And sadly, it’s all true.
Caucasoids have been forced into these levels by the labeling and stratification of all other races, genders and types, due to Leftist pressures. Everyone else can have “their own,” but Caucasoids cannot even think about “their own.”
This makes many of my readers uncomfortable, but the truth is no less.
Until there are no “favoreds,” until all are equal, no one is equal.
“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”
BZ
From the GatewayPundit.com:
by Jim Hoft
Utah policeman, Officer Bron Cruz, was cleared in the shooting death of unarmed white teen Dillon Taylor.
The confrontation was captured on camera.
Further:
The controversy over the killing of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Mo., has renewed interest in another recent police shooting.
Some of the details are similar: An unarmed young man. An officer who says the suspect refused to follow orders and behaved in a threatening manner. A decision not the charge the officer with any crime, despite an outcry from some in the community.
But there are also some key differences: Suspect Dillon Taylor, 20, was white. And in the Salt Lake City shooting, the officer wore a body camera that captured the entire incident.
Salt Lake County District Attorney Sim Gill said in a statement this week that the officer was clearly justified in the shooting, despite the fact that the suspect was unarmed, KTSU reported.
Police were called to a convenience store on a report of a man with a gun, the station reported. Officers arrived to find Taylor nearby.
Footage from the officer’s body camera appears to show Officer Bron Cruz confronting the suspect, who ignores commands to stop and show his hands.
Officers said Taylor then quickly moved his hands up from his waistband, prompting Cruz to shoot him in the chest and stomach.
The suspect subsequently died. No weapons were found nearby.
Hands up. Don’t shoot. A meme for the stupid, the ignorant, the racists.
BZ
First, check SketchFactor.com.
This is now an “app” created for various smart phones, which was quantified as “SketchFactor — a community empowerment app for anyone, anywhere, at any time.”
Then, with that in mind, consider the facts. Because facts in and of themselves, these days, seem to be considered racist.
SketchFactor actually deigned to consider bad neighborhoods as bad, as criminally rife, and distinguished between areas of high crime and low crime.
By way of those terribly-racist statistics.
Launching on Friday, SketchFactor allows users to report on, read about and navigate around potentially unsafe neighborhoods.
Almost every New Yorker has had that moment: finding oneself on a strange block in an unfamiliar neighborhood late in the evening and wondering, “am I in a bad situation?”
Well, now, there’s an app to answer that question.
SketchFactor, the brainchild of co-founders Allison McGuire and Daniel Herrington, is a Manhattan-based navigation app that crowdsources user experiences along with publicly available data to rate the relative “sketchiness” of certain areas in major cities. The app will launch on iTunes on Friday, capping off a big week for the startup, which was named as a finalist in NYC BigApps, a city-sponsored competition that promotes technologies designed to improve quality of life issues in New York City and government transparency.
According to Ms. McGuire, a Los Angeles native who lives in the West Village, the impetus behind SketchFactor was her experience as a young woman navigating the streets of Washington, D.C., where she worked at a nonprofit.
There you go. Caucasoids being racist once again.
As “racists” — from Gawker.com — a website for the guilty Caucasoids amongst us:
Crain’s reports on SketchFactor, a racist app made for avoiding “sketchy” neighborhoods, which is the term young white people use to describe places where they don’t feel safe because they watched all five seasons of The Wire.
Is there any way to keep white people from using computers, before this whole planet is ruined? I ask because the two enterprising white entrepreneurs above just made yet another app for avoiding non-white areas of your town—and it’s really taking off!
These days, seldom do I take an entire post and remotely attempt to reproduce it here.
But now? Go ahead and sue me for stating what needs to be said: And I freely and grandly give Thomas Sowell sole and wondrous attribution.
A Primer on Race
by Thomas Sowell
Back in the heyday of the British Empire, a man from one of the colonies addressed a London audience.
“Please do not do any more good in my country,” he said. “We have suffered too much already from all the good that you have done.”
That is essentially the message of an outstanding new book by Jason Riley about blacks in America. Its title is “Please Stop Helping Us.” Its theme is that many policies designed to help blacks are in fact harmful, sometimes devastatingly so. These counterproductive policies range from minimum wage laws to “affirmative action” quotas.
This book untangles the controversies, the confusions, and the irresponsible rhetoric in which issues involving minimum wage laws are usually discussed. As someone who has followed minimum wage controversies for decades, I must say that I have never seen the subject explained more clearly or more convincingly.
Black teenage unemployment rates ranging from 20 to 50 percent have been so common over the past 60 years that many people are unaware that this was not true before there were minimum wage laws, or even during years when inflation rendered minimum wage laws ineffective, as in the late 1940s.
Pricing young people out of work deprives them not only of income but also of work experience, which can be even more valuable. Pricing young people out of legal work, when illegal work is always available, is just asking for trouble. So is having large numbers of idle young males hanging out together on the streets.
When it comes to affirmative action, Jason Riley asks the key question: “Do racial preferences work? What is the track record?” Like many other well-meaning and nice-sounding policies, affirmative action cannot survive factual scrutiny.
Some individuals may get jobs they would not get otherwise but many black students who are quite capable of getting a good college education are admitted, under racial quotas, to institutions whose pace alone is enough to make it unlikely that they will graduate.
Studies that show how many artificial failures are created by affirmative action admissions policies are summarized in “Please Stop Helping Us,” in language much easier to understand than in the original studies.
There are many ponderous academic studies of blacks, if you have a few months in which to read them, but there is nothing to match Jason Riley’s book as a primer that will quickly bring you up to speed on the complicated subject of race in a week, or perhaps over a weekend.
As an experienced journalist, rather than an academic, Riley knows how to use plain English to get to the point. He also has the integrity to give it to you straight, instead of in the jargon and euphemisms too often found in discussions of race. The result is a book that provides more knowledge and insight in a couple of hundred pages than are usually found in books twice that length.
Unlike academics who just tell facts, Riley knows which facts are telling.
For example, in response to claims that blacks don’t do well academically because the schools use an approach geared to white students, he points out that blacks from foreign, non-English-speaking countries do better in American schools than black, English-speaking American students.
Asian students do better than whites in schools supposedly geared to whites. In New York City’s three academically elite public high schools – Stuyvesant, Bronx Science and Brooklyn Tech – there are more than twice as many Asian students as white students in all three institutions.
So much for the theory that non-whites can’t do well in schools supposedly geared to whites.
On issue after issue, “Please Stop Helping Us” cites facts to destroy propaganda and puncture inflated rhetoric. It is impossible to do justice to the wide range of racial issues – from crime to family disintegration – explored in this book. Pick up a copy and open pages at random to see how the author annihilates nonsense.
His brief comments pack a lot of punch. For example, “having a black man in the Oval Office is less important than having one in the home.”
Imagine that. Truth said.
BZ
Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban is under fire for alleged “racist” remarks he made at a business conference. Read the remarks and then tell me: were they racist?
From YahooNews.com:
by Lisa Maria Garza
Overcoming bigotry requires acknowledging internal prejudices, Cuban said in a video-recorded interview shown on Wednesday at the GrowCo convention hosted by Inc magazine.
“If I see a black kid in a hoodie and it’s late at night, I’m walking to the other side of the street. And if on that side of the street, there’s a guy that has tattoos all over his face – white guy, bald head, tattoos everywhere – I’m walking back to the other side of the street,” he said in the interview that was posted on the Internet.
Cuban just happens to be correct, as he is no racist for simply having the temerity to rip a page from the journal of Captain Obvious.
But wait; it gets even better.
Cuban, who spoke the truth and made no racist statement, is now walking his remarks back according to the NYDailyNews.com:
by Bernie Augustine
“The “black kid in a hoodie” remark led to comparisons to the Trayvon Martin slaying, something Cuban apologized for on Twitter later Thursday.
“In hindsight I should have used different examples. I didn’t consider the Trayvon Martin family, and I apologize to them for that. Beyond apologizing to the Martin family, I stand by the words and the substance of the interview,” Cuban wrote. “I think that helping people improve their lives, helping people engage with people they may fear or not understand, and helping people realize that while we all may have our prejudices and bigotries, we have to learn that it’s an issue that we have to control. that it’s part of my responsibility as an entrepreneur to try to solve it.”
In my opinion Trayvon Martin was a little thug. And the man who shot him was found not guilty. As with O.J. Simpson, get over it. The juries spoke.
That said, we can obviously have no national much less a brief and regional discussion of race in any form without someone getting their Race Panties in a bunch.
With, again, more GOWPs and others getting involved in an issue that won’t ever be solved until it can actually be addressed and people don’t automatically cut others off at the knee who wish to honestly address the topic.
Because Cuban is correct. Blacks and young thugs wear hoodies because it sends a message. It allows them to hide their faces and not be recognized for crimes. Hoodies and baggy sagging pants represent prison and jail culture. Gangbangers and thugs wear hoodies even in the summer because it sends a message. Gangbangers and thugs wear facial tattoos because it sends a message. No legitimate business would ever hire a piece-o-crap human whose face was tattooed. Because: it sends a message.
And if people are too stupid to realize that, they are apparently too stupid to walk and swing their arms simultaneously.
BZ
P.S.
I just recently tried to get into the Hugh Hewitt radio show regarding this very topic, and was unceremoniously hung-up on by a female screener when I revealed my opinion. Because it conflicted with Hugh’s assertion that Mark Cuban is in fact a racist for making his statement as documented above. Nice to know. You can either have an honest discussion about race or you can be a coward.