Obama: completely and utterly incompent, confirmed by Syria:

Obama SCOAMF BookMr Obama drew his verbal red line regarding the use of chemical weapons, and now has used his own decree to paint himself into a corner.  And anyone can read Popular Mechanics.

He stated that there would be a price to pay for the use, by Syria, of gas attacks on civilians.  Following that, the UK Parliament bowed out and decided not to back PM David Cameron.

The UK Parliament produced a slap in the face to Mr Obama, but he was still going in — until he wasn’t.

On Saturday, he decreed that he was going to seek consensus for an Syrian incursion from Congress.

And the Demorats are not behind Mr Obama on this.  Even Putin’s foreign minister exhorts DC to behave like grown-ups — which it is not.

Complicated enough for you?  Enough zig-zagging and indecisiveness for you?  Obama has no coherent policy for the Middle East.  He has stated he “leads from behind” and this underscores that phrase.  The UK Guardian is on-board with Obama being an imbecile.

Continuing to prove that Mr Obama is nothing but a SCOAMF — Stuttering Clusterfuck of a Miserable Failure.

Sorry.  That video is so good I simply couldn’t resist.

BZ

P.S.
I continue with my opinion: stay the hell out of Syria.  Let the two sides, both evil by nature, no innocence on either side, slaughter each other.

Former Assistant Secretary of Defense K.T. McFarland once said:

“The cardinal rule in Washington is that if you have two enemies fighting each other, do not try to step in and stop them.”

Truer words were never spoken, particularly applied to today’s situation regarding Syria.

 

 

 

Obama on Syria: cowardice, indecision or a head-fake?

SyriaToday, we are not in Syria nor have we bombed.

I suspect because, primarily, the UK bowed out of this option.

Cameron’s nonbinding motion was defeated 285-272 and he conceded after the vote that “the British Parliament, reflecting the views of the British people, does not want to see British military action.”

So, is Mr Obama a coward, is it indecision or is it a head-fake?

BZ

 

 

Attorney for Whistleblower: 400 US Missiles Stolen in Benghazi

Clinton & Benghazi Lies

From Breitbart.com:

On August 12, Joe DiGenova, attorney for one of the Benghazi whistleblowers, told Washington D.C.’s WMAL that one of the reasons people have remained tight-lipped about Benghazi is because 400 U.S. missiles were “diverted to Libya” and ended up being stolen and falling into “the hands of some very ugly people.”

DiGenova represents Benghazi whistleblower Mark Thompson. He told WMAL that he “does not know whether [the missiles] were at the annex, but it is clear the annex was somehow involved in the distribution of those missiles.”

He claimed his information “comes from a former intelligence official who stayed in constant contact with people in the special ops and intelligence community.” He said the biggest concern right now is finding those missiles before they can be put to use. “They are worried, specifically according to these sources, about an attempt to shoot down an airliner,” he claimed.

Is this the unspoken nasty secret surrounding Benghazi and the reason the current administration thinks those four deaths mean nothing?  And why they’ll do anything to cover it up and minimize it to their best extent?

Perhaps this paragraph will shed some light:

Months earlier, following then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta’s February 7 testimony on Capitol Hill about the Benghazi attacks, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) suggested that one of the causes behind the terrorist attack “may have been that there was a gun running operation going on in Benghazi, leaving Libya and going to Turkey and [distributing] arms to the [Syrian] rebels.”

As may perhaps my previous posts here and here and here and here.

But no one seems to care.

Which tells me one thing: never work for the federal government.  Your death means nothing.

BZ

 

 

For Friday: Whittle’s State of the Union — on firearms — 2013

From the simply-too-logical Bill Whittle:

I must apologize, up front, for the common sense and the facts and the logic.  I further apologize for not immediately sparking, lighting and ramping up the jejune flames of emotion and illogic.

Leftists would have us stop with the logic, stop with the statistics, stop with the common sense.  If something “feels” innately good, well, then, it simply must be good according to primeval emotions.

But emotions didn’t build fire, and emotions didn’t discover the wheel.  Necessity and survival did.  As did the piles and piles and piles of dead bodies required to discover these things through trial and error.

Let there be no mistake: Mr Whittle speaks for me.

And let there be no further mistake: the Fornicalia Department of Justice (DOJ), under current Governor Jerry Brown, who is a Leftist abortion-on-toast that immediately disbanded the BNE (because CNOA opposed Brown as governor) and, having fired numerous DOJ agents, is once again re-hiring 40 said personnel in order to specifically target firearms enforcement and firearms confiscation in the state.  Let my DOJ readers weigh in.

Fornicalia AG Kamala Harris is another Leftist apologist for Leftists, a despiser of law enforcement, and a sniveling jackanape-of-a-disciple of Barack Hussein Obama due to philosophy and shared melanin counts — may he ascend towards godhood.  Little g.  Kamala Harris: no death penalty for a dead SFPD officer, eh wot?  Good for you.  Time to take a stand against law enforcement.

All: prove to me that this is incorrect or improperly reported.

The Second Amendment exists to prevent tyranny.  It exists to prevent people from, at its base, government.

BZ

 

 

Trey Gowdy: Obama administration HIDING survivors of Benghazi

From the Greta Van Susteren show on Fox:

Trey Gowdy weighs in:

In an appearance on Fox News’ show ‘On The Record’ with Greta Van Susteren, Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) said the Obama Administration is hiding the survivors of the Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Gowdy also told Greta that the administration is dispersing the survivors to locations around the country, and also changing their names.

“Stop and think what things are most calculated to get at the truth? Talk to people with first-hand knowledge. What creates the appearance and perhaps the reality of a cover-up? Not letting us talk with people who have the most amount of information, dispersing them around the country and changing their names,”

But is this information bleated on every front page of every newspaper in this great nation?  On every American TV, internet and radio network?

Of course not.  Because such information would damage the wondrous and stupendous Administration of Barack Hussein Obama, and create doubt in the hearts of those who would consider the Next Big Demorat for president, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

A “phony scandal,” ladies and gentlemen?  Just why would you go so far out of your way to purposely cover up a so-called “phony scandal,” pray tell?

No, I will not let Benghazi die, damn me to Hell.

BZ