So there I was, on the smart phone, when I clicked on a Drudge poll.
It asked: WHO WON THE FIRST PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE?
I clicked the button for Trump and clicked Vote. The screen above was my result. My vote did not count because of “suspicious voting patterns.” Apparently clicking on Donald Trump is suspicious.
OR: the site locked up because so many persons were voting.
Something must be happening, because Trump is winning 79.89% to Clinton’s 20.11%.
BZ
Ah yes, more Hillary voter fraud in Nevada (What is it with Nevada anyway?):
You, of course, already watched Part I yesterday; click here to see it.
After embedding this video, I wondered: just what would you get in Google if you searched “Hillary voter fraud”?
Being Google and all, and being extra superior about its auto-filling logarithms, I immediately noticed that Google absolutely did not “auto-fill” as I typed on the keyboard. You had to type the complete phrase “Hillary voter fraud” into the field and, even with that, there was nothing provided below until you hit the ENTER key.
Try it.
Hmmm, I thought, I wonder what other search engines might be yielding?
So I tried Bing.com. Which, oddly enough, I’ve never tried before. This time, at the point I got to “Hillary voter” this is what appeared below:
How odd, I thought. “Hillary voter fraud” came up immediately and was at the top of the list. My guess: this is precisely what most persons are searching for when they begin typing that phrase.
But wait, I thought. There are other search engines. I wonder what Yahoo.com would show? I wrote “Hillary voter” in the field and this is what I received:
Once again, “Hillary voter fraud” came out on top. A real chin-scratcher, that. But what the hell, let’s try it one more time. I lastly went to Ask.com using the same methods. It came up with:
I suspected I was starting to see a pattern. It made me wonder: do you think that Google would in any way purposely jiggle its search engine AlGoreIthms with regard to Hillary Clinton or the Democrats or Leftists or voter fraud identification/information on behalf of the Democrats?
Would Larry Page or Sergei Brin or Alphabet or Eric Schmidt or Ruth Porat actually lean left on as serious an issue as this? As in, purposely skewing or hiding results that became immediately obvious on other search engines?
Nah.
BZ
P.S.
Above, please note Barack Hussein Obama meeting personally and intimately with Silicon Valley tech leaders on February 17, 2011, to include Apple CEO Steve Jobs, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Oracle CEO Larry Ellison, Google CEO Eric Schmidt (far Left, imagine that) and Twitter CEO Dick Costolo.
Is this correct?
Because if it is, then Hillary Rodham Clinton is in for a much rougher ride than she ever imagined.
Because if it is, then there is a chance for SCOTUS and our future.
Slim as it may be.
BZ
I wouldn’t have believed had I not seen the words myself.
Thomas Friedman, op-ed columnist for the New York Times, cleverly called for the outright assassination of presidential candidate Donald Trump in his Tuesday, August 9th article entitled “Trump’s Wink Wink to Second Amendment People.”
Friedman couches the true meaning of his article in the crafty guise of a response about Hillary Clinton as the victim of Trump when, in truth, the real intent is revealed in his final paragraph:
People are playing with fire here, and there is no bigger flamethrower than Donald Trump. Forget politics; he is a disgusting human being. His children should be ashamed of him. I only pray that he is not simply defeated, but that he loses all 50 states so that the message goes out across the land — unambiguously, loud and clear: The likes of you should never come this way again.
There can only be one interpretation of that last sentence — ironic, isn’t it, “last sentence”? — “the likes of you should never come this way again.”
That is the outright violent removal or total elimination, possibly by assassination, of Donald Trump.
And the US media insists that Leftists aren’t violent?
BZ
The longer Bernie Sanders stays in this race, the more that Millennials will determine not to vote for Hillary Clinton. They will even consider voting for Donald Trump, just to make a statement.
Millennials believe that, absent Bernie, Hillary is stiff, a sell-out, unlikeable, false. Those are their words.
Go figure.
BZ