Tag Archives: Ferguson MO

Ferguson out of control:

Posted on by

FERGUSON BLUE LIVES MATTERThe Ferguson Police Department is the last department that officers throughout this nation would want to belong to.

Despite the fact that Officer Darren Wilson was completely exonerated, two officers were shot on Thursday.

From CNN.com:

State, county police take over Ferguson protest security after shooting

by Greg Botelho and Catherine E. Shoichet

(CNN)  With tensions running high after the shooting of two officers in Ferguson, Missouri, state and county police took over protest security in the St. Louis suburb Thursday.

St. Louis County Police and the Missouri State Highway Patrol are assuming “command of the security detail regarding protests,” St. Louis County Police said, while Ferguson Police will remain responsible for “routine policing services” in the city.

Meaning: the city was “taken over” by outside forces.

Ferguson DecisionThe officers who remain are there because they cannot readily leave, and they can do nothing right — at this point — in the eyes of the nation.

Ferguson Cops SensitiveThey are caught between belief and physicality.

And they are caught up in the lie that apparently won’t stop.

#BLACK LIVES MATTER

#HANDS UP DON’T SHOOT

BZ

 

 Share

No 1983 Action for Officer Wilson, per DOJ

Posted on by

Darren WilsonThe residents of Ferguson, Missouri won’t be be terribly pleased.

From the NYTimes.com:

Justice Dept. to Recommend No Civil Rights Charges in Ferguson Shooting

by Matt Apuzzo & Michael S. Schmidt

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department has begun work on a legal memo recommending no civil rights charges against a white police officer in Ferguson, Mo., who killed an unarmed black teenager in August, law enforcement officials said.

That would close the politically charged case in the shooting death of 18-year-old Michael Brown. The investigation by the F.B.I., which is complete, found no evidence to support civil rights charges against the officer, Darren Wilson, the officials said.

This therefore lends much credence to the chronology of events as portrayed by ex-Ferguson Police Department Officer Darren Wilson, who indicated that suspect Michael Brown did in fact attempt to disarm him and did in fact strike him, requiring the application of force which, in that case, was Officer Wilson’s sidearm.

Think about this: ex-Officer Wilson was forced to resign and he and his family subject to death threats locally and nationally, despite his actions being upheld in two separate legal venues: the Grand Jury failed to indict, and the US Department of Justice will fail to charge.

Officer Wilson’s actions were scrutinized for months by, literally, hundreds of persons, one sitting jury and the US DOJ.  He was exonerated in both instances and still his professional and likely his private life was destroyed.

For responding properly to a threat.

Don’t think for a moment there wasn’t great pressure on the DOJ to find something, anything on Darren Wilson, with said pressure coming directly from the Oval Office and the Racial Pimps, NYC and DC chapters.

On a professional and clinical level, justice was done.

On a personal level, one good man’s life was changed forever.

BZ

 

 Share

Pro-Wilson Ferguson witness murdered?

Posted on by

Ferguson Witness MurderedAnd was he a witness who stated Michael Brown was shot in the back with his hands in the air?

Perhaps he was not.

Hearken back to this post first, then continue:

From the NYDailyNews.com:

Man found dead amid Ferguson riots had bullet in head, accelerant on body: police

by Nina Golgowski

Among those appearing to grieve for Joshua was Dorian Johnson, who witnessed Brown’s death.

A nearby resident, previously speaking to the St. Louis Post Dispatch, has claimed that hours before the young man’s body was found they overheard four people armed with guns talking about looting and killing someone Monday night.

“I knew it was going to be true,” said Richard Taylor after hearing word of Joshua’s death. “When I got up this morning, I saw this.”

Why was DeAndre Joshua killed?  It seems his death has been completely ignored and shuttled aside.  The national media, what I term the American Media Maggots, seem not AMM - American Media Maggots 2to be interested in the slightest and have asked not one question.

They appear to have taken whatever the Ferguson PD and/or the St Louis County authorities have said as gospel.  Why?  They don’t trust these authorities with any information regarding Michael Brown.

DeAndre Joshua’s death is the only one to have occurred in Ferguson following Brown, but it has apparently been disregarded and rejected by the AMM.  Doesn’t that seem just a tad bit odd to you, given the recent history of Ferguson?  After all, the AMM and specifically the late Christopher Hitchens accused President George Bush 43 of being “unusually uncurious.”  J’accuse, AMM, Mr Hitchens?

A death in Ferguson?  A black man’s death in Ferguson, following that of Brown?  Uncovered by the AMM and not splayed across the headlines of papers and media sites around the nation and the world?  I repeat: a black man killed in Ferguson is now ignored, following the death Michael Brown?

Just how can that be?

I am wondering: is it because the incident doesn’t fit the meme of blacks being killed by Caucasoids?  It is because Joshua may have been killed since he was perceived by the “black community” as being a “snitch” and worthy of death?  Because he may have been killed by a black male and not a Caucasoid?

I don’t know.

But at least I’m courageous enough to even pose the question.

J’accuse, American Media Maggots.  Is there not one ounce of testosterone amongst all of you?

BZ

 

 Share

Eleanor Holmes Norton: ignorant and racist

Posted on by

And exposed blatantly on Sean Hannity.

Please watch the video regarding Norton’s interpretation of Ferguson events.

Hannity: “Did you read the evidence that was released in this case?”
Norton: “I did not, and that is not a concern.”

All you need to know, in one sentence, about the racist Eleanor Holmes Norton.  She has an agenda and nothing will get in her way of furthering that agenda — facts be damned.

Norton is dismissive, arrogant, condescending, disdainful, lofty.  The “stops in the street.”  What happens when the “stops in the street” occur in areas that are primarily black?  Do blacks not deserve a law enforcement response?  Do they not deserve protection by local law enforcement?  Or should “those areas” be predominantly ignored by law enforcement and allowed to become lawless war zones?

As I’ve said for years and years: never let common sense, facts, evidence, rationality and proportion get in the way of a good fucked-up administrative decision.

Norton proves my statement.

And Barkley is prescient.

BZ

 

 Share

Charles Barkley: now a “sell-out,” say blacks

Posted on by

Charles BarkleyBecause Charles Barkley deigned to actually state some truth and weigh in on the Ferguson riots.  Please listen below.

From the ChristianScienceMonitor.com:

Former NBA star Charles Barkley recently called Ferguson looters “scumbags,” praised police officers who work in black neighborhoods, and said he supports the decision made by the grand jury not to indict officer Darren Wilson in the Michael Brown shooting.

During an interview on 97.5 The Fanatic in Philadelphia on Tuesday, the day after the Ferguson decision was announced, host Mike Missanelli asked Barkley about it and why “black America” doesn’t trust the ruling.

Charles Barkley, for the uninitiated, has always spoken his mind.

“The true story came out from the grand jury testimony,” Barkley said, adding that he was made aware of “key forensic evidence, and several black witnesses that supported Officer Darren Wilson’s story…” He continued, “I can’t believe anything I hear on television anymore. And, that’s why I don’t like talking about race issues with the media anymore, because they (the media) love this stuff, and lead people to jump to conclusions. The media shouldn’t do that. They never do that when black people kill each other. ” 

Wait; Barkley speaks even more plainly:

He also called those who rioted after the decision was announced “scumbags,” and said “There is no excuse for people to be out there burning down people’s businesses, burning down police cars.”

But here’s where a radical paradigm shift comes into play, and why Barkley is perceived as a traitor to his race:

And in a marked departure from other prominent black leaders who have questioned tactics used by officers and, in some cases, accused officers of racial profiling and outright racism, Barkley supported police officers, especially those who work in black neighborhoods.

“[W]e have to be really careful with the cops, because if it wasn’t for the cops we would be living in the Wild, Wild West in our neighborhoods,” he said. “We can’t pick out certain incidentals that don’t go our way and act like the cops are all bad…. Do you know how bad some of these neighborhoods would be if it wasn’t for the cops?”

As a matter of fact, yes, Charles, I do know how bad “some of those neighborhoods would be” if it weren’t for a law enforcement presence.  I am a cop.

Certain blacks — and some GOWPs — hate Barkley because he is in a position to actually state the truth.  He has money, he answers to no one.  He can’t be hurt.  And with such independence comes an amazing freedom.  Which Barkley utilizes.

Good for him.

BZ

 

 Share