And will Obama take him up?
Five million dollars.
The video:
Will Obama take this offer?
On its face, it is a very simple request and — at the same time — a very lucrative request. For Mr Obama and/or his designated charity.
So: how transparent ARE you, Mr Obama?
BZ
And this video displays that fact in a way few other words or pictures can:
Mr Obama is clearly mouthing the same empty platitudes he did back in 2008. He’s back with “promise” after “promise.”
He “promises” once again.
But what has he actually delivered?
The only difference? Mr Obama’s hair exhibits just a bit more gray.
In the meantime, back at the ranch, Romney now takes the edge in “favorability.”
Gallup: 51% to 46%, Romney.
Rasmussen: 50% to 46%, Romney.
Obama supporters continue to threaten Romney with death, backed by riots.
In a global poll, Obama is massively ahead. That said, I couldn’t care less what Europe thinks of the United States, nor any other country for that matter. If Europe, for example, so elevates and adores Mr Obama then they can have him, and I suggest he move immediately — upon his defeat — to another continent.
Which he won’t do, of course, because he won’t place his very narrow ass where his mouth trots.
Mr Obama’s “doctrine“? Here is the actual “Obama Doctrine“:
Embolden our enemies. Undermine our friends. Diminish our country.
I used to think that my former governor, Gray Davis, was the emptiest of political empty suits.
Mr Obama has since taken that title by leaps and bounds.
Empty Suit: thy name IS Barack HUSSEIN Obama.
BZ
P.S.
I’m not cocky; I’m confident. Mr Obama is a one term president.
The debate can be watched here via livestream, at ABC/YahooNews.
This debate is being held at Lynn University in Boca Raton, Florida. Instead of walking about, the candidates will be seated. Bob Schieffer is the moderator.
The format calls for six 15-minute segments, each devoted to one international topic. The topics, chosen by Bob Schieffer, are:
• America’s role in the world.
• Our longest war – Afghanistan and Pakistan.
• Red lines – Israel and Iran.
• The changing Middle East and the new face of terrorism, Part 1.
• The changing Middle East and the new face of terrorism, Part 2.
• The rise of China and tomorrow’s world.
In the two-minute introduction, I recommend that Romney ignore Mr Obama entirely and, instead, lay out his plan for America’s foreign policy and why it’s inherently superior to that of Mr Obama. Mr Romney needs to get on top of his details and lay them out immediately.
It’s time to not just act “presidential” but be presidential.
This post will be updated as the debate occurs.
IT STARTS:
“Attacking me is not an agenda. Attacking me does not stem the tide of violence.” YES, Mr Romney, that is TRUE!
Physically, Obama sits his neck down and scowls. This won’t play well with women or those who are sensitive to body/head/neck language.
Romney is being quite restrained. There is little over-riding.
Obama doesn’t look good by interrupting when Romney does not.
Romney: “Number one I get rid of is ObamaKare. And we get rid of them.”
YES. Sir, YES!
Romney: “And because states run these programs more efficiently.”
YES. Sir, YES!
Romney: “The president hasn’t balanced a budget yet.” YES!
Romney: “Our navy is the smallest since 1917.”
Obama goes with technology. Romney goes with logic. Blue water navy vs littoral navy. It still doesn’t work. Canoes vs destroyers.
However: one F-22 Raptor does not = 22 Migs.
By this time, Romney’s blinks in repose are in keeping with most every other person.
Romney: “We will have Israel’s back.” YES.
Romney: “And then the president began with an Apology Tour.” YES!
Romney: “It’s expected for a president to show strength from the very beginning.” YES!
Romney: “And by the way, you skipped Israel. And they noticed that you skipped Israel.” YES!
Schieffer tried to pull some rugs from under Romney. And he wasn’t having it.
Romney: “I don’t see our influence growing around the world. I see our influence receding.”
Obama goes — of course — with the PERSONAL capture of Osama bin Laden. As if HE “captured” OBL. I knew he would go there.
So far Romney is too much the kind individual. That doesn’t play with another who works with fire and lava and brimstone.
Overall, this was a very measured debate. No one much over-rided Bob Schieffer. I don’t much know why that was. Was it because they were seated? Was it because they were in their third debate? Was it because Schieffer was more physically and intuitively mellow than the two priors?
Position on the use of drones? Proper. We need to have a much more comprehensive strategy for dealing with the Middle East.
So far: Romney has AVOIDED mentioning Benghazi! This was a target-rich environment, Mr Romney! What part of “Obama was stupid” did you NOT conceive — ??
Romney didn’t interrupt. He didn’t insist. That’s how you lose presidential elections, sir.
Romney: “I will label China a currency manipulator. But you’ve got to play by the rules.”
Obama: “You invested in jobs that were shipped overseas.” And so did you, Mr Obama, if you had stock in ANY one of the major investment firms from the United States. Because you can’t be truthful.
In conclusion, I believe that Mitt Romney was WAY more kind than he needed to be.
“Attacking me is not an agenda for acquiring more jobs for this country.”
Obama smiled with the mention of Solyndra. Like the lying sack of shit that he IS.
Closing statements:
Mr Obama has a plan: WHAT THE HELL IS IT?
Obama: “We bounce back because of our character.” Meaning: it’s all on the American Taxpayer.
Romney: “America is going to come back. And that means a president who can come across the aisle. Washington is broken.” And I agree.
Will the REAL Mitt Romney PLEASE come out — ??
“Go vote. It makes you feel big and strong.”
BZ
Go here for Monday’s Gallup poll.
Rasmussen’s poll in Colorado, an historically Blue State: Romney = 50%, Obama = 46%.
And what do you do, if you’re a Leftist, when the polling doesn’t go your way?
That’s correct: have the DOJ sue the Gallup poll service.
After bowing to the suit regarding methodology, Romney still polls ahead.
Even Politico.com indicates Romney leads Obama.
But, as TF point out: whither the Electoral College?
BZ
So I ask Mr Obama: what foreign policy?
Oh, right. This:
Bowing? Scraping? Asking for permission and forgiveness? Kicking Israel to the curb?
Yeah, that’s some kind of foreign policy there, Mr Obama.
UPDATE:
Evil enjoys weakness.
Hence, from the LA Times:
The latest [dictator] to publicly announce his support for the commander-in-chief’s reelection bid was Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, who this week assured he’d vote for Obama if he were from the United States. The America-bashing strongman made the announcement on state-owned television, saying “Obama is a good guy” and that if Obama was from Caracas, he’d surely return the favor by voting for Chavez.
Earlier in the year the government-official daughter of Cuban military dictator Raul Castro proclaimed her country’s support for Obama during a visit to the U.S. “I believe that Obama needs another opportunity and he needs greater support to move forward with his projects and with his ideas, which I believe come from the bottom of his heart,” Mariela Castro said during a cable news interview. …
That brings us to Russia’s Vladimir Putin, who has eliminated most elections in his country, monopolized all major media and destroyed the political party system. … In a letter to a major newspaper, the president of a group dedicated to expanding freedom around the world points out that under Putin there has been an “across-the-board crackdown on civil society.” The piece goes on to ask: “Will Obama stand up against Putin’s abuses?” Unlikely, now that the Russian dictator has extended his endorsement.
Evil respects and fears strength; it therefore promotes and does its best to enable weakness in its enemies.
It’s enemies absolute adore a weak America. They as much as publicly tell us this.
BZ