And it’s best to have them immured in video for all to see.
Hillary Rodham Clinton is sociopathic to the point where she lies about lying.
BZ
Remember Hillary Clinton’s LIES
Tag Archives: Clinton Foundation
Hillary took millions from the Middle East
And somehow that’s not massive news?
And somehow that’s not plastered across every newspaper above the fold for days and days all across the nation?
Can you say: the American Media Maggots “in the tank” for the Clintons and a Demorat presidential candidate?
From the DailyCaller.com:
EXCLUSIVE: Persian Gulf Sheikhs Gave Bill & Hillary $100 Million
by Richard Pollock
A Daily Caller News Foundation investigation reveals that Bill and Hillary Clinton received at least $100 million from autocratic Persian Gulf states and their leaders, potentially undermining Democratic presidential candidate Hillary’s claim she can carry out independent Middle East policies.
As a presidential candidate, the amount of foreign cash the Clintons have amassed from the Persian Gulf states is “simply unprecedented,” says national security analyst Patrick Poole.
To wit: over $100 million dollars.
The Middle East states are buying the Clintons. And the Clintons don’t mind being bought.
“These regimes are buying access. You’ve got the Saudis. You’ve got the Kuwaitis, Oman, Qatar and the UAE. There are massive conflicts of interest. It’s beyond comprehension,” Poole told TheDCNF in an interview.
$100 million dollars paid to the Clinton Foundation from Muslim states in the Middle East — they aren’t doing this because of altruism. Mother Teresa was altruistic. And Catholic. These gulf states are not. They expect favors for cash. Quid pro quo.
But wait; there’s more:
The FBI has reportedly launched a second investigation of the former secretary in addition to its probe of her private email server. This investigation is looking into “political corruption” and is seeking evidence where former Secretary Clinton may have offered official government favors to foundation donors.
Most troubling for Hillary, however, could be Bill’s personal, five-year business partnership with Dubai’s authoritarian ruler, Sheikh Mohammed bin-Rashid al-Maktoum and his overall friendship with the rulers of the United Arab Emirates — a confederation of states that includes Dubai.
Again I ask: these headlines splashed across the top of newspapers across the country?
You know the answer to that. The American Media Maggots, complicit in corruption — participating in it instead of investigating and revealing it.
The only hope for any amount of truthnfulness lies with the FBI and Director James Comey.
BZ
The REAL story: Hillary’s SAP emails
The American Media Maggots are making Palin’s endorsement of Trump Tuesday’s focus, in an attempt to obfuscate and divert attention from the REAL story.
From Politico.com:
Watchdog: Clinton’s server had classified material beyond ‘top secret’
by Rachael Bade & Josh GersteinIntelligence officials have discovered sensitive national security information on Hillary Clinton’s server that goes beyond the “top secret” level, the intelligence community inspector general told lawmakers in a letter last week.
In a copy of the Jan. 14 correspondence obtained by POLITICO, Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III told both the Senate Intelligence and Senate Foreign Relations committees that intelligence agencies found messages relating to what are known as “special access programs,” or SAP. That’s an even more restricted subcategory of sensitive compartmented information, or SCI, top secret national security information derived from sensitive intelligence sources.
Information like this is mandating a continued clear investigatory path by the 6’8″ James Comey’s FBI — a director who has never shied away from Obama.
The Business Insider writes, in explanation:
Intelligence is allocated to a special-access program when “the vulnerability of, or threat to, specific information is exceptional,” according to Executive Order 13526, which was signed by US President Barack Obama in late 2009 and details how to properly handle and protect classified national-security information.
Clinton signed a nondisclosure contract when she got to the State Department, in which she agreed to “never divulge anything marked SCI [sensitive compartmented information] or that I know to be SCI to anyone who is not authorized to receive it without prior authorization from the US Government department or agency that authorized my access.”
FoxNews.com adds:
Intelligence from a “special access program,” or SAP, is even more sensitive than that designated as “top secret” – as were two emails identified last summer in a random sample pulled from Clinton’s private server she used as secretary of state. Access to a SAP is restricted to those with a “need-to-know” because exposure of the intelligence would likely reveal the source, putting a method of intelligence collection — or a human asset — at risk. Currently, some 1,340 emails designated “classified” have been found on Clinton’s server, though the Democratic presidential candidate insists the information was not classified at the time.
“There is absolutely no way that one could not recognize SAP material,” a former senior law enforcement with decades of experience investigating violations of SAP procedures told Fox News. “It is the most sensitive of the sensitive.”
THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO WAY THAT ONE COULD NOT RECOGNIZE SAP MATERIAL.
Now check this:
While the State Department and Clinton campaign have said the emails in questions were “retroactively classified” or “upgraded” – to justify the more than 1,300 classified emails on her server – those terms are meaningless under federal law.
THOSE TERMS ARE MEANINGLESS UNDER FEDERAL LAW.
Hillary Clinton comes ever closer to being criminally indicted, and it couldn’t happen to a more applicable person.
A very important note from Guy Benson:
According to court documents, former CIA Director David Petraeus was prosecuted for sharing intelligence from special access programs with his biographer and mistress Paula Broadwell. At the heart of his prosecution was a non-disclosure agreement where Petraeus agreed to protect these closely held government programs, with the understanding “unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized retention or negligent handling … could cause irreparable injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign nation.” Clinton signed an identical non-disclosure agreement Jan. 22, 2009.
Please closely read these stories from Hot Air, Fox News and Business Insider.
The sagacious Charles Krauthammer weighs in:
Krauthammer’s Take: Hillary E-mail Scandal Now ‘Worse than What Snowden Did’
Petraeus, as was mentioned earlier, he pled guilty because precisely this kind of information he shared. And I don’t see, given the fact that he is the inspector general of the intelligence community who was writing this officially to the intelligence committee heads in Congress that there is any way to contradict this. It is not a news story. This is an investigative story. And now it’s in the hands of the FBI. It’s hard to imagine that the Department of Justice will ignore this or wave it away.”
Finally, as I theorized here, is this the next step?
Will an arrogant, corrupt, law-breaking Clinton finally be indicted?
BZ
Clinton ruminations
So there I was, last Monday morning, being wheeled into a surgery theater, face up, wearing a stupid hairnet and dressed in the Mark I Model I Embarrassing Hospital Gown with my ass completely uncovered. Thank God my ass was ass-down on the rolling gurney as it entered the cold room. I ooched from the gurney onto the operating table and was told to scoot down, scoot down. Then, clank-clank, two armrests were dropped down and I was splayed out like the fat BZ turkey I am, an IV already attached. Down came the mask and I was asked to breathe deeply. I seem to recall taking three deep breaths. Nighty-night.
About 75 minutes later, my dream featured someone talking to me from above. “Open your eyes,” my protagonist said. Eventually I did so. “A better life through chemicals,” I thought. I was literally feeling no pain. Then.
My point is, I’m going to be horizontal for the next few weeks as I am supposed to stay off my foot, the subject of some ongoing and worsening problems. The drugs are fairly serious anti-inflammatory and pain meds. Some hours they work well, some hours not so much. I won’t be able to place weight down for about six weeks. Until then I “work” from the lounger in the living room. Work, live and sleep there. The laptop is on an adjacent tray table which I move to my lap until the thighs get too hot. Getting to the bathroom is an ordeal; first with crutches and now with a rented knee scooter. The drugs make me woggy or lucid, just depending. I sleep when I can.
As a consequence, I spend a lot of time on the confuser, texting, reading and watching television. I’ve found programs I didn’t know exist. It’s also given me time to reflect on some political machinations involving the presidential race.
It has been presumed this year and last that Hillary Rodham Clinton is the Demorat candidate for president. Much of this is because it is Clinton’s “turn” and she has “paid her dues.”
Like Tammy Wynette, Hillary stood by her man whilst he swived his way through hordes (Linda Tripp alleges over 1,000) of jaded strumpets. She did it all not because she enjoyed being the butt of fuck, blue dress and fellatio jokes, but because she recognized the inherent power that William Jefferson Clinton 
possessed. She knew that, if played properly, she could ride on Bill’s coat-tails from the periphery of power to real personal political power.
But just when you may have thought it was “her time,” some pesky things have gotten in the way. Like Trey Gowdy, some emails, some security and server concerns, four American deaths at the Benghazi consulate and the Clinton lies that began immediately thereafter. When Hillary provided immediate excuses for the terrorists killing our Americans, she declared a further and more pointed open season on the United States.
On the other hand, there is this:
It’s pretty obvious the DNC has done its level best to bury the Demorat debates on the weekends, but this debate was even more “buried” due to the three-day weekend. Conventional wisdom is that the less Hillary is exposed — because “it’s her turn” — the lesser a chance of her being challenged or damaged. The problem with that, recently revealed, is that she has been losing points in the polls whilst Sanders has been gaining. Uh-oh. Time to push Hillary more towards Front Street. Sort of. But not too much.
It was simply assumed Hillary would win Iowa and perhaps New Hampshire. Now, Sanders is looking strong in New Hampshire. Hillary is being overcome by the self-described Socialist Demorat. And a doddering one at that, with wild hair and a funny accent.
Further, Hillary’s husband is doing her no favors thanks to Trump’s recent focus. It also doesn’t help — though it makes me laugh abundantly — that the top recent Google search question is “will Hillary Clinton get prosecuted?”
So began to think further: what if Hillary loses Iowa and New Hampshire to Sanders? What if he actually gets stronger and not weaker? What if Hillary is actually indicted?
We know that Martin O’Malley isn’t pulling numbers. I would also submit that Sanders is a Nutjob of the First Order whose mind doesn’t operate in reality. The DNC won’t kill SuperPacs just for Bernie nor will they eschew corporate cash.
Who or what is left?
Will the DNC pull a Biden out of its hat? An Al Gore? Maybe even a Jim Webb?
What if Hillary really does go back to her unappealing 2008 days?
Moreover, can the GOP manage to coalesce around one candidate and, further, can that chosen candidate beat a Demorat?
BZ
Bill Clinton has bills
Proving that even “great communicators” die in their dotage.
The Clintons, Bill and Hill, don’t deserve a thing, yet they still scare up millions and millions and millions of dollars from those persons who want the Clintons to peddle influence. Look: there is no other logical reason to throw dollars at the CankleMeister or the AgingSexAddict. People don’t throw cash at the Clintons out of inherent goodness. They expect a quid pro quo.
Bill said:
FORMER PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON: I don’t think there is anything sinister in trying to get wealthy people in countries which are seriously involved in development to spend their money wisely in a way that helps poor people, and lifts them up, I don’t think there is anything bad about it. I think it is good!
There has been a very deliberate attempt effort to take the Foundation down. And there are almost no new fact that is known now…
I don’t think I did anything that was against the interests of the U.S.
QUESTION: Do you understand though, the perception itself is the problem. You don’t?
No. I don’t want to get into the weeds here. I’m not responsible for anybody else’s perception. I asked Hillary and she said that no one has ever tried to influence me by helping you. No one has even suggested they have a shred of evidence about that.
Because, as Bill says, he still has “bills to pay.”
Oh yeah. Horrible, horrible bills.
“I gotta pay our bills. And I also give a lot of it to the foundation every year.”
Right. That’s Bill paying Bill, because Bill happens to write it off courtesy of the IRS.
But Bill Clinton says he’s not worried about the criticism, brushing it off as “political.” He quoted his wife as telling him: “No one has ever tried to influence me by helping you.”
He claimed there has been a “very concerted effort to bring the foundation down” and said he might even step down as its head if his wife is elected.
“I might if I were asked to do something in the public interest that I had an obligation to do. Or I might take less of an executive role,” he said. “But we’ll cross that bridge when we come to it.”
One thing he won’t stop doing: giving high-priced speeches, even though he acknowledges being a wealthy man these days, reportedly worth tens of millions of dollars.
“I gotta pay our bills,” he said. “And I also give a lot of it to the foundation every year.”The fees — $500,000 or more for 11 speeches while his wife was Secretary of State — are justified, he insisted.
“I spend a couple of hours a day just doing the research. People like to hear me speak,” he said.
“We do our best to vet them,” he said of the groups that pay for his talks. “And I have turned down a lot of them. If I think there’s something wrong with it, I don’t take it.”
He also says he has turned down donations to the foundation — though he won’t say from where.
Ah yes, those poor Clintons — poor in terms of cash, and poor in terms of people trying to drive them down.
I feel so sorry for them.
Don’t you?
BZ