Ladies and gentlemen, what more do you need?
And still, people say they are staying home on election day, not returning absentee ballots or voting down-ticket only.
Excellent tactic ladies and gentlemen.
Apparently you do want Hillary Rodham Clinton elected.
I don’t want to hear a word from you when you disagree with HRC’s policies, positions and giveaway tactics.
BZ
What? Haven’t heard about Hillary Clinton’s verbal abuse? Just wait, it gets worse.
Ever hear about that?
Wait. You must have heard about that. No? Check Wikileaks here if you disbelieve.
Wikileaks also revealing that HRC said:
“The main reason behind successful immigration should be painfully obvious to even the most dimwitted of observers: Some groups of people are almost always highly successful given only half of a chance (Jews*, Hindus/Sikhs and Chinese people, for example), while others (Muslims, blacks** and Roma***, for instance) fare badly almost irrespective of circumstances. The biggest group of humanity can be found somewhere between these two extremes – the perennial overachievers and the professional never-do-wells.”
A heaping helping of massive racism and stereotyping, anyone?
Ever suspect the failure to cover these facts is purposeful?
Fmr Bernie Sanders staffer @TezlynFigaro brings a little sanity to the #TrumpTapes hubbub?Millennials know the score ? #BillClintonIsARapist pic.twitter.com/SoeovAWBuT
— Boston Bobblehead (@DBloom451) October 8, 2016
Trump fesses up and apologizes. Neither Bill nor Hillary will fess up or apologize.
Here is my statement. pic.twitter.com/WAZiGoQqMQ
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 8, 2016
So spare me the false umbrage. It’s political, plain and simple, nothing else.
BZ
1. CRIMINAL
More evidence of Hillary’s campaign workers SYSTEMATICALLY breaking voter registration laws. Promoting a candidate is illegal#NeverHillary pic.twitter.com/8zc9cpAvzw
— Deplorable ‘D’ Owens (@NubianAwakening) October 5, 2016
That’s odd. Ever seen individuals registering people to vote who have been outwardly soliciting Trump as a candidate, wearing Trump promotional material? Me neither. Because had they, YouTube would be rife with it, as well as the American Media Maggot lapdoggies for Hillary.
You may not know it, but promoting a specific candidate whilst attempting to register people to vote is a violation of election laws. If she were not promoting Hillary Clinton, then why did she walk away? Consciousness of guilt, ladies and gentlemen.
But wait. Let’s not stop with the Hillary Clinton voter fraud. Let’s show more, shall we?
Hillary’s campaign workers committing voter registration fraud in Nevada AGAIN – it’s illegal to promote a specific candidate!#NeverHillary pic.twitter.com/JWPd6hImYT
— Deplorable ‘D’ Owens (@NubianAwakening) October 5, 2016
Good to know that those registering voters are unbiased and completely neutral. Wait. Are those Hillary Clinton buttons?
2. UNENTHUSIASTIC
This is so pathetic. If @HillaryClinton weren’t so vile, I would almost feel sorry for her; but she is, and I don’t. pic.twitter.com/OLYYIkWhoZ
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) October 6, 2016
One can say that the Warden Arena literally burns with passion for presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton. Thanks to James Woods for the second video.
BZ
A few points.
Roughly 84 million people watched the presidential debate on CNN, Monday night.
Lester Holt, NBC moderator, interrupted Donald Trump 41 times.
He interrupted Hillary Clinton 7 times.
Holt challenged Trump with follow-up questions 6 times.
Holt had not one challenge question for Hillary Clinton.
Listen to Howard Kurtz speak about the debate and the interruptions here.
Lester Holt was incorrect when he braced — sorry, “fact-checked” — Donald Trump on “stop and frisk,” insisting that the concept is unconstitutional. In fact, Lester Holt is wrong and Trump is correct. “Stop and frisk” is not unconstitutional, as correctly delineated by Rudy Giuliani. He is correct: “Terry v. Ohio.” A court case even all Baby Cops know.
Finally, arguments can be made on both sides that either candidate “won” the first debate. But what is incontrovertible is this: given the “target-rich environment” that Hillary Rodham Clinton’s history provides, in my opinion Donald Trump took little advantage of it.
On Sunday I theorized that the election was Hillary Clinton’s to lose.
After the Monday debate, I theorize this: it is Trump’s election to lose if he continues to not listen to his advisers.
BZ
P.S.
Anyone besides me think that Hillary Clinton appeared to be drugged in some fashion?
So there I was, on the smart phone, when I clicked on a Drudge poll.
It asked: WHO WON THE FIRST PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE?
I clicked the button for Trump and clicked Vote. The screen above was my result. My vote did not count because of “suspicious voting patterns.” Apparently clicking on Donald Trump is suspicious.
OR: the site locked up because so many persons were voting.
Something must be happening, because Trump is winning 79.89% to Clinton’s 20.11%.
BZ