BZ’s Berserk Bobcat Saloon Radio Show, Tuesday, 7-21-20, an SHR Media Network Special Report: “It’s Not About BLM; It’s About Communism.”

Hours 1 and 2: BZ featured a two-hour SHR Media Network Special Report: “It’s Not About BLM; It’s About Communism,” detailing the truth about BLM, Black Lives Matter, their funding, who they are, what they want, and where it leads.

This broadcast was packed with facts, audio cuts, information you’ve never heard, and culminated in a clear conclusion. BLM isn’t about one man who lost his life on May 25th; it’s instead about the destruction of an entire nation and the goal of installing Communism in America.

If you want people to understand the truth about BLM, refer them to this broadcast.

If you want to hear the show on Spreaker, audio only, click on the yellow button below.

Listen to “BZ’s BBS, Tuesday, 7-21-20, An SHR Media Network Special Report: “It’s Not About BLM; It’s About Communism.”” on Spreaker.

Here is the show on YouTube; click the red arrow to play.

Here is the show on Facebook. Though I of course despise Facebook.

Join me, the Bloviating Zeppelin every Tuesday and Thursday night on the SHR Media Network from 11 PM to 1 AM Eastern and 8 PM to 10 PM Pacific, at the Berserk Bobcat Saloon — where the speech is free but the booze is not.

  • Want to listen to all the Berserk Bobcat Saloon archives on SpreakerGo here.
  • Want to listen to the Saloon on iHeart radio? Click here.
  • Like Apple products? You can listen to the Saloon here on Apple Podcasts.
  • Want to listen to the show on the huge Podcast AddictClick on this.
  • Do you like Spotify? You can listen to the Saloon via Spotify right here.
  • Want to watch past shows on the SHR Media Facebook page? Go here.
  • Want to watch past Berserk Bobcat Saloon shows on YouTubeGo here.

Thank you one and all for listening, watching and supporting the SHR Media Network: “Conservative Media Done Right.”

BZ

 

 

Nothing about the systemic violence against America has to do with a man whose name no one remembers. Instead, it’s all about COMMUNISM.

Who is the man in the graphic? Can you name him?

Instead, it has everything to do with, ultimately, Communism.

But let’s go back — to May 25th of 2020.

What do you remember about that specific day?

When was the last time — in the span of just 57 days — you heard anyone from the American Media Maggots make a reference to the man who died on that day while in the custody of the Minneapolis Police?

I won’t name the man — it’s up to you to remember him. But I’ll wager you’re struggling with that task and having something of a difficult time. Despite the fact that, if they’re to be believed, the name of that man is the sole reasoning for BLM and other anarchist elements to have destroyed much of American cities — Demorat-run cities, I should specify.

One man. One fate. He is the pivot and the fulcrum from which all social justice must now stem. So BLM said.

Or is he?

Let’s talk about the truth. Black Lives Matter is an organization that was founded after Trayvon Martin, but really expanded upon the out-and-out lie of “hands up, don’t shoot,” in reference to the deceased felon Michael Brown, in which he attacked Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson on August 9th of 2014 and was alleged to have been holding up his hands when “gunned down” by Officer Wilson. In truth, Michael Brown was attempting to disarm Officer Wilson.

A lie. That was the conclusion of 100 — ONE HUNDRED — FBI agents who flooded Ferguson, Missouri, in order to conduct a federal investigation of the shooting.

We know that, subsequently, people in BLM were chanting about killing cops, “pigs in a blanket, fry ’em like bacon.”

“What do we want? Dead cops. When do we want it? Now.”

Black Lives Matter, or BLM, is a racist organization that favors one race over another, the very definition of racism. We know this because BLM will not accept that “blue lives matter” or “Hispanic lives matter” or even — dare we say? — that “all lives matter.”

Any number of individuals have been pounded into social paste by BLM and their associates for daring to intimate anything remotely close to “all lives matter,” because the only mantra acceptable is “black lives matter.” Only. Period. No deviation.

Or your life, your family, your employment, will be ruined and you will have to wear the heavy label of RACIST around your neck like a stone of destruction. Hanging a dead chicken around the dog’s neck. Belling the cat. Worse.

NBA announcer fired over controversial ‘All Lives Matter’ tweet

by Mark Fischer, NY Post, 6-3-20

Grant Napear was fired by his radio station and resigned as the play-by-play announcer for NBA franchise the Sacramento Kings after his tweet that said “All Lives Matter” was met with backlash amid the George Floyd protests.

Napear tweeted “All Lives Matter … Every Single One!” after former Kings star DeMarcus Cousins asked the 60-year-old for his view on the Black Lives Matter movement.

And there you have it. Napear was the canary in the coal mine. His fundamental problem was even expressing a view.

This became a proverbial “learning experience” for people all around the US. Say nothing. Tolerate everything. You can be destroyed by the Cancel Culture — and that is precisely the point of it. Whites need not weigh in. Nod, acquiesce, get sapped, shut up.

And apparently the issue as to whether or not white are even human — well, that’s up for grabs as well. BLM is already packed with racists. How about a perfect example?

BLM Leader Yusra Khogali: ‘White People Are Genetic Defects’

by Clarion Project, 7-7-20

A Toronto-based leader of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement was exposed dehumanizing white people. A Black Muslim and race supremacist, Yusra Khogali was caught in a series of social media posts that attacked people based on nothing more than the color of their skin.

Khogali’s social media post goes into a pseudo-scientific rant on melanin and concludes that the lack of melanin in white people means they have “genetic defects.”

Khogali adds that white people have a “higher concentration of enzyme inhibitors” which suppresses melanin production, adding that melanin is important for a number of things such as “strong bones, intelligence, vision and hearing,” which for her means that black people are super humans. She continues in comments to her original Facebook post, “melatonin directly communicates with cosmic energy.”

The posts have since been deleted.

But of course, I have saved them here for you to see, dear reader.

The irony of the attack is not lost. BLM prides itself for uplifting the value of black lives, yet, in attempting to do so, uses dehumanizing narratives and racial attacks against others.

Speaking to the extremism, Clarion Project’s National Correspondent Shireen Qudosi shares how BLM isn’t rooted in human rights but is deeply rooted in the language of divisiveness.

Khogali’s social media posts and presence in the Canadian activism sphere are nothing new and have been ongoing for at least the last three years. In fact, they’ve been deflected by BLM leaders when reporters drew attention to them in the past and, instead, BLM has been rewarded by the community.

And yet, here I am, telling you the truth in this post. And the truth is that it’s cool to be a black racist, hating white people. From the DailyCaller.com:

‘Closer To Animals’: Nick Cannon Goes On Racist, Anti-Semitic Rant, Says ‘White People’ And Jewish People Are ‘The True Savages’

by Peter Hasson, 7-13-20

Former “America’s Got Talent” host Nick Cannon delivered a racist and anti-Semitic rant in a June 30 episode of his podcast, “Cannon’s Class.”

Cannon hosted rapper Professor Griff, whose record of anti-Semitic comments is well documented, for an interview in which they promoted anti-Semitic conspiracies about Jewish families secretly controlling the world and claimed that black people can’t be anti-Semitic because they’re the real Semitic people.

“In order for me to be anti-Semitic, I’d have to be anti-black man, anti-black woman, anti-black people, anti-Africa, anti-all other people,” Griff said.

“Because the Semitic people are black people,” Cannon added.

Okiedokie.

“They have to rob, steal, rape, kill and fight in order to survive. So these people who didn’t have what we have, and when I say ‘we,’ I speak of the melinated people, they had to be savages, they had to be barbaric because they’re in these Nordic mountains, they’re in these rough torrential environments, so they’re acting as animals, so they’re the ones closer to animals, they’re the ones that are actually the true savages,” Cannon said in the video.

BLM says they don’t want any cops whatsoever.

Black Lives Matter’s Philadelphia arm wants ‘complete abolition’ of cops in five years

by Mollie Mansfield, 7-8-20

THE Black Lives Matter’s Philadelphia arm wants “complete abolition” of cops in five years.

YahNé Ndgo, a representative for the city’s movement, told Fox News on Tuesday that the organization “don’t want to see any police in our community.”

She said: “One of the things that we are demanding over five years is the complete abolition. We don’t want to see any police in our community.

And then this staggering quote.

She continued: “Quite often, if there is violence happening, by the time the police arrive, that has already occurred and particularly in poor neighborhoods and in black and brown communities.

“So the police are not really a resource for preventing that kind of crime from happening. Just a response.”

Let’s examine those incredibly-stupid statements. And let’s be honest and clear: two things I value highly.

First, Ndgo demands a rapid police response and bemoans their late arrival when violence occurs, then wants no police. Stupid person.

Ndgo demands less crime but bemoans the fact that police come in and actually try to, you know, do their jobs. Police. Stupid person.

So she’s acknowledging that violence occurs in the “minority communities” but demands that cops not be in the “minority communities.” Stupid person.

Police are not a resource because, Ndgo, you accuse the police of “over-policing” and don’t want them in the community. Yet you say you want them in the community. But you don’t. Stupid person.

And yet the biggest threat to blacks are — wait for it — fellow blacks. Young, Urban, Fighting-Age Male (YUFAM) blacks. Cops aren’t the biggest threat. White cops aren’t the biggest threat.

Young, Urban, Fighting-Age Male (YUFAM) blacks are the biggest violent threat to other blacks. And, of course, Planned Parenthood, but that’s a story for another day.

Blacks demand respect but don’t respect themselves. Blacks demand respect but don’t mind littering their own dead black bodies all over major Leftist-Demorat-managed Urban Rat Cages.

Blacks demand “respect.” But until blacks respect themselves, they don’t deserve my respect and they don’t have it.

And let me be clear: Leftist, BLM, Demorat, non-Conservative blacks. You know. The ones killing themselves and slewing bodies all around. And shooting little girls, little boys, infants, and leaving one-year-old bodies in their wake. Those blacks. That’s pretty specific.

They. Don’t. Care.

Then there are the real Americans, a shit-ton of American blacks who are great patriots, great warriors, great believers, great soldiers for Christ, who have served and are serving this incredible country of ours behind the scenes and in front of the scenes, who are fighting evil in all its forms — to include Demorats, Leftists, anarchists, Antifa, Socialists, Communists, the American Media Maggots and more — on a daily and hourly basis. Who know this country is at its tipping point and that this November’s election is its most important, most seminal, most critical in United States history.

The bottom line is, if you’re not Conservative — and I couldn’t care less what paint job Conservative comes in — then I just don’t have time for you.

Those aren’t just empty words. That is fact.

And there are more who are being converted every day, leaving the Demorats, leaving Evil, seeing the light, and coming over to the Good side. It’s as simple as that.

Either Good wins, or Evil wins.

Either those who love this country win, or those who despise this country win. The choice is absolutely that binary.

With regard to BLM, we have made a rather rapid transition over the span of just 43 days. We have transited in this fashion:

  • From tolerance
  • To acceptance
  • To advocacy

If you are not an active and outright advocate for BLM and associated issues, you are a racist. You must be an advocate. Nothing less will suffice.

Confirmation? See Bubba Wallace, Jussie Smollet, and FakeHateCrimes.org.

(NOTE: nothing pisses off BLM and Leftists more than laughing at them.)

If you think “black lives matter” over anyone else, however, in truth you’re a racist. As I continue to say and have said for decades, “either everyone is equal, or no one is equal.”

Of course, we’ve been told for years that the greatest US problem is the issue of “economic inequality.” So let’s consult with one of America’s greatest treasures, the 90-year-old economist Thomas Sowell who, here, addresses that very issue and admits that, at one point in his life, he was a Marxist.

Historically as now, Demorats are not the friend of American blacks. Malcolm X told us this back in 1963.

So, damn me, let’s go into the numbers again.

In 2019, there were more than 10 MILLION arrests in the United States.

Of those 10,000,000+ arrests, 1,004 ended in the suspect being fatally shot (most were armed).

Of the 1,004 who were fatally shot, 41 were unarmed.

Of the 41 unarmed suspects who were shot, 9 were black, 19 were white and the other 13 were Hispanic, Asian, etc.

In 2019, 89 police officers were shot and killed in the line of duty.

A black man is more likely to be killed by lightning than by a police officer.

According to the FBI UCR (Uniform Crime Reporting), there were 1,186,742 incidents of violent crime in 2018, and of them, 14,123 were homicide victims.

Blacks comprised 54.9% of all homicide offenders, compared to 42.4% for whites. Blacks are 13.4% of the US population, yet they accounted for more than half of all homicides.

According to the FBI’s National Incident-Based Reporting System, 61.5% of all offenders were male, and according to the FBI UCR for 2018, 87.7% of murder offenders were male. That means approximately 6% (black males) of the population committed approximately 50% of the murders.

Repeat: That means approximately 6% (black males) of the population committed approximately 50% of the murders.

But no one can talk about that.

Homicide is not the only crime where the black population offends at higher rates.

According to the FBI UCR, of 7,710,00 arrests reported in 2018, blacks comprised 27.4%. Approximately 28.6% of people arrested for rape were black, 54.2% of robbery arrests, 33.7% of aggravated assault arrests, 29.4% of burglary arrests, and 30% of arrests for larceny-theft.

Black arrest rates for violent crimes are also correlated with victim descriptions of offender race. Higher crime rates within the black population increases contact with police and therefore the chance of police shootings within that community.

So: damn this man for telling the truth. The truth that black lives really don’t matter. Just some black lives. “All black lives are equal, except that some black lives are more equal than others.”

The whole narrative of systemic racism?

The data doesn’t support the claim, and several thorough studies don’t support that claim.

So roll with me here. I’m going somewhere.

I haven’t seen one shred of evidence yet that the white police officer who had his knee on George Floyd’s neck or that the other 3 non-white officers who helped to hold Floyd down acted out of racism.

George Floyd was killed by these officers, but it appears to be an excessive use of force, abuse of power, and a callous disregard for Floyd’s health. And even that investigation hasn’t concluded.

If you don’t believe Tucker Carlson, listen to Larry Elder.

And even in 2020, slavery still exists in these six nations:

  • Mauritania
  • India
  • China
  • Uzbekistan
  • Libya
  • North Korea

But that is immaterial, BLM insists. As are the horrific numbers of black males shot and killed by other black males around the US. Go to HeyJackass.com for the latest in Chicago deaths — where you’ll see them all trotted out in nothing but clear statistics.

Ho-hum. More black lives not mattering.

We’ll get to that.

And Demorats are not mocking American blacks in any way, either.

They also appear to be, situationally speaking, ambivalent between BLM being saviors or demons — depending, of course, on whose ox gets gored. Schadenfreude.

Mayor celebrates BLM protests, then calls them ‘domestic terrorism’ when her home is vandalized

by Collin Jones, 6-16-20

Mayor of Olympia, Washington, Cheryl Selby, has been a vocal proponent of Black Lives Matter and backer of the protests that have spread across the country amid the death of George Floyd, but when these same people vandalized her home, she called it “domestic terrorism.”

It was reported last week that “two groups converged in downtown Olympia, and some became destructive, burnings flags, smashing windows, and spray painting businesses” moving eventually migrating to Selby’s neighbourhood and vandalizing her home.

The group dressed in black made its way to Selby’s South Capitol neighbourhood, chanting “abolish the police” outside her home as someone spray-painted “BLM” on her door and porch.

Although neither Selby nor any part of her family was home at the time, she received text notifications from neighbours letting her know about the vandalism.

Here’s the best part of the story:

“I’m really trying to process this,” Selby said. “It’s like domestic terrorism. It’s unfair.”

“It hurts when you’re giving so much to your community,” she added.

Poor baby. They are terrorists. Lay down with Marxists, Socialists and Communists, and you’re gonna get used and then discarded like a bloody Kotex.

Make no mistake. BLM co-founder Patrisse Cullors is an avowed Marxist. She’ll tell you that herself all day long.

Trained Marxists, indeed.

Black Lives Matter founder admits org’s creators are ‘trained Marxists,’ BLM’s goal is to ‘get Trump out’

Black Lives Matter, which was created by Alicia Garza, Opal Tometi, and Patrisse Cullors, has a self-described mission to “build local power to intervene in violence inflicted on Black communities by the state and vigilantes.”

“We engage comrades with the intent to learn about and connect with their contexts,” the site states.

“Comrades.” You know, the buzzword from the USSR. What a success story that was!

The interesting part?

Earlier this week, a report was released that claimed the national arm of Black Lives Matter spent millions of dollars on travel and compensation over the past three fiscal years, but only 6% of BLM spending went to local chapters and grassroots organizations.

Here’s another very interesting point about BLM, revealed by “fact checkers.”

Fact Checkers: ‘Black Lives Matter’ Not Recognized IRS Charity, Raises Funds Through ‘Fiscal Sponsor’

by Amanda Prestagiacomo, 6-22-20

Earlier this month, FactCheck.org and Politifact confirmed that Black Lives Matter Global Network is not a recognized IRS charity, instead raising their funds through a fiscal sponsor, global nonprofit Thousand Current, which would likely “have a legal obligation to make reasonable efforts to ensure that the funds they receive are spent consistent with 501(c)(3) restrictions.” Some critics of the group suggest that its financial arrangement “blocks full transparency.”

FactCheck.org notes that ActBlue helps to raise funds for Black Lives Matter Global Network by directing donations to Thousand Currents, their fiscal sponsor.

“The partnership between the network (ActBlue) and the nonprofit (formerly the International Development Exchange) was announced in 2016,” the site explains. “The nonprofit organization (Thousand Currents) said it would provide ‘fiduciary oversight, financial management, and other administrative services to BLM.’”

An ActBlue spokesperson, Caleb Cade, confirmed to the fact-checking site that “donations made through ActBlue go to Thousand Currents for Black Lives Matter.”

You know. A Ponzi Scheme.

But now things start to expand, and the direct linkages with BLM become exposed. From FrontPageMag.com:

Minnesota State Rep: Antifa and Muslim Groups Plan to ‘Police Minneapolis Under Muslim Rule’

by Robert Spencer, 6-24-20

As the city of Minneapolis moves to dismantle its police force, Minnesota state Rep. Steve Green on Tuesday stated the obvious that virtually everyone else has been tiptoeing around and pretending isn’t there: “What you’re looking at, in my humble opinion, is communism moving into Minneapolis and St. Paul.” And not just Communism, but the Leftist/Islamic alliance. Green asserted that Antifa and Muslim organizations plan to “police Minneapolis under Muslim rule.” Those who scoff at such a notion simply aren’t paying attention to recent developments.

Back in 2016, a series of Minneapolis Muslims in man-on-the-street interviews stated matter-of-factly that they preferred Islamic law over American law. We have seen Sharia patrols in Germany, Britain, and even New York City, where the Muslim Community Patrol (MCP) is decked out in uniforms that strong resemble New York Police Department uniforms, and drives cars carefully designed to look like NYPD cars, to enforce “fundamentals of the Sharia.”

Muslim leader Siraj Wahhaj explained what that meant: “The mosques need protection and the MCP cars can help stop people who were not following the rules and regulations of the sharia, doing what they’re not supposed to be doing, but still doing it.” According to a Muslim involved with the MCP, this would involve stopping “Muslim women being out after dark, Muslim men hanging out in the corners doing dope, Muslims drinking liquor,” and enforcing, “basically, the fundamentals of the Sharia.”

If such a community patrol is launched in Minneapolis, it is likely to focus on the same things, but not do anything about the fact that the 5th Congressional District in Minneapolis, Rep. Ilhan Omar’s district, is the jihad terror recruitment capital of the United States. Stopping young Muslims from engaging in jihad activity is unlikely to be a high priority for a group that is dedicated to enforcing Sharia, since Sharia calls upon Muslims to wage war against and subjugate unbelievers.

Sharia Law on the streets of America, aided and abetted by BLM and their contingents.

Stepping stones. Think stepping stones. On the way to an ultimate goal. If you listen, listen carefully, BLM and their linkages are telling you precisely what they want. They’ll fight over the scraps later. Could it be Islam vs Communism? Who will win? Who is weakest? That’s who will lose.

You see how that one guy’s name really doesn’t matter now?

And just like Communism, BLM is coming for your religion. Any religion. Every religion. Except Islam. The Communist Manifesto by Marx and Engels fully recognizes there can be no religion in a Communist regime. Government must become the religion. Shaun King, known otherwise as Talcum X, a massive supporter of BLM, called for the eradication of religious artifacts. White religious artifacts. From GVWire.com:

‘Tear Them Down’: BLM Activist Shaun King Calls for Destruction of Jesus Christ Statues, Churches: ‘White Supremacy,’ ‘Oppression,’ ‘Racist Propaganda’

Shaun King, the controversial Black Lives Matter activist known for pushing false claims, called for the destruction of Jesus Christ statues and Christian churches for their depiction of the “white” holy family, which King argued are forms of “white supremacy” and “racist propaganda” that promote “oppression.”

“Yes, I think the statues of the white European they claim is Jesus should also come down,” the activist posted via Twitter on Monday. “They are a form of white supremacy. Always have been.”

“In the Bible,” King continued, “when the family of Jesus wanted to hide, and blend in, guess where they went? EGYPT! Not Denmark.”

“Tear them down.”

See how this all ties together?

Hawk Newsome, BLM advocate, tells you in quite certain language one of the stepping stones necessary.

But there is philosophy, and there is cash. Who funds BLM?

WHO IS FUNDING BLACK LIVES MATTER AND WHY? THE ANSWER MAY SHOCK YOU!

by Alexandra Bruce, 6-26-20

Spiro Skouras is back, addressing the rampant speculation about how Black Lives Matter is financed by George Soros.

In the wake of the murders of Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown, which spawned unprecedented riots in the US, Spiro says, “George Soros stepped in through his Open Societies Foundation, as well as grant-making from the Center of American Progress, to the tune of $33 million to fund Black Lives Matter.

“In addition to the $33 million contributed by George Soros, another funding campaign was formed: the Movement for Black Lives, which received $100 million through the black-led movement fund, paid for by the Ford Foundation and Borealis Philanthropy – and directly funded Black Lives Matter and dozens and dozens of other similar groups – actually, up to 150 other groups, including Black Lives Matter.

And this from NeonNettle.com:

Soros Plows $220 Million into Radical BLM Groups and Anti-Police Movements

by Paul Whitehead, 7-13-20

Open Society Foundations makes massive investment into radical groups

George Soros‘ Open Society Foundations has announced $220 million donations to radical Black Lives Matter justice organizations across the US.

The most significant share of the investment is $150 million, which will be via grants to black-led organizations focused on racial equality, the organization announced on Monday.

The Open Society Foundations added that donations aid the movement to “end policing as we know it.”

According to the Open Society Foundation’s statement:

“We are honored to be able to carry on the vital work of fighting for rights, dignity, and equity for oppressed people the world over started by our founder and chair, George Soros.”

Some of the organizations that will receive Soros’ grants are fighting to “defund the police” and “expand” voting rights.

Never forget, Hillary Clinton was always behind George Soros and advocated for him every step of the way — a man whose goal has always been the ruination and destruction of the United States of America.

Anyone besides me can’t wait for George Soros to die?

But there’s more on the Ford Foundation.

REVEALED: Ford Motors Makes Millions From Police Cruisers While The Ford Foundation Donates Millions To ‘Defund The Police’ (Updated)

by Sloan Rachmuth, 7-7-20

Ford Motors built America’s first police cruiser in 1950.  Today the company holds 65 percent of the market share for police cars.

Meanwhile, in New York City, the Ford Foundation is proudly taking part in the Defund the Police movement on its website:

“We’ve seen our grantees at the forefront of the change that’s taken place over the last few days—from the City Council of Minneapolis’s pledge to dismantle the police department to reimagine public safety, to Mayor Garcetti’s commitment to divest $250 million of the LAPD’s budget.” 

Founded in 1936 by Edsel Ford, the Ford Foundation is one of the country’s most recognized charitable organizations. In 2019, it handed out $500 million in grants to promote a “just, fair, and peaceful world with opportunity for all.”

But now, for the first time since 1976, a member of the Ford Motors dynasty sits on the Board of the Foundation. 

Henry “Sonny” Ford, joined the Foundation’s Board of Trustees in February of 2019 to help drive its “racial injustice” agenda. 

The move is aimed at giving the Ford Foundation more legitimacy as it presses forward with its social justice policies. But it could spell trouble for the Ford car company. 

Translation: America’s founding was unjust, it was unfair, and now, the country’s people deserve no peace. This appears to be the Ford Foundation’s new doctrine.

How does Mr. Ford conceptualize his risk of being associated with the Foundation, given its history of working to spread Marxism through this country and others?

BLM doesn’t exist to truly assist black Americans. It exists to further its own agenda of destruction, not creation, oppression, not freedom, goose-stepping solitary mindthink, not questions or opposing viewpoints.

And after a while, we should begin to ask ourselves: was any of this truly “spontaneous”? Or had it been planned for some time? Remember what I said about “coincidence”? I just really don’t believe in it much, any more. I have been disabused, somewhat violently, of believing in coincidence. Further, is it just about BLM? About a man whose name doesn’t readily trip off the tongue of everyone after 57 days?

What else could it be about?

Let’s start connecting some dots, tying some links together, and doing what I call the “logical extension.”

Charles Faddis wrote on June 25th:

We are now weeks into what amounts to a nationwide insurrection. Monuments have been defaced, statues toppled, and the commercial centers of our great cities gutted. Yet, throughout, most of our mass media has characterized violence and lawlessness on an unprecedented scale as “peaceful protests.” The scope of the destruction has been concealed. The demands of the anarchists and Marxists rampaging across America seemingly systematically mischaracterized simply as demands for justice and reform.

Purposely. Because, as we know, the American Media Maggots are hard at work.

Some of the explanation no doubt lies in the fact that much of what passes for our mainstream media is simply so blind in its hate for Donald Trump that it will support anyone and anything that seems to oppose him. There are other factors at work, however, and some of what is transpiring may, in fact, be due to a decidedly anti-American agenda and the desire of a particular foreign actor not only to damage this great nation but to promote its own particular ideology.

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) uses propaganda and influence operations as a means of projecting its power and weakening its enemies. Chief amongst the targets for these kinds of operations is the United States. These operations are not run on some kind of ad hoc basis. They are coordinated and directed at a national level by the CCP’s United Front Work Department.

It is critical to understand that America’s greatest enemy isn’t Russia, but China. CHINA IS OUR ENEMY.

The CCP’s United Front system mobilizes the party’s “friends” to strike the party’s enemies. The system has existed for a long time, but it has been greatly energized and expanded in recent years by Xi Jinping. It operates inside foreign political parties, diaspora communities, colleges and corporations, all with the goal of promoting the party’s interests. The express goals of the United Front system include undermining social cohesion, exacerbating racial tension, and influencing politics.

Offices known as “Confucius Institutes” on dozens of U.S. campuses have “longstanding and formal ties” with the United Front Work Department. As of this writing, there are 81 such institutes in the United States. The express purpose of these institutes is to shape American attitudes toward the CCP and Communism. The institutes are staffed by Chinese nationals and their purpose within the United Front system is to feed American students and faculty members positive images of Communism and the Chinese Communist Party. The students whose minds are shaped then, obviously, go on to careers not only in academia but throughout America including in the media.

Let’s bottom line things: the CCP owns vast interests in the American Media Maggots. Want to be staggered as to the depths of betrayal? Read the rest of the article.

We know that Opal Tometti, a co-founder of BLM, is deep into Communist philosophy and a great and ardent lover of all things Maduro. Here she is with Venezuelan Communist Nicolas Maduro himself.

From PanamPost.com:

The Links Between Black Lives Matter and Nicolas Maduro Revealed

by PanAmStaff, 6-25-20

The organization’s founders are avowed Marxists, more interested in ideology than in solving racial inequality

Black Lives Matter purportedly exists to combat the alleged racism inherent in America’s police forces. Police abuse, and particularly police abuse against black citizens is the raison d’etre of the organization.

Yet, at the PanAm Post we have found that while Black Lives Matter claim to oppose police abuse and racism around the world, the organization is simultaneously a great supporter of some of the world’s most brutal and repressive dictators. In particular, the founders of BLM have been staunch supporters and allies of the sanguinary Venezuela dictator Nicolas Maduro and of the Castro regime in Cuba.

Take it away, Opal.

In December 2015 Black Lives Matter sent a delegation, headed by the organization’s co-founder, Opal Tometi, to act as observers during the Venezuelan Parliamentary elections of that year. The Maduro regime did not allow accreditation for observers from the Organization of American States, the UN, or the EU. The only accredited observers where from regimes and organizations friendly to the “revolutionary cause.”

Later that same month Tometi penned an article where she espouses, word for word, the regime’s standard text for international propaganda. “In these last 17 years, we have witnessed the Bolivarian Revolution champion participatory democracy and construct a fair, transparent election system recognized as among the best in the world ,” wrote Tometi about one of the world’s most corrupt voting systems in history.

Opal Tometi is, clearly, “down with the sickness.”

BLM’s main claim to fame, and its own name are derived from a premise that has been proven to be completely false. Police do not kill proportionally more black men than they do white men. Moreover, the organization has a lot of explaining to do regarding its support and collaboration with murderous and tyrannical regimes, some of which are intent on harming Americans of all colors.

It is truly stunning that some of America’s most renowned business leaders have chosen to ignore the evident and even glaring intent of BLM’s founders to promote Marxism and a so-called “revolution” in the United States, that has nothing to do with race, and everything to do with ideology.

Somali Representative Ilhan Omar, who unlawfully married her brother to achieve entry into this country, and who is being investigated by the DOJ for campaign fraud and tax fraud, will at least be honest and reveal her real intent for the United States of America, the country she cheated to enter but hates with her very soul.

Dismantle everything. You see how so many seemingly-disparate elements somehow magically dovetail into one semi-united front? Nothing is about creation. Everything is about destruction

More about how Communists are arming their brothers in BLM to commit acts of violence against Americans.

US authorities uncover massive, nationwide weapons trafficking ring run by communist China to arm Black Lives Matter terrorists with powerful weapons of war

by Mike Adams, 7-18-20

On July 3rd of this year, Natural News reported that communist China was trafficking full-auto weapons parts into Florida as a way to arm Black Lives Matter terrorists in advance of a planned armed uprising / revolution. US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) had interdicted and seized a shipment of over 10,000 full-auto upgrade parts that convert semi-auto rifles into full-auto weapons of war.

According to the CBP announcement from June 26th, the shipment originated in Shenzhen, China and was destined for “a residence” in Melbourne, Florida. Inside the shipment was over 10,000 small machine parts that function as full-auto drop-in upgrades for AR-15s. Natural News was able to determine that this operation was part of an attempt by communist China to destabilize the United States by arming Antifa and Black Lives Matter terrorists.

So make no mistake about the goals of the CCP — Chinese Communist Party. Theirs is an attempt to rape the US for all her proprietary industrial secrets, create weakness and chaos, destroy the nation, install Communism, and make what used to be the United States into a puppet for Communist China — a satellite thereof, if you will.

So let’s talk Socialism and Communism. Let’s start with Marx and Engels.

But note this: if BLM’s cause was truly a fight against actual racism, then why has the movement not fully divested itself from one of history’s most prolific racists, Karl Marx? Marx and his contemporary and friend Friedrich Engles are, of course, the fathers of that most murderous of political philosophies, communism. Communist tyrants have murdered well over 100 million people.

But both Marx and, more significantly, Engles were also notorious for their racist ideas. Both men viewed blacks specifically as lesser humans and more closely related to “the animal kingdom” than other races. In fact, Marx and Engels believed that race was a primary determiner for one’s economic status and ability. Using this belief, they developed a system by which they “radicalized skin-color groups, ethnicities, nations, and social classes, while endowing them with innate superior and inferior character traits,” as noted by Erik van Ree of the Institute for East European Studies of the University of Amsterdam. “They regarded race as part of humanity’s natural conditions, upon which the production system rested. ‘Races’ endowed with superior qualities would boost economic development and productivity, while the less endowed ones would hold humanity back.”

Not very BLM-like, is it? Because BLM is, at its very core, racist, stupid and ignorant.

Like most Leftists, this is cultivated and purposeful.

But what is Capitalism and what is Socialism? And please note what Denmark says about itself: “it’s far from a Socialist planned economy. Denmark is a Market economy.”

Who is Karl Marx, and what is Communism?

So let’s make no mistake. Socialism is the government providing for the individual, wherein the government owns and runs much of the nation. Incentivization barely exists for the individual. And those in government profit. Not you. Guaranteed.

Communism is the ultimate goal of Socialists, wherein the government — the “state” — owns and controls everything and the people own nothing. There is no such thing as private property. And the government — the state — owns the individual as well.

If Communism were such a wonderful idea, why hasn’t it spread like popular wildfire around the planet hundreds of years ago? Because Communism, in practice, kills people and makes slaves of those who are not in the “elite” portion of government. Simple. And those in government profit. Not you. Guaranteed.

We’d all do best to be reminded that, in 2020, in an election year, everything is about the election. I have been thoroughly and completely disabused of relating to anything, any more, as “coincidence.” Coincidence has died a hard, bloody, struggling death. It no longer exists.

Forces, never before arrayed en masse, have been brought about by those who wish to do America harm. To, literally, ensure there is no such thing as America any more. No more United States. No more unity. Only division and hatred and violence and death and burning and looting and intimidation and fright and the eradication of history and the corruption of our youth and the normalizing of everything that is anti-American.

Leftists, Demorats, the American Media Maggots, anarchists, Antifa, Socialists and Communists have been handed and are continuing to be handed a series of golden opportunities to tear down this nation — and they are taking complete and utter advantage of GOWPs — Guilty Overeducated White People — the WCM — Woke Child Mob — and the ignorance and complacency of the bulk of Americans who cower in their homes over another strain of what has now been proven to be a virulent flu.

It’s a Perfect Storm, a perfect opportunity for those who despise America and want to see her torn asunder, jealous of her power, her strength, her independence, and see her “put in her place” just as Barack Hussein Obama attempted to do — but didn’t yet have the combination of events handed to him on a silver platter. He wanted — and told us — that he wanted to be “fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

But even he couldn’t quite pull it off. The lethal combination of incidents and opportunities were not yet exquisitely arrayed. And worst of all, OMB, Orange Man Bad, Donald John Trump, the guy with the dead orange cat on his head, was elected in place of the one whose “turn” it was — Hillary Clinton.

So if all of these elements can’t “have” America, they’re going to tear her apart.

And if they can, they’ll install outright Communism.

That’s the goal.

Make no mistake.

And once the United States of America is gone — the only firewall against tyranny and oppression — then the rest of the planet falls as well.

Remember.Pastor Niemoller:

BZ

 

 

Be careful what you want from law enforcement

I’ve said for years, “people get the kind of law enforcement they deserve.” In a way, that distills down to the Talking Heads lyrics: “watch out, you might get what you’re after.”

I make this notation in reference to the NYPD’s firing of Officer Daniel Pantaleo on Monday, August 19th, resulting from the July 17th, 2014 death of Eric Garner on Staten Island.

NYPD fires Officer Daniel Pantaleo for chokehold in Eric Garner’s death

by David K. Li

An administrative judge had earlier recommended that Pantaleo be terminated. Garner’s death, which sparked national protests, occurred on July 17, 2014.

Daniel Pantaleo, the New York City police officer seen on video using a chokehold during Eric Garner’s deadly arrest five years ago ⁠— sparking mass protests ⁠and becoming a rallying cry for the Black Lives Matter movement — was fired by the department on Monday.

NYPD Commissioner James O’Neill announced he’ll enforce an administrative judge’s recommendation, made this month, that Pantaleo be terminated over the July 17, 2014, confrontation as Garner was being arrested on Staten Island for selling loose, untaxed cigarettes.

Pantaleo, who has been with the NYPD since 2006, was suspended as soon as that departmental verdict was reached, in keeping with long-standing practice when there is a recommendation for firing. The 13-year veteran had been on desk duty as his case made its way through legal and administrative circles.

“It is clear that Daniel Pantaleo can no longer effectively serve as a New York City police officer,” O’Neill announced.

It would seem to me that this is yet another police officer kicked to the curb due to politics. Please allow me to elaborate and elucidate. Because the implications then and now are rather massive. Here is the caveat:

Minutes after the police commissioner announced his ruling on Monday, Lynch said O’Neill had permanently lost the confidence of officers on the beat.

“The NYPD will remain rudderless and frozen, and Commissioner O’Neill will never be able to bring it back,” Lynch said in a statement.

“Now it is time for every police officer in this city to make their own choice. We are urging all New York City police officers to proceed with the utmost caution in this new reality, in which they may be deemed ‘reckless’ just for doing their job. We will uphold our oath, but we cannot and will not do so by needlessly jeopardizing our careers or personal safety.”

NYPD Officer Daniel Pantaleo has been through every horror-show ride imaginable. His actions have been examined by every city, county, state and federal microscope extant. Despite that, not one prosecution was recommended.

A Staten Island grand jury declined to indict Pantaleo and, this summer, the Justice Department said it would not bring federal civil rights or criminal charges against him.

Why not? Because, after all, let’s admit that it would certainly have been convenient and politically expedient to recommend Pantaleo for every possible prosecutory venue imaginable. It would have satisfied any number of “communities” involved both local and national.

Let’s not forget that cops don’t just find themselves exposed to “double jeopardy.” Oh no. (this is absolute nirvana for Leftists) They can be tried criminally. They can be tried civilly. They can be prosecuted by the federal government — which pays attorneys to do so under 42 USC 1983. And they can be face entirely separate administrative repercussions. Like Pantaleo. Sounds like quadruple jeopardy to me.

For doing their job. For responding to calls for service.

Why didn’t all of these various potential prosecutions come to fruition? Could it be that the fact patterns extant have had something to do with that?

You see, the laws of physics still remain. Those laws exist on a physical plane and on a human plane. I would remind you of them.

  • “A body at rest will remain at rest, and a body in motion will remain in motion unless it is acted upon by an external force.”
  • “The force acting on an object is equal to the mass of that object times its acceleration.”
  • “For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.”

So true, we are now discovering. In a societal fashion, you see.

You cannot denigrate the importance of a civilized, organized, policed society advancing the rule of law and then complain when it becomes none of that. Nor would you ever want the proverbial “cop on every corner” because that becomes, naturally, Big Brother and “1984.”

There has to be — and there is — some sort of happy medium which now, unfortunately, is far from sight. We talk of pendulums and cycles in law enforcement. Because in my almost 70 years on the planet and 45 years as a Sheepdog in law enforcement, I have seen it all, done it all, watched it all, heard it all, experienced it all, paid for it in a marriage, blood, injuries, psychologically and with alcohol — yet I find myself actually a bit surprised and massively disappointed by today’s state of law enforcement.

I have to admit: I truly didn’t see law enforcement caving to Leftist politics though, of course, I truly shouldn’t be surprised. The gene pool for law enforcement and law enforcement administrators is no different from the one that surrounds every locale. If it is weak, you get weak cops. If it is Leftist, you get Leftist cops. Gene pool, baby.

Read my post about the limp-wristed and Leftist Berkeley Police Department here, the likes of which stood down in the face of Leftist Antifa rioting directly in front of their faces. Their chief told them to stand down, directed by the Berkeley mayor. No more, no less. And the abysmal Berkeley PD officers did just that. They disgust me.

For perspective, all we have to do is go back to LAPD and Rampart in the 1990s. That lovely time was acquired when hiring standards plummeted due to the dearth of appropriate candidates, and LAPD — like most every other California LE agency — lowered its hiring standards. There was a delay in corruption because, as indicated by the IACP — it took a few years for those persons to become sufficiently familiar with the system and feel comfortable with gaming it. Gang members. Minorities. Ties to Death Row Records. The Kingpin of Rampart wasn’t some Caucasoid. It was a guy named Rafael Perez.

Whoa. Hold up on that car wash. I guess that means — as I said — you truly do get the kind of law enforcement you deserve. Or accept.

Stop. Law enforcement agencies get sued due to three primary failures or exposures:

  • Negligence in hiring
  • Negligence in training
  • Negligence in retention.

Are we starting to see that now? I respond: everything is cyclical. Everything.

The New York Times says:

Daniel Pantaleo Was Fired. We’re Still Afraid for Our Lives.

by Steven W. Thrasher

Five years after Eric Garner’s death, it’s painfully obvious that the daily anxiety black and brown people experience is justified.

Last week, while the officer who had held Eric Garner in a banned chokehold as he said “I can’t breathe” about a dozen times was still employed by the New York Police Department, I was thousands of miles away, in Arizona, where I found myself terrified by a different set of law enforcement officials.

Returning from visiting a friend near the Mexico border, I was driving up State Route 90 when all northbound traffic was diverted into a giant tent, where officers from Customs and Border Protection were performing cursory inspections of all vehicles. A menacing German shepherd was being led around each and every car, presumably sniffing for narcotics.

I was experiencing one of the legal checkpoints that the agency uses to search and potentially seize any vehicle within 100 miles of a border, without what would normally be called probable cause. And while I didn’t have any contraband, I felt a rising sense of panic as the officers and dog got closer to my car.

Stop. I vehemently disagree with checkpoints away from a border. But that’s a discussion for another time.

But as a black journalist who has reported as police officers lobbed tear gas and used sound cannons in Baltimore, Ferguson and New York, and simply as a black person living in America, my experience in Arizona reminded me of how very real the stress of living under occupation is for black and brown people. Such stress, of course, takes a mental health toll and likely contributes to rates of hypertension and heart disease that create “John Henryism,” a term Dr. Sherman James, an epidemiologist, coined while trying to understand why black men die younger than white men.

So blacks live “under occupation” in the United States of America?

Take a breath BZ. Then state: what a load of unmitigated bull.

I’ve been stopped by CHP a number of times, some for bogus reasons. I was an EVOC instructor, after all. I was stopped by SPD for no reason. I was stopped by a drunk CHP officer on I-5 in 1986 for going over the limit by two miles per hour. He reeked of alcohol, his hair was askew. He was a mess. I swear, the only reason I was let go was because my then-girlfriend had G-cup breasts in a low-cut blouse. Which he ogled. I’ve been stopped numerous times by law enforcement. And I’m as Caucasoid as the driven snow. So “I’ve been stopped”? Boo-damned-hoo. Get in line.

Do you know what I do that is different from most everyone else when stopped? I pull to the right cautiously and in an area that is safe for the officer. I don’t stop on the left. I don’t stop on freeway ramps. I roll down every window. I keep my hands on the steering wheel. I don’t make any movements. I let the officer set the contact. At night I turn on the overhead cabin light. I say “yes sir” and “no sir.” Lots of that. When I am armed (I am always armed) that is the first thing I say, with both my hands out on the driver’s side door sill. I stay in the car unless directed otherwise.

Today, could I get smoked? Of course I could. If I did something stupid. No one knows me any more. Melanin count means nothing. You act. Cops only get to react.

Chris Rock is correct.

It would seem that most deaths from law enforcement come down to a rather simple equation, much simpler than even Newton’s Laws. Compliance vs resistance.

And when a multitude of brackets, organizations, movements, political groups, communities, media, social mores and even the administrations of various law enforcement agencies insist upon resistance or tacitly condone it, we are discovering that this makes for a brew of terrible consequences, not unlike The Ferguson Effect.

Well, not unlike. Precisely like The Ferguson Effect.

And back we go to the NYPD. Let’s examine the Eric Garner case and why it’s critical not only to the NYPD, but to law enforcement in general. Because some decisions have to be made — not only in terms of law enforcement, but in terms of the overall thinking regarding the crafting of laws.

The background of the Eric Garner case is this.

You have a large, obese black man, Eric Garner, 6’3″ and 370 pounds, who is selling what the City of New York calls “onesies” (cigarettes sold singly, out of a pack, without tax stamps) outside of a store (known as a bodega) on July 17th of 2014.

When it’s written “without tax stamps” that means the City of New York is removed from the tax revenue stream it demands on cigarettes.

So here is a man selling individual cigarettes that folks can purchase tax free, specifically so that people avoid paying taxes. He is doing this directly in front of a store where the owner has to pay tax on every cigarette pack he sells. And the owner doesn’t get the luxury of selling them individually. That is clearly undermining the store owner who is abiding by the law. Paying taxes.

The City of New York not only declares that unfair, but illegal as well.

Here’s where I make one very critical distinction that will come into play in a moment. The cops didn’t create the law. The City of New York did.

At issue is the use of force by the NYPD in terms of an individual who was breaking the law, albeit not regarding a felony, but a crime nevertheless.

And let us not deal in generalities or phrases or SJW chants as Leftists and Demorats are wont to do, but actual issues at handreal time and immediate solutions to problems cops find themselves facing on the street every day. Decisions that must be made in seconds. They don’t have the luxury of months of deliberation.

What Leftist organizations fail to disclose was that this was a common grievance for that area. NYPD just didn’t “happen” to be there. Citizens had complained about persons circumventing the law and, specifically, in front of their stores. The City of New York had decreed that it must have its own Tybalt-like “pound of flesh.”

Meanwhile, Eric Garner’s arrest record with the NYPD indicated a frequency of more than thirty times since 1980 for assault, resisting arrest and grand theft. Even The New York Times wrote that many of these arrests had been for selling untaxed cigarettes. What a shock to find that behavior continuing.

Here is CBS coverage.

But let’s examine things further. Much further than Leftists would care. Let’s look at the size of Garner as compared to the officers around him. They had options. Many options when people fail to comply. Chemicals. Batons. Striking moves. Even deadly force if he attempted to disarm the officers or acquire their weapons which, luckily, he did not do.

Unlike Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, upon which an entire lie was built — “hands up don’t shoot” — and “Black Lives Matter” was created. Yes. On a lie.

What they decided to do, instead, is utilize numbers. An attempt to overpower an individual who clearly was much larger than every other officer present. Further, positional asphyxia comes into play. This is something the suspect brought to the table. Not the officers. The suspect acted. The officers can only react.

But even before we get into those details, which are important, let’s examine the overall situation in the first place.

NYPD either made an on-view notice of a crime, the selling of illegal cigarettes, or they were sent there by dispatch. It really doesn’t matter which one.

They confront the person involved. He either complies or he doesn’t. The initial action is his to make. The officers gauge their reactions to his action. They only know that he’s big. Really big. And he isn’t complying.

Let’s say this is a misdemeanor. And let’s say Eric Garner resists.

If you’re in charge of NYPD, what do your officers do now in the face of resistance?

Do they — as many citizens seem to demand — simply evaluate his quotient of resistance and then determine not to engage? And walk away?

What if the officers write a citation and tell Eric Garner to sign? What if he refuses to sign a summons? Do they walk away in the face of refusal?

I mean, come on, these were cigarettes. It’s not like he murdered someone. They should have simply walked away, right?

“Stop selling cigarettes.” No compliance.

“Sign the citation.” No compliance.

“You’re now under arrest for NYC Code ___.” No compliance.

This would be the perfect time for the officers to turn around and walk away, wouldn’t it? Maybe take his name and submit for a later arrest warrant? Wouldn’t that be logical?

“Give me your name.” No compliance.

“What’s your date of birth?” No compliance.

“What’s your address?” No compliance.

“Give me some ID.” No compliance.

There. The NYPD officers should simply have walked away because, of course, everyone could see the potential escalation at that point.

By this time, everyone on the street is watching you. Do you back up your lawful demands? Do you engage? Or do you simply walk away?

Here are some examples of walking away.

And this.

Look. Let’s be real. Making the dousing of officers a felony may be impractical. Logic tells us, if enacted, the crime may be dropped to a misdemeanor.

So make it a misdemeanor that mandates an immediate arrest, no citation and, if they physically resist, depending upon the violence of resistance and substance, you could easily bump it up to a felony.

We know that, likely, at some time in the future some individual will get the bright idea of substituting, say, vinegar or gasoline or rubbing alcohol or bleach or some clear caustic chemical for water. It’s the nature of crime and criminals. Luckily, to this point, that has not occurred.

But the most important aspect of the situation is to react now. Not an hour from now. Not tomorrow or next week. Immediately at the time of the crime.

Governor Cuomo is correct. With a massive caveat.

Had the officers reacted immediately to their incidents and a “community outrage” ensued, you and I both know that Governor Andrew Cuomo would have been one of the first — after determining which way the prevailing political prairie winds were blowing, sticking his finger up in the air — to condemn the NYPD and those officers, kicking them to the curb. Guaranteed. Easy for him to say in retrospect. Isn’t it?

The streets of what I quaintly term “Urban Rate Cages” are not always filled with warm and fuzzy individuals. Sometimes they aim to punch, kick, rob, steal and murder.

Because in the lawless community — and oh yes, those communities do exist — to do nothing when law enforcement is faced with lawbreakers, simply engenders more lawbreaking and disrespect to not only authority but the entire concept of civility in general.

To do nothing — and watching various NYPD officers walking away from being assaulted — tells those persons in the affected neighborhoods that the cops do nothing and hence mean nothing.

Acting this way — acquiescing in the face of crime — tells criminals that they can do whatever they wish and emboldens them. It also makes the job of law enforcement infinitely tougher for cops who decide to actually enforce laws. They will now be the “bad guys” because “the other officers didn’t do anything.”

So, Leftists, Demorats and American Media Maggots: what are your answers?

Because essentially what you’re saying is that, in the face of resistance, just about any amount, law enforcement should step back.

One pause for a brief waft of sanity.

Had someone done that to me or any other of my fellow officers in the 70s, 80s or 90s, no matter their ethnicity, they would have found themselves handcuffed and under arrest. No one did that to me or fellow officers where an arrest failed to occur. Just as Governor Cuomo indicated. We knew where the line existed and we held that line.

The laws of certain jungles applied then as now. Either you rule the jungle or the jungle rules you. Lawlessness is either accepted or it is overcome.

Why officers don’t react that way now? Because they realize their very own departments won’t have their backs due to political pressure. And political correctness. The Ferguson Effect.

On August 1st of 2014 the Medical Examiner ruled Garner’s death a homicide. According to the medical examiner’s definition, a homicide is a death caused by the intentional actions of another person or persons, which is not necessarily an intentional death or a criminal death. The five medico-legal rulings in every death are natural, accident, suicide, homicide, and undetermined.

The grand jury decided not to indict. DOJ? Nothing. FBI? Nothing. Attorney General? Nothing.

And earlier this summer, federal prosecutors ended their five-year-long probe of the matter and elected not to pursue any civil rights charges against Pantaleo.

That means: no 42 USC 1983 actions.

Officer Pantaleo was fired after Police Commissioner James O’Neill took a phone call from Mayor Bill de Blasio over that weekend. Politics, baby.

Did we ever see this?

At a May 2019 disciplinary hearing for Pantaleo, Dr. Floriana Persechino, who performed Garner’s autopsy, testified that Pantaleo’s use of a chokehold on Garner “set into motion a lethal sequence” that led to a fatal asthma attack.[167][168] However, the examiner conceded that even “a bear hug” could have had the same effect as the chokehold, given that Garner weighed 395 pounds, suffered from asthma and diabetes, and had a heart twice the size of a healthy person’s heart.[166] Moreover, during the trial at a hearing in June 2019, a defense witness, Dr. Michael Graham, St. Louis, Missouri’s chief medical examiner, testified Garner’s death couldn’t have been caused by a chokehold because, Graham said, Garner was never actually choked or unable to breathe during the arrest.[169][170]Graham attributed Garner’s death to heart disease exacerbated by the stress of the arrest.[169][170]

Imagine that. An excerpt from an article by Dr G Wesley Clark:

Having reviewed the video several times now, and being a physician who specialized in the surgery of the very obese, I believe that the cause of Mr. Garner’s death was not
“police brutality” or negligence, but rather the unfortunate synergy between his disease of morbid obesity and actions most police perform countless times with only transient
discomfort to the arrestee. The decision of the Grand Jury was reasonable.
Mr. Garner’s demise was the consequence of a confluence of many factors, most of which were beyond the ken of a policeman, and which occurred in devastatingly rapid
sequence.
Eric Garner was very obese, said to weigh at least 350 pounds. In fact, based upon his height and appearance, he very likely weighed more than that, but very few bathroom
scales read high enough to accurately measure weight of that magnitude. By simple observation, one could see that his abdomen was very large and protuberant. His chest
was similarly blanketed with a heavy layer of fat, and he had no visible neck – no indentation under his jaw, typically present in non-obese persons, which permits
application of a “chokehold,” to briefly arrest the carotid circulation to render him unconscious and manageable. The chokehold was ineffective as a control, but it served
to take him to the ground by leverage.

Guaranteed you didn’t read of this in any American Media Maggot venue. Then there is this:

The subsequent post-mortem examination is said to have shown no evidence of injury to either the larynx or the hyoid bone, which is almost always fractured in cases of
strangulation. Mr. Garner is said to have died from “chest compression” and associated heart disease.

Few persons, undoubtedly including most police officers and even Mr. Garner, would understand the gravity and complex pathophysiology of this condition, and the rapidity
with which it can become irreversible, unless an airway and mechanical ventilation can be quickly administered – and establishing an airway in a very obese person is itself
extremely challenging even under ideal conditions, such as in an operating room, let alone on the sidewalk.

Eric Garner’s death had essentially nothing to do with racism or racial animosity, particularly when one can see an African-American female sergeant, in charge at the
scene, standing and observing the arrest in the background. Ultimately, as the senior officer on the scene, she was responsible for Mr. Garner’s safety, although it would be
unreasonable to incriminate her, either, given the obscure physiology of the chain of events that led to his unfortunate demise.

But you didn’t hear that either, did you?

This is an interesting opinion piece from the WashingtonExaminer.com:

Despite Eric Garner, Daniel Pantaleo doesn’t deserve to be fired

by James Gagliano

Pantaleo, now 34, inadvertently became part of ground zero for the populist uprising of social justice activists during the summer of 2014. It was then that he was dispatched to a Staten Island street corner, directed to take a 43-year-old father of six, Eric Garner, into custody for selling single cigarettes from packs without a tax stamp, or “loosies,” outside a bodega.

Garner’s death is a vicissitude that should sadden us all. But only one person is accountable here. It is the man who broke the law, obstinately advised police he wouldn’t be held to account for same, and then placed everyone involved in a dangerous intersection of sworn duties and no-way-out choices. Garner caused this horrible incident to occur. Pantaleo will presumably pay the price for that poor decision-making, as well.

Oddly enough, precisely what I’ve been saying.

The tragic incident has undergone scrutinization from outside investigators. First, a Staten Island grand jury failed to indict the officer. Then followed a Department of Justice investigation into Pantaleo’s actions to determine if Garner’s civil rights had been abridged. This investigation spanned both the Obama and Trump presidential administrations and was overseen by four separate attorneys general.

And two excellent points by author James Gagliano, a former FBI agent of 25 years.

Broken Windows has been under fire in the woke days of 2019. But let’s not pretend that its employment has not saved countless black and brown lives when perpetrators and victims of homicides in New York City are overwhelmingly black and brown.

We may debate whether or not the sale of untaxed cigarettes should be considered an arrest-worthy transgression. But cops don’t make laws. When we have laws on the books, law enforcement professionals swear an oath to uphold them. Do we want to confront exactly what “selective enforcement” would look like in a country that already suffers from the belief that certain communities are treated differently with respect to the law?

After a while, having been told by various communities that law enforcement “over polices,” by their administrations that they “over police,” by the news media that they “over police,” by their local politicians that they “over police” and certainly Leftists, Demorats and the American Media Maggots that they “over police,” sooner or later law enforcement officers are going to take this clarion cry to heart.

They’re going to reduce their self-initiated activity or proactive responses. Simultaneously, this is occurring as well:

NYPD officer injuries spike as union blames anti-police lawmakers

by Sara Dorn

NYPD cops have a new reason to walk their beat on eggshells: Officer injuries are spiking.

Amid a spate of assaults on police, including a melee at Brooklyn’s Marcy Projects that left three cops hurt as well as a rash of water-dousing attacks, injuries rose 12.5 percent in the second quarter over the first three months of the year, NYPD data show.

That’s up 2.5 percent over the same time period in 2018 and up 3.5 percent through June over the first half of 2018.

With 1,120 total injuries, April to June this year was the bloodiest quarter for cops since the final three months of 2016, the earliest time period of publicly available data.

Injuries aren’t just knee scrapes; 35 officers were “seriously” hurt and 47 suffered “substantial” injuries, the NYPD says.

Police-union president Patrick Lynch — who’s been warring with NYPD brass and Mayor de Blasio in the wake of officer Daniel Pantaleo’s firing — blamed the uptick on “anti-police lawmakers and failed NYPD leaders” who have “emboldened criminals to assault cops and resist arrest.”

Absolutely correct. That is America’s current narrative with regard to law enforcement.

Cops are human. Their job is to do the job. Their job is also to go home in one piece at the end of their shifts. And like all others, they have to look out for themselves and their families. So they’re going to have to make some considered decisions.

NYPD Union Tells Cops To Ask Supervisor Permission Before Arresting Anybody

by Sandy Malone

New York, NY – The police union put out a list of guidelines for officers to follow on Monday after New York Police Department (NYPD) Commissioner James O’Neill fired Officer Daniel Pantaleo in connection with the death of Eric Garner despite the fact a grand jury and a federal investigation had exonerated him.

“Be advised that neither your Police Academy training nor the current Patrol Guide procedures reflect the precedent established by this decision,” Police Benevolent Association President Patrick Lynch wrote in the memo, a copy of which has been obtained by Blue Lives Matter.

Lynch warned that Commissioner O’Neill’s termination of Officer Pantaleo set a dangerous precedent and “fundamentally changed the nature of our job” when he allowed politics to determine Officer Pantaleo’s fate without regard for the fact.

The memo encouraged officers to “uphold our oath” and continue doing their jobs but reminded them “we must remain united to protect each other from the toxic political environment in which we are forced to work.”

On Monday, the PBA accused Commissioner O’Neill of rolling over for City Hall and doing Mayor Bill de Blasio’s bidding.

In order to be in exact compliance with the patrol guide, officers will have to do a lot of things in a specified way that, in the past, was unofficially left to officers’ discretion.

The reasoning is, of course, to ensure they have authority to conduct business. They’re also saying that if they’re to be held perfectly accountable, they must act or react as the guidelines are specifically written.

“For every job involving a possible arrest situation, immediately request response by patrol supervisor and additional members to help control situation, pursuant to P.G. 221-02, ‘Use of Force,’” the PBA memo instructed officers in accordance with NYPD policy. “Await the patrol supervisor’s arrival before attempting to effect an arrest, except when immediate action is necessary to protect life and personal safety of all persons present (see P.G. 221-02).”

“Prior to effecting an arrest, confer with the patrol supervisor,” the memo said, and reminded officers to use their bodycams and “document in your memo book all instructions received from the patrol supervisor or other supervisors at the scene.”

Translated: CYA. Cover Your Ass.

The memo also reminded officers that anytime a suspect doesn’t voluntarily submit to being handcuffed, they need to request an Emergency Service Unit (ESU) before they can take that suspect into custody.

Officers should “attempt to isolate and contain the suspect” while they wait for ESU to arrives, as per NYPD official policy.

If those are the standards then they must be met, the PBA is saying.

“It’s very well known that for a majority of circumstances, the patrol guide is not followed to a T because you’d never get anything done,” the official told Blue Lives Matter. “It’s just too inefficient to do everything that way.”

The PBA memo to its members also reminded officers that they must call for an ambulance every single time there is a use-of-force, regardless of whether anyone has claimed to be injured.

“Do not transport the prisoner until he or she has been evaluated by EMS personnel,” the PBA wrote.

The memo also told officers to be sure and do their paperwork completely and as soon as possible for every incident.

When you’re under the gun as is law enforcement today, what other choices remain?

The NYPD official told Blue Lives Matter that most officers save paperwork to complete at the end of their shift so they can get back out on the street faster when they complete a call, but that the policy says they have to do all paperwork immediately after a call is completed.

I imagine you see the issues here. It’s called “back and forth.” No more. It’s now “one way.”

In Kalifornia, things got worse for law enforcement officers. From CalMatters.org:

Newsom signs landmark police use-of-force bill

California will soon have a tougher new legal standard for the use of deadly force by police, under legislation Gov. Gavin Newsom signed today that was inspired by last year’s fatal shooting of a young, unarmed man in Sacramento.

The governor contends that with Assembly Bill 392 in place, police will turn increasingly to de-escalation techniques including verbal persuasion, weapons other than guns and other crisis-intervention methods.

Under the new law, which takes effect January 1, police may use deadly force only when “necessary in defense of human life.”

That’s a steeper standard than prosecutors apply now, which says officers can shoot when doing so is “reasonable.” One of the most significant changes will allow prosecutors to consider officers’ actions leading up to a shooting when deciding whether deadly force is justified. 

Some police administrators are saying “calm down, there is no difference.” Changing the word “reasonable” to “necessary.” And how will you determine “necessary”? Only at the end of the event. What is “reasonable” to the officer in terms of reaction is no longer of consideration — in other words, what would other reasonable officers have done in a similar situation?

The Ferguson Effect.

It would appear that, throughout all this, Leftists, Demorats and American Media Maggots are getting what they want. From Fox26Houston.com:

Significant drop in people wanting to become police officers

There has been a significant drop in the number of people wanting to be police officers. One officer says he knows why.

Please remember this: at the same time law enforcement is attacked and themselves handcuffed, the LDAMM are waging war against your Second Amendment rights and your ability to defend yourself. Who defends you if law enforcement is stymied and your rights are removed?

The entire point of the article is this: what do you want from your law enforcement officers? At what point do you demand they back down? Is it a sliding scale in terms of the initial crime committed? Is it a sliding scale of the resistance encountered?

Because you have to realize that in terms of any and every crime encountered by law enforcement, persons are going to resist. They are going to resist speaking to an officer, signing a citation, getting out of a car, refusing to submit to handcuffing and more.

Every law created has the potential for resistance. Including smoking in a bar. Vaping in a doorway. Onesies. Cops are called. What do you really want them to do when faced with resistance? Nothing?

Then why are you sending them to calls for service in the first place if you don’t intend them to enforce the law?

The bottom line is this: citizens, what kind of law enforcement do you really want?

After many decades in law enforcement, I do know this: people get the kind of law enforcement they deserve.

The Ferguson Effect is real.

Because cops are human just like everyone else. Unless you want RoboCop — perhaps it might not be that far off.

Good luck with that.

“Watch out, you might get what you’re after.”

BZ