The truth about Kamala Harris: caveat emptor

Make no mistake. Any Demorat or Leftist who lamented the shot placement of the demented 20 year old meant precisely what they said. Any equivocation is simply because of perceived or actual negative blowback experienced.

The Demorats were responsible, as I’ve said since 2016, for a soft coup against Donald John Trump, OMB, Orange Man Bad, the guy with the dead orange cat on top of his head — as a

  • Presidential candidate
  • Presidential nominee
  • President-elect
  • And a sitting president

In keeping with tradition, the Demorats are also responsible for the soft coup against Joe Biden, whom I term Joe Vegetable because, well, he is. This was known overtly and covertly since at least 2020. And yet every Demorat and Leftist, in concert with the American Media Maggots, somehow managed to keep Captain Obvious locked in the underground bunker until June 27th of 2024. When things just became too blatant, too indisputable to ignore.

No one could likely have foreseen 2024. It’s almost beyond human ken. Just when you thought it couldn’t have gotten more stupid, fattening, or violent — well, it did.

Yet, one solitary event seems to have stalled even the Demorat Leftist mind, when Biden debated Trump on June 27th, and this happened to be the highlight of that event.

Despite “Gaslighting Über Alles,” even Bill Maher was taken aback.

Mind you — this was only in June. That was only four months ago, yet it seems like eons.

And I’ve had people tell me, shriek at me, even on the alleged “conservative” side, that I should be kinder in my evaluations of Joe Vegetable, including my appellation. In response, I say “go to hell.”

Let’s allow a modicum of truth to escape. This is the biggest American political scandal to have occurred before and after Watergate. It only gets worse.

The Leftist cabal in the DNC has, for years, covered up the ghastly incompetence and decrepitude of an old man, solely to ensure that Bernie Sanders would not achieve the presidency.

Sanders, who meant what he said about stopping the corruptive torrent of cash into political coffers, could not be let anywhere near presidential powers. The Demorats finally realized this, and took his words to heart. They couldn’t afford to have the cash taps righty-tighty, much less potentially turned off entirely.

So Joe Vegetable was selected as the empty suit, the dancing puppet at the end of the Obama/Valerie Jarrett/Susan Rice/Ron Klain strings. As Obama himself stated, “Don’t underestimate Joe Biden’s ability to fuck things up.” You’ll find the quote buried in paragraph 724 of that linked Politico article.

As an aside, the Bidens and Obamas have never been the best of friends, as Steve Forbes explains here, particularly regarding 2016 — hence Biden’s immediate endorsement of Kamala Harris, with the intention of scuttling Big Mike. Listen:

Jill Biden, mind you, had tasted VP power. With this opportunity, she could have more. There is no more craven and cynical public elder abuser on the planet than Jill Biden.

Everyone knew. The entire “Biden presidency” was and is a massive, conspiratorial scam.

Every family member, every DNC sycophant, every assistant, every White House and Oval Office worker, the Secret Service, every Demorat, Psaki, KJP, every bit of the American Media Maggots, were “all in” on the scam, 24/7, 365.

A scam, a grift, a naked power grab behind an old man who, injected with too many chemical cocktails, finally fell apart before the eyes of the planet.

And everyone, EVERYONE, was told they were stupid, ignorant, conspiratorial, biased, ridiculous, to think Joe Vegetable wasn’t in top form, in his prime.

Here are the American Media Maggots telling us how stupid we are for believing our lying eyes.

The Binder, KJP, Karine Jean-Pierre, a Three-Fer herself, called videos of Biden being Biden “cheap fakes,” which the American Media Maggots again gladly regurgitated out countless times for consumption by the sheepses.

What these assholes did to Joe Vegetable is precisely what a violent domestic abuser does to their spouse.

It was all a staggering con job, nothing more than a Barack HUSSEIN Obama third term. And a man who wants his fourth term. Let’s not forget:

I’m absolutely convinced that Obama spoke the truth, as he has a disdain for getting his hands dirty, dealing with the great unwashed, having to be accountable to us little people, the peons. Doing the work, shaking hands, being accountable, being responsible, attending all the meetings, glad-handing, photo ops, all the political dreck associated with POTUS was beneath him and frequently the arrogance would ooze through his vocals. He just couldn’t help it. If he could command absolutely, and let somebody else be The Face, he’d be fine. Sometimes you simply have to take people at their word. Like Islam. When they say they want to kill you, well, they really want to kill you.

And now, used up, washed up, Joe Vegetable will be flushed down the Demorat toilet like a dripping, soiled tampon. He is already so incredibly Yesterday’s News.

Let’s remember, though, even in January of this year, NONE, ZIP, ZERO, the Null Set, not one media outlet here or on the planet hammered Joe Biden for incomprehensibility. Had Trump done just this, below, it would have been replayed for weeks. You know it, I know it, Demorats and Leftists know it, and the American Media Maggots know it.

It was the biggest LIE, the largest calumny in the history of American politics. It makes Watergate look like kindergarten play involving toddlers. Because everyone — and I mean everyone — in the White House, the Oval Office, the Joe Vegetable Regime, the Demorats, Leftists, the American Media Maggots, Kamala Harris, were all — absolutely all — complicit.

In a way, you can’t blame Biden. As Joe Biden, he was initially motivated and later puppeted by his own avarice — when a semblance of cognition was still remaining — pushed by the duplicitous power monger Jill Biden.

As Joe Vegetable, however, he was over-the-top obvious as a proxy for Obama, Rice, Jill Biden, Ron Klain, et all — as evidenced by the fake “snap in his step,” his getting lost on innumerable stages, reading text from cards out loud meant only to guide him, reading prompts, holding instructions on which reporters to call, escorted off stages by his elbow by both Jill Biden and Barack Obama.

Biden’s cheat sheet for his very first press conference, 3-25-21. Everything prearranged.

Biden’s cheat sheet tells him how to sit. Everything prearranged.

NewsNation’s story on his cheat sheets and pre-selected questions and answers.

People have asked: “But where is your empathy for Joe Biden?” My empathy for Joe Biden doesn’t exist. Or his wife. Or his family. They all put themselves on Front Street, playing the Big Game, playing for all the political marbles, and the moment he or those helping/deciding for him insisted on his insertion into the Big Leagues, the gloves were off, and he becomes a target for my truth. Which is: Biden is an incontinent, wandering, embarrassing vegetable.

It’s clear the Biden Crime Family has sucked at the teat of the American Taxpayer for literally decades, enriching themselves at the expense of those who can’t assemble a savings account, who can’t keep jobs, who watched their jobs, their businesses, their communities, their education, their children, their families destroyed first by lockstep Wuhan-19 sycophants, then by drugs, overdoses, deaths, and the installation of Joe Biden who, in his very first act, throttled the energy industry which launched the instigation of expanding, then exploding inflation. Whilst simultaneously destroying American national security, sovereignty, and displaying weakness for every US enemy to see in plain view.

Yet, the assclowns kept assclowning.

How do people making $175,000 in Congress leave DC politics as millionaires? Only one way. Insider trading, insider knowledge, cheating, corruption. But that’s a story for another day.

Then came the oncoming November presidential election, the debate, the utter collapse of Joe Vegetable that affected — well, everything.

But WHY was that debate the proverbial “tipping point” when, up to then, a simple declaration by Demorats and Leftists was sufficient to soothe the fevered brows of most every one of the nipple suckers?

Because the gig was truly up. The truth was out. To the point that the sphincters of Demorat donors clenched and began to withhold the very Mother’s Milk of all politics: CASH.

The outward cry from Demorats, when cash was the focus, then became “unelectable.” But because I speak Leftist, I can translate. That meant: whereas the spice must flow, it was now slammed shut. Oh my God. Did we install Joe Biden, only to have the ghost of Bernie Sanders interrupt our cash?

This cannot stand. Joe must Goe.

The pressure was on. Hollywood via George Clooney via Barack Hussein Obama leaned in hard, as did a small but expanding cadre of Demorats. “He must step aside for the good of the order,” they bleated. The American Media Maggots dutifully took up this clarion call.

And with that, those who shrieked that Trump and Republicans were every possible “threat to democracy” — though we’re in fact a Republic — were themselves complicit in shutting down the very “democracy” to which they referred. Your 14 million votes, Demorats, suddenly didn’t mean caca. What’s worse, it’s apparent Demorats don’t care.

Kammie Harris did truly become “the anointed one.”

That’s Demorat and Leftist “democracy” at work.

Kamala Harris was installed as nominee before the August 19th DNC Convention in Chicago.

There wasn’t a debate at the convention, no opportunity for a debate at the convention, no opportunity to challenge her.

These delegates for Biden swapped for Harris. And like the TV show “Whose Line Is It Anyway,” the 14 million voters don’t matter.

The threat to democracy is via Demorats. It’s an autocracy. Providing zero access for questioning. More on that in a moment.

Another interesting point is this quote from George Orwell:

“In the case of a word like democracy, not only is there no agreed definition, but the attempt to make one is resisted from all sides. It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it: consequently the defenders of every kind of regime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using the word if it were tied down to any one meaning.”

Even though Joe Vegetable, up to the very last second, claimed he was “in it to win it.”

Veggie said he was staying, unless his health was affected. So in steps Wuhan-19, on cue, just as commanded.

Then, on Saturday, July 13th, whilst at an outdoor rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, President Trump was almost assassinated on live television by a 20 year old whose name doesn’t bear repeating — killing a good and kind American citizen named Corey Comperatore, 50, whose final act was shielding his wife and daughter. Also seriously injured were David Dutch, 57, and James Copenhaver, 74. Both, thankfully, were released from the hospital in something of a short order. But their wounds will never fully heal.

Dead sniper,1 each. His name isn’t worth mentioning, but this photo is worth posting. Fuck you with a white hot piece of rebar, all the way to a flaming, twisted Hell.

This is not the time or place to review the assassination attempt, there are thousands of questions and very few, if any, reliable answers — but of course the American Media Maggots did their level best to minimize the event, saying that “Trump fell down” and, aided and abetted by the despicable FBI Director Christopher Wray, who stated in an open Congressional hearing that Trump was hit by “shrapnel.”

Which the FBI itself later updated by stepping on their very own director, walking back his statement, which was truly delicious.

An aside: I firmly believe that the FBI in its current iteration is nothing more than the weaponized arm of the DNC and Leftists, a corrupt, anti-American terrorist organization.

TERRORISM:
The unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in pursuit of political aims.

Demorats, Leftists, and the American Media Maggots pretended to be appalled regarding the attempted assassination, but in truth they were terribly disappointed.  They were disappointed it wasn’t successful.  They said Donald Trump’s harsh language brought this all on himself. While doing everything a cornered animal can do to overthrow the nation, while pretending that they’re the ones trying to save “our democracy.”

From JustTheNews.com:

Poll shocker: 28% of Democrats think America better off if Trump had been assassinated

by John Solomon, 9-18-24

New Scott Rasmussen poll also shows Americans think anti-Trump rhetoric main reason for assassination attempts.

n a shocking display of how vitriolic U.S. politics has become, more than a quarter of Democrats believe America would be better off if GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump had been killed during one of the two assassination attempts on his life, a new survey revealed Wednesday.

The new poll of 1,000 registered voters taken by veteran pollster Scott Rasmussen’s Napolitan News Institute after the second assassination attempt against Trump on Sunday at a Florida golf course revealed that 17% of voters say it would have been better for America had Donald Trump had been killed last weekend.

That figure included a whopping 28% of Democrats, the survey showed.

It’s all make believe and pretend. Like children. Shhh. Don’t say that.

The global Crowdstrike update failure occurred on July 18th, and Biden withdrew from presidential nomination three days later, on Sunday, July 21st.

After that, the assassination attempt on Donald John Trump was completely memory-holed by the American Media Maggots, and Kamala Harris was endorsed by Joe Vegetable. We know why.

Here is the very odd letter released regarding Biden’s taking himself out of the presidential race — which never explains WHY, and is not on either official White House or Oval Office letterhead, with a signature that some are questioning.

Up until that point, we were hearing that Biden had no trust in Harris, Demorats had no trust in Harris, a person who acquired zero delegates in the 2020 presidential race, and didn’t even make it to the Iowa caucus. Barack Hussein Obama took his sweet time in endorsing Kammie Kackler.

Even — something I found absolutely gobsmacking — BLM weighed in on the crowning investiture of Kammie.

In retrospect, what were the Biden-Harris “accomplishments” anyway — that every Demorat should automatically bankroll their trust and confidence in the apparently unchallenged transition from Joe Vegetable and thusly to Kammie Kackler?

But now, it’s a love fest, replete with ass-shaking black chicks, and fake southern accents — just like Kammie’s mentor, Hillary Clinton, back in 2015.

Here’s Kammie Kackler during the Atlanta rally on July 30th. You be the judge.

Nothing like pandering to and slapping the faces of black voters with shocking buckets full of dripping condescension.

But now is the time that we must begin to understand just who is this person named Kamala Devi Harris (most def an Indian middle name)? What is her history — and how can it be traced directly back to Kalifornia and a powerful political patron?

Born in Oakland, Kalifornia, Harris turned 60 on October 20th. Her mother is Indian, and her father is Jamaican.

In 1990 she was hired as an deputy DA for Alameda County, which encompasses Oakland and the East Bay in Kalifornia.

And here it begins. That is to say, the lies and the fellation. Per Wikipedia, “In 1994, Speaker of the California Assembly Willie Brown, who was then dating Harris, appointed her to the state Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board and later to the California Medical Assistance Commission.”

Had she not known Willie Brown, do you think those appointments would naturally have occurred for someone unfamiliar with insurance, and unfamiliar with medical assistance? Of course not. MMN. Merit Matters Not.

The LIE, promulgated by Demorats and Leftists, is that “Willie Brown wasn’t married” — as he was swiving the crap out of Kamala, then 29, and Willie, then 60, from 1994 to 1995. Let’s be blunt. Willie Brown was still married. Kamala was screwing a married man, and he was tapping some young chickadee literally half his age and, by dint of that, used his political power to place his strumpet into political positions of power and burgeoning wealth. Because she had, well, the appropriate kneepads and a dutiful amount of vacuum. Anyone telling you different is lying. She hitched her wagon to power by way of sexual favors, in an illicit affair. No more complicated than that. An age-old power dynamic between men and women.

The Federalist correctly wrote:

The Media Won’t Tell You Political Corruption Defined Kamala Harris’ Affair With Willie Brown

by Mark Hemingway, 7-26-24

The New York Times says it’s ‘sexist’ to question why Harris had an affair with a powerful political boss twice her age — but the facts they’re not telling you are damning.

Harris herself admits her career benefited significantly from said relationship. Other Democrats shared the perception she did not earn her positions. And Harris, a lawyer who initially failed the bar exam, can only say that she “brought a level of life knowledge and common sense” rather than actual qualifications to the jobs Brown appointed her to. But it’s a sexist insinuation to insist these facts are rather unflattering to Kamala.

Once in office, Harris then dropped or pled out corruption charges against friends of Willie Brown that Hallinan had been pursuing. There were a number of Brown’s friends let off the hook, but most notably this included a sweetheart plea deal for a notorious city contractor caught defrauding the city by using inferior recycled concrete in sensitive projects such as parking garages and the Bay Bridge. This compromised the structural integrity of those projects and endangered lives. But Harris dropped all the fraud charges and accepted a guilty plea on a single count involving an environmental violation.

No problem. If the Bay Bridge falls down again, well, we’ll just fleece the local, state, and federal taxpayers for more money.

She loved Juicy Smollett.

She loves rioters.

Never forget that Kamala Harris is an intentional racist, full well buying into a racist hoax, DEI, reparations, and the rest of the Racist Industrial Complex. I wonder if that’s the

So let’s talk about the real Kamala Harris — because there’s a very distinct reason why she has no real policy on her website, why it isn’t nailed down, why it isn’t clear, obvious, and delineated in great detail as a platform.

Instead, she’s caught in the middle of the Joe Vegetable drain, and trying to handle her history of massive Leftism. She can’t quite kick Joe Biden to the curb, and she can’t quite embrace huge Hamas terrorists — though she’d desperately love to.

Anyone with a molecule of common sense in their wheelhouse knows that, as the saying goes, “the best predictor of future behavior is past performance, or the lack thereof.”

That demands illustration. Caveat Emptor. Let the buyer beware. Because a shit-ton of ignorant people are willing to sacrifice a massive percentile of American history in order to usher in emotions over facts and common sense. Because they fail to see beyond their One Trick Pony issue: hot-and-cold running abortions on demand.

As an aside, want to watch and hear what made me anti-abortion? Let’s hear Dr Anthony Levatino talk about performing an abortion, as he testifies before Congress.

Abortion is “health care.” Abortion right up to birth is “health care.” Screw the thousands of Americans who would love to have a child, if more children were put up for adoption. But adoption? No. More infants must die because things are simply inconvenient.

This is the true Kammie Kackler. A massive Leftist, damned near a full-on Communist. Once, if elected, she’ll kick everything “moderate” she ever said and revert to her true self: an unlikeable, snake-like, back stabbing, Communist even harder aport than Barack Hussein Obama — which is quite the feat.

Gad Saad said it best:

Kammie was ranked “the most liberal Senator” in 2019, a page that has since managed to vanish at either the push, blackmail, or “convincing” of GovTrack, once the information emerged into the mainstream.

From FoxNews.com:

Webpage that rated Kamala Harris the ‘most liberal’ senator in 2019 suddenly disappears

7-24-24, by Yael Halon

GovTrack, an organization that tracks congressional voting records, confirmed to Fox News Digital it had removed a 2019 web page that ranked Kamala Harris as that year’s “most liberal” U.S. senator sometime within the last two weeks.

The self-described “government transparency website” scored Harris as the “most liberal compared to all senators” in 2019, outranking Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren at the time. 

But the web page with the ranking, which was widely covered in news reports during the 2020 election, was recently deactivated. The link now displays a “Page Not Found” message. The Internet Archive shows the page was deleted sometime between July 10 and July 23, with some on X claiming the page was still up on July 22.

Tauberer confirmed to Fox News Digital that the page was removed sometime in the last two weeks, but did not give a specific date. Asked why the pages weren’t removed when single-year report cards were abandoned years ago, he said, “I was focused on more impactful aspects of our work.”

I’d like to point out an important point. Bernie Sanders is an admitted Democrat Socialist. And Harris was determined to be left of him.

I speak Leftist, so I’ll translate: “We got caught with our pants down, actually revealing the truth, and had to cover for Kammie Kackler — which we did.”

Kackler doesn’t want you to see this interview with from CBS, and the ranking from GovTrack. See how the kackling somehow diminishes?

That internet, while revealing, can also be some Slim Shady Shit. But you just have to know where and how to look. Let’s move on.

What are some of the things Harris has done?

  • Co-sponsored Bernie Sanders’ Medicare For All Act
  • Sponsored a bill providing illegal invaders with a right to legal representation
  • Expressed support for sanctuary cities
  • Introduced legislation to block the implementation of the Trump travel restrictions
  • Touted the agreement at COP28 to phase out fossil fuels
  • Sponsored a bill requiring DOJ to award grants to replace cash bail systems
  • Sponsored a bill to advance the Green New Deal
  • Sponsored a bill banning DHS from using federal funds to build or expand immigration detention facilities

Demorats and Leftist bleat about the “ruination of Democracy” but, as the very wise Victor Davis Hanson wrote, the only destroyers of “democracy” are the Demorats themselves. And for idiot Leftists and Demorats, we’re not a democracy. We’re a republic. And the coups against “democracy” were committed by Demorats.

Coup Upon Coup Upon Coup

by Victor Davis Hanson, 7-25-24

In March 2020, all the major Democratic primary candidates abruptly, mysteriously, and in near unison withdrew from the presidential race, ceding the nomination to Joe Biden.

Yet Biden had lost the first three races in Iowa, New Hampshire, and Nevada—and only won his first victory in South Carolina.

Suddenly, on the eve of the Super Tuesday mega-primaries, the candidacies of front-runner Bernie Sanders, Pete Buttigieg, Elizabeth Warren, and others simply evaporated.

The fear of a front-runner Sanders’ socialist victory and nomination—and thus an enviable landslide loss to incumbent Donald Trump in the general election—had prompted the donor class and shadowy political insiders to act.

Can’t have that. Then — ruh-roh — Biden’s vegetable nature became too big to ignore in the debate.

Democrats demonized anyone critical of Biden’s obvious mental decline. Their smearing crested during Biden’s now-aborted 2024 reelection bid, even as Biden could no longer display even a veneer of mental and physical engagement.

Your lying eyes are deceiving you. Listen to what we say. Not what you see.

So suddenly on a Sunday, July 21—just days left before state ballots were formalized with the names of the parties’ official nominees, and on the eve of the Democratic convention—party bosses, mega-donors, and Obama puppeteers went into action for yet a third time.

They reportedly threatened candidate Biden with a complete loss of any further campaign funding and raised the specter of invoking the 25th Amendment to end his presidency—should he not suddenly withdraw from the race and endorse Vice President Kamala Harris as his surrogate on the ticket.

In one moment, the choices of nearly 15 million Biden primary voters were vitiated. No delegates were consulted. No other alternative Democrat candidates were even considered.

Biden was dethroned; Harris was coronated—without much public input or even knowledge of how or why.

Oh my. Victor Davis Hanson does so beautifully nail this.

Democrat insiders not only removed their leading candidate, who for the prior six months had won all the 2024 primaries and almost all the delegates, but insisted that Biden keep Democrats and himself in power—but only if he agreed to quit the race.

In sum, at the 11th hour of a two-year reelection effort, a cabal arbitrarily decided that Joe Biden might well lose the Democrats the White House and the Congress.

So, they reversed course, now claiming his dementia was so acute as to destroy their November prospects. But mysteriously, his decline was not severe enough to imperil the American people, whom Biden must continue to lead until January 20, 2025.

Furthermore, the bosses’ replacement choice, Vice President Kamala Harris, had entered no primary. She never won a single delegate. Harris also never captured a single delegate in her first and only presidential run back in 2020. She then dropped out of the race even before the first Iowa and New Hampshire balloting.

We have now witnessed three left-wing veritable coups.

But hey: all in the name of “democracy.” And meanwhile, back at the ranch, that evil Donald John Trump, OMB, was a continuing existential threat to “democracy.”

Suddenly, it was 1967 again, the Summer of Love and Joy, as regaled by Kamala Harris.

And good little Demorat sycophants circled the wagons in order to support a darker female — you can’t really call her black (she’s Jamaican and Indian) — 20+ years Biden’s junior, who, likewise, couldn’t string a cogent sentence together absent the wonders of modern TelePrompters.

At first blush, she was great. She was wonderful. She was both great and wonderful. Until she opened her mouth and attempted to speak. And her history caught up to her.

This is the true Kamala Harris. This is what she really believes, despite the massive amount of flip-flops.

No matter how you parse it, Kamala Harris believes in defunding the police.

She believes that every illegal invader deserves healthcare, to be paid by YOUR American Taxpayer dollars.

Kamala Harris doesn’t support police anyway. As DA, Harris purposely chose not to attach the death penalty to the suspect convicted of murdering a police officer in 2004.

Slain SF cop’s family ‘certainly not’ supporting Kamala Harris for president over her actions as DA in 2004 shooting: report

by Deirdre Bardolf, 8-10-24

Isaac Espinoza, a 29-year-old husband and father, was shot and killed by then-22-year-old gang member David Hill during a traffic stop in the Bayview District of San Francisco the night before Easter.

Harris, just months into her role as district attorney, got on television three days after the killing to announce that she wouldn’t seek the death penalty — before even speaking with the heartbroken family.

The family of a San Francisco cop shot dead in 2004 says they won’t support Vice President Kamala Harris after she put politics before justice — adding that Donald Trump is the “better option” for police departments across the US.

No surprise. Kamala Harris is a corrupt Leftist. Then. Now. Always.

Kamala Harris prosecuted black men for smoking dope.

During her tenure as California attorney general, some 1,560 people were sent to state prisons for cannabis-related offenses between 2011 and 2016, according to state corrections data analyzed by the Washington Free Beacon.

Harris’s record in California as attorney general, district attorney, and prosecutor before her election to the Senate drew increased scrutiny as she entered the presidential arena in 2019, with voters seizing on her record.

In 2010, California introduced a ballot measure to legalize marijuana in the state. Harris, like other prominent Democrats, opposed the measure known as Proposition 10, raising concerns that it could lead to “driving while high.”

Harris declined to join a bid to remove marijuana from the Drug Enforcement Administration’s list of most-dangerous substances while she was attorney general and was accused of failing to help the state’s cannabis industryduring a2011 federalcrackdown.

But somehow things changed.

But Harris, once a hard-nosed prosecutor, rallied behind the Biden administration’s decision last week (10-11-22) to pardon all federal convictions of simple marijuana possession, a surprise announcement delivered in the countdown to the midterm election.

Kamala Harris had a young black mother for failing to have her child in school, “truancy,” despite her child having serious medical issues.

Kamala Harris refused to prosecute the Catholic Church when there were numerous cases of abuse in San Francisco and other cities in Kalifornia.

Fact Check: Kamala Harris Covered Up Sexual Abuse Allegations as a Prosecutor Before Claiming to Fight for Victims at DNC

by Olivia Rondeau, 8-22-24

Vice President Kamala Harris bragged about her supposed passion for helping victims of sexual assault while speaking at the Democratic National Convention (DNC), ignoring her track record of failing to prosecute sexual abuse cases within the Catholic Church and even hiding “vital records on abuses that had occurred” when she was a San Francisco district attorney.

During Harris’s 13-year tenure as district attorney and then attorney general, she failed to prosecute even one case of priest sexual abuse, even as at least 50 major cities brought charges against priests in the same period.

Rick Simons, an attorney who represented victims of clergy sexual abuse in California, said Harris’s action of covering up documents on the cases “shows a pattern and practice and policy of ignoring the rights of children by one of the largest institutions of the city and county of San Francisco, and in the Bay Area.”

Later in her convention speech, Harris claimed, “As a young courtroom prosecutor in Oakland California, I stood up for women and children against predators who abused them.”

Lies. Cui bono, monetarily? The question must be asked.

However, Schweizer revealed that in addition to campaign donations from multiple law firms defending San Francisco priests against abuse claims, multiple “board members of San Francisco Catholic archdiocese-related organizations and their family members donated another $50,950 to Harris’s campaign.”

“Harris had no particular ties to the Catholic Church or Catholic organizations, but the money still came in large, unprecedented sums,” the investigative journalist wrote.

Schweizer alleged that connections Harris had with powerful people within the archdiocese influenced her “to bury the records” with allegations against priests.

Her office “would strangely hide vital records on abuses that had occurred,” he added.

Kamala Harris also plans to tax unrealized gains. If something went up in value, but you didn’t sell it, didn’t make a profit — you’ll still be taxed.

Kamala is proposing an *INSANE* 25% tax on unrealized capital gains. Imagine buying shares for $100,000, and their value rises to $150,000. Under Kamala’s plan, you’d owe taxes on the $50,000 gain, even though you haven’t sold the shares or made any actual profit. Now, imagine the stock’s value drops back to $100,000 the following year. The gain you were taxed on has vanished. You’ve already paid a 25% tax on a gain that no longer exists, leaving you with a financial loss and no real benefit. Taxing unrealized gains would force investors to sell off assets to cover their tax bills, hurting long-term investment and economic growth. This isn’t just risky; it’s a recipe for a stock market crash and another Great Depression.

Trust me. If this plan in achieved, the Demorats and Leftists will be coming for everyone next. It’s their inherent nature.

I could go on. But I am literally running out of room to write, and energy to continue with her abominations.

Like Joe Biden is on the wrong side of every issue — Kamala Harris is likewise on the wrong side of every issue.

She will transform her external mouth music in order to accommodate whatever audience she speaks before. A readily apparent chameleon. Except, as she says, her “views haven’t changed.”

Because truly, she is a massive Leftist.

Don’t listen to what she says. Examine what she’s done.

Caveat Emptor, regarding Kamala Harris.

Know that, before you buy her crap.

BZ

The reason retired General Mark Milley, American Traitor, despises President Trump? MONEY.

As a general axiom, and certainly one of BZ’s Axioms, “when people say it’s not about the money — it’s about the money.”

And this is certainly true of retired General Mark Milley, also a traitor to the United States of America.

Anyone remember when Milley stated he would notify Communist China if President Trump decided to act against Communist China?

From the New York Post, the same newspaper that published the TRUTH about the Hunter Biden laptop, then had its stories wiped from the internet, then hundreds of thousands of social media users on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and other digital locations, were likewise suppressed, censored and, in many cases, accounts were closed permanently. Because of the truth.

So here’s some truth. Followed by even more truth.

Milley admits he would tell Chinese general if US launched an attack

by Mark Moore, 9-29-21

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley admitted Wednesday that he would give his Chinese counterpart a heads up if the US launched an attack against Beijing, during a second day of grilling on Capitol Hill that touched on his two reported calls to the Chinese general.

​”I said, hell, I’ll call you. But we’re not going to attack you,” Milley told the House Armed Services Committee about one of his conversations with Gen. Li Zuocheng of the People’s Liberation Army.

Milley was questioned ​about two calls he made to Li — in October 2020 before the presidential election and on Jan. 8, two days after the Capitol riot.

He told members of the panel that he reached out to Li to assure him that President Donald Trump did not intend to launch a military strike.

It was clearly evident that General Milley had forgotten his place, and his role in allegedly serving the United States of America, and had very clearly forgotten his oath, and to whom he swore allegiance.

“​You articulating that, that you would tell him​,​ you would give him a call​,​ is worthy of your resignation. ​I just think that’s against our country that you would call our ​No.1 adversary and tell him that​,” she told Milley. 

According to “Peril,” the book by Washington Post reporters Bob Woodward and Robert Costa, Milley told Li he would give the Chinese advance warning of an attack.

To the US. Not to its enemies. Milley believed he owed Communist China a warning, rather than our very own president, whom he betrayed. It is not Milley’s job, not any general officer’s job, to conduct policy and communicate policy of this nature to largest enemy of the United States, that being Communist China.

But this is a clear delineator of who he truly is, at his core. An abject traitor. It is he who believed he was the president, not the actual sitting President of the United States, Donald Trump. He believed it was up to him to set policy, not Congress. By assuring Communist China, our obvious enemy, Milley managed to completely do away with two entire branches of the government.

Yet he kept his job. In my estimation, a rather serious error on Trump’s part.

First, let us examine the US code section regarding treason, 18 US Code § 2381, which rather plainly and succinctly reads:

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 807Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(2)(J)Sept. 13, 1994108 Stat. 2148.)

The penalty for a conviction of treason — a penalty that Julius and Ethel Rosenberg paid in 1953 — is death.

Please explain what part of Milley’s actions do not constitute treason. Allow me to repeat, at the risk of being repetitive: “Milley told Li he would give the Chinese advance warning of an attack.”

Point being made, General Milley has recently commented on Donald Trump, due to his candidacy for president. General Milley said Trump is “fascist to the core.”

Trump’s former Joint Chiefs chair: Trump is ‘fascist to the core’

by Steve Benen, 10-14-24

As The Washington Post reported, Milley apparently put subtlety aside when speaking to Bob Woodward for the longtime journalist’s new book.

Retired Gen. Mark A. Milley warned that former president Donald Trump is a “fascist to the core” and “the most dangerous person to this country” in new comments voicing his mounting alarm at the prospect of the Republican nominee’s election to another term, according to a forthcoming book by Washington Post associate editor Bob Woodward.

Apparently, however, Trump was insufficiently fascist for Milley to resign from his position, make an actual stand, and potentially affect his retirement. Trump was just kinda fascist, not totally fascist, a wee bit fascist, but enough to verbally complain.

In general, let’s examine the meaning of the word, and understand how those who accuse others of fascism are doing the precise same thing themselves, only worse.

Fascism:
A governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.

Let’s look at history. Most references are to Italy’s Mussolini (1922 to 1943). Applied to President Trump, let’s go point by point.

Was Trump a dictator? Did he have complete power?
No. He was frequently opposed by numerous groups, and both parties, Republicans and Demorats. He was successfully sued over some of his actions. He was the subject of numerous “investigations” by Demorats which frequently found nothing. In fact, as directly opposed to a dictator, Trump was impeached twice, acquitted once. That’s nothing to which a dictator is subject.

I should remind everyone that Trump was impeached for a “phone call” to Ukraine.

Here on January 23rd of 2020, however, entirely ignored, is then Vice President Biden crowing about his threats to pull $1 BILLION DOLLARS in loan guarantees, shoving Ukraine towards insolvency, if it didn’t immediately fire the prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, investigating Burisma Holdings — where his son, Hunter Biden, sat on the board.

This is public bribery, with Joe Biden also intimating that then-President Barack Hussein Obama, March of 2016, was likewise in on the deal.

Of course, nothing happened to Joe Biden, though this is immured forever on the internet.

Did Hunter Biden make money? Why yes, a veritable shit-ton of it.

From 2013 through 2018 Hunter Biden and his company brought in about $11 million via his roles as an attorney and a board member with a Ukrainian firm accused of bribery and his work with a Chinese businessman now accused of fraud, according to an NBC News analysis of a copy of Biden’s hard drive and iCloud account and documents released by Republicans on two Senate committees. 

Why was Hunter Biden, a know-nothing about gas and oil, on the board of Burisma at all? For two very important reasons:

  • Ukraine was and is the corrupt Laundromat To The World Stars, including the Biden Crime Family.
  • The oldest schemes: purchasing the influence, power, and control, of VP Biden, which required its own quid pro quo.

Did Trump forcibly suppress opposition and criticism?
Hardly. The criticism and opposition was rampant and 24/7. The people who actually suppressed opposition and criticism were the Demorats, the American Media Maggots, the DOJ, and the FBI, with election interference utilized as a large cudgel, by censoring Americans, having social media repress individuals on social media and remove their accounts at the behest of the US government.

Did Trump regiment all industry, commerce?
Not in the slightest. In fact he advocated for American industry and commerce, and for a fair and level playing field in world markets.

Was Trump nationalistic?
To a great degree, Trump was and is a populist, hence his America First theme, and Make America Great Again theme. These came after literally multiple decades of other nations and countries, many our enemy, taking advantage of our largesse, our ignorance, good will, and conciliatory nature. For the first time in a presidency, we were engaged in ZERO wars, because the primary bad actors knew Trump had acted, and would act, against aggression.

Was Trump racist?
According to the Race and Poverty Pimps, yes — who profit from constantly hitting the Cash Throttle. However, when Trump’s statements are examined in full, and not with the salient parts dropped on the editing room floor, you discover that Trump was the opposite of racist. He only became “racist” when he entered the fray for president, running against Hillary Clinton. Here’s just one fact pattern, the truth about Charlottesville — a continuing LIE spit forth from the Demorats, Leftists, Globalists, and the American Media Maggots.

Now let’s look at some timelines. Because facts are inconvenient things sometimes.

Mark Milley joined the board of JP Morgan in February of 2024.

JPMorgan Chase & Co. brought on retired General Mark Milley, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as a senior adviser.

Milley, who spent more than four decades in the US military, will advise the bank’s board of directors, senior leaders and clients on dangers around the world, Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon told employees in a memo Thursday.

JP Morgan Chase is the largest US bank, by assets. And Milley will rock even more personal cash and assets to embiggen his wallet, with his board seat. Since his retirement in 2023, Mark Milley has somehow magically, mystically, jumped into the faculties of Georgetown and Princeton, is making big coin on the paid speaking circuit, and landed a cushy “senior advisor” spot on JP Morgan Chase bank’s board.

Military personnel call this “cashing in,” as a select few like Milley manage to transition from a capped military pay of $204,000 a year to — well, the sky’s the limit. It’s whatever you can negotiate, depending on how much you hate Trump.

Bob Woodward’s book “War,” which you can already locate at Thriftbooks.com, was released on October 15th, this year. In it, Woodward brings in Milley and Milley’s labeling of President Trump a fascist.

What do we know? It takes some time to turn around a book. It takes time to write a book. And Milley already made his deal with JP Morgan Chase in February of this year.

Why the doubling down on Trump being called a fascist, by Mark Milley?

Let’s realize this.

BlackRock and JPMorgan are backing a $15 billion investor fund to rebuild Ukraine

by Vinamrata Chaturvedi, 3-14-24

It would cost almost half-a-trillion dollars to reconstruct Ukraine

A coalition of investors, with support from BlackRock and JPMorgan, are aiming to put together $15 billion in aid to rebuild Ukraine. In a new group known as the Ukraine Development Fund, they are supporting investments from state bodies and capital markets; the fund will bring together a consortium of investors to finance at least $15 billion of reconstruction work in the country after two years of Russian invasion.

You couldn’t possibly think this little scheme was put in the works yesterday, do you?

So you must ask yourself: who has had constant access to every bit of military and intelligence information regarding Ukraine, do you suppose, for at least a decade? That wouldn’t be Mark Milley, would it?

Because, though he’s retired, he and others like him always retain their top secret (and above) clearances, with access to the same information as before via their friends, or directly (shhh, quiet) via computers they have at home, installed by some of the finest former NSA tech employees on the planet.

They know people who know people. And Milley knows people who know people.

President Trump 45 cannot possibly be allowed to become President Trump 47.

The corrupt Ukraine Laundromat never stops. The Machine never quits. It keeps churning out cash like an ATM with no PIN required.

So let me just distill things down to this, because sometimes actions truly are fairly transparent, but not super-intentionally. One has to actually do a little occasional digging. I did a little internet digging.

JP Morgan and BlackRock are backing an investor to rebuild Ukraine, requiring about half a TRILLION DOLLARS.

Would JP Morgan Chase or BlackRock invest unless they believed they could make a staggering amount of money on returns?

WHO has hitched his star to JP Morgan?

General Mark Milley.

Who want to get us out of needless wars?

Donald Trump.

See what’s happening?

See why Milley despises Trump?

Trump threatens The Spice.

The Spice must flow.

BZ

 

 

Leftists: “It’s the worst time in US history!”

Just ask the LDAMM — the Leftists, Demorats and American Media Maggots. They’re all colluding and have been doing so, ever more cemented than before, since November 9th of 2016, when the worst calamity in the history of history occurred: Hillary Clinton was not elected as 45th president of the United States.

Despite every possible lever having been thrown, every shitty deal cut, every corner clipped, every US counterintelligence agency up and alerted then thrown against the OMB himself: the Orange Man Bad. Yes. Despite all that, Hillary Clinton was not anointed president, as was her official right. After all, it was “her turn.” Don’t you guys get that?

He should never have won. Ever. You know, the guy with the dead orange cat on his head: Donald John Trump.

The mantra now, besides the explosion of every -ist, -ism and -obe on the planet laid at the feet of Donald Trump, is that the United States is clearly plummeting towards doom.

With, eh, a couple of exceptions.

From CNSNews.com:

Hispanic Unemployment Rate Sets New Record Low in April

by Craig Bannister

The national seasonally-adjusted unemployment rate for Hispanics and Latinos in the U.S. labor force fell to a record low of 4.2% in April, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data released Friday show.

In April, the unemployment rate for Hispanics and Latinos, aged 16 and up, was 4.2%, down from 4.7% in March – breaking the record low of 4.3% set two months earlier in February. BLS began tracking Hispanic-Latino employment data in 1973.

The number of unemployed Hispanics fell to 1,198,000 – the fewest unemployed since August of 2007 (1,190,000) and a decline of 165,000 from 1,363,000 in March of 2019.

The number of Hispanics employed fell to 27,348,000 from 27,566,000 in March and off from its record high of 27,701,000 in December 2018. The number of Hispanics participating in the workplace increased as Hispanics’ labor force participation rate fell to 65.9% from 67.0% in March.

Job Creators Network President and CEO Alfredo Ortiz says Hispanics’ job opportunites have benefited greatly from President Donald Trump’s pro-business policies:

“One of the biggest beneficiaries of the Trump economy has been Hispanics, whose entrepreneurial talents have been harnessed in this climate of deregulation and tax cuts. While Democrats play class warfare and identity politics, President Trump’s policies are creating a booming economy that is lifting all boats.”

Some more numbers?

Hispanic-Latino employment statistics for February 2019:

  • Unemployment rate: 4.2%, down from 4.7% in March.
  • Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population (16+ years old): 43,289,000 up from 43,205,000 in March.
  • Number Participating in Labor Force: 28,546,000 down from 28,929,000 in March.
  • Labor Force Participation: 65.9, down from 67.0% in March.
  • Number Employed: 27,348,000 down from 27,566,000 in March.
  • Number Unemployed: 1,198,000, down from 1,363,000 in March.

From Breitbart.com:

Unemployment Rate for Women Falls to Lowest Since 1953

by John Carney

The unemployment rate for women in the U.S. workforce fell to 3.4 percent in April, the lowest rate since September 1953.

The unemployment for women fell below 4 percent in March 2018 for the first time since the dot com boom in 2000. It has remained below 4 percent in 12 out of the last 13 months.

The longest streak of below 4 percent unemployment was 18 months starting in 1952. The record low was 2.7 percent in May 1952.

Ivanka Trump, the president’s daughter, cited a slightly different statistic that is also at the lowest level in over 60 years. Unemployment for women over 20 years old fell to 3.1 percent.

From the WashingtonExaminer.com:

Lowest unemployment in 19 years for workers without bachelor’s degrees in April

by Joseph Lawler

Unemployment for workers without bachelor’s degrees fell to the lowest rate in 19 years in April, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday, a sign the recovery is benefiting the people most in need of help as it stretches toward a 10th year.

Unemployment for workers without four-year or graduate degrees fell to just 3.5% in April, the lowest such mark since the 3.4% rate in April 2000, which was the lowest recorded, with data going back to 1992.

That statistic, which is adjusted for seasonal variations, represents workers above the age of 25 without associate’s degrees or who didn’t finish college, people with only high school degrees, and high school dropouts. Those groups generally have much higher unemployment rates.

From the Associated Press:

Unemployment hits 49-year low as US employers step up hiring

by Christopher Rugaber

WASHINGTON (AP) — Hiring accelerated and pay rose at a solid pace in April, setting the stage for healthy U.S. economic growth to endure despite fears of a slowdown earlier this year.

Employers added 263,000 jobs, with the unemployment rate dropping to a five-decade low of 3.6% from 3.8%, though that drop partly reflected an increase in the number of Americans who stopped looking for work. Average hourly pay rose 3.2% from 12 months earlier, matching March’s year-over-year increase.

Friday’s jobs report from the government showed that economic growth remains brisk enough to encourage strong hiring nearly a decade into the economy’s recovery from the Great Recession. The economic expansion, which has fueled 103 straight months of hiring, is set to become the longest in history in July.

“All of the recession talk earlier in the spring was much ado about nothing,” said Gus Faucher, chief economist at PNC.

Read that again. You know, the crap that exited the pie-holes of the LDAMM. “Recession recession recession.” Except:

“All of the recession talk earlier in the spring was much ado about nothing,” said Gus Faucher, chief economist at PNC.

From CNBC.com:

Jobs surge in April, unemployment rate falls to the lowest since 1969

by Jeff Cox

  • The U.S. added 263,000 new hires in April, easily beating Wall Street expectations of 190,000.
  • The unemployment rate fell to 3.6% vs. 3.8% expected and the lowest since December 1969.

The U.S. jobs machine kept humming along in April, adding a robust 263,000 new hires while the unemployment rate fell to 3.6%, the lowest in a generation, the Labor Department reported Friday.

Nonfarm payroll growth easily beat Wall Street expectations of 190,000 and a 3.8% jobless rate.

Average hourly earnings growth held at 3.2% over the past year, a notch below Dow Jones estimates of 3.3%. The monthly gain was 0.2%, below the expected 0.3% increase, bringing the average to $27.77. The average work week also dropped 0.1 hours to 34.4 hours.

Unemployment was last this low in December 1969 when it hit 3.5%. At a time when many economists see a tight labor market, big job growth continues as the economic expansion is just a few months away from being the longest in history.

From RasmussenReports.com:

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. Forty-seven percent (47%) disapprove.

ABC kept the good news pretty much quiet. Can you blame them? Everything else Leftist is falling down around Demorat heads.

Bad News for Liberals? ABC Can Barely Speak of 50-Year Low in Unemployment

by Tim Graham

The news was shocking on Friday morning when the Labor Department reported the economy added 263,000 new jobs — higher than expected — lowering the unemployment rate to 3.6 percent, the lowest in fifty years. Would the networks acknowledge this news, or try to dodge it like last Friday’s surprisingly strong 3.2 percent growth in GDP? ABC and CBS skipped that, and NBC gave it ten seconds. This Friday, Curtis Houck noted on Twitter that CBS and NBC had full reports on Friday night, but ABC’s World News Tonight was done with it in 18 seconds. 

Nah. No bias there. Uh-oh. Neil Irwin of the New York Times said:

After more than two years of the Trump administration, warnings that trade wars and erratic management style would throw the economy off course have proved wrong so far, and tax cuts and deregulation are most likely part of the reason for the strong growth rates in 2018 and the beginning of 2019 (though most forecasts envision a slowing in the coming quarters as the impact of tax cuts fades).

In particular, it now appears that recession fears that emerged at the end of 2018 were misguided — especially once the Fed backed off its campaign of rate increases at the start of 2019.

But beyond the assigning of credit or blame, there’s a bigger lesson in the job market’s remarkably strong performance: about the limits of knowledge when it comes to something as complex as the $20 trillion U.S. economy.

He’s clearly going to Leftist Hell. At minimum, he’ll be receiving no more Christmas cards. Oh wait. The New York Times doesn’t believe in Christmas. Or is it that Christ doesn’t believe in the New York Times?

And that from just one day’s news this past week.

Question: did you hear this good news hammered home by the American Media Maggots? CNN, MSNBC, CNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC? Of course you didn’t. Why? Because it would tend to make President Trump look good — and none of those outlets can afford to allow President Trump to look good. They run in lockstep with the Demorats and the DNC. The Demorats and DNC cannot allow President Trump to look good.

You didn’t hear about this story either, from Investors Business Daily, did you?

Media Bias: Pretty Much All Of Journalism Now Leans Left, Study Shows

Media Bias: Ask journalists, and they’ll likely tell you they play things right down the middle. They strive to be “fair.” They’re “centrists.” Sorry, not true. The profound leftward ideological bias of the Big Media is the main reason why America now seems saturated with “fake news.” Journalists, besotted with their own ideology, are no longer able to recognize their own bias.

If you ask “journalists” how they voted, well, they won’t tell you. They’ll fall back on

  • What does that matter, and
  • We can do our jobs in a vacuum.

Except they can’t. And yes, it matters greatly. Because the bulk of them are Leftists.

Despite journalists’ denials, it’s now pretty much a fact that journalism is one of the most left-wing of all professions. But until recently, that wasn’t thought to be true of financial journalists — who have a reputation for being the most right-leaning and free-market-oriented among mainstream journalists.

If that was ever true, it sure isn’t today, a new study  suggests.

Researchers from Arizona State University and Texas A&M University questioned 462 financial journalists around the country. They followed up with 18 additional interviews. The journalists worked for the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, Washington Post, Associated Press and a number of other newspapers.

From the DailyWire.com:

462 Financial Journalists Were Asked Their Political Leanings. Guess How Many Said They Were Conservative.

by Ashe Schow

“First, financial journalists have stronger incentives to produce original information and analysis than to disseminate information already in the public domain, and they rely heavily on private communication with company management for information. Second, sell-side analysts play an important role in informing financial journalists, many of whom lack financial sophistication. Third, the incentives for sensationalism in the business press assumed in prior research are dominated by incentives for accurate, timely, in-depth, and informative reporting, while the quid pro quo incentives assumed in prior literature (e.g., putting a positive spin on company news to maintain access to inside sources) are substantial.”

Let’s translate the pablum speech.

Get that? Journalists covering the financial industry don’t know the industry and give favorable coverage to keep access. Sounds like pretty much every other type of journalist.

Here’s the crux of the biscuit:

The journalists surveyed by the scholars come from the Wall Street Journal, New York Times, Associated Press, Washington Post and other highly respected outlets, as well as other smaller outlets.

One other thing the researchers found was that the surveyed journalists overwhelmingly described themselves as liberal. Of those surveyed, 17.63% said they were “very liberal,” and 40.84% said they were “somewhat liberal,” for a total of 58.47% saying they lean left.

On the other side of the spectrum, just 0.46% said they were “very conservative” and 3.94% described themselves as “somewhat conservative,” for a total of 4.4% of respondents leaning right. The other 37.12% said they were moderate.

“Moderate.” I suppose like a “moderate Muslim.” Or “kinda pregnant.” Or “I had part of a colonoscopy.”

Simultaneously, from Newsbusters.org:

Journalism Institute Poynter Tries to ‘Blacklist’ 29 Conservative Outlets as ‘UnNews’

by Corinne Weaver

The attack on the conservative internet has reached a new low.

Poynter, the journalism institute responsible for training writers and reporters, decided to promote a left-wing smear of conservative groups online. The result was a hit job written by someone who works for the anti-conservative Southern Poverty Law Center for a journalism organization funded by prominent liberal billionaires such as George Soros and Pierre Omidyar.

Poynter, which has started the International Fact-Checking Network, shared the new report and dataset called “UnNews,” declaring at least 29 right-leaning news outlets and organizations to be “unreliable news websites.”

Report author and SPLC producer Barrett Golding combined five major lists of websites marked “unreliable.” That result, which consisted of 515 names, included many prominent conservative sites —  Breitbart, CNSNews.com, Daily Signal, Daily Wire, Drudge Report, Free Beacon, Judicial Watch, LifeNews, LifeSiteNews, LifeZette, LiveAction News, the Media Research Center, PJ Media, Project Veritas, Red State, The Blaze, Twitchy, and the Washington Examiner.

Let’s stop here for a moment. The microsecond I see the DRUDGE REPORT on ANY Leftist list I know they’re ignorant and lying. Why? Because the DR doesn’t write any content whatsoever. Matt Drudge hasn’t written a word on his site for years. The DR is nothing more than an aggregator of news. It carries stories written by other outlets and frequently includes New York Times, LA Times, CNN and other Leftist stories. Every. Day.

Judicial Watch is a site that essentially sues for information via FOIA requests and, AGAIN, doesn’t create original content. It only publishes what the government releases.

Project Veritas has video to back up every claim it makes.

The Washington Examiner has been part of the DC scene for literally decades.

This where we are today.

But remember: it’s all about footsteps.

I can hear them.

Can’t you?

BZ

 

BZ’s Berserk Bobcat Saloon Radio Show, Tuesday, 3-26-19, with KEN McCLENTON and an SHR Media Special Report: “Mueller Reveals A Soft Coup”

Featuring Right thinking from a left brain, doing the job the American Media Maggots won’t, embracing ubiquitous, sagacious perspicacity and broadcasting behind enemy lines in Occupied Fornicalia from the veritable Belly of the Beast, the Bill Mill in Sacramento, Fornicalia, I continue to proffer my thanks to the SHR Media Network for allowing me to utilize their studio and hijack their air twice weekly, Tuesdays and Thursday nights, thanks to my shameless contract — as well as appear on the Sack Heads: Against Tyranny Show every Wednesday night.

On January 17th, it was the second anniversary of BZ broadcasting on the SHR Media NetworkBZ has held his show, the Berserk Bobcat Saloon, on SHR continuously since January 17th of 2017. BZ is forever in debt to the co-owners of SHR, Sack Heads SHAUN and Sack Heads CLINT for believing in me and providing me with air time, a studio and unparalleled support. God bless them for that. I had a message, and they allowed me to become something of a messenger.

Hour 1BZ spent the first hour with KEN McCLENTON, The Exceptional Conservative himself and owner of TECN, The Exceptional Conservative Network. Ken is a force to be reckoned with in the DC area, where he lives and broadcasts, and is a beacon of Conservatism for black Americans. He fights the good fight every day in the face of ridicule and hatred for daring to be a black Conservative. Come listen to what he had to say!

Hour 2: BZ featured an SHR Media Special Report: “Mueller Reveals a Soft Coup Against America.” Great depth and detail in an examination of Attorney General William Barr’s release of his summary of the Mueller investigation into Trump, concluding that there was no collusion or conspiracy involved between Trump and Russia. Finally!

BZ says: “Prepare for retribution. You can’t turn this nation upside down and not expect any fallout, Leftists, Demorats and American Media Maggots.” Retribution hell; I want decimation. This is a thousand times worse than Watergate because the situation involved the deaths of four Americans, and the attempt to turn this nation into a dictatorship from the interference of Barack Hussein Obama and his Leftist annihilists.

If you want to listen to the show on Spreaker, audio only, click on the yellow button below.

Listen to “BZ’s Berserk Bobcat Saloon Radio Show, Tuesday, 3-26-19” on Spreaker.

If you care to watch the show on the SHR Media YouTube channel, click on the red arrow below. We kindly ask you to SUBSCRIBE to the SHR Media channel. Please NOTE: For DISH subscribers: your Hopper has recently been wired to play YouTube videos. You can now toss ol’ BZ onto your massive flatscreen TV and watch him in all of his obese, biased and politically-egregious, lamentable goodness — for free!

You can watch the show here on the SHR Media Facebook page. Please like us and follow us on Facebook.

Please join me, the Bloviating Zeppelin (on Twitter @BZep, Facebook as Biff Zeppe and the Bloviating Zeppelin, and on Gab.ai @BZep), every Tuesday and Thursday night on the SHR Media Network from 11 PM to 1 AM Eastern and 8 PM to 10 PM Pacific, at the Berserk Bobcat Saloon — where the speech is free but the drinks are not.

As ever, thank you so kindly for listening, commenting, and interacting in the chat room or listening later via podcast.

Please remember we only monitor the chat room at SHRMEDIA.COM — though there is chat available on both Facebook and YouTube. Come on over to the SHR chat room where you’ll meet great friends!

  • Want to listen to all the Berserk Bobcat Saloon archives on SpreakerGo here.
  • Want to watch past shows on PeriscopeGo here.
  • Want to watch past shows on the SHR Media Facebook page? Go here.
  • Want to watch past Berserk Bobcat Saloon shows on YouTubeGo here.

Thank you one and all for listening, watching and supporting the SHR Media Network: “Conservative Media Done Right.”

BZ

 

The Mueller report confirms: a soft coup against America and Trump

I’ve said this since late 2016, all through 2017 and 2018, with the March 2019 Mueller report now confirming:

What we experienced in America, instigated by the Barack Hussein Obama 44 administration, the DNC, Hillary Clinton and her campaign, the DOJ and the FBI plus other abetting actors like John McCain (and many others), was a soft coup against a presidential nominee, a president-elect and a sitting president of the United States.

Donald John Trump.

This soft coup was, yes, against him but by extension was aimed directly at you and me. Us. American voters. Anyone who dared not to vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Here’s what happened in a nutshell: the counterintelligence divisions of the FBI, the DOJ, the CIA, the DIA and the NSA were all arrayed — in concert with the DNC, the Demorats, Hillary Clinton, Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, Fusion GPS, Christopher Steele, John McCain, Glenn Simpson — while working hand-in-hand with the American Media Maggots in a week-by-week, day-by-day, hour-by-hour hammering of the situation — and in concert with the Barack Hussein Obama administration and the then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch — were working overtime with all possible available resources in order to not only derail the candidacy of an individual for president but, further, to smear the person in such a way as to make them a pariah, a leper, forevermore in the minds and eyes of the United States and the world.

This was spying on a political campaign. Spying on a private citizen. With the full weight of the US government behind.

This is something a tinpot dictatorship does. This is something a totalitarian society does. Not a Republic. Not a nation that abides by laws and operates by the rule of law.

Then there was the dirty bought-and-paid-for “dossier” financed by the DNC, the FBI, Hillary Clinton and aforementioned Russian oligarch. You want actual “Russian collusion”? Want to mix in Jimmy The Leak?

The fuckery was afoot, the plot drawn, and even “insurance” formulated by FBI agents Lisa Page and Peter Strzok in case Hillary Clinton failed to win the presidency. The Russia investigation was just that “insurance.” There was no way, of course, this could happen. But “just in case.”

Page first entered the spotlight in December 2017, when it was revealed by the Justice Department inspector general that she and then-FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok exchanged numerous anti-Trump text messages. The two were involved in the FBI’s initial counterintelligence investigation into Russian meddling and potential collusion with Trump campaign associates during the 2016 election, and later served on Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team.

Among their texts was one concerning the so-called “insurance policy.” During her interview with the Judiciary Committee in July 2018, Page was questioned at length about that text — and essentially confirmed this referred to the Russia investigation while explaining that officials were proceeding with caution, concerned about the implications of the case while not wanting to go at “total breakneck speed” and risk burning sources as they presumed Trump wouldn’t be elected anyway.

Further, she confirmed investigators only had a “paucity” of evidence at the start.

Then-Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., kicked off that section of questioning by asking about the text sent from Strzok to Page in August 2016 which read: “I want to believe the path you threw out in Andy’s [McCabe’s] office—that there’s no way he gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take the risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40.”

The former FBI lawyer explained how the FBI was trying to strike a balance with the investigation into the Trump campaign—which agents called “Crossfire Hurricane.”

“So, upon the opening of the crossfire hurricane investigation, we had a number of discussions up through and including the Director regularly in which we were trying to find an answer to the question, right, which is, is there someone associated with the [Trump] campaign who is working with the Russians in order to obtain damaging information about Hillary Clinton,” Page said. “And given that it is August, we were very aware of the speed and sensitivity that we needed to operate under.”

You caught that, correct? “The Director” is none other than Jimmy “The Leak” Comey who had been keep in this loop. And there was a “paucity” of evidence. Lisa Page said that, even prior to the appointment of Robert Mueller as Special Counsel by Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein — the same Rosenstein who wrote a letter to President Trump outlining the various and numerous reasons to fire James Comey — there was no evidence to indicate Trump-Russia “collusion.” From September of 2018:

More than nine months after the FBI opened its highly classified counterintelligence investigation into alleged coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia, FBI lawyer Lisa Page said investigators still could not say whether there was collusion, according to a transcript of Page’s recent closed-door deposition reviewed by Fox News.

“I think this represents that even as far as May 2017, we still couldn’t answer the question,” Page said.

“I cannot provide the specifics of a confidential interview,” Ratcliffe told Fox News when asked for comment. “But I can say that Lisa Page left me with the impression, based on her own words, that the lead investigator of the Russian collusion case, Peter Strzok, had found no evidence of collusion after nearly a year.”

May 2017 is a key month because FBI DIrector James Comey was fired by President Trump and Mueller was designated special counsel. In August, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who appointed Mueller, wrote the still-secret “scope memo” spelling out the boundaries for the special counsel investigation.

Do we remember why I call Comey “Jimmy the Leak“?

Comey testified to the Senate Intelligence Committee in June 2017 that he leaked memos he wrote after conversations with Trump in order to force the appointment of a special counsel.

“I asked a friend of mine to share the content of a memo with the reporter, I didn’t do it myself for a variety of reasons, but I asked him to because I thought that might prompt the appointment of a special counsel,” Comey testified June 8, 2017. (RELATED: James Comey Denies Being A Leaker)

Comey instructed his friend, Daniel Richman, to give the Times a memo he wrote about a conversation he had with Trump on Feb. 14, 2017. Comey claimed Trump asked him to shut down an investigation of former national security adviser Michael Flynn.

Comey’s ploy worked, as Robert Mueller was appointed special counsel May 17, 2017.

So what occurred this past Sunday, March 24th?

Let’s get back to the letter issued on Monday by Attorney General William Barr, which states the Mueller report indicates there is no Trump-Russia conspiracy:

Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins:

As a supplement to the notification provided on Friday, March 22, 2019, I am writing today to advise you of the principal conclusions reached by Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III and to inform you about the status of my initial review of the report he has prepared.

The Special Counsel’s Report

On Friday, the Special Counsel submitted to me a “confidential report explaining the prosecution or declination decisions” he has reached, as required by 28 C.F.R. § 600.8(c). This report is entitled “Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election.” Although my review is ongoing, I believe that it is in the public interest to describe the report and to summarize the principal conclusions reached by the Special Counsel and the results of his investigation.

The report explains that the· Special Counsel and his staff thoroughly investigated allegations that members of the presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump, and others associated with it, conspired with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, or sought to obstruct the related federal investigations. In the report, the Special Counsel noted that, in completing his investigation, he employed 19 lawyers who were assisted by a team of approximately 40 FBI agents, intelligence analysts, forensic accountants, and other professional staff. The Special Counsel issued more than 2,800 subpoenas, executed nearly 500 search warrants, obtained more than 230 orders for communication records, issued almost 50 orders authorizing use of pen registers, made 13 requests to foreign governments for evidence, and interviewed approximately 500 witnesses.

The Special Counsel obtained a number of indictments and convictions of individuals and entities in connection with his investigation, all of which have been publicly disclosed. During the course of his investigation, the Special Counsel also referred several matters to other offices for further action. The report does not recommend any further indictments, nor did the Special Counsel obtain any sealed indictments that have yet to be made public. Below, I summarize the principal conclusions set out in the Special Counsel’s report.

Russian Interference in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. The Special Counsel’s report is divided into two parts. The first describes the results of the Special Counsel’s investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. The report outlines the Russian effort to influence the election and documents crimes committed by persons associated with the Russian government in connection with those efforts. The report further explains that a primary consideration for the Special Counsel’s investigation was whether any Americans -including individuals associated with the Trump campaign – joined the Russian conspiracies to influence the election, which would be a federal crime. The Special Counsel’s investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election. As the report states: “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

[Footnote from letter: In assessing potential conspiracy charges, the Special Counsel also considered whether members of the Trump campaign “coordinated” with Russian election interference activities. The Special Counsel defined “coordination” as an “agreement-tacit or express-between the Trump Campaign and the Russian government on election interference.”]

The Special Counsel’s investigation determined that there were two main Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election. The first involved attempts by a Russian organization, the Internet Research Agency (IRA), to conduct disinformation and social media operations in the United States designed to sow social discord, eventually with the aim of interfering with the election. As noted above, the Special Counsel did not find that any U.S. person or Trump campaign official or associate conspired or knowingly coordinated with the IRA in its efforts, although the Special Counsel brought criminal charges against a number of Russian nationals and entities in connection with these activities.

The second element involved the Russian government’s efforts to conduct computer hacking operations designed to gather and disseminate information to influence the election. The Special Counsel found that Russian government actors successfully hacked into computers and obtained emails from persons affiliated with the Clinton campaign and Democratic Party organizations, and publicly disseminated those materials through various intermediaries, including WikiLeaks. Based on these activities, the Special Counsel brought criminal charges against a number of Russian military officers for conspiring to hack into computers in the United States for purposes of influencing the election. But as noted above, the Special Counsel did not find that the Trump campaign, or anyone associated with it, conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in these efforts, despite multiple. offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.

Obstruction of Justice. The report’s second part addresses a number of actions by the President – most of which have been the subject of public reporting – that the Special Counsel investigated as potentially raising obstruction-of-justice concerns. After making a “thorough factual investigation” into these matters, the Special Counsel considered whether to evaluate the conduct under Department standards governing prosecution and declination decisions but ultimately determined not to make a traditional prosecutorial judgment. The Special Counsel therefore did not draw a conclusion – one way or the other – as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction. Instead, for each of the relevant actions investigated, the report sets out evidence on both sides of the question and leaves unresolved what the Special Counsel views as “difficult issues” of law and fact concerning whether the President’s actions and intent could be viewed as obstruction .. The Special Counsel states that “while this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

Stop. Alan Dershowitz has something to say about this point.

Excellent questions. May I be so base as to suggest that Mueller lacks the political cojones to draw the distinction, and may I also suggest that Mueller essentially “Comey’ed” the situation (using the name as a verb) insofar as he drew clear and numerous points but failed to do his job. Either there are events and situations worthy of prosecution or there are not. This was Mueller’s job. He equivocated. You see, Robert Mueller and Jimmy The Leak are not just friends, but they are former FBI Directors.

The Special Counsel’s decision to describe the facts of his obstruction investigation without reaching any legal conclusions leaves itto the Attorney General to determine whether the conduct described in the report constitutes a crime. Over the course of the investigation, the Special Counsel’s office engaged in discussions with certain Department officials regarding many of the legal and factual matters at issue in the Special Counsel’s obstruction investigation. After reviewing the Special Counsel’s final report on these issues; consulting with Department officials, including the Office of Legal Counsel; and applying the principles of federal prosecution that guide our charging decisions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel’s investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense. Our determination was made without regard to, and is not based on, the constitutional considerations that surround the indictment and criminal prosecution of a sitting president.

In making this determination, we noted that the Special Counsel recognized that “the evidence does not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime related to Russian election interference,” and that, while not determinative, the absence of such evidence bears upon the President’s intent with respect to obstruction. Generally speaking, to obtain and sustain an obstruction conviction, the government would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that a person, acting with corrupt intent, engaged in obstructive conduct with a sufficient nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding. In cataloguing the President’s actions, many of which took place in public view, the report identifies no actions that, in our judgment, constitute obstructive conduct, had a nexus to a pending or contemplated proceeding, and were done with corrupt intent, each of which, under the Department’s principles of federal prosecution guiding charging decisions, would need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to establish an obstruction-of¬justice offense.

37,040-41 (July 9, 1999). As I have previously stated, however, I am mindful of the public interest in this matter. For that reason, my goal and intent is to release as much of the Special Counsel’s report as I can consistent with applicable law, regulations, and Departmental policies.

Based on my discussions with the Special Counsel and my initial review, it is apparent that the report contains material that is or could be subject to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6( e ), which imposes restrictions on the use and disclosure of information relating to “matter[ s] occurring before [a] grand jury.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e)(2)(B). Rule 6(e) generally limits disclosure of certain grand jury information in a criminal investigation and prosecution. Id. Disclosure of 6( e) material beyond the strict limits set forth in the rule is a crime in certain circumstances. See, e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 401(3). This restriction protects the integrity of grand jury proceedings and ensures that the unique and invaluable investigative powers of a grand jury are used strictly for their intended criminal justice function. Given these restrictions, the schedule for processing the report depends in part on how quickly the Department can identify the 6( e) material that by law cannot be made public. I have requested the assistance of the Special Counsel in identifying all 6( e) information contained in the report as quickly as possible. Separately, I also must identify any information that could impact other ongoing matters, including those that the Special Counsel has referred to other offices. As soon as that process is complete, I will be in a position to move forward expeditiously in determining what can be released in light of applicable law, regulations, and Departmental policies.

As I observed in my initial notification, the Special Counsel regulations provide that “the Attorney General may determine that public release of’ notifications to your respective Committees “would be in the public interest.” 28 C.F.R. § 600.9(c). I have so determined, and I will disclose this letter to the public after delivering it to you.

The reactions, as you might guess, came pouring forth. Here are Steve Hilton, Gregg Jarrett, Sara Carter and Kayleigh McEnany.

Who knew of this? Who do you think knew of this?

Is there anyone here who believes that Barack Obama is stupid, ill-educated, unaware of politics and was so incredibly laissez-faire that he was completely oblivious as to what occurred in his administration? Particularly with regard to what became the number one target of the Demorats, Donald John Trump?

Here is ABC’s George Stephanopoulis speaking with Representative Jim Jordan:

The American Media Maggots did indeed shit car parts following AG Barr’s summary of the Mueller report.

So somehow this Steven Colbert video isn’t aging so well any more.

Here are the American Media Maggots in full-on continuous Trump Derangement Mode. Let’s listen.

Yet: I have a question. An obvious one. Perhaps so incredibly obvious that no one seems to have thought of it.

Dear Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, Jerry Nadler, Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, James Comey, et al. You all swear you have proof of President Trump “colluding” with Russia or Russia having influenced our election for Trump, against Clinton. I believe you have index fingers. Or at least you have staff with index fingers. Why is it that you didn’t utilize said device and dial up the Mueller team?

“Say Bob, ol’ buddy, have I got some evidence for you.” And then give it to him.

You could have done this every day for the past two years. Yet either one of two things happened: 1) You simply forgot to, in the daily rush of your hectic lives, or 2) You never had any fucking evidence in the first place. Me? I’m going with number two.

We know the FBI was biased. There are numerous facts in evidence regarding that.

The Mueller report summary is out. The Leftists, Demorats and American Media Maggots, having been thwarted once more by facts, are busy resetting goalposts, changing equations, reframing accusations and generally shitting car parts. The question is: what next? Does the report itself get released?

Lindsay Graham, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee has some thoughts.

Further: why not release just about all the documents relevant to the case? President Trump could declassify a host of documents.

For example: why can’t we see just what it was that the FBI provided to the FISA courts in order to acquire their searches of Trump, the tower and his associates?

One thought is this. And it is a damning one. A massive reason why Leftists and Demorats want no further documents uncovered.

Does anyone understand the Fruit of the Poisonous Tree doctrine? If, for example, an investigation is conducted and it is found that a FISA judge signed off on an affidavit packed with specious, unverified information such as the salacious “dirty dossier” — up to and including outright falsehoods — everything in terms of evidence subsequently procured is illegal and therefore inadmissible in court.

That would mean: convictions and indictments on Michael Flynn, Manafort, Cohen, et al, would have to be vacated.

One final point, something I’ve always wondered.

Where was the benefit of the doubt for Donald Trump?

As in: “Mr Trump, I’m Agent Smith from the FBI and we have information to indicate your campaign may have been subject to some kind of infiltration attempt by foreign powers, to possibly include the Russians. Would you work with us to try to get to the bottom of this?”

You know. Like what happened to Kalifornia Senator Diane Feinstein when it was discovered that she had a Chinese operative as her driver and personal attache for ten years, in her office, with access to highly sensitive documents and information.

The FBI managed to afford Senator Diane Feinstein the benefit of the doubt.

I wrote this back in August of 2018.

Feinstein was ‘mortified’ by FBI allegation that staffer was spy for China: report

by Lukas Mikelionis

U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein fired a staffer a few years back who was allegedly part of an effort to spy and pass on political intelligence to the Chinese government.

The FBI informed Feinstein, the then-chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, about five years ago about the staffer and allegations that the staffer was a spy. The source who confirmed the incident to the San Francisco Chronicle said “Dianne was mortified” upon learning about it.

Certainly Donald Trump would have been “mortified” to discover such a thing in his campaign.

But let’s ask ourselves a fundamental question. Could it be remotely possible that the Chinese determined to insert an agent directly into Feinstein’s vehicle because she was the Chair of the Senate Committee on Intelligence — a committee upon which she still sits?

The suspected spy served as the lawmaker’s driver in California, but took on other roles as well, including helping out in her San Francisco office and being Feinstein’s liaison to the Asian-American community in the state. He attended Chinese Consulate events on behalf of the senator.

This is worth a chortle:

A former official said that the spy’s handler “probably got an award back in China” for his efforts to penetrate Feinstein’s office and pass on intelligence.

Taxpayer money paid this Chinese mole or spy. Yours and mine. First question: did he get a pension? How would we know? Wouldn’t it behoove the Demorats to keep such a cock-up quiet? Of course it would. What a great job. Steal secrets, spy on the gweilo, then take a cushy retirement.

Then let’s break this down as well:

The suspected spy served as the lawmaker’s driver in California, but took on other roles as well, including helping out in her San Francisco office and being Feinstein’s liaison to the Asian-American community in the state. He attended Chinese Consulate events on behalf of the senator.

He was a driver and, apparently, much more. Let’s be serious. After her husband’s close associations with China and her comfort factor in dealing with same, would it not be logical that the amount of time spent with her day after dayweek after weekyear after year, a bit of a confidant, would result in her guard letting down? Of course. It turns out that Russell Lowe wasn’t just her driver — he was her office manager as well.

What of this?

Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s Ties To China Go Way Deeper Than An Alleged Office Spy

by Ben Weingarten

Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s warm relationship with and advocacy for Communist China go back decades and involve millions, if not billions, of dollars.

As media, intelligence agency, and political scrutiny of foreign meddling is seemingly at its apex, a story with big national security implications involving a high-ranking senator with access to America’s most sensitive intelligence information has been hiding in plain sight.

The story involves China and the senior U.S. senator from California, and former chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Democrat Dianne Feinstein. It was buried eight paragraphs into a recent Politico exposé on foreign efforts to infiltrate Silicon Valley, as a passing example of political espionage.

Did the senator expose herself to potential blackmail, or the public to danger through leakage of sensitive, highly classified information? Is firing really the proper punishment for providing political intelligence to a foreign power?

By now you get my point. The FBI decided to do Senator Feinstein a solid by notifying her and her staff of the potential threat from within due to this individual. They told her something similar to “we think you have a Chinese spy problem.”

That is precisely what the FBI did not do for the Donald Trump campaign. They could have taken the staff and then-candidate/nominee Donald Trump aside and said something similar to “eh, just thought you should know, we think you have something of a Russia problem,” as with Feinstein.

But no.

Gosh. I wonder what the difference was? And wasn’t Robert Mueller the FBI director during that time, in 2013? Why yes, he was. Comey wasn’t appointed until September of 2013.

The difference was Donald John Trump.

This was a soft coup against President Trump.

But in truth it was and is a soft coup against the American people. The American voters.

The story is just unfolding.

But wait; there’s more.

BZ