Montanta’s Proposal:

And I can’t fault its logic:

The state of Montana, which came up with the idea that the guns made, sold and kept inside its borders simply are exempt from federal regulations and made that its law, now is considering a new weapon that could be used to cancel much of the authority of federal agents over its residents.

A new legislative proposal would declare that the state’s local county sheriffs are the pre-eminent law enforcement authority in their jurisdictions, and federal agents such as those working for the Internal Revenue Service, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Drug Enforcement Administration, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and others, would be required to get permission from them before they could take any action.

States’ rights, anyone?

The proposal, Senate Bill 114, is called “An act regulating arrests, searches, and seizures by federal employees; providing that federal employees must obtain the county sheriff’s permission to arrest, search, and seize; providing exceptions; providing for prosecution of federal employees violating this act; rejecting federal laws purporting to give federal employees the authority of a county sheriff in this state; and providing an immediate effective date.”

Again, states’ rights, anyone?

Inside that mouthful of provisions is a requirement that federal agents work through and get permission from sheriffs before taking any action to arrest anyone, seize any object or search anywhere. And it includes a promise of consequences if that is not followed:

“An arrest, search, or seizure or attempted arrest, search, or seizure in violation of [section 2] is unlawful, and the persons involved must be prosecuted by the county attorney for kidnapping if an arrest or attempted arrest occurred, for trespass if a search or attempted search occurred, for theft if a seizure or attempted seizure occurred, and for any applicable homicide offense if loss of life occurred. The persons involved must also be charged with any other applicable criminal offense in Title 45,” the bill explains.

Read the full article here.

Your thoughts?

BZ

Leftists, Stepping Over The Bloody Body Of Their Own, Say Free Speech MUST Be Chained:


And any Conservative couldn’t see this coming?

Power and control.

Leftists control Education. They are fighting to control SCOTUS. If they can control words by, therefore, controlling media — ?

The so-called culture and political “wars” in America only started when the Right decided to voice its stance. The Left had their voice carried for them in the Mainstream Media for years and, as the Left leaned farther left, the Right became increasingly frustrated. The true breakthrough did in fact come via AM radio when a little fuzzball was given a chair at KFBK in 1984 Sacramento. Oooh, 1984chilling!

Rush Limbaugh provided the voice and the venue for those of a Conservative bent and a movement was started. There are those who would credit the political process itself for the Right finding its voice — and certainly the Ronald Reagan years should not be discounted as it was during the temper of these times that RL worked his way to syndication in 1988.

From there the wars began. After literally decades of ruling all forms of media and, moreover, its content, liberals were most chagrined to discover AM radio shortly became the bastion of conservatives. It took literally years for the Left to even attempt inroads to AM radio via Air America — and we all know how solvent and powerful AA is currently.

From there, the internet blossomed. Conservatives took to the net like fish to water. This in turn led to various conservative magazines with links to the internet, Fox News and, most recently, to my venue — the blog. Conservatives are big in the Blogosphere.

As grew the voice of Conservatives, so the Left and liberals felt (because, let’s face it, they were) more challenged. Not everything they said and espoused was accepted by rote. Persons actually had, egads, the temerity to speak up and attempt to refute what the MSM said and wrote. And, egads, it was proven time and again that the MSM occasionally seemed to omit some very salient things from their stories — some people call them facts.

Liberals then, during that transition and now (witness this book and others) feature themselves the victims in this heinous and oppressive power grab by the Right.

What happened is this: common people found a voice. They found an outlet for their frustrations. People from the heartland. People from the working class who wanted to get ahead and didn’t want the government to do it for them. People who wanted to be left alone to prosper. People who believe in Capitalism and believe that hard work should yield benefits. People who believe in a higher being as did our Founding Fathers, who believed in justice, in ethics and morals.

So in truth, Conservatives haven’t “fought back” — they just had the gall to voice their beliefs and concerns in a way they never had before.

And that’s what’s threatening to liberals.

Make no mistake: Leftist dogma is every bit a religion; Leftists believe the greatest enemy is the United States, the epitome of Capitalism. Capitalism by its nature must exploit people, so a major country like America, as a capitalistic leader, must be overthrown just as any capitalist oppressor must be overthrown. Anti-big, anti-corporate. Anti-capitalist. Anti-success.

With my 2006 thoughts in mind, Fast Forward to today in 2011 when Simon Jenkins — a daft Brit, of course — writes in The Guardian:

Today’s culprit is freedom of speech, or at least the speech of the American right and its broadcast cheerleaders. Shock-jock radio presenters feed on biased television news to present a view of the world divided between goodies and baddies. The baddies are always on the brink of victory and must be confronted with virile aggression. Language that might not disturb a balanced mind can clearly stimulate and legitimise an unbalanced one.

The vitriol and inaccuracy of the campaign against Obama’s public health reforms last year were like those against abortion and homosexuality. To many Europeans, the echo across the Atlantic came from a people isolated from the outside world and unable to handle today’s social and scientific progress. The debate was infused with nastiness and xenophobia, as if the US was a land composed of tribes bred only to hate the outside world, and often themselves.

So freedom of speech is bad. And this from a country that guarantees no such rights as does the United States. To me, it sounds like opposition, dissension, is bad — is the True Culprit. But, of course, that would be My Biased Self being judgmental. Continuing:

Free speech is a Hobbesian jungle. It requires a marketplace where the trade in information, ideas and opinion has a framework of rules, including rules that maintain fair and open competition. Most will be voluntary, but others need enforcement. The US supreme court last year freed from control all political campaign gifts from corporations, on the grounds that this would be a breach of free speech. Ronald Dworkin’s rebuttal of this “devastating decision for democracy” in the New York Review of Books pointed out that freedom of speech was hopeless if vulnerable to the bullying of wealth. Obama warned that it would “open the floodgates for special interests – including foreign corporations – to spend without limit in our elections”.

Does Mr Jenkins really want to go here? Apparently, he does, in closing:

But sometimes, as Obama said, there is a yearning “to try to impose some order on the chaos”. If American politics is now going the way of wounding, not healing, it needs the tonic of order. It is the great paradox of democracy. Free speech cannot exist without chains.

Right. “Free speech cannot exist without chains.” And those chains — to be determined in their formation, and their application — by whom?

I’m sure you can suss that one out yourself.

Time to obviate my free speech. Your free speech.

Advocated from a nation that lords its own press in chains. Despite being a Western Nation. It cannot even see how its laws are being utilized against itself. It is being subsumed by Islam. But it is finally beginning to fight back; just a little. Budgetarily, to begin.

Leftists fear the murmuring taxpaying rabble. And they fear you are actually beginning to not just find your voice.

— but they fear that you are actually beginning to do what they do best: to ORGANIZE.

And, worse yet, you are beginning to organize not necessarily CENTRALLY, but you are organizing LOCALLY — meaning that there is no ONE central head to decapitate.

You bastards.

BZ

P.S.
Great news: Gabrielle Giffords’s condition has been changed from CRITICAL to Serious. Considering a direct gunshot wound to the skull, this is an absolute miracle. My prayers to her and her family and friends. Please send your own personal prayers. . .

Sikorsky X2: World’s Fastest Helo?

The Sikorsky X2 reached 262 knots in the above video, breaking the 250-knot barrier. This translates to 301.504 mph and 287.695 mph respectively.

Below, at the Heli Expo show in Anaheim, California on February 23rd, 2009, a Sikorsky chief test pilot explains the various system of the X2:

Cruises at 250 knots, with “dash” speeds of 270 knots (310.710 mph). All done with composite materials and a “fly by wire” system.

At this point the X2 is a test bed for potential future production.

But the story doesn’t stop at the X2. Going back, the Lockheed XH-51A claimed an achieved speed of 263 knots (302.6 mph, 486.9 km/h) on November 29th of 1967.[4] This was accomplished with 16-foot wings and 2,500-hp turbojet engine attached to the left wing. The A was another test bed and never went into production.

Finally, the Bell 533 reached a top speed of 274.6 knots (316.0 mph, 508.6 km/h) in 1969, but it too was a one-off research test bed as well. The 533 likewise carried huge turbojet engines; this time two of them.

Technology marches on.

BZ

P.S.
Thanks, Chris!

One Thought

Why the bleeding over one DC representative and one federal judge?

Close to two hundred + cops get killed every year. Purposely and pointedly; some targeted for assassination. Yearly. For multiple years and years.

Thousands and thousands of people get killed by assailants and gangbangers every year.

WHY is it that THESE people are valued more than others?

Think about that.

Are they MORE worthy than the other victims I mention above?

If so: WHY?

BZ

Sarah Palin & Her Ilk: Killers All?


With one massive historical notation: no.

Most American political assassins and attempted assassins have been Leftists. Anarchists, Socialists, Communists and, now, a Nihilist.

I would suggest you check out the incredibly-researched and detailed link here at The Crank Files.

Beamish has researched the topic in a way that I couldn’t begin to touch with the available time in my current life.

For that reason, please click on the link above and read thoroughly. Revelatory, indeed.

I hate it when facts get in the way of a good Leftist meme.

By the way, anyone mention that Giffords was a gun chick who actually wanted to close the borders? Nah. Doesn’t fit the meme. That puts her too uncomfortably close to Palin. Bad. Can’t have that. Palin = bad = Conservative = Must Destroy. We are Borg.

BZ

P.S.
This is it for the topic. I’m done. Exhausted. Leftists are left with sand falling through their fingers. Even the president excoriates Leftists for their inane ploys.

P.P.S.
You WISH your governor looked like Sarah Palin. Hell, my former governor was on steroids the bulk of his life.