Imagine Wednesday Morning, Pt I

First thing is this: I’m not staying up Tuesday night.

I’ll have a dinner, hit the rack around 8 PM for the next day, read a book in bed. I may get up to empty my bladder in the middle of the night — the prostate, you know. But that’s as much as I’ll worry about or monitor the election results.

I, however, believe that Barack Hussein Obama will meet John Doe literally overnight, as well as Joe the Plumber. I believe a large number of some very heretofore silent persons will make their choices obviously known.

For example: [If you want to tap the phone of a terrorist in this country, you have to beg on bended knee to FISA; you have to beg the Demorats to “allow” the Right Thing to occur. But just let “Joe The Plumber” ask ONE question in public — and he somehow finds himself anally probed, illegally, digitally and publicly, more thoroughly than any alien ever could envision.]

The DEM/MSM conducted more in-depth investigations in the 24 hours following the questions of Joe The Plumber, into Joe The Plumber, than they ever have in the entire 26 months of the Barack Hussein Obama campaign.

So I ask you to do this:

Imagine Wednesday morning.

Imagine that John Sidney McCain III, 72, becomes the 44th President of the United States.

Imagine that Sarah Louise Heath Palin, 44, becomes the 47th Vice-President of the United States.

And imagine, if you will, the number of camshafts thrown that morning when, considering every avenue, every issue, every overview, every advantage, every moment and second spent by the MainStream Media and the Defeatist Elitist Media to enforce their will on the populace — imagine, if you will, the hue and cry to come by the Leftists and Socialists in this nation.

What saddens me in consideration is this: a bulk of the United States citizens are impervious to reason.

JS McCain, POTUS. SLH Palin, VP.

There is EVERY possibility that it will happen!

And in my opinion, it will.
Can you even begin to imagine the excuses and abrogations the Demorats will allege? They, who have embraced and embodied every form of cheating, will thusly accuse the same?

BZ

You’re Selfish and I’ll Be King:

Your desire, as a taxpayer, to keep more of the money you earned is termed SELFISH by Barack Hussein Obama:

The reason that we want to do this, change our tax code, is not because I have anything against the rich,” Obama said in Sarasota, Florida, yesterday. “I love rich people! I want all of you to be rich. Go for it. That’s the America dream, that’s the American way, that’s terrific.

“The point is, though, that—and it’s not just charity, it’s not just that I want to help the middle class and working people who are trying to get in the middle class—it’s that when we actually make sure that everybody’s got a shot – when young people can all go to college, when everybody’s got decent health care, when everybody’s got a little more money at the end of the month – then guess what? Everybody starts spending that money, they decide maybe I can afford a new car, maybe I can afford a computer for my child. They can buy the products and services that businesses are selling and everybody is better off. All boats rise. That’s what happened in the 1990s, that’s what we need to restore. And that’s what I’m gonna do as president of the United States of America.

“John McCain and Sarah Palin they call this socialistic,” Obama continued. “You know I don’t know when, when they decided they wanted to make a virtue out of selfishness.”

WE ARE FIVE DAYS AWAY FROM CHANGING AMERICA,” says Barack Hussein Obama. Do I want to change the way government works? Yes. Do I want to change the way America works, in terms of the Constitution? No, I do not.

So what is the difference that Barack Hussein Obama seems to not understand? It is this:

–CHOOSING to delineate your funds to whomever you wish in terms of charities, donations, etc.
–Being FORCED to have monies TAKEN from you in consequence of civil and criminal penalties and fines via the IRS

My Fornicalia governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, finally stepped up publicly in his support for John McCain. In Ohio, on Friday he said (in part):

And then we’re going to make him do some biceps curls to beef up those scrawny little arms. But if he could only do something about putting some meat on his ideas. Senator McCain on the other hand is built like a rock. His character and his views are solid.”

“John McCain’s character has been tested as no other presidential candidate in the history of this nation,” Schwarzenegger said. “He has spent five and a half years as a prisoner of war. He has been tested under torture, under temptation, under deprivation, under isolation.

“He has proven what kind of a man he is. We don’t have to wonder if he’s ready to lead. We don’t have to wonder is he ready to be president of the United States. John McCain has served his country longer in a POW camp than his opponent has served in the United State Senate.”

AND HERE’S WHAT YOU’LL GET UNDER AN OBAMA ADMINISTRATION:

THREE NEWSPAPERS ENDORSE McCAIN; COINCIDENTALLY, THEIR REPORTERS ARE DUMPED FROM OBAMA’S PLANE:

The Barack Obama for president campaign has kicked off three newspaper reporters its campaign plane.

The campaign says it was a tough decision deciding to boot the working reporters for the New York Post, the Dallas Morning News and the Washington Times. But, they say, there are only so many seats on the plane that the spunky new Christian Science Monitor politics blog calls “O-Force One.”

And somebody had to go for these last few campaign days.

It’s probably just a simple coincidence that all three newspapers recently endorsed Obama’s Republican rival, Sen. John McCain, for the White House job.

“It feels like the journalistic equivalent of redistributing the wealth,” quipped John Solomon, executive editor of the Times, which lost its seat after three years of travel with the candidate and just 72 hours after endorsing McCain.

The Barack Hussein Obama campaign has given every indication that the ability of you to enjoy complete Free Speech will be, at the very least, diminished. There will be an effect, a repercussion: to BLOGS.

There will be The King.

BZ

Why Character Matters

A wonderful summation of why character is more important than simply education. And why character matters. From the Dartmouth News (thanks Pete!):
Remarks by Student Body President Noah Riner at Convocation Sept. 20, 2005
Posted 09/21/05

You’ve been told that you are a special class. A quick look at the statistics confirms that claim: quite simply, you are the smartest and most diverse group of freshmen to set foot on the Dartmouth campus. You have more potential than all of the other classes. You really are special.
But it isn’t enough to be special. It isn’t enough to be talented, to be beautiful, to be smart.

Generations of amazing students have come before you, and have sat in your seats. Some have been good, some have been bad. All have been special.
In fact, there’s quite a long list of very special, very corrupt people who have graduated from Dartmouth. William Walter Remington, Class of 1939, started out as a Boy Scout and a choirboy and graduated Phi Beta Kappa. He ended up as a Soviet spy, was convicted of perjury and beaten to death in prison.
Daniel Mason ’93 was just about to graduate from Boston Medical School when he shot two men – killing one – after a parking dispute.
Just a few weeks ago, I read in the D about PJ Halas, Class of 1998. His great uncle George founded the Chicago Bears, and PJ lived up to the family name, co-captaining the basketball team his senior year at Dartmouth and coaching at a high school team following graduation. He was also a history teacher, and, this summer, he was arrested for sexually assualting a 15-year-old student.
These stories demonstrate that it takes more than a Dartmouth degree to build character.
As former Dartmouth President John Sloan Dickey said, at Dartmouth our business is learning. And I’ll have to agree with the motto of Faber College, featured in the movie Animal House, “Knowledge is Good.” But if all we get from this place is knowledge, we’ve missed something. There’s one subject that you won’t learn about in class, one topic that orientation didn’t cover, and that your UGA won’t mention: character.
What is the purpose of our education? Why are we at Dartmouth?
Martin Luther King, Jr. said:
“But education which stops with efficiency may prove the greatest menace to society…. We must remember that intelligence is not enough. Intelligence plus character – that is the goal of true education.”
We hear very little about character in our classrooms, yet, as Dr. King suggests, the real problem in the world is not a lack of education.
For example, in the past few weeks we’ve seen some pretty revealing things happening on the Gulf Coast in the wake of hurricane Katrina. We’ve seen acts of selfless heroism and millions around the country have united to help the refugees. On the other hand, we’ve been disgusted by the looting, violence, and raping that took place even in the supposed refuge areas. In a time of crisis and death, people were paddling around in rafts, stealing TV’s and VCR’s. How could Americans go so low?
My purpose in mentioning the horrible things done by certain people on the Gulf Coast isn’t to condemn just them; rather it’s to condemn all of us. Supposedly, character is what you do when no one is looking, but I’m afraid to say all the things I’ve done when no one was looking.

Cheating, stealing, lusting, you name it – How different are we? It’s easy to say that we’ve never gone that far: never stolen that much; never lusted so much that we’d rape; and the people we’ve cheated, they were rich anyway.
Let’s be honest, the differences are in degree. We have the same flaws as the individuals who pillaged New Orleans. Ours haven’t been given such free range, but they exist and are part of us all the same.
The Times of London once asked readers for comments on what was wrong with the world. British author, G. K. Chesterton responded simply: “Dear Sir, I am.”
Not many of us have the same clarity that Chesterton had. Just days after Hurricane Katrina had ravaged the Gulf Coast, politicians and pundits were distributing more blame than aid. It’s so easy to see the faults of others, but so difficult to see our own. In the words of Cassius in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, “the fault, dear Brutus is not in our stars but in ourselves.”
Character has a lot to do with sacrifice, laying our personal interests down for something bigger. The best example of this is Jesus. In the Garden of Gethsemane, just hours before his crucifixion, Jesus prayed, “Father, if thou be willing, remove this cup from me: nevertheless not my will, but thine, be done.” He knew the right thing to do. He knew the cost would be agonizing torture and death. He did it anyway. That’s character.
Jesus is a good example of character, but He’s also much more than that. He is the solution to flawed people like corrupt Dartmouth alums, looters, and me.
It’s so easy to focus on the defects of others and ignore my own. But I need saving as much as they do.
Jesus’ message of redemption is simple. People are imperfect, and there are consequences for our actions. He gave His life for our sin so that we wouldn’t have to bear the penalty of the law; so we could see love. The problem is me; the solution is God’s love: Jesus on the cross, for us.

In the words of Bono:
[I]f only we could be a bit more like Him, the world would be transformed. …When I look at the Cross of Christ, what I see up there is all my s—- and everybody else’s. So I ask myself a question a lot of people have asked: Who is this man? And was He who He said He was, or was He just a religious nut? And there it is, and that’s the question.
You want the best undergraduate education in the world, and you’ve come to the right place to get that. But there’s more to college than achievement. With Martin Luther King, we must dream of a nation – and a college – where people are not judged by the superficial, “but by the content of their character.”
Thus, as you begin your four years here, you’ve got to come to some conclusions about your own character because you won’t get it by just going to class. What is the content of your character? Who are you? And how will you become what you need to be?

Why character matters, and why character is King. Who of the two presidential candidates do you believe possesses the most?

BZ

It’s NOT OVER Until It’s Over!

Accuracy Of Polls a Question In Itself
Skeptics Challenge Assumptions Made
By Michael Abramowitz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, October 29, 2008;

Could the polls be wrong?

Sen. John McCain and his allies say that they are. The country, they say, could be headed to a 2008 version of the famous 1948 upset election, with McCain in the role of Harry S. Truman and Sen. Barack Obama as Thomas E. Dewey, lulled into overconfidence by inaccurate polls.

“We believe it is a very close race, and something that is frankly very winnable,” Sarah Simmons, director of strategy for the McCain campaign, said yesterday.

Few analysts outside the McCain campaign appear to share this view. And pollsters this time around will not make the mistake that the Gallup organization made 60 years ago — ending their polling more than a week before the election and missing a last-minute surge in support for Truman. Every day brings dozens of new state and national presidential polls, a trend that is expected to continue up to Election Day.

But buried in the next line:

Still, there appears to be an undercurrent of worry among some polling professionals and academics. One reason is the wide variation in Obama leads: Just yesterday, an array of polls showed the Democrat leading by as little as two points and as much as 15 points. The latest Washington Post-ABC News tracking poll showed the race holding steady, with Obama enjoying a lead of 52 percent to 45 percent among likely voters.

From Drudge: Rasmussen poll = Obama +3. Gallup poll = Obama +2.

THIS ELECTION IS NOT OVER!

IT IS NOT UNWINNABLE!

There just might be a very startling surprise come next Wednesday morning.
THIS JUST IN:

From National Review’s The Corner:

Obama’s Moving Tax Threshold: $250,000? $200,000? $150,000? What Next? [Byron York]

One of the things I’ve seen at Republican rallies is that people just don’t believe Barack Obama when he says he’ll raise taxes only on those who make more than $250,000 a year. It’s not that these people make that much money or even think they’ll make that much money sometime in the next four years. It’s that they believe Obama, once in office, would lower the threshold and raise taxes on people who make less than $250,000.

Obama’s position in the past was that he would raise taxes on families making more than $250,000 a year and individuals making more than $200,000. But in his new ad, “Defining Moment,” he seems to lower it to $200,000 for families. “Here’s what I’ll do as president,” Obama says in the ad. “To deal with our current emergency I’ll launch a rescue plan for the middle class That begins with a tax cut for 95 percent of working Americans. If you have a job, pay taxes and make less than $200,000 a year, you’ll get a tax cut.”

That seems kind of ambiguous, but the graphic on the screen says clearly: “Famlies making less than $200,000 get tax cut.”

Now, the McCain campaign is pointing out something that Joe Biden said in a Pennsylvania TV interview yesterday:

What we’re saying is that $87 billion tax break doesn’t need to go to people making an average of 1.4 million, it should go like it used to. It should go to middle class people — people making under $150,000 a year.”

BZ