In an interview between guest-host Carol Platt Liebau and Chuck Todd, on Friday’s Hugh Hewitt Radio Show, Chuck Todd (who interviewed Mr Obama here) essentially stated that the White House has no idea how to repair the Obamacare problem regarding people whose insurance has been dropped.
My, that is certainly hopeful, is it not?
There, ladies and gentlemen, is the leader you elected.
BZ
I originally posted this on Wednesday, but I re-post now because I suspect it largely was unseen.
That’s right: over SIX people served!
BZ
P.S.
While I’m on the subject, how about this musical mash-up by Michael Patrick Tracy, involving Obama, Obamacare and JJ Cale: http://songwroter.com/CLAR/CLARadioMashUp-Lies-JJCale.mp3
I’d posit this video says it all:
Ah, the virtuous, kind, understanding, loving, all-inclusive, humble, non-judgmental, nurturing, moral, accepting and ethical goodness of Leftists nationwide, and particularly those in charge of the administration of Obamacare, no matter who they may be, from Kathleen Sebelius on down.
After all, Lord knows, this young single black mother with one son certainly needed to be fired from her five-week, low-paying Obamacare phone-help job (the Healthcare Marketplace Call Center) — as she deigned to be helpful and speak to the Evil Sean Hannity.
Earline Davis had the temerity to speak to the “enemy” and, for that, was fired summarily the very next day, held in a locked room, not allowed to go back to her place at the phone desk, not allowed to go back to her locker. She was then escorted, by a number of security people (you can see, Earline Davis being an imposing thug herself), out of the building where she worked — past tense.
Sean Hannity makes an excellent point: Earline Davis lost her job for being effective, helpful and kind, whilst Kathleen Sebelius, as arrogant, unhelpful, condescending and ineffectual as she is, still has her job.
Imagine that.
Those kind Leftists.
BZ
From the DailyCaller.com:
by Neil Munro, White House Correspondent
President Barack Obama
told his enthusiastic supporters Monday night that he never promised what video recordings show him promising at least 29 times.
The videos show Obama promising 300 million Americans that “if you like your health-care plan, you will be able to keep your health-care plan, period.”
But that’s not what he really said, Obama announced Monday in a speech to about 200 Organizing for Action supporters, gathered at the St. Regis hotel in D.C.
Ready for the lying about lies? Here we go:
“What we said was you could keep it if it hasn’t changed since the law was passed,” he told Obamacare’s political beneficiaries and contractors.
That claim is not supported by his videotaped statements, which don’t include any mention of his new “if it hasn’t changed” exception.
[again, my new favorite video:]
Continuing:
“So the bottom line is, is that we are making the insurance market better for everybody,” he declared, prompting loud applause by supporters eager to ignore his three years of fraudulent statements.
Obama’s higher promise is now causing the cancelation of insurance policies chosen by at least 3.5 million Americans.
Of course that can’t be true. Or can it? As with many things these days, due to technology, the veracity of that allegation can be confirmed.
Simply go to http://mycancellation.com/.
Letter after letter after letter attests to the fact that regular people, American Taxpayers like you and me, are losing their health insurance plans. The plans that Mr Obama swore, roughly 29 times, in public, captured in video, you could keep. With the doctors you could keep too.
See the American Thinker article here as well.
Demorats are quantifying cancellations as simply some sort of “rite of passage,” a “transition” if you will — like an ugly pupae into a gorgeous Obamafly.
And that you’ve lost your insurance or been inconvenienced in the slightest means nothing to Mr Obama.
“We decided we need to build something better, no matter how hard it is,” he declared.
A nice little capper: Mr Obama lied with purpose and deliberation.
Obama’s deceptive statements were deliberate and were intended to bolster Obama’s ability to get Obamacare passed in 2010 and him reelected in 2012, according to aides cited in a Wall Street Journal article Saturday.
The thing I find absolutely astounding is the remarkable indifference of the American Media Maggots — to the point that I believe they are not only choosing to ignore but mislead.
That’s where I come in. I’m doing the job the American Media Maggots refuse to. The once-prototypical inquisitive and suspicious nature of American journalists is gone.
BZ
Courtesy of this website (thanks Jeff).
How interesting that, simultaneously, the US government is removing references to Muslim groups or interests.
The 72 types of Americans believed by our government to threaten it:
1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”
2. Those that advocate for states’ rights
3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”
4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”
5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”
8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”
9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”
10. “Anti-Gay”
11. “Anti-Immigrant”
12. “Anti-Muslim”
14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”
15. Members of the Family Research Council
16. Members of the American Family Association
18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol
19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform
20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition
21. Members of the Christian Action Network
22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”
23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”
24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21
25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps
26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”
28. The sovereign citizen movement
29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”
30. Anyone that “complains about bias”
31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”
32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”
33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs”
34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”
35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”
36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”
37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”
38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”
39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”
40. “Militia or unorganized militia”
41. “General right-wing extremist”
42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.
43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”
44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”
45. Those that are “anti-global”
46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”
47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”
48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”
49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”
51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”
52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”
53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”
54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”
55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”
56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”
57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”
60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”
61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”
62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”
63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”
65. Those that are against illegal immigration
66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner
67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations
68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”
69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr
70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)
71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies
[Click on the link to see the source governmental document involved.]
How many applied to you?
BZ
P.S.
Just by dint of the categorization for this post, I make myself suspect.