CSI Syria:

If there were a better chain of custody.  .  .

From JTA.org:

Obama: ‘Chain of custody’ needed for Syria action

WASHINGTON (JTA) — President Obama said he needs to have all the facts on who used chemical weapons in Syria before taking further action.

“What we now have is evidence that chemical weapons have been used inside of Syria, but we don’t know how they were used, when they were used, who used them,” Obama said Tuesday at a news conference. “We don’t have a chain of custody that establishes what exactly happened. And when I am making decisions about America’s national security and the potential for taking additional action in response to chemical weapon use, I’ve got to make sure I’ve got the facts.”

“We don’t have a chain of custody that establishes what exactly happened.”

CSI Syria.

Obaka drew a red line.  Then he pulled that red line and kicked it up a few hundred thousand feet.

BZ

P.S.
Charles Krauthammer responds.

 

 

Ed Henry, Fox News, catches Jay Carney in a series of lies regarding sequester

First, the video:

And then, the link, here.

Rentoon, rentoon, rentoon, bullshit bullshit bullshit, blah blah blah.

Carney then mocked Henry, saying “feel free to convey to your viewers and readers that the sequester doesn’t matter.”

It still amazes me that Mr Carney can continue to so religiously fellate in such an advanced fashion into the Obama regime’s second term.

Frankly, at this late date, Carney sounds a bit like Baghdad Bob.


Baghdad Bob by US_Marine_Hoorah

BZ

 

 

Bob Woodward: Obama has a “kind of madness”

And I most certainly agree.

I already wrote here that I believe Mr Obama has NPD, which is Narcissistic Personality Disorder.  You can hear it every day, over and over and over, in his speeches.  He loves the sound of his voice, and every tenth word is “I.”  Because, after all, it’s all about him.

Here, Woodward takes Mr Obama to task.  Things have gotten so bad in DC that historic Liberals are starting to stutter-step:

Bob Woodward blasted President Obama on Wednesday morning for deciding to recall an aircraft carrier from the Persian Gulf because of impending budget cuts, calling the decision “a kind of madness.”

Woodward: “Can you imagine Ronald Reagan sitting there and saying ‘Oh, by the way, I can’t do this because of some budget document?’ Or George W. Bush saying, ‘You know, I’m not going to invade Iraq because I can’t get the aircraft carriers I need’ or even Bill Clinton saying, ‘You know, I’m not going to attack Saddam Hussein’s intelligence headquarters,’ as he did when Clinton was president because of some budget document? Under the Constitution, the president is commander-in-chief and employs the force. And so we now have the president going out because of this piece of paper and this agreement, I can’t do what I need to do to protect the country. That’s a kind of madness that I haven’t seen in a long time.”

Mr Obama wants you to hurt.  He wants you to feel pain.  He wants you to feel the shock and agony that he allegedly feels by those evil sequestration cuts.

First, he’s releasing illegal Mexicans and then kicking Janet Napolitano to the curb via Jay Carney, because Mr Obama lacks the balls to do the job himself.

Mr Obama wants to make you hurt.  Because he is being defied — and he cannot possibly countenance defiance.  He wants everything and everyone and every issue held at arms’ length from him.  He absolves himself of all responsibility, culpability, capacity, charge, burden, duty or obligation.  A bit like salesmen who must be “always closing,” Mr Obama is always campaigning.  And he never is actually governing.

Mr Obama’s minions are already claiming that teachers are receiving pink slips.  Another LIE.

It’s just one massive shell game of DC lies and — I completely concur this time with Woodward — naked madness.

BZ

P.S.
New word, now, is that a “senior staffer” at the White House called Woodward and threatened him, saying that Woodward would “regret” his words about Obama.

Perfectly in keeping with the dirty tactics, lies and corruption in the Obaka Regime.

The continuance of “Chicago Politics,” anyone?