
Correct. Not ONE Demorat voted for Mr Obama’s budget. Instead of “partisan,” the vote was entirely bipartisan : NO ONE voted for it.
BZ

Correct. Not ONE Demorat voted for Mr Obama’s budget. Instead of “partisan,” the vote was entirely bipartisan : NO ONE voted for it.
BZ

The Russian news source Pravda (organ of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation) endorses Barack Hussein Obama and excoriates Mitt Romney. Official Pravda site here.
After this fiasco — imagine that.
This, my fellow Americans, is called a clue. A clue that you, in your ignorance, will predominantly ignore.
With the exception of my readers.
BZ
A lie.
A complete lie.
Does anyone, anywhere, have a memory?
BZ

Whilst everyone else worries about the second-day arguments before SCOTUS regarding ObakaKare, one heinous point slipped through:
The first step in CapNTax.
From Reuters.com:
Government proposes first carbon limits on power plants
(Reuters) – The Obama administration proposed on Tuesday the first rules to cut carbon dioxide emissions from new U.S. power plants, a move hotly contested by Republicans and industry in an election year.
The Environmental Protection Agency’s proposal would effectively stop the building of most new coal-fired plants in an industry that is moving rapidly to more natural gas. But the rules will not regulate existing power plants, the source of one third of U.S. emissions, and will not apply to any plants that start construction over the next 12 months.
Note: “Effectively STOP THE BUILDING of most new coal-fired plants.”
Mr Obama made it quite clear that he was gunning for coal, that he wanted to bankrupt the coal-fired electrical generation industry. Said on January 17th of 2008 in a San Francisco Chronicle interview:
So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it’s just that it will bankrupt them because they’re going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that’s being emitted.
That will also generate billions of dollars that we can invest in solar, wind, biodiesel and other alternative energy approaches.
The only thing I’ve said with respect to coal, I haven’t been some coal booster. What I have said is that for us to take coal off the table as a (sic) ideological matter as opposed to saying if technology allows us to use coal in a clean way, we should pursue it.
So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can.
It’s just that it will bankrupt them.
In the meantime, in the seeking of some Sylvan Utopia, if the elderly or the infants die due to extreme cold or heat, no big deal. It’s just a transition stage; get used to it.
On the other hand, do you see this nation beginning to truly mine and tap its vast natural gas reserves? Why, that would be a resounding NO — because of the Religious Left.
This country is under physical assault, ladies and gentlemen. Under incredible assault.
Now, the Religious Left have decided we can have no wind power because it kills birds.
Nothing works, ladies and gentlemen.
Nothing solves.
We can, essentially, per the Religious Left, make NO electricity because each and every way is bad and evil.
Then: what are the final options? What do you leave us?
BZ