Tag Archives: federal incompetence

Rubio: Obama despises Netanyahu

Posted on by

Netanyahu WinsFirst, watch the video.  Barack Hussein Obama did all he could to ensure that Benjamin Netanyahu did not acquire re-election in Israel.  Netanyahu won despite that, and Obama is livid.  It’s time for retribution, as no one crosses Hussein.

Not a single word from the Obama Administration congratulating Netanyahu for his win.  Hold that thought.

“Barack Obama’s Democrat campaign team went to Israel, a team of five campaign managers, to coordinate the anti-Likud campaign.  Obama was literally trying to stop an ally, Benjamin Netanyahu, from being re-elected.”

One of the groups responding was literally funded by the US State Department.

It doesn’t get any more official than that.

“Is there a single country in the world with which America now has better relations than when Obama started?”

“Is there anyone who actually loves America more (under Obama) besides Iran and Cuba?”

I could make an excellent and cogent argument for a rampant and rabid case of anti-Semitism on the part of Barack Hussein Obama.

Further: Senator Marco Rubio hit the proverbial Obama nail on the Netanyahu head earlier Thursday.  From FloridaPolitics.com:

Marco Rubio lambastes Obama for failing “to respect” Benjamin Netanyahu

U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio took to the Senate floor Thursday afternoon to lash out at President Barack Obama for failing to congratulate Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, after his Likud Party victory in Israel’s elections on Tuesday.

“In March of 2012, he was among the first to call Putin in Russia,” Rubio said. “Or that in June in 2012, he was among the first to call Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood when they won the Egyptian presidency.” He went on to mention the election victories of the Chinese, Turkish, and Iranian leaders in recent years. “Time and again, this president has made a habit of quickly calling these leaders when they win. But as of 4:40 eastern time, as far as I know, this call has not been made.”

“That is saying a lot by someone elected at least once, if not twice using extremely divisive language,” he said, referring to Obama’s elections. However, he said that when the Iranian government appeared to have a fraudulent election and killed protestors in the street, the U.S. refused to condemn that government. 

Obama insists: up is down, black is white, right is wrong.

Rubio said he agreed with Netanyahu that conditions don’t exist now for a two-state solution “with people who teach their children that killing Jews are a glorious thing.”

The most telling — and logical — sentence is this:

“This President is making a historical mistake,” he said of Obama’s strained relationship with Netanyahu. “This is a historic and tragic mistake,” adding that it wasn’t a political issue. “If this was a Republican president doing these things, I would be giving the exact same speech. In fact, I would be even angrier.”

I can only conclude a few things:

Giuliani was correct.

BZ

Krauthammer Quote Obama

 Share

Obama: undermining Israel. Again.

Posted on by

It isn’t sufficient for Obama to attempt to undermine Netanyahu by funding his opponents.  Read this as well.

It isn’t sufficient for Obama to work against Israel in favor of Iran, influenced as he is by his upbringing and education.

Now, Benjamin Netanyahu having reacquired the Prime Minister’s position — not by a thread but quite decisively — Obama has decided it’s time to double-down against Israel and Bibi.

Because Netanyahu played the “no two-state solution” card and ended up winning.  However, as the New York Daily News wrote, “reports that he ruled out a two-state solution are pure bunk.”  A fabrication by the Obama Administration.

That Netanyahu won rankles Obama to no end.  That and the fact that Netanyahu was asked to speak before Congress a few weeks ago regarding Iran.  Obama is weak-kneed on Iran and Muslims in general.  Upbringing and education.

Now, from ForeignPolicy.com:

From Tel Aviv to Turtle Bay

by John Hudson & Colum Lynch

The White House hoped a new Israeli prime minister would resume peace talks with the Palestinians. With Netanyahu holding on, the administration is weighing a turn to the U.N. to help force a deal.

After years of blocking U.N. efforts to pressure Israelis and Palestinians into accepting a lasting two-state solution, the United States is edging closer toward supporting a U.N. Security Council resolution that would call for the resumption of political talks to conclude a final peace settlement, according to Western diplomats.

The move follows Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s decisive re-election Tuesday after the incumbent publicly abandoned his commitment to negotiate a Palestinian state — the basis of more than 20 years of U.S. diplomatic efforts — and promised to continue the construction of settlements on occupied territory. The development also reflects deepening pessimism over the prospect of U.S.-brokered negotiations delivering peace between Israelis and Palestinians.

Anything to cock-block Netanyahu and favor Iran over Israel.

Upbringing and education.

BZ

 

 Share

“An unprecedented act of surrender”

Posted on by

John Bolton GlassesJohn Bolton quantified Obama’s negotiations with Iran, according to TheHill.com, as:

Bolton calls Iran deal ‘unprecedented’ surrender

by Mark Hensch

Former United Nations Ambassador John Bolton said Saturday that President Obama is negotiating “an unprecedented act of surrender” with Iran in discussions over its nuclear weapons program.
 
“This deal is fundamentally flawed,” Bolton said at the South Carolina National Security Action Summit in West Columbia, S.C. “There really is no deal I’d trust Iran with. It is a regime determined to have nuclear weapons and this deal will give it to them.”

Repeat:

“There really is no deal I’d trust Iran with. It is a regime determined to have nuclear weapons and this deal will give it to them.”

Tom Cotton was correct, Rudy Giuliani was correct, and I was correct.

Controversy erupted over an open letter Republicans sent Iran’s leadership Monday. It vowed Congress can void any deal it finds unsatisfying and was signed by 47 GOP senators.

And the forty-seven Congressmen are correct.

Bolton rebuked the president’s response as unjustified Saturday. He said the Senators were not traitors, but rather lawmakers who “stood up for the Constitution.”
“The president coddles the Iranian ayatollah and attacks his own countrymen and our closest allies over this deal,” Bolton said Saturday. “The danger we hope to avoid is now imminent. This is just one example of how the President doesn’t care about America’s national security.”

I completely concur.  I wrote why I believe Mr Obama is willing to make such terrible concessions to Iran in my post “Obama: protecting Islam and Iran.”  I said that  “relations between Israel and Barack Hussein Obama have always been rocky.  I believe this is because Mr Obama sympathizes with Muslims and disdains Jews.  This is in consideration of his upbringing and his education, amongst other things.”

Bolton said Saturday that Obama’s eagerness for a deal would give Tehran a “free pass” for nuclear arms. He said American voters should thus make national security the central issue of 2016’s presidential elections.

There is no denying this statement whatsoever; it became true in 2008 and is equally true today:

“The gravest threat to our national security sits in the Oval Office,” Bolton said. “The next two years can’t pass swiftly enough. For God’s sake, let’s not make the same mistake in 2016.”

Mr Obama is one who makes US allies an enemy, and US enemies a friend.

BZ

 

 Share

Tom Cotton stirs it up:

Posted on by

Tom CottonTom Cotton, a Freshman Republican, has certainly struck the hornet’s nest with a major rhythm stick.

From the NYTimes.com:

Senator Behind Iran Letter Is Latest Freshman Republican to Stir Things Up

by Jennifer Steinhauer

WASHINGTON — First there was Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, who held up bills, conducted an antidrone talk-a-thon and generally annoyed his colleagues. Next was Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, who whipped up a campaign that shut down the government.

Now comes Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas, another Republican freshman, whose letter to the leaders of Iran warning against a nuclear deal with the Obama administration has caused an international uproar.

At 37, Mr. Cotton is the youngest member of the Senate and had served as of Wednesday exactly 65 days. A graduate of Harvard and Harvard Law School, Mr. Cotton served as an infantry officer in the 101st Airborne Division in Iraq in 2006, one of the bloodiest periods of the war.

But what did Cotton actually advocate?

Kerry LetterMore importantly:

Leaders in the House noted Mr. Cotton’s intellect and the fact that he showed little willingness to compromise on legislation, even when the leadership wanted him to. In 2014, he campaigned in a camouflage-themed recreational vehicle against the Democratic incumbent, Senator Mark Pryor, and handily beat him.

Let’s face it, Mr Obama’s “deal” with Iran includes concessions just short of abject capitulation to the Iranians.  It would leave Iran’s nuclear infrastructure primarily intact, including heavy water reactors and at least 6,000 centrifuges.  It would even allow work to continue on Iran’s ballistic missile program.

The “deal” will also sunset in 10 to 15 years, allowing Iran to do anything it wishes thereafter.

Because Mr Obama is the smartest man in DC and in every room, just what did he receive from Iran in terms of concessions?

Let’s see: uh, nothing.

That’s right, Mr Obama is clearly a hard-line negotiator when dealing with the Muslim world, by God!

Sanctions would actually be lifted on Iran, in “exchange” for Iran allowing inspection of its nuclear facilities — something it’s supposed to already be doing — yet the IAEA finds itself currently stymied at most every turn by Iran.  Already.

DC and Obama are pissed because Cotton dares to point out the lack of clothing on Emperor Obama.

BZ

Obama Imperial King

 Share