Embellishments? Falsehoods?

I recently wrote about an early and outright LIE Mr Obama made here.

The DEM/MSM didn’t do its job in 2007/2008 with regard to Mr Obama, and still doesn’t do its job. It couldn’t possibly, essentially, fellate Mr Obama any more now than then. Whatever Mr Obama says is etched with proverbial Stone-Carved Accuracy.

Unless, of course, it isn’t.

David Mariness recently wrote a Vanity Fair piece (see it here, coming in the June 2012 issue, as an excerpt from his forthcoming book) where “composite characters” are mentioned, having been assembled by Mr Obama. “Composite characters” is a phrase for LIE.

Let me refresh your memory, if I might, when James Frey wrote “A Million Little Pieces” and was embraced by Oprah Winfrey — until, that is, his book was revealed to be a LIE because of “composite characters.”

If it’s a LIE in one book, it’s a LIE in all. Period. Simple. No exceptions. No tap-backs, no erasies.

With lies in mind, an Obama lawyer ADMITS that his birth certificate was a forgery.

Yet, who covered this? Hello? Anyone? Bueller?

And does this go back and source to Snopes.com — and is Snopes itself suspect now? I submit: yes, it is. Snopes is run by nothing more than a married couple. Not researchers. Not scientists. Not journalistas. Not independents.

As Hugh Hewitt asks in this post:

The obvious question is: If he was willing to make stuff up in his memoir, what other stuff has he made up along the way? Not just in the memoir, but generally?”

Further, John Hinderaker at PowerLine refers to things in Obama’s Dreams From My Father that simply didn’t exist. Please allow me to do what I call the “logical extension”: those things are LIES.

Some might accuse me of attempting to “discredit” Mr Obama. Please let me reply to that:

Yes. I’m not just attempting. I’m doing it.

Because Mr Obama is a bald-faced liar emboldened by GOWPs and the DEM/MSM. For two salient reasons: 1) because he is a Leftist and, more importantly, 2) people perceive Obama to be black. Though he is conveniently black when he wishes and white when he wishes. According to his targeted audience. He is slick and smart and smarmy enough to “play” in both venues.

Another final LIE recently propagated on the internet in Mr Obama’s attempt for re-election:

The “Life of Julia.”

And what an incredible crock of unmitigated, emo pap proffered for the most brain-dead of Americans. I won’t waste my time in examination; you can see it for yourself by clicking the link above.

Human Events rightly asks: “Who the hell is Julia and why am I paying for her whole life?” And I would reply: a fictional woman — yes, perhaps even a purposely-created “composite character” — whose sole purpose, it seems, is to rely upon the American Government her entire life!

Apparently, Julia is ignorant, clueless, powerless, uneducated, unassertive, unmotivated and brainwashed, because she believes that government is the solution to all of her ills, real or imagined. A single woman promised, by government, with all manner of life-long subsidies. In my way of thinking, another leech sucking upon the bloodstream of producers.

Oddly enough — imagine this! — nothing is mentioned of the unfathomable and unpayable debt she — and her children — will carry throughout her life because of Mr Obama. Julia is nothing more than a Serf, a Pawn, a Groundling.

That is to say, if she determines to demean herself sufficiently to actually have children and, further, if she actually wants to utilize her womb. Let’s not just simply make this assumption. In terms of her “children.”

Today, 46% of adults under 35 in Europe still live with their parents.

My! That’s something to which we all should aspire — Julia included.

Again: “Julia” is another “composite character” and, as such, another bald-faced LIE.

Promulgated, promoted and supported by Mr Obama, our current Liar In Chief — and his biased, Leftist minions.

To me, the most important phrase is this: “If you think Social Security benefits allow you to live your retirement without worry, you deserve Barack Obama.”

Oh yes, you surely do.

But not this time.

BZ

On April 14th of this year, there was an attack of a group of young black men upon two white reporters — one male, one female — for a Norfolk, Virginia newspaper.

The newspaper for which they worked, The Virginian-Pilot — purposely refused to report the incident for two weeks though they had the victims — literally — in their midst.

And I submit that the paper purposely refused to disclose the facts of the attack because of a melanin issue. Which made their reporters, in my opinion, of LESS worth than those who attacked them.

Because the reporters were WHITE.

The suspects were BLACK.

And the newspaper is managed by GOWPs. That is to say: Guilty Over-educated White People.

From WND.com:

There’s outrage in Norfolk, Va., today after a white couple was attacked by dozens of black teenagers, and the local newspaper did not report on the incident for two weeks, despite the victims being reporters for the paper.

Even today, the Virginian-Pilot did not cover the crime as news, but rather as an opinion piece by columnist Michelle Washington.

From MSNBC.com:
The Virginian-Pilot newspaper of Norfolk, Va., waited two weeks before reporting that two white reporters were beaten by a group of young black men. And since the story came out, the city’s police department has defended its handling of the case.

Columnist Michelle Washington broke the news of the April 14 attack on reporters Dave Forster and Marjon Rostami in the May 1 edition of the newspaper.

“Wave after wave of young men surged forward to take turns punching and kicking their victim,” Washington wrote.

Neither suffered grave injuries, but both were out of work for a week. Forster’s torso ached from blows to his ribs, and he retained a thumb-sized bump on his head. Rostami fears to be alone in her home. Forster wishes he’d stayed in the car.

Many stories that begin this way end much worse. Another colleague recently wrote about the final defendant to be sentenced in the beating death of 19-year-old James Robertson in East Ocean View five years ago. In that case, a swarm of gang members attacked Robertson and two friends. Robertson’s friends got away and called for help; police arrived to find Robertson’s stripped, swollen corpse.

Forster and Rostami’s story has not, until today, appeared in this paper. The responding officer coded the incident as a simple assault, despite their assertions that at least 30 people had participated in the attack. A reporter making routine checks of police reports would see “simple assault” and, if the names were unfamiliar, would be unlikely to write about it. In this case, editors hesitated to assign a story about their own employees. Would it seem like the paper treated its employees differently from other crime victims?

More questions loomed.

Forster and Rostami wondered if the officer who answered their call treated all crime victims the same way. When Rostami, who admits she was hysterical, tried to describe what had happened, she says the officer told her to shut up and get in the car. Both said the officer did not record any names of witnesses who stopped to help. Rostami said the officer told them the attackers were “probably juveniles anyway. What are we going to do? Find their parents and tell them?”

The officer pointed to public housing in the area and said large groups of teenagers look for trouble on the weekends. “It’s what they do,” he told Forster.

Could that be true? Could violent mobs of teens be so commonplace in Norfolk that police and victims have no recourse?

Police spokesman Chris Amos said officers often respond to reports of crowds fighting; sirens are usually enough to disperse the group. On that night, he said, a report of gunfire in a nearby neighborhood prompted the officer to decide getting Forster and Rostami off the street quickly made more sense than remaining at the intersection. The officer gave them his card and told them to call later to file a report.

The next day, Forster searched Twitter for mention of the attack.

One post chilled him.

“I feel for the white man who got beat up at the light,” wrote one person.

“I don’t,” wrote another, indicating laughter. “(do it for trayvon martin)”

Trayvon Martin, an unarmed black teen, died after being shot by a community watch captain with white and Hispanic parents, George Zimmerman, in Florida.

Forster and Rostami, both white, suffered a beating at the hands of a crowd of black teenagers.

From Todd Starnes at Fox News:

And he swings his support over to Mitt Romney.

Some people aren’t quite so happy, however, because Mr Gingrich’s campaign dumped him $4 million dollars in debt — much to the chagrin of many businesses and campaign workers.

And thusly, it plays out just the way many persons prognosticated many months ago: the money makes it. And the money is with Mitt Romney.

Plain and simple.

BZ

From this post:

Respect comes back, when respect is proffered.

Obaka is not respectful of the populace; he insults our intelligence, he relies upon the propaganda foundations of Josef Goebbels. He embraces Communists.

BZ

And he swings over to Mitt Romney.

Some people aren’t quite so happy, however.