Tag Archives: Brett Kavanaugh

What is #WalkAway?

Posted on by

Briefly, #WalkAway is a Twitter hashtag indicating that people should walk away from the Democrat Party for any number of reasons. Here is one.

Candace Owens talks about #WalkAway with Charles Payne.

Here is the man who started the #WalkAway campaign, in his own words.

Breitbart.com writes about #WalkAway:

WATCH: #WalkAway Movement to Abandon Liberalism Goes Viral

by Thomas D Williams, PhD

The #Walkaway movement that began with a popular Facebook video featuring a gay hairdresser in New York City explaining why he was leaving the Democratic Party has quickly morphed into a major force on social media and beyond.

Uh-oh. Just what Leftists, Demorats and the American Media Maggots (LDAMM) don’t want.

According to an article last Thursday in the Epoch Times, some five million people on Facebook and YouTube have seen the groundbreaking video showing a “very handsome gay man” who describes his awakening to the inanities of liberalism and the Democratic Party.

It gets worse. For the LDAMM.

Straka published his original #WalkAway video on May 26, and since then his life “has been overtaken by a tidal wave,” the Epoch Times reports.

The movement has been especially successful because its spokespersons have not been the sort typically associated with conservativism. Young and old, black and white, men and women, gay and straight—the campaign seems to elude stereotypes and pigeonholing.

The popular young conservative commentator C.J. Pearson, for instance, has given the movement a significant push by highlighting the Democratic Party’s racist past. “The Democratic Party is the party of slavery. The party of Jim Crow. The party of segregation. The party of the KKK,” Pearson tweeted Saturday.

“Democrats walked away from black folks long ago. Now, it’s our time to #WalkAway,” he added.

Another explanation is here:

These aren’t bots. These are real people. With voices. And lives. And history. Listen to them. Listen to CJ Pearson:

There is also Brandon Tatum. He reminds everyone of some very, very inconvenient truths purposely ignored by the LDAMM. Tatum “nails it” in a comprehensive way that no one else has quite yet expressed so clearly and rationally.

You want more examples? Here is David Harris, Jr:

Here is Christopher Wright.

Another testimonial, this time from Kara Bustos:

David Harris in re Whoopi Goldberg. Because Leftists cannot not push the envelope.

I would be remiss not to point this out:

Why Blacks Are Leaving the Democratic Party

by Celia Farber

The focus on illegal immigrants is helping push away blacks

The dominant feeling among the defecting block of African-Americans is that the Democrats have abandoned them in favor of a new voting block of illegal immigrants whose victimhood will guarantee votes. In their view, the Democrats seem to have abandoned old loyalties for a new road to political power.

Here’s the unvarnished truth, Demorat warts and all.

“They are kind of rejecting black America, like that’s over and now it’s all about, ‘OK, how can we go all in on illegal immigration? How can we make this the next reliable Democratic voting block for the next 30 to 40 years?’

“This is not about morality, and it’s not about anything else—it’s literally about a new voting block.”

More unvarnished historical truth:

Sheila Lewis Ealey, an African-American mother of two from Texas, said: “Blacks coming out of slavery sided with the Republicans because those were the ones who fought for them. It was only because of the fact that we’ve got this revisionist history that you’ve got people who don’t know who they are and have formed an allegiance with the Democratic Party, because during the Kennedy administration, that was the party who really were forthright with the Civil Rights Act.

“When you look at blacks, they have been conservatives for a very long time. They are the group who really don’t believe in abortion. They follow the Bible to the letter, they are very rigid about the things that need to happen.

The Henry Davis video:

As if that was insufficient, Candace Owens said this:

So what’s really happening? What’s this about? Moreover, why is it occurring at a time when the LDAMM are trumpeting a great Blue Wave or perhaps a Blue Tsunami come November?

I submit it’s because of this:

And this:

And this:

And this:

And this:

And this:

Then there was the Leftist who talked about a “life sentence” for Sanders.

Rubin: Sarah Huckabee Sanders Should Be Harassed Publicly as a ‘Life Sentence’

by Brad Wilmouth

On Sunday’s AM Joy, MSNBC contributor and Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin declared that Sarah Huckabee Sanders deserves a “life sentence” of being harassed publicly as she asserted that the White House press secretary “has no right to live a life of no fuss, no muss” because of her negative interactions with the press.

The phony conservative columnist also freaked out over the possibility of abortion being banned, and suggested Republican Senators Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins are “phony pro-choice women” if they vote for President Donald Trump’s nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Well, that’s pleasant. Kind. Understanding. Tolerant. Everything the LDAMM says it is? It isn’t.

Which led Sarah Huckabee Sanders — one of the strongest and most valiant White House Press Secretaries I’ve ever seen — to this response:

Which then led to this brilliant mock-up:

And this, the win of open and avowed 28-year-old Democratic Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez who supports the abolishment of ICE, prisons, bail and outright Socialism — free money, free jobs, free housing.

And this:

And this:

And this:

And this, as protesters drive Ted Cruz and his wife Heidi out of a DC restaurant on Monday the 24th:

But wait, there’s more.

This type of behavior is championed by Maxine Waters. pic.twitter.com/KJOyOGw7tV

— Kyle Morris (@RealKyleMorris) September 25, 2018

A Columbian man tells us why he walked away.

#WalkAway is, of course, upset with the Kavanaugh hearing process whereupon a good man is smeared with unsubstantiated accusations up to and including his being a serial rapist — a charge levied by an attorney defending a whore with inflated, fake breasts.

Responses to this have included:

I was on the left at one time…thought I believed facts and truth. I even targeted Dinesh for his beliefs. But now I’ve had an awakening and can no longer support the evil and corruption that thrives under the name of liberalism. Open your eyes. It’s painfully obvious.

And

If this disturbing version of the Democratic party has reached the level where due process is not relevant anymore, and an accusation without evidence is enough to ruin someone’s life, then though I’m not a republican, I’ll welcome a red wave. . Remember Emmet Til.

And

When are people going to wake up to the reality of the criminals who are running the Democrat Party. They are truly the new Mafia. Gangsters. It takes someone as tough as Trump to deal with this lawless, godless, amoral group.

And

What, we’re supposed to believe women because they’re all automatically telling the truth?! So what about Keith Ellison’s accuser? And all men are lying sexual predators? This is the disgusting reasoning powering the movement… away from the Democrats.

And

They will continue to use the term “fair treatment ” as an excuse b/c they think it is effective. The committee has bent over backwards for this woman. Enough is enough! Take the vote.

There is this from Axios.com:

A Progressive “Blue Wave” Could Swamp Democrats

by Alexi McCammond & Mike Allen

The “Blue Wave” is crashing over the Democrats’ own party.

The dark blue wave … Democratic Socialists of America, which endorsed Ocasio-Cortez, is a growing force within the party. Its membership has ballooned from 7,000 to 37,000 members since the 2016 election, per NY Times.

  • The group supports things like Medicare for All and abolishing ICE, which more and more Democrats are embracing, like Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and Mayor Bill de Blasio.
  • Progressive Change Campaign Committee (PCCC), a leading progressive group, has launched a campaign to tarnish the New Dem brand of centrist House members.

The other side: After more moderate candidates like Doug Jones and Conor Lamb helped Democrats pick up seats in unlikely places, the party saw them as a path to the majority. They didn’t consider how President Trump has radicalized candidates on both sides.

Be smart: Democrats need to unite the competing wings of their party before November if they want to win, but they’re missing a central figure who can pull that off.

This from GatewayPundit.com:

“This Is Just the Beginning” – Liberal Website Warns Republicans of 70’s Style Bombings

Via Splinter.com:

Do you think that being asked to leave a restaurant, or having your meal interrupted, or being called by the public is bad? My fascism-enabling friends, this is only the beginning…

…Read a fucking history book. Read a recent history book. The U.S. had thousands of domestic bombings per year in the early 1970s. This is what happens when citizens decide en masse that their political system is corrupt, racist, and unresponsive. The people out of power have only just begun to flex their dissatisfaction. The day will come, sooner that you all think, when Trump administration officials will look back fondly on the time when all they had to worry about was getting hollered at at a Mexican restaurant. When you aggressively f*ck with people’s lives, you should not be surprised when they decide to fuck with yours.

Stop working for this man. Stop enabling him. Stop assisting him. Start fighting him. The people who are responsible for what is happening are not going to get out of this with their happy wealthy respectable lives unscathed. This is a country that locks poor people in cages for decades for trying to make $20. This is a country that is “tough on crime.” Remember? And the ones who make the laws are not going to like what happens when America starts to regard them as the criminals.

Isn’t that odd. Just as I previously mentioned: the 1970s.

The bottom line is this: #WalkAway is gaining momentum and the LDAMM elements all throughout the United States are quite literally in PSH (Pants-Shitting Hysteria) Mode, completely panicked, because whatever they’re trying appears to as yet not be working.

Which is why they are doubling down on lies, doubling down on cheating, doubling down on pushing the Demorat Party to abject and utter Socialism — they tell us that to our faces now — and why their violence, much less incivility, will only increase geometrically.

Which is why they are tripling down on the nomination process for Judge Brett Kavanaugh. The LDAMM are fully cognizant of the fact that, if they lose SCOTUS, they’ve lost the final outlet for pushing the ideas they can’t abide by lawful means, discussion or the electoral process. Their days of “discussion” are over. There is only, now, room for disruption, cheating, corruption, backstabbing, smearing and violence.

Folks, I saw all of this in the 1970s as a California law enforcement officer. I can remember when Leftist factions in California planted what would now be called IEDs under police vehicles, bombed police stations, robbed banks and carried names such as the Weather Underground, Black Panthers, Baader-Meinhof Gang, SDS (Students for a Democratic Society) and the SLA (Symbionese Liberation Army).

These are wounded, cornered animals who have never — in their blighted memories — been here before. They’re going to act like wounded, cornered animals because, in altogether too many cases, they are. They believe it to their very core. They are under assault — in their minds — like never before. Don’t count on a modicum of rationality. That’s out the door. They’ve told us precisely that.

Gird thy loins. We are returning to those times courtesy of the Left.

All we’re missing is Ulrike Meinhof and the RAF in Germany.

BZ

P.S.

Let me throw this out there: what if the Republicans keep the House and the Senate? What if the midterms are a replay of November 8th, 2016?

 

 Share

No, we don’t change the entire judicial process for one person

Posted on by

In 2012, during a counseling session with my wife during a difficult time in our marriage, I revealed that I had been subject to an incident in high school where I was attacked by an individual who had attempted to sexually assault me. I was at a party with another friend, I’m pretty sure, and another boy had pushed me down on the bed and tried to undress me. He’d said he wanted to have sex with me but I said no. We had been drinking. While he was grabbing for my crotch and forcing himself on me, he was kissing me and attempting to put his tongue in my mouth.

It was bad enough that I had been drinking. But I’m a Mormon and having any kind of sex outside of marriage and drinking were two of the biggest things you weren’t supposed to do. Ever. I tried to push away but he put his hand over my mouth and, well, I was really drunk. I couldn’t resist and, worse, when he was trying to turn me over, I thought he was going to suffocate me. Maybe kill me. One of his friends jumped on the bed and the three of us fell to the floor. I managed to get up and go into the bathroom. Then I managed to get out of the house.

I never told anyone up to 2012 because I was frightened. And I was really embarrassed. Here I was, a young boy, a Mormon, at someone else’s house, at a party, where there was drinking. I knew I shouldn’t have been in that situation in the first place. But I was a kid; I was 15. I couldn’t have told anyone. About the drinking. About the boy trying to forcibly have sex with me. I would have been in so much trouble. And it really affected me. It affected my relationships with women to the point that, in 2012, I need counseling to keep my marriage together. This happened in Utah. I ended up going all the way to Florida to escape it. It still weighs on my mind. I had betrayed my values, my church, my family, my friends. And I was almost anally raped. I know it. The whole thing was traumatic in the extreme. This was in 1982. I’m pretty sure.

Since that time, I’ve become a respected doctor. I’ve made something of myself despite what happened. I was able to get married. But now I see that boy, now a man, Sylvan Peratus, has been nominated to the US Supreme Court. He’s nothing but a reminder to me of that night. Now he’s all over the television.

It’s only fitting that the FBI investigate my claim. In fact, I demand it. I’m not exactly sure on the year. Probably 1982. Around there. Or the place. The house. Or the time. I’m not sure how I got to the party. I’m not sure how I got home. I was drunk. But I’m the victim here. I have some people who support me. Except now they’ve recanted. And I see that Peratus has a letter saying that 65 people support him. They’re all lying, obviously.

He represents everything that me, my family, my parents and my friends don’t believe in. My brother works for a law firm that supports work against Leftists, people I don’t like. I myself have worked for causes in order to ensure that Leftists don’t acquire political power of any kind. I worked against everything Obama tried to enact or pass.

Worse yet, Sylvan’s mother Hayley Peratus, while she was a judge, ruled against our family in a house foreclosure case in 1996. I never forgot that.

I wrote my local GOP representative about what happened, who then contacted one of my state’s GOP senators. I wanted to be anonymous. But now, somehow, something leaked and the media found me and so my name is out there. So is my allegation. I’ve retained an attorney and I took a polygraph back in August.

The GOP want me to testify against Peratus. My lawyer, who has worked for Judicial Watch and the ACLJ in the past, says that I simply need to be believed. I was almost anally raped. I know it. An allegation like mine is very serious and, after all, I’m the victim here. Not Peratus.

One Democrat Senator asked me: “If Mr BZ really did not want to come forward, never intended to come forward … why did he pay for a polygraph in August, and why did he hire a lawyer in August? And who paid for it?” Senator Feinstein asked.

This is clearly prejudicial. I’m the victim here. I may testify before the Judiciary Committee. I may not. I’m not sure yet. But they’re trying to pin me down, pin my testimony down, and that’s just not fair. I’m insisting that Peratus testify before I do. If I even testify at all. But no matter what, everyone needs to know what Peratus did to me.

Everyone simply needs to believe me. I say it, so it’s true. I’m the victim here. These dates the Judiciary Committee set in order to pin me down are completely arbitrary. What’s the rush? The November election really doesn’t mean anything. I need to be heard, on my schedule and by my terms. It should be my timetable and at my convenience. I’ve had 36 years to think about it. I just need some more time.

Need I remind you? I’m the victim here.

Would I inherently be believed by the American Media Maggots?

Women are clearly stronger, more resolute, dedicated, truthful, honest and possessed of leadership abilities than men.

Until they’re not, and wish — no, demand — to be protected like delicate, wilting flowers with little will or strength.

Am I sensing something of any number of mixed messages here?

Am I saying that’s what’s good for the goose is good for the gander? Clearly not. Situationally-dependent, women are more delicate and worthy of protection than Evil Men. Women cannot defend themselves. Men can. Uh, wait. Except that the current meme is that women are inherently stronger than men and inherently more believable than men.

Wait; that’s not exactly what’s being said either. What is being said?

“I believe her because I know she’s telling the truth.” That’s a sensible as saying the earth is flat or that the sun rises in the west because I’m convinced it’s accurate. It’s also an apparent embracing of Napoleonic Law where one is guilty until proven innocent.

In other words, being placed into a position where one must prove a negative. Good luck with that. Prove that you didn’t crash into my car in 1982 and drive away.

Yes. That is how silly it’s all gotten. Silly and, more importantly, damaging. Demorats resort — because it’s the only play that seems to work any more — to identity politics once again.

As of this writing, here is what we know.

Christine Blasey Ford has indicated she will testify on Thursday.

There are now three “witnesses” who have refuted Professor Ford’s allegations. Additionally, from Breitbart:

Nolte: Every Witness Named by Kavanaugh’s Accusers Sides with Kavanaugh

by John Nolte

The two women making sexual misconduct allegations against Brett Kavanaugh claim to have witnesses, but so far, all of their witnesses back Kavanaugh’s claim that nothing happened.

It might be difficult to remember this as Democrats and the media throw around phrases like “second accuser” and “attempted sexual assault” and “exposing himself” against the Supreme Court nominee. But the facts are still the facts, and every single witness named so far by both accusers say they witnessed nothing of the sort.

A second accuser has emerged. There is a continuing problem, however. From the DailyCaller.com:

THE NEW YORK TIMES WAS UNABLE TO CORROBORATE SECOND KAVANAUGH ACCUSER’S STORY

by Amber Athey

The New York Times reported on Sunday that it was unable to corroborate the claims of a second accuser who says Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh exposed himself to her in college.

Deborah Ramirez alleges that Kavanaugh thrust his penis into her face while she was drunk at a Yale University dormitory party. The New Yorker ran with Ramirez’s allegation on Sunday despite being unable to produce any firsthand witnesses or confirm that Kavanaugh was at the party where the incident was said to have occurred.

The New York Times noted several paragraphs deep in a report that it chose not to report on Ramirez’s allegation because of a lack of corroborating evidence.

But hell, why let the lack of facts stand in the way of slaughtering Judge Kavanaugh.

NYT also noted, “The New Yorker did not confirm with other eyewitnesses that Judge Kavanaugh was at the party.”

In an interview with CBS’ “This Morning” on Monday, Jane Mayer, a co-author on The New Yorker piece, admitted that they had no firsthand witnesses who could confirm Ramirez’s account.

Let me be abundantly clear: even the New York Times wouldn’t touch the story about allegations made by the second accuser. That in and of itself bespeaks volumes. To those who are actually paying attention.

The good news is this, from TheHill.com:

Kavanaugh: ‘I will not be intimidated into withdrawing’

by Jordain Carney

Brett Kavanaugh on Monday said he will “not be intimidated into withdrawing” from his Supreme Court nomination after a second woman came forward with a sexual misconduct allegation against him. 
Kavanaugh sent a letter on Monday to Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) — the chairman and ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, respectively — saying the accusations against him are “smears, pure and simple.” 
“They debase our public discourse. But they are also a threat to any man or woman who wishes to serve our country. Such grotesque and obvious character assassination—if allowed to succeed—will dissuade competent and good people of all political persuasions from service,” Kavanaugh said in the letter to Grassley and Feinstein.
“I will not be intimidated into withdrawing from this process. The coordinated effort to destroy my good name will not drive me out. The vile threats of violence against my family will not drive me out. The last-minute character assassination will not succeed,” Kavanaugh continued. 

Judiciary Committee Chairman Senator Chuck Grassley has been more than accomodating to Professor Ford. But NO, she should not testify second. She should testify first. This is one of the basic precepts of the entire judicial process. One person — male or female, it doesn’t matter — doesn’t get to hijack the entire judicial system.

Here’s what I believe after having worked in law enforcement for 41 years and also as a detective for a large department in Child Abuse and sex assaults (amongst many other assignments).

  • All victims should be afforded the opportunity to make claims and reports.
  • All victims should be afforded the opportunity to be heard but not to be believed absent corroboration in some significant fashion.
  • Women are no more inherently truthful or believable than men.
  • Facts lead an investigation where it needs to go. Not a single allegation taken in isolation. But a series of facts with supporting evidence taken in totality.
  • Due process is primary.

It has been a chaotic panoply of errors, shenanigans, stupidity and a purposefully backstabbing derailment strategy played out in public for political purposes by Demorats. Any pretense at bipartisanship, compromise or good will has resolutely ended on the part of the Demorats. “By any means necessary” is now the slogan of the Demorat Party and they will stop at nothing until they have GOP veins between their teeth and are in total control with restored power in DC. Nothing is too low, no tactic too obscene.

Senator Mitch McConnell is correct with this Tweet on Monday:

Democrats and their allies are trying to destroy a man’s personal and professional life on the basis of unsubstantiated and uncorroborated allegations. This is a smear campaign, pure and simple…aided and abetted by members of the United States Senate.

However, the GOP is still back at “gosh, what will people think of us?”

This is for all the marbles folks.

America is on the brink of truly destructive DC governmental bedlam.

And this ain’t playing.

BZ

 

 Share

Democrats conspire to obstruct Kavanaugh hearing and pay Antifa protesters

Posted on by

And there is evidence to prove it.

Aurally, photographically and otherwise.

But first, this statement: Brett Kavanaugh will be confirmed by the Senate.

Beginning, from Breitbart.com:

Dick Durbin Admits: Democrats Plotted to Disrupt Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court Hearing

by Joel B. Pollak

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) admitted Tuesday in the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court that he and other Democrats participated in a conference call on how to disrupt the hearings.

Durbin was responding to a question by Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), who cited an NBC News tweet from earlier in the morning that reported that Senate Democrats had planned over the Labor Day weekend to use protests and interruptions.

The hearing had already been disrupted several times by protesters — led by the anti-Trump and Democrat-aligned Women’s March, which claimed credit — and several senators also interrupted proceedings with interjections.

Senator Tom Tillis from North Carolina asked:

“This is outrageous.” And then Durbin assumes full Deflection Mode.

Then, from TheGatewayPundit.com:

Schumer Plotted Kavanaugh Disruptions in Weekend Call – Including Execution of Mob Tactics

by Cristina Laila

President Trump’s Supreme Court pick Judge Brett Kavanaugh testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday morning

Democrats and screaming protesters interrupted the hearing for the first half hour.
Judge Kavanaugh has not even been sworn in yet!

It was all planned.

Democrats plotted the coordinated protest over the holiday weekend. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) led a phone call and Committee members are executing now, reported NBC’s Kasie Hunt.

Of course we know the results.

Judge Kavanaugh was heckled by screaming protesters Tuesday morning.

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) unleashed on Democrat lawmakers for requesting to delay Kavanaugh’s hearing over ‘withheld documents.’

Kavanaugh gave the Senate Judiciary Committee over 430,000 documents which is two times more than any SCOTUS nominee in US history, but this isn’t good enough for the Democrats.

This occurred the very first day of the hearings last week.

People like this should be led away if for no other reason than their shrill voices break glass and injure the eardrums of small children and animals.

Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk made some observations about the Kavanaugh protests outside the Capitol. And protesters themselves learned something significant as well: there is a difference between “free speech” on a college campus and free speech in real life. Listen to the purposeful indifference of the police regarding the protester’s umbrage.

But wait; there’s more. Here, the Daily Caller provides an inside peek at the Kavanaugh protests.

So: Antifa and other paid to protest? Naturally.

From LawAndCrime.com:

Doctors claim they saw protesters get paid to disrupt Kavanaugh hearing

by Ronn Blitzer

Judge Brett Kavanaugh‘s Supreme Court confirmation hearing was interrupted several times by protesters who shouted over Senators who were speaking, many of whom were arrested. Now, three men from Texas who were there claim that they saw some of them get paid for their actions.

Video of their comments has been circling in conservative circles, and the men were speaking with Adam Schindler, a digital strategy consultant who is a supporter of President Donald Trump. The doctors’ story has not been verified by any official body, but Schindler has shared photos that appear to back up their claim.

It gets better. Photographically.

In one image that he posted to Twitter, a woman in a black and white top can be seen with a man who appears to be handing her cash. In another photo, an individual who appears to be that same woman is being escorted out of the hearing by officers.

That photo is above. As my professors in college would say, “compare and contrast.”

Same chick, same hair, same ugly dress, getting removed from the Kavanaugh hearing. How about a confirmation photograph?

Check the cash. But why stop there? The article continues:

One of the men, Dr. Tom Schlueter, described one of these alleged transactions.

“One thing was there were people who had come along … who had a bag of money, and people would hand them a piece of paper, and then they would give them money,” he said. “So we know money was exchanged for some of the people to be here, just to protest.”

Schlueter then described instructions that these people supposedly received.

“They were actually told, we heard them say this, ‘when you go in, we want you to yell, to scream, and even possibly to get arrested.’ So that was some of the processes we saw happening,” he recalled.

Good ol’ American grassroots protests. Uh, by people who otherwise wouldn’t be there unless they knew some coin was in the offing. Here is the audio.

Then this from the GatewayPundit.com:

CONFIRMED: Organizer Vinay Krishnan Who Was Caught Paying Off Kavanaugh Protesters — Works for Soros-Linked Organization

by Jim Hoft

On Tuesday several Texas doctors attended the Kavanaugh hearing in Washington DC. After the hearing the doctors told reporter Adam Schindler that they witnessed organized activists with a bag of cash paying the rent-a-mob protesters.

So perhaps you’re wondering, “who is Vinay Krishnan”?

Vinay is an “organizer of civil disobedience” who works for a George Soros-funded group, the Center for Popular Democracy.

I’d like to end the post with this, in what is likely the most revealing thing said during the Kavanaugh hearings, spoken by young Two-Fer Kamala Harris, a rising star for Demorat consideration in the 2020 presidential election. Listen to this interchange.

“That book that you carry” is only the US Constitution. But who holds that dear? Her? Leftists? Demorats? The American Media Maggots? Of course not. Kamala Harris couldn’t be more smarmy, dismissive, alienating, snide, smug, berating, self-righteous, arrogant and plastered with what she fervently believes is her inherent intellectual superiority.

But four very important bottom lines are these:

  1. President Trump is just that: the President of the United States of America, and
  2. Neil Gorsuch was confirmed and sits on the SCOTUS bench, and
  3. Judge Brett Kavanaugh is going to get confirmed as a sitting member of SCOTUS, and
  4. I’ll wager President Trump is going to be afforded the opportunity to nominate a third SCOTUS member before the end of his first term or early in his second term.

BZ

 

 Share

BZ’s Berserk Bobcat Saloon Radio Show, Thursday, 9-6-18, with KARI BAXTER DONOVAN

Posted on by

Featuring Right thinking from a left brain, doing the job the American Media Maggots won’t, embracing ubiquitous, sagacious perspicacity and broadcasting behind enemy lines in Occupied Fornicalia from the veritable Belly of the Beast, the Bill Mill in Sacramento, Fornicalia, I continue to proffer my thanks to the SHR Media Network for allowing me to utilize their studio and hijack their air twice weekly, Tuesdays and Thursdays, thanks to my shameless contract — as well as appear on the Sack Heads: Against Tyranny Show every Wednesday night.

Hour 1: BZ spoke to his East Coast Political Goddess, KARI BAXTER DONOVAN, co-creator and co-owner of Populist Media — whose website has changed to Populist.Media. She weighed in on her populist website and on current political events.

Hour 2: BZ led the hour with numerous Happy Stories, and then transitioned into an SHR MEDIA SPECIAL REPORT: the Intelligentsia Elites. Yes, the show went into overtime by about 10 minutes.

If you care to listen to the show in Spreaker, click on the yellow button at the upper left.

Listen to “BZ’s Berserk Bobcat Saloon Radio Show, Thursday, 9-6-18” on Spreaker.

If you care to watch the show on the SHR Media YouTube channel, click on the red start button below. We kindly ask you to SUBSCRIBE to the SHR Media channel. Please NOTE: For DISH subscribers: your Hopper has recently been wired to play YouTube videos. You can now toss ol’ BZ onto your massive flatscreen TV and watch him in all of his obese, biased and politically-egregious, lamentable goodness — for free!

Facebook has decided to play well with Spreaker again, so you can watch the show here on the SHR Facebook page. SHR has also associated itself with PERISCOPE and with Google Play.

Please join me, the Bloviating Zeppelin (on Twitter @BZep, Facebook as Biff Zeppe and the Bloviating Zeppelin, and on Gab.ai @BZep), every Tuesday and Thursday night on the SHR Media Network from 11 PM to 1 AM Eastern and 8 PM to 10 PM Pacific, at the Berserk Bobcat Saloon — where the speech is free but the drinks are not.

As ever, thank you so kindly for listening, commenting, and interacting in the chat room or listening later via podcast.

Please remember we only monitor the chat room at SHRMEDIA.COM — though there is chat available on both Facebook and YouTube. Come on over to the SHR chat room where you’ll meet great friends!

  • Want to listen to all the Berserk Bobcat Saloon archives on Spreaker? Go here.
  • Want to watch past shows on Periscope? Go here.
  • Want to watch past shows on the SHR Media Facebook page? Go here.
  • Want to watch past Berserk Bobcat Saloon shows on YouTube? Go here.

Thank you one and all for listening, watching and supporting the SHR Media Network: “Conservative Media Done Right.”

BZ

 

 Share