Most recent Time magazine cover which purposely misleads the viewer about the truth involving “refugee” and “asylum” illegals, placing the blame, as you can see, “at the feet of President Donald Trump.” An abject lie.
They lack the capability any more. They prove it time and again. Monthly. Weekly, Daily. Some lies are bigger than others. Some are lies of omission. Some are purposely deceptive such as the photograph above.
At a time when they must be more ethical, more accurate, more unbiased and jam-gepacked with probity — the American Media Maggots continue to move in the opposite direction. Precisely in lockstep with the Demorats and Leftists.
Crying migrant girl on TIME magazine cover was not separated from mother, family says
by Adam Shaw
A little girl shown in a viral photo crying as a U.S. Border Patrol agent detained her mother – and used by TIME magazine to symbolize the Trump administration’s family separation policy – reportedly was never separated from her mom.
“Welcome to America,” declared a somber TIME cover, which showed the picture of the Honduran child Yanela Sanchez next to a towering President Trump.
TIME, which is standing by the cover despite the new information, originally called it “an image America could not ignore” and interviewed the photographer, as did other outlets. TIME followed up with another article entirely about the cover and “the story behind” it.
Please see my first two paragraphs above. Confirmed by Time. They cannot not lie. They completely lack the capability. They don’t possess that gene. Then Time doubled down on their naked half truths with more bias. Odd. Just as the Demorats and Leftists are doing.
Multiple outlets interviewed the father of the girl behind the iconic image, and he said he had learned that his two-year-old daughter was detained with her mother at a facility in Texas, and the two were not separated at all. The Honduran government confirmed his version of events to Reuters.
The Washington Post reported that the mother, Sandra Sanchez, had previously been deported in 2013 to Honduras. Her husband told the Post that she left without telling him she was taking Yanela with her and couldn’t contact her. But then he saw the picture on the news.
“You can imagine how I felt when I saw that photo of my daughter. It broke my heart. It’s difficult as a father to see that, but I know now that they are not in danger. They are safer now than when they were making that journey to the border,” Denis Javier Varela Hernandez told The Daily Mail.
The bottom line is: the publishing of Time magazine’s cover was a deliberate attempt to mainstream the idea that only President Trump is responsible for separating children from parents at our border, and only President Trump threw foil blankets at children and kept them behind chain link fences. Both are lies.
Articles the LDAMM don’t wish you to read or know about, to include:
The continuing hypocrisy — not just with this issue but, literally, any other issue involving President Trump — is that, pick one, they’ve been ignored under the previous 8 year Obama Administration.
And that they’ve only somehow magically become significant issues now.
Important Safety Tip to the American Media Maggots: learn the First Rule of Holes.
You will cease being called Fake News when you stop printing and promoting news that is false. A lie. You know: fake. Half-truths won’t cut it. Doubling down on what you wrongly did, printed or showed won’t cut it.
You’re just like the FBI now these days. Stop your whining. No one trusts you. You brought the situation upon yourselves. It’s up to you to fix things. No one else.
With two major caveats: the issue isn’t “new” by a long shot, and the massive bulk of persons illegally entering the US aren’t “refugees.”
Leftists, Demorats, American Media Maggots and some Republicans are weeping about children being separated from “refugee families” at our border. This is not a new policy, of course. These things occurred under the Bushes and also under Obama.
Oddly enough it wasn’t an issue then — not even under Barack Hussein Obama. That in and of itself bespeaks volumes about the biased bleating of the groups indicated above. Translated: when administrations other than Trump do it, no problemo. Under Trump: heinous.
Obama, in fact, featured the ATEP policy — the Alien Transfer Exit Program, also called Lateral Repatriation. You’ll see why. Here is an example:
Montes was put on a plane, flown halfway across the country and bused to the California-Mexico border. At 2 a.m. Tuesday, U.S. border authorities took off his handcuffs and escorted him to a gate leading to the desert city of Mexicali. Montes was back in Mexico, but about 1,200 miles away from where he started.
But wait; did you read of this then or hear of it now — Obama’s policy? Of course not.
But immigrants’ rights activists had long cautioned that Lateral Repatriation breaks up families. The reason is fairly simple: many male Mexican nationals who are detained trying to cross the border often come with their families in tow. When ATEP is used, the men are captured and taken thousands of miles away, while their wives, partners and children are placed in immigrant detention centers.
More, under Obama:
Single Mexican fathers or men who traveled without an adult female companion while attempting to cross the U.S.-Mexico border with children, when subject to ATEP, had their children separated from them. Unaccompanied minors would then be placed into the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement. Such custody is supposed to be temporary and ORR is supposed to release children to an identified family member or sponsor.
Because of Homeland Security’s dismissal of the need for accountability, it’s unclear exactly how many children were separated from their families under this Obama-era policy.
But that’s okay, It was Obama after all — the single smartest and most compassionate man in any room, anywhere, any time.
Caught at a brief moment in time when she was relatively cogent, Nancy Pelosi plays the Religious Card. Nancy Pelosi believes in “church” to the extent that the Hells Angels believe in “church.”
Nancy Pelosi blasts ‘the hypocrisy of all people of faith’ over border policy dispute
by Douglas Ernst
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi unleashed a broadside against “all people of faith in our country” on Friday over prosecutions of illegal immigrants on the southern border.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ recent comments that respecting the rule of law is a biblical principle sparked a scathing response from the California Democrat on Friday. Mrs. Pelosi accused the Trump administration, its surrogates and all people of faith of gross hypocrisy for not agreeing with her preferred policy regarding the children of illegal immigrants.
Parents who illegally cross into the U.S. are briefly separated from children for up to three weeks while their case is adjudicated. Minors are given medical care, meals, and educational material in accordance with federal regulations.
“The very hypocrisy of the Attorney General to quote the Bible, the hypocrisy of all people of faith in our country not to clamor for what the administration is doing to end — whether it’s to deprive the dreamers of the respect they deserve or whether its taking babies away from their mothers and fathers,” Mrs. Pelosi said Friday, the Daily Caller reported.
San Fran Nan, pot meeting kettle under the color of black? That would be you madame. First, someone must have caught you at a semi-lucid hour. What AG Sessions actually said was:
We are not sending children to jail with their parents. Non-citizens who cross our borders unlawfully, between our ports of entry, with children are not an exception. They are the ones who broke the law. They are the ones who endangered their own children on their trek. The United States, on the other hand, goes to extraordinary lengths to protect them while the parents go through a short detention period.
One word: true. But let’s go further and examine how the face of illegal immigration has changed over the years. Ten, twenty years ago the primary immigrant was male and Mexican. Gradually women were brought and then children and families.
The Trump administration isn’t changing the rules that pertain to separating an adult from the child. Those remain the same. Separation happens only if officials find that the adult is falsely claiming to be the child’s parent, or is a threat to the child, or is put into criminal proceedings.
It’s the last that is operative here. The past practice had been to give a free pass to an adult who is part of a family unit. The new Trump policy is to prosecute all adults. The idea is to send a signal that we are serious about our laws and to create a deterrent against re-entry.
Let’s not forget this very salient fact that, naturally, Leftists, Demorats and the American Media Maggots wish to Bleach Bit your brain from.
The United States Code. Specifically 8 USC § 1325. The United States Code delineates crimes against the United States. The first violation of this statute is a misdemeanor. Illegal re-entry is a felony. A crime. Congress built and authorized these statutes. You know, Congress: the Legislative Branch of the US government.
The clearest description of procedure I’ve yet found is again from NationalReview.com:
When a migrant is prosecuted for illegal entry, he or she is taken into custody by the U.S. Marshals. In no circumstance anywhere in the U.S. do the marshals care for the children of people they take into custody. The child is taken into the custody of HHS, who cares for them at temporary shelters.
The criminal proceedings are exceptionally short, assuming there is no aggravating factor such as a prior illegal entity or another crime. The migrants generally plead guilty, and they are then sentenced to time served, typically all in the same day, although practices vary along the border. After this, they are returned to the custody of ICE.
If the adult then wants to go home, in keeping with the expedited order of removal that is issued as a matter of course, it’s relatively simple. The adult should be reunited quickly with his or her child, and the family returned home as a unit. In this scenario, there’s only a very brief separation.
That’s the easy part. What’s happen now is that the bulk of illegals coming north from Mexico — with children — are seeking “asylum.” Many are provided cards from which to read so that the precise “buzz words” and phrases can be spoken at the border to US authorities. Even back in 2016 this was a very serious issue. From the WashingtonExaminer.com in 2016:
Illegals seeking asylum up 900%, get cash, welfare, school loans
by Paul Bedard
The number of illegals seeking asylum to gain easy access to the United States has jumped 900 percent in less than 10 years, greatly expanding the immigration population receiving Social Security benefits, school loans, green cards, welfare and other taxpayer funded services, according to figures from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.
While about 8,000 mostly Latin Americans in 2009 sought asylum, the number is expected to reach 80,000 or more this year, according to a projection from the Center for Immigration Studies.
The report said 80 percent come from just three countries that have already flooded the border with youths and young families, El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras. Most claim a fear of torture, abuse, or retaliation, fulfilling the U.S. requirement that they must voice some credible fear of returning home.
Of course, there is much that Leftists, Demorats, the American Media Maggots and — the Republicans — are failing to tell you. From the NYTimes.com:
The Flores settlement (Flores v Reno, 1997) required immigration officials to “place each detained minor in the least restrictive setting appropriate” — for example, providing food, water and toilets. The government also agreed to release immigrant children “without unnecessary delay” under an established preference ranking for custody.
The Obama Administration screwed the pooch with regard to detained children and, hence, our illustrious 9th Circuit weighed in.
In 2016, the Ninth Circuit of Appeals ruled that the Flores settlement “unambiguously applies both to minors who are accompanied and unaccompanied by their parents.” It also overturned a Federal District Court’s decision that the government must also release the parents.
As a result the Trump White House has been responding to an all-out frontal assault by Leftists, Demorats and the American Media Maggots who are giddy that, finally, Trump is hemmed in. That part is true.
Under Flores, the government has three options: releasing families together, passing a law that would allow for family detention or breaking up the families. The Trump administration has so far chosen the third option.
Gosharoo. I wonder which one of those three options has been touted all over the media this past weekend? Something about perpetually-open borders, n’est-ce pas?
The Emos thusly weighed in the past weekend to include Republicans. Remember that option regarding “passing a law”? From the WashingtonTimes.com:
Republicans abandon Trump, demand end to zero-tolerance border policy
by Stephan Dinan and Dave Boyer
Congressional Republicans beat a full-scale retreat Monday from the administration’s zero-tolerance border policy, joining Democrats to demand that President Trump stop jailing parents and find ways to keep families together while trying to stop a new surge of illegal immigration.
High-profile Republicans said they are writing bills that would end family separations, and Massachusetts Gov. Charlie Baker, a Republican, said he will no longer allow his National Guard troops to assist with border security as a protest against Mr. Trump’s policies.
Former first lady Laura Bush also weighed in, comparing family separations to internment of Japanese-Americans during World War II.
How odd. GW Bush didn’t have to face the situation. Here is the full Kirstjen Nielson press gaggle on Monday, June 18th.
Why should illegals skate the “parent/child conundrum” whilst other US citizen arrestees are afforded no such luxury? Further, because illegals know it is working, more and more adults — not the parents — are taking children to the border and claiming they are the parents. These could be sex traffickers. These could be slave traders. That too is on the increase. People are not stupid; they know when advantages exist and how to acquire those advantages. Not everyone is Juan Valdez and his innocent family.
Acting ICE Director Thomas Homan tells us the truth about the situation:
When I came upon a scene as a California law enforcement officer in which parents were going to jail and children were present, I arrested the parents and ended up taking custody of the children if no other responsible adults were available. Arrangements were made to take them to what was termed the Children’s Receiving Home and it was up to the County to make further placement plans. The presence of children didn’t affect my arrest decisions whatsoever — and neither should they affect decisions of ICE or the USBP. Unlawful is unlawful no matter the circumstance.
Which is why the issue, I insist, goes back to Congress.
If you as a whole, Congress, US citizens, don’t care for the laws on the books, change the laws on the books. But until you do, your law enforcement personnel are going to have to work within the legal boundaries set forth in the USC as well as fiscal boundaries.
Simultaneously, Leftists, Demorats and the American Media Maggots are attempting to Cloward-Piven the situation. That is to say, overloading the system in order to precipitate a crisis that would lead to a replacement of the system with another — one to the liking of Leftists, Demorats and American Media Maggots.
Not entirely dissimilar to the teachings of Saul Alinsky.
You want to see an agenda? You want to see a wanton display of rudeness, arrogance and emotions based upon political bias? You must go no further than this video.
What a “journalista.” A guy that writes for Playboy magazine. At least he supports my previously-juvenile retorts fifty years ago about buying the magazine for the articles.
Let me also reveal this fact: in California and most all states, adults and juveniles cannot lawfully be mixed in custodial situations. Jails and prisons are just like detention centers. Would you mix a male with a female in custody? Would you mix an adult with a juvenile in custody? Would you mix a sophisticated criminal arrested on a violent felony in custody with someone charged with an infraction or a misdemeanor? Would you mix someone charged with a hate crime, child abuse, elder abuse, with the general population?
If the answer is “no” to ANY of the above questions in normal custodial situations in the US, why would you throw them out the window for federal detentions?
Two words: you wouldn’t.
But that’s not the issue. The issue is to stretch and distend and tax the federal system to the breaking point — to where it collapses but upon itself because of weight and politics and unsustainable policies and regulations.
WHEN OBAMA WAS PRESIDENT FAMILIES WERE SEPARATED AT THE BORDER! YES IM TALKING IN ALL CAPS! STOP ACTING LIKE THIS A BRAND NEW AND TRUMPS FAULT. pic.twitter.com/n5DL1vwzc9
Muster the votes. Convince the American Taxpayer. Make your case, your argument. Against borders. Against walls. Against proscriptions. Against detentions. Against current laws.
But let’s cut to the chase. Altogether too many Republicans won’t interfere with the illegal immigrant status quo because they benefit from cheap labor. This is why Republicans purposefully fail to rally around making the utilization of E-Verify a federal law. For everyone. All the time.
Regarding Demorats, they have locked onto illegals because their former voting bloc — blacks — is letting them down. Blacks aren’t carrying enough water for Demorats and, let’s be honest, they’re not having enough babies to keep up the future voting bloc lock. What to do?
Demorats have now decided: let’s hang our hopes now and in the future with illegals from the south. The brown people will lead us to the Promised Land of a voting lock in perpetuity. Blacks are — harumph, kinda like Kanye West — starting to throw off the Demorat chains.
Here is an accurate summary from a recent Department of Justice (DOJ) report regarding crimes and illegal aliens.
And here is an accurate summary and series of questions from Tucker Carlson.
To which DOJ report is Tucker Carlson referring? And why is the release of the report germane at this time?
You see, the general public wouldn’t have been privy to this information regarding the true impact of illegal aliens on crime in the United States were it not for an executive order signed by President Trump on January 25th of 2017. Numbered EO 13768, entitled Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States, the order explicitly states that the numbers of foreign born individuals currently in US federal prison system custody must be reported quarterly.
There was no such requirement emphasized beforehand because, frankly, Leftists, Demorats, the American Media Maggots and a number of Republicans simply didn’t want to know.
It would not have furthered their collective and individual agendas and it would have interfered with their collective and individual cash flows. Moreover, they didn’t want you, The American Taxpayer, to know.
What? Illegal aliens not the huggy, lovable, honest, charitable persons they’ve been made out to be? Heresy! Apostate! Malcontent! Troublemaker! Radical!
A total of 58,766 known or suspected aliens were in in DOJ custody at the end of FY 2017, including 39,455 persons in BOP custody and 19,311 in USMS custody.
Of this total, 37,557 people had been confirmed by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to be aliens (i.e., non-citizens and non-nationals), while 21,209 foreign-born people were still under investigation by ICE to determine alienage.
Among the 37,557 confirmed aliens, 35,334 people (94 percent) were unlawfully present. These numbers include a 92 percent unlawful rate among 24,476 confirmed aliens in BOP custody and a 97 percent unlawful rate among 13,081 confirmed aliens in USMS custody.
A highly-important note:
This report does not include data on the foreign-born or alien populations in state prisons and local jails because state and local facilities do not routinely provide DHS or DOJ with comprehensive information about their inmates and detainees. This limitation is noteworthy because state and local facilities account for approximately 90 percent of the total U.S. incarcerated population. DHS and DOJ are working to develop a reliable methodology for estimating the status of state and local incarcerated populations in future reports.
According to the numbers, one-in-five individuals incarcerated in DOJ custody — 20% — were born outside of the U.S. and a significant number are illegal aliens.
Besides the physical cost and toll taken on true Americans in the population — up to and including murder, rape, robbery, sodomy, various sex crimes and child abuse crimes — Illegal alien incarceration costs American taxpayers nearly$2 billion dollars per year.
Not exactly the way the argument has been framed by lovers of illegals, lovers of DACA and lovers of lawbreaking.
Tucker Carlson also spoke to Mark Steyn on the issue.
From Carlson’s show on December 21st:
“According to statistics from the U.S. Sentencing Commission, non-citizens are actually far more likely to commit serious crimes than Americans are.”
“Non-citizens account for 22 percent, more than a fifth of all federal murder convictions.”
“18 percent of fraud convictions.”
“33 percent of money laundering convictions,” added Carlson.
“29 percent of drug trafficking convictions and 72 percent of convictions for drug possession.”
“Meanwhile, the non-citizen percentage of the American people? About 7 percent.”
Let’s be bottom-line honest.
The Demorats want illegals because they are useful voting tools. Demorats want to be elected in perpetuity by ensuring the demography of Free Cheese Demanders skews their way. Yes. That would be illegals and “minorities.”
Leftists and the American Media Maggots want illegals for those reasons and take into account additional GOWP, fear, PC and racist factors against Caucasoids.
Republicans want illegals because they work for lesser wages than other Americans and that saves on the business bottom line.
Call me wacky, call me a tinfoil-hat-wearer, but I still believe that the so-called “three million vote advantage” that Hillary had over Donald Trump was due to voter fraud and illegals voting unchecked. In terms of lawful votes, I believe that Trump equaled if not exceeded the votes for Hillary Clinton.
Featuring Right thinking from a left brain, doing the job the American Media Maggots won’t, embracing ubiquitous, sagacious perspicacity and broadcasting behind enemy lines in Occupied Fornicalia from the veritable Belly of the Beast, the Bill Mill in Sacramento, Fornicalia, I continue to proffer my thanks to the SHR Media Network for allowing me to utilize their studio and hijack their air twice weekly, Tuesdays and Thursdays, thanks to my shameless contract, as well as appear on the Sack Heads Radio Show each Wednesday evening.
Tuesday night we had the special pleasure of having Dan Butcher of High Plains Pundit Media on the show, jam ge-packed with an arseload of buttery hurricane and political goodness. (By the way Dan, I very much like the new website formatting.)
My thanks to Dan for devoting a full two hours of his time to the Saloon — and every minutes was remarkably enjoyable.
Tonight in the Saloon:
Dan Butcher talks about the impact of Hurricane Harvey on the Houston, Texas area and its surroundings;
Hurricane Irma is coming towards the state of Florida;
Dan addresses the Houston evacuation issue;
Harvey vs Katrina: it’s all about pre-planning and mindset;
Coordination between the city and the state and the federal governments;
After Hurricane Harvey, Dan Butcher and I speak about North Korea and its terrible implactions; what to do and how to handle?
Spreaker and Blogtalk Radio and merging; is this a good or bad thing?
DACA and the hypocrisy of the Demorats and Leftists.
If you care to listen to the show in Spreaker, please click on start.
If you care to watch the show on YouTube, please click on start.
Please join me, the Bloviating Zeppelin(on Twitter @BZep and on Gab.ai @BZep), every Tuesday and Thursday night on the SHR Media Network from 11 PM to 1 AM Eastern and 8 PM to 10 PM Pacific, at the Berserk Bobcat Saloon — where the speech is free but the drinks are not.
As ever, thank you so kindly for listening, commenting, and interacting in the chat room or listening later via podcast.
Want to listen to all the Berserk Bobcat Saloon archives in podcast? Go here. Want to watch the past shows on YouTube? Please visit the SHR Media Network YouTube channel here.
La Raza, an organization that is racist foundationally and purposely (“La Raza” translates to “The Race” — as in there is no other race.) racist in nature, came out with another recent and similar racist bleat. As in: Aztlan.
La Raza President and CEO Janet Murguia said it sickened her to hear Americans against illegal immigration chanting “USA! USA!” at protests around the country.
Singling out the Murrieta demonstrators during her keynote address at La Raza’s annual conference in Los Angeles on Monday, Murguia accused them of having “cloaked their hatred in patriotism” by shouting “‘USA! USA!’ again and again.”
“It made me angry,” she said. “In fact, I was outraged.”
Murguia demanded that the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants who are currently here receive amnesty and said the road to the White House for Republicans goes through the Latino community and La Raza. She also said Republicans who want to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program or do not want to pass comprehensive amnesty legislation will not get Hispanic votes. And she repeatedly claimed that protesting illegal immigration was “un-American.”
“What we saw in Murrieta is not patriotism,” she asserted. “It is ugly, divisive, and yet another low in a debate I thought could not get much lower.”
Odd, this from an individual who presides over an organization whose sole purpose is to promote “The Race” and also to promote “Reconquista,” which is the annexation, by Mexico, of much of the southwest United States. Both are foundational goals that are by their very bent racist in nature. Also check out the MEChA website. Another lovely racist society believing in “Reconquista.”
At least Murguia is very clear in her bigoted ways, and does not hide behind layered rhetoric. She states, clearly and up front, that every Mexican and South American needs to be granted immediate amnesty. No, scratch that. She doesn’t state, she “demands.”
Further, she happens to be a racist hypocrite, as demonstrated clearly below.
‘Viva La Raza!’ Pro-Illegal Alien Activists at Murrieta Town Hall
by Michelle Moons
Outside a community town hall meeting Wednesday in Murrieta, California, left-wing activists supporting the illegal alien transfers that had been thwarted earlier in the week chanted and intimidated community residents as they left the local high school. The town meeting had been held to address community concerns over the impact of hundreds of illegal aliens destined for processing at the Murrieta Border Patrol station.
An activist with a bullhorn spoke to direct the crowd. Shouts of, “Viva La Raza!” were raised from the crowd.
Imagine that. Hypocrisy unrestrained.
Nothing portrays the truth like the truth.
Where, I ask, was the opprobrium of that?
Here’s where I exert Executive Privilege on my own blog, and tell La Raza President and CEO Janet Murguia: go straight to hell, you racist. As if “your” race is “the” race.
Most recent Time magazine cover which purposely misleads the viewer about the truth involving “refugee” and “asylum” illegals, placing the blame, as you can see, “at the feet of President Donald Trump.” An abject lie.
With two major caveats: the issue isn’t “new” by a long shot, and the massive bulk of persons illegally entering the US aren’t “refugees.”
And here is an accurate summary and series of questions from Tucker Carlson.
Featuring Right thinking from a left brain, doing the job the American Media Maggots won’t, embracing ubiquitous, sagacious perspicacity and broadcasting behind enemy lines in Occupied Fornicalia from the veritable Belly of the Beast, the Bill Mill in Sacramento, Fornicalia, I continue to proffer my thanks to the 
Tuesday night we had the special pleasure of having Dan Butcher of 
