Who is responsible for the war on cops?

The courageous Sheriff of Milwaukee County, David Clarke, tells you precisely who he believes is responsible for this current war on law enforcement officers:

Barack Hussein Obama and former Attorney General Eric Holder, the Head Racists in DC.  The so-called “leader” of the United States of America and his former AG.

Obama sets the tone and the pace for the administration in DC and, by dint of that, the tone for the rest of those who follow he and his fellow political Leftists.

Trayvon Martin became Barack Hussein Obama’s son.  Obama didn’t have all the facts but proclaimed Martin a victim.  Zimmermann was found not guilty, though Obama had already found him guilty.

Obama stated with Bully Pulpit firmness that the Cambridge Police Department “acted stupidly” in the arrest of professor Henry Gates, though Obama didn’t have all the facts.  Gates, by the way, just “happened” to be a personal black friend of Obama’s.

Obama’s attitude of Officer Darren Wilson was that of guilt, though Wilson was never indicted or charged.  Wilson’s life was, however, ruined forever though not convicted of any crime.

Holder had the opportunity to make a statement when Black Panthers barricaded the polls in Philadelphia with weapons they carried, but Holder refused to take any actions whatsoever.

Obama has fanned racist flames, whenever he could, in Ferguson and in Baltimore.  It’s no secret that he wants to federalize police nationally.

No one seems to remember that, in 2014, he nominated Debo Adegbile to the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice.  Adegbile is such a flaming Leftist that this occurred:

In February 2014, six major law enforcement organizations representing more than 1 million law enforcement officers across the country, including the Fraternal Order of Police, sent scathing letters to senators and Obama opposing Adegbile’s nomination. Adding insult to injury, it was later revealed these organizations weren’t consulted before Obama put Adegbile up for the position. Maureen Faulkner, Officer Faulker’s widow (slain by black murderer Mumia Abu-Jamal, whom Adegbile defended. -BZ), was also left in the dark. 

Adegbile’s nomination was such an affront to justice, the rule of law and the law enforcement community he was voted down by the Democrat-controlled Senate, 52-47. Regardless, the White House called his failed confirmation a “travesty.”

“The Senate’s failure to confirm Debo Adegbile to head the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice is a travesty based on wildly unfair character attacks against a good and qualified public servant,” the president said last year when the vote failed. 

What about Saturday, where Black Lives Matter chanted, at the Minnesota state fair, “pigs in a blanket, fry ’em like bacon”?

Of course you saw that story plastered all over the mainstream media and the American Media Maggots, right?  What?  You didn’t?

Look, we already know that Obama has an anti-police philosophy; it was acquired during his youth when raised by Socialists and Communists, and emphasized by his education and associations with William Ayers, Bernardette Dohrn, Reverend Wright, and with books such as Saul Alinsky’s Rules For Radicals and knowledge of the Cloward-Piven Strategy.

What I wonder is this: if Obama, Leftists and Progressives hate cops, and Obama, Leftists, Progressives and Demorats hate guns — you may as well include our military too — then what or who is left to protect the citizens of the United States?

Good intentions?  Kind words?

The United Nations?

BZ

P.S.

What further confuses me is this: Leftists and Progressives seem to disdain all forms of authority.  Yet the greatest, most unmoving and unflinching authority of all is the Imperial Barack Hussein Obama, he of the executive order pen, and Racist In Chief.

 

Your top three?

Rubio Cruz WalkerWho, at this point, would be your top three GOP candidates for the presidency?  Not in terms of strategy or tactics, but in terms of reflecting views closest to your own.

Mine would be:

– Cruz
– Walker
– Rubio

In no particular order.  Yet.

BZ

RINO Graphic, Take Back the GOP

Obama leading from behind:

As he does.

Politics: Marines looking to deploy on foreign ships because the U.S. doesn’t have enough

by Dan Calabrese

USN Carrier GroupEnough what?

Oh yeah: ships.

And leading from behind.

Faced with a shortage of U.S. Navy ships, the Marine Corps is exploring a plan to deploy its forces aboard foreign vessels to ensure they can respond quickly to global crises around Europe and western Africa.

The initiative is a stopgap way to deploy Marines aboard ships overseas until more American vessels are available, said Brig. Gen. Norman Cooling, deputy commander, U.S. Marine Corps Forces Europe and Africa.

The Marines will be able to respond quickly to evacuate embassies or protect U.S. property and citizens, a need highlighted by the 2012 attack in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador.

“There’s no substitute for U.S. amphibious” vessels, Cooling said. “We’re looking at other options” in the meantime, he added.

The Marines have been working with Spain, Italy, the United Kingdom and other close allies to determine the suitability of the foreign ships for U.S. personnel and aircraft.

The units would be designed for limited operations and not major amphibious assaults. A ground force of about 100 to 120 Marines would be deployed along with three or four Ospreys, which fly like airplanes but can take off and land like helicopters.

The U.S. Navy has 30 amphibious ships but says it needs 38 to fulfill war fighting requirements. It won’t reach that level until 2028 because of budget constraints, according to the Navy.

One would ask: are you kidding me?

We kid you not.

So now we don’t have enough ships for the Marines to do their jobs, and they’re seriously having to seek space on foreign ships.

Thanks ever so kindly, you who voted for this ignoramus.

BZ

 

The Hillary disaster:

Hillary Clinton InvestigatingIt just keeps getting worse for Hillary Rodham Clinton.

She just recently spoke to eBay personnel in Fornicalia on Thursday, for roughly $200,000.  The eBay team wanted her speech to be “off the record.”

Repeat: for $200,000.

Hillary Clinton YeahThat said, FoxNews weighs in with an amazing article on her e-mails:

Hackers, probing Clinton server, cite security lapses

by James Rosen

Stirred by the controversy surrounding Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server when she was secretary of state, a determined band of hackers, IT bloggers, and systems analysts have trained their specialized talents and state-of-the-art software on clintonemail.com, the domain under which Clinton established multiple private email accounts, and uncovered serious lapses in security, according to data shared with Fox News.  

The findings call into question Clinton’s confident declaration, at a hastily arranged news conference in New York on Tuesday, that “there were no security breaches” in her use of a private server. One prominent figure in the hacker community, bolstered by long experience in the U.S. intelligence community, has undertaken to build a virtual “replica” of Clinton’s server configuration in a cyberlab, and has begun testing it with tools designed to probe security defenses. This individual has shared details of the Clinton system not disclosed publicly but legally obtainable.  

So hackers are interested in vetting Hillary’s claims?  I find this most interesting.

“There is a very strong indication that the clintonemail.com server is in Manhattan,” the source told Fox News.

But the best paragraph of all in the story:

Just the original decision to use a private email account, with Clinton’s own surname embedded in it, has baffled the hacker community. The analyst with experience in the intelligence community, a “white hat” hacker — the kind corporate firms retain to conduct “penetration testing” that exposes businesses’ cybersecurity lapses — told Fox News: “If we learned that the foreign minister of a major foreign country was using her own private server to send and receive emails, and was relying on outdated commercial software to operate and protect it, that’d be a hallelujah moment for us.”

You don’t conduct sensitive government e-mail communications on a private server.  Period.

Brian Williams Hillary's EmailsBut what about this?

Hillary Emails FactsArrogant, entitled, insulated, insular.  Hillary is all of those things.

EMAIL RULESAnd what about this, from FoxNews.com:

No one read Hillary emails before destruction

by Chris Stirewait

NO ONE READ HILLARY EMAILS BEFORE DESTRUCTION
How did Hillary Clinton know that the tens of thousands of emails from her time in office she ordered destroyed were personal? Did she or even her staff scroll through her sent items scanning emails about “yoga routines” or “family vacations” before deleting them? Nope. No one looked at them. The Clinton campaign said those emails that did not crop up in a keyword search performed by her team were automatically deleted. No eyes. No one to be subpoenaed. Just highlight all and press delete. That method seems better for missing emails than to finding them. And it would sound reckless and haphazard coming from another politician. In this case, though it sounds like a woman covering her tracks in preparation for a long and bloody legal fight over subpoenas to come.

Further:

DID HILLARY SIGN ON THE LINE?
WashEx: “Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, like all departing federal employees, was required to fill out and sign a separation statement affirming that she had turned over all classified and other government documents, including all emails dealing with official business. Fox News’ Megyn Kelly reported Wednesday evening on the requirement and that a spokesman for Clinton had not responded to a request for comment, including an explanation of when the former chief U.S. diplomat signed the mandatory separation agreement or, if she didn’t, why didn’t she. The Washington Examiner also asked Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill for comment late Wednesday but had received no response from him early Thursday.”

“Every employee at the State Department has to sign this little piece of paper when   they leave the State Department. And it says I certify basically under penalty of perjury that I have returned all official records that were in my possession while I was an officer of the Department of State. So where is that document, Megyn? And if there isn’t, if [Hillary Clinton] didn’t sign that, why not? There are a lot of questions to be answered.” –Former DOJ Attorney Shannen Coffin on “The Kelly File” Watch here.

Hillary Deleted EmailsThere was a clear and present intent to deceive the federal records act.  Plain and simple.  Hillary Clinton believed she was above the law.

As an aside, I should care to mention this pertinent tidbit:

Dead. Broke. – Politico: “By Election Day 2016, taxpayers will have paid out more than $16 million to fund Bill Clinton’s pension, travel, office expenses and even the salaries and benefits of staff at his family’s foundation, federal records show. Since he left the White House in 2001, Clinton and his office have received more money through the Former Presidents Act than any other ex-president, according to a POLITICO analysis of budget documents.”

The Clintons: taking advantage of every penny, every copper, every dime of American Taxpayers throughout the nation.  They Live Large at your expense.

Because, after all, you owe it to them for their immaculation.

BZ

Hillary Clinton Question