reporting perceived as being “unmasculine.” Finally: women verbally abuse men with much greater frequency and efficacy than the reverse.

Both men and women know this.

Ask women who they’d rather their supervisor be. And ask women if they’d like to work in an all-female environment.

I used to say when I worked Patrol that I became very tired of my utilization as the Womens’ Gestapo. That sexist paradigm continues to exist today.

Leftists: get over yourselves. This crap is laughable.

Another reason so few of you live in Reality.

P.S.
One salient comment from the article that bespeaks a massive amount of Leftist Truth:

This ONLY applies to straight (conservatives). Rump wranglers and fur traders can do as they always do……………..

Check the comments; there exists some funny and poignant stuff.

“So, 4000 rubes are dead. Cry me the Tigris. Another 30,000 have been seriously wounded. Boo fucking hoo. They got what they asked for–and cool robotic limbs too.”

Thus begins a virulent anti-American soldier screed titled “Fuck the Troops,” written by Politico Magazine reporter Ian Murphy during the Iraq War. His current offering for Politico, “How I Punked Scott Walker,” appeared yesterday as the number two profiled story in the website’s new magazine. It describes Murphy’s failed attempt to upend the Wisconsin Governor’s historic battle against public service union collective bargaining rights.

Murphy’s May 2008 column appeared as the intense combat of “the surge” was winding down. As Murphy said “…our soldiers are lauded by all as saints. Why? They volunteered to partake in this savage idiocy, and for this they deserve our utmost repsect. I think not… stop sucking off the troops. They get enough action raping female soldiers and sodomizing Iraqi detainees.”

Murphy goes on to question young Americans’ service in defense of their country:

As a society we need to discard our blind deference to military service. There’s nothing admirable about voluteering to murder people… but what kind of world would we rather live in: one where fools are admired for being fooled and murderers are extolled for murdering, or one where we have the capacity to step back and say, “I don’t care who told you to do what and why; you’re still an asshole!”

Perfect! I think that perhaps The Bystander and Politico writer Ian Murphy should get together. They apparently don’t much care for soldiers, and certainly don’t believe that soldiers deserve any more praise than toilet cleaners; perhaps much less.

But — I simply cannot understand that tack.

Bloviating Zeppelin

Right thinking from a Left brain.

Category Archives: Leftists

Liberals want to stop men from checking out women

Women spend more time checking out OTHER WOMEN than they do men (and it’s their clothes, figures and hair we’re most interested in)

The very best of Leftism from Politico: “Politico Reporter: ‘F*ck the Troops”

“So, 4000 rubes are dead. Cry me the Tigris. Another 30,000 have been seriously wounded. Boo fucking hoo. They got what they asked for–and cool robotic limbs too.”