Tag Archives: FBI

Schadenfreude: watching Hillary implode

Posted on by

Hillary Clinton Stunned

Here, Hillary shows she’s familiar with Federal Bureau of Prisons coverall colors.

I have to tell you, it’s good clean fun to watch.

And it happened today as The Queen deigned to walk out of the throne room when she was asked one too many questions by subjects she thought were once loyal to the Her Royal Realm.

First the video, captured in all its YouTubely glory:

From TheHill.com (oh, the buttery goodness of it all):

Clinton pulls plug on testy presser over server questions

by Ben Kamisar

Hillary Clinton dismissed the controversy surrounding her private email server and defended her conduct as legal during a press conference Tuesday in Las Vegas. 

“What I did was legally permitted, number one, first and foremost,” the Democratic presidential candidate said in response to a question from Fox News reporter Ed Henry. “We turned over everything that was work-related, every single thing.”

Hillary Clinton made the consequential mistake on Tuesday of not taking the events seriously and it did not play well.  Instead, it sounded dismissive, cavalier and arrogant.

Asked if the server, which has been turned over to the Department of Justice, had been wiped clean, Clinton initially shrugged and later joked: “Like with a cloth or something?” 

“I don’t know how it works digitally at all,” she added. 

Hillary Clinton didn’t answer one question directly.  Not one.  Then she became dismissive and cavalier.

Guess what?

That’s not playing very well any more.

The days when the Clintons managed to skate on most every issue may be finally at an end.  It is beginning to appear that Hillary could face some actual consequences for her actions, even if it only to derail her candidacy.

Hillary tanked in 2008.  I submit she is well on her way to a replay of 2008.  Hillary Clinton believes it is “her turn” whereas, in truth, Hillary is imploding due to her lies, her arrogance and her being as likable as the average eastern diamondback rattler — and as warm.

At least, as I pointed out, she’s familiarizing herself with FBOP federal jumper colors.

BZ

 

 Share

Ferguson out of control:

Posted on by

FERGUSON BLUE LIVES MATTERThe Ferguson Police Department is the last department that officers throughout this nation would want to belong to.

Despite the fact that Officer Darren Wilson was completely exonerated, two officers were shot on Thursday.

From CNN.com:

State, county police take over Ferguson protest security after shooting

by Greg Botelho and Catherine E. Shoichet

(CNN)  With tensions running high after the shooting of two officers in Ferguson, Missouri, state and county police took over protest security in the St. Louis suburb Thursday.

St. Louis County Police and the Missouri State Highway Patrol are assuming “command of the security detail regarding protests,” St. Louis County Police said, while Ferguson Police will remain responsible for “routine policing services” in the city.

Meaning: the city was “taken over” by outside forces.

Ferguson DecisionThe officers who remain are there because they cannot readily leave, and they can do nothing right — at this point — in the eyes of the nation.

Ferguson Cops SensitiveThey are caught between belief and physicality.

And they are caught up in the lie that apparently won’t stop.

#BLACK LIVES MATTER

#HANDS UP DON’T SHOOT

BZ

 

 Share

No 1983 Action for Officer Wilson, per DOJ

Posted on by

Darren WilsonThe residents of Ferguson, Missouri won’t be be terribly pleased.

From the NYTimes.com:

Justice Dept. to Recommend No Civil Rights Charges in Ferguson Shooting

by Matt Apuzzo & Michael S. Schmidt

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department has begun work on a legal memo recommending no civil rights charges against a white police officer in Ferguson, Mo., who killed an unarmed black teenager in August, law enforcement officials said.

That would close the politically charged case in the shooting death of 18-year-old Michael Brown. The investigation by the F.B.I., which is complete, found no evidence to support civil rights charges against the officer, Darren Wilson, the officials said.

This therefore lends much credence to the chronology of events as portrayed by ex-Ferguson Police Department Officer Darren Wilson, who indicated that suspect Michael Brown did in fact attempt to disarm him and did in fact strike him, requiring the application of force which, in that case, was Officer Wilson’s sidearm.

Think about this: ex-Officer Wilson was forced to resign and he and his family subject to death threats locally and nationally, despite his actions being upheld in two separate legal venues: the Grand Jury failed to indict, and the US Department of Justice will fail to charge.

Officer Wilson’s actions were scrutinized for months by, literally, hundreds of persons, one sitting jury and the US DOJ.  He was exonerated in both instances and still his professional and likely his private life was destroyed.

For responding properly to a threat.

Don’t think for a moment there wasn’t great pressure on the DOJ to find something, anything on Darren Wilson, with said pressure coming directly from the Oval Office and the Racial Pimps, NYC and DC chapters.

On a professional and clinical level, justice was done.

On a personal level, one good man’s life was changed forever.

BZ

 

 Share

Oopsie: Norks not responsible for the Sony hack?

Posted on by

Sony PicturesFrom Politico.com:

FBI briefed on alternate Sony hack theory

by Tal Kopan

FBI agents investigating the Sony Pictures hack were briefed Monday by a security firm that says its research points to laid-off Sony staff, not North Korea, as the perpetrator — another example of the continuing whodunit blame game around the devastating attack.

Even the unprecedented decision to release details of an ongoing FBI investigation and President Barack Obama publicly blaming the hermit authoritarian regime hasn’t quieted a chorus of well-qualified skeptics who say the evidence just doesn’t add up.

Something tells me you can place this into the “More To Come” category, with a sub-category of “Obama Sticks Foot In Mouth Once More.”

Man, this is getting good.

BZ

 

 Share

Pro-Wilson Ferguson witness murdered?

Posted on by

Ferguson Witness MurderedAnd was he a witness who stated Michael Brown was shot in the back with his hands in the air?

Perhaps he was not.

Hearken back to this post first, then continue:

From the NYDailyNews.com:

Man found dead amid Ferguson riots had bullet in head, accelerant on body: police

by Nina Golgowski

Among those appearing to grieve for Joshua was Dorian Johnson, who witnessed Brown’s death.

A nearby resident, previously speaking to the St. Louis Post Dispatch, has claimed that hours before the young man’s body was found they overheard four people armed with guns talking about looting and killing someone Monday night.

“I knew it was going to be true,” said Richard Taylor after hearing word of Joshua’s death. “When I got up this morning, I saw this.”

Why was DeAndre Joshua killed?  It seems his death has been completely ignored and shuttled aside.  The national media, what I term the American Media Maggots, seem not AMM - American Media Maggots 2to be interested in the slightest and have asked not one question.

They appear to have taken whatever the Ferguson PD and/or the St Louis County authorities have said as gospel.  Why?  They don’t trust these authorities with any information regarding Michael Brown.

DeAndre Joshua’s death is the only one to have occurred in Ferguson following Brown, but it has apparently been disregarded and rejected by the AMM.  Doesn’t that seem just a tad bit odd to you, given the recent history of Ferguson?  After all, the AMM and specifically the late Christopher Hitchens accused President George Bush 43 of being “unusually uncurious.”  J’accuse, AMM, Mr Hitchens?

A death in Ferguson?  A black man’s death in Ferguson, following that of Brown?  Uncovered by the AMM and not splayed across the headlines of papers and media sites around the nation and the world?  I repeat: a black man killed in Ferguson is now ignored, following the death Michael Brown?

Just how can that be?

I am wondering: is it because the incident doesn’t fit the meme of blacks being killed by Caucasoids?  It is because Joshua may have been killed since he was perceived by the “black community” as being a “snitch” and worthy of death?  Because he may have been killed by a black male and not a Caucasoid?

I don’t know.

But at least I’m courageous enough to even pose the question.

J’accuse, American Media Maggots.  Is there not one ounce of testosterone amongst all of you?

BZ

 

 Share