Tag Archives: first amendment

Rachel Jeantel Explains The Difference Between ‘Nigga’ And ‘Nigger’ To Piers Morgan

Posted on by

Rachel JeantelAs if that needed any kind of an explanation.

From MediaIte.com:

In the third part of Piers Morgan‘s extensive, exclusive interview with Trayvon Martin‘s friend Rachel Jeantel about her testimony in the George Zimmerman trial, the host asked his guest if there was anything she wished she’d said on the stand. Jeantel answered with one word: “Nigga.”

Jeantel explained to Morgan that “the whole world say it’s a racist word” but the version of the word that she testified Martin had used in reference to Zimmerman, spelled “n-i-g-g-a” doesn’t mean what most people think it means. It doesn’t mean a “black male” as Morgan assumed, she said, but rather any kind of man, including “Chinese” for example. Morgan helpfully pointed out that that’s the version rappers use in their music.

“But nigger,” Jeantel said, stressing the “-er.,” is a “racist word.” She said “I’d advise you not to be by black people” when you say that word, Jeantel explained, “because they’re not going to have it like that.” And this is not just in her community as Morgan posited but in the entire “generation.”

Okay.  So that explains it all.

There you have it.  Nigga vs Nigger.

With one salient observation:

  • ewgrif76 A fan of the 1st Amendment • a day ago

    You’re an idiot, and any white man who grew up in the “ghetto” gets it and understands why black people use “N***A” amongst themselves…Zimmerman deserved the not guilty verdict, but you also deserve a swift kick to your ignorant mouth.

And you wonder why people don’t respect blacks?  Out of the mouth of babes and the ignorant.

BZ

obamacare-cartoon-2-a

 

 Share

Obama: using Trayvon Martin as nothing more than a political tool

Posted on by

Obama Race CardWay to go, Mr Obama; we would expect nothing less of you: take full advantage of the death of a black man to further enable your political ends.  How craven of you.

From NBCNews.com:

Obama: Honor Trayvon Martin by battling gun violence

By Hasani Gittens and Elizabeth Chuck, NBC News

President Obama called on the nation to honor Trayvon Martin a day after George Zimmerman was acquitted of his murder by asking “ourselves if we’re doing all we can to stem the tide of gun violence.”

His comments came as family members of Zimmerman and Martin, as well as pundits, celebrities, and court observers had strong reactions to Saturday’s not guilty verdict, with those reactions taking various forms — from joy and outrage to Shakespearean references and calls for peace.

Leftists, Progressives and Demorats will call again and again for the limitation of our freedoms, to include restrictions on the Second Amendment — which lead to restrictions of the First and all other amendments in the Bill of Rights — and an increase in our taxes.

Restrictions and money — they both answer every Demorat question or problem.  Except they do not, and never have.  You cannot change a culture with money.  You cannot make blacks value the lives of its own young black men, with money.  You cannot eradicate gangs with money.  You cannot bring black fathers back into the lives of black children with money.

You can, however, drive the once-nuclear black family apart with money — welfare money.  You can pay blacks money to eliminate the influence of the father.  You can pay single-parent black families to continue to break apart and you can guarantee this breakdown (and thus a continual reliance on government) by never stopping the flow of welfare cash.  Then you can create generation after generation of blacks who have been highly incentivized to demand their Free Cheese, instead of promoting their ability to learn how to make cheese for themselves.  Independence vs dependence.  For votes.  Voting themselves “largesse.”

But little occurs in a vacuum so what, do you think, happened when traditional and nuclear black families were eliminated with purpose and profound naivete by Demorats?

Gangs happened.

Because people are primarily Social Animals.  And when you stop the Natural Family, the vacuum created embraces gangs.  Because gangs are, at their most base, a family enabling a sense of belonging and engendering loyalty.  Rewarding loyalty.

Restrictions and money.

Money solves nothing; it only serves to make the problems addressed more convoluted and expands government and its concomitant bureaucracy.  It pays administrators bloated sums for glotted directorates, broken group-think, ever-expanding budgets, and a mindset that continues to believe that removing our freedoms and then selling them back to us, when the bureaucracy so deigns, is a good thing.

Finally: thanks again, Mr Obama, for being on the wrong side of an issue and further exposing your racist aspects, noting your comment: “You know, if I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon.”

Nothing like putting the force of the entire Presidential Bully Pulpit against a suspect where, in this country, persons are allegedly considered innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.  Unless one wishes Napoleonic Law.  Or one is a racist.  Or perhaps even both when it serves.

Let us not forget that it was Mr Obama’s DOJ that paid people to protest against George Zimmerman.  If that isn’t biased and racist, I cannot conjure what is.  Yes; perpetrated under the cloak of the power of presidential authority.

I leave you with this clue from the very beginning: “At the time, police said they found no evidence to contradict Zimmerman’s claim of self-defense.”  [20][22][23]

One high-profile dead black man = wonderful political fodder for Mr Obama.

Your Loving Black President at work.

BZ

Obama Racist Words

 

 

 Share

Justice Department Fights Release of Secret Court Opinion Finding Unconstitutional Surveillance

Posted on by

Obama Big Brother TheaterAgain, the Obama Administration — which “promised” to be the most transparent in history — is proving itself the complete opposite: the most OPAQUE in history and the most strident in keeping information from the electorate.

From MotherJones (Of all places!):

Government lawyers are trying to keep buried a classified court finding that a domestic spying program went too far.

—By

| Fri Jun. 7, 2013 12:22 PM PDT

In the midst of revelations that the government has conducted extensive top-secret surveillance operations to collect domestic phone records and internet communications, the Justice Department was due to file a court motion Friday in its effort to keep secret an 86-page court opinion that determined that the government had violated the spirit of federal surveillance laws and engaged in unconstitutional spying.

The violations and abrogations of our Constitution and Bill of Rights go on and on and on, one abortion after the other, and still you have to dig and scrape and pry and unearth to discover what’s going on in your very own back yard, your very own country!

AMM - American Media Maggots 1Further, the American Media Maggots, like thousands of domestic cats, do their very best to paw the sand over the daily piles of steaming shit created and served up by Mr Obama in DC.  They’re happy to do it.  Overjoyed.

Then they become packed and bristling with umbrage and scarlet outrage when the obvious is pointed out: their mouths and faces are coated with years of old and cracked DC shit along with the fresh strands of fecal materials dripping from their very teeth.

Never before have I seen an American press so willing to become such abject coprophages for Washington DC.  It is beyond disgusting.  And never have I been so disillusioned by the American electorate for installing this pseudo-black American Destroyer not once, but twice — mostly because they want more Free Cheese.

This is detestable.  Beyond shameless.  I lack further abominable words at this point.

I say — and this administration proves me correct — that if you thought the political damage stemming from Washington is bad, just wait another week.

It gets worse.

Keep pushing, Mr Obama.  I don’t think America will like what’s just over the horizon.

Gird thy loins, America.  Be prepared.

BZ

 

 

 Share

Islamists & Leftists chase college Republicans out of their own movie screening

Posted on by

As Texas Fred wrote in his post, “A warning from a former Muslim,” Islam has patience.  And drive.  And violence.  They are the 800-pound gorilla of religions, cold, cruel, barbaric, single-minded.  Read Fred’s post first.

Some people may be asking, in light of the recent declaration that Feds suggest anti-Muslim speech can be punished, why such emphasis on the negative aspects of one tiny religion when there are so many other issues of greater importance requiring focus in today’s world?  And, further, won’t this get me in trouble?

The second question is easiest to answer: because I believe in my First Amendment rights.  Once we lose our First, everything else means nothing.  That is why it is the FIRST Amendment and why the Leftists and “Progressives” by way of the Demorats work so hard to eliminate our Second Amendment protections.  Once the Second Amendment is gutted and emasculated, the rest of the Bill of Rights — with the First Amendment clearly “first to go” — can be tossed aside with abandon.  Then the nation truly becomes one populated by Groundlings, Serfs and Proles.  This doesn’t just work for Obama, folks; any old and staid Republican could potentially do the same thing.  No one, ladies and gentlemen, gets my First Amendment.

The first question is also an easy one to answer: because Islam has the West in its gunsights.  Literally and figuratively.  And the so-called “good” and “moderate” Muslim keeps silent and quaking in his boots for fear of the True Islam.  My phrase “Islam is as Islam does” isn’t merely some trite coinage; it’s the absolute truth.  Do the reversal: substitute the word “Catholic” for all the death and carnage committed at the hands of and in the name of Islam and imagine what the state of Catholicism would be today.

People say that, after all, these kinds of thing can’t happen here and that Texas Fred and I are simply religionists and terribly over-reactive.  One tiny point: people also intimate that Texas Fred and I are racists and to that I laugh out loud: the dolts and cretins making this remark are themselves ill-educated and give away their obvious poor public school days: Islam is a religion and not a race.  Such goobers.

It can’t happen here, you say?

Really?  Watch:

Ah, nothing like the goodness and kindness of Leftists and Islamists working in concert to eliminate the truth regarding Islam.  As so clearly illustrated by Texas Fred’s guest writer.

Plus this:

You think the First Amendment isn’t already threatened?  You think that Islam doesn’t already have a foothold in America?

Then you would be foolish.

BZ

P.S.

See two linked articles about the Portland event, here and here.

 

 Share

Feds suggest anti-Muslim speech can be punished

Posted on by

Islam BeheadsFrom Josh Gerstein in Politico:

A U.S. attorney in Tennessee is reportedly vowing to use federal civil rights statutes to clamp down on offensive and inflammatory speech about Islam.

Bill Killian, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Tennessee, was quoted by the Tullahoma News this week suggesting that some inflammatory material on Islam might run afoul of federal civil rights laws.

“We need to educate people about Muslims and their civil rights, and as long as we’re here, they’re going to be protected,” Killian told the newspaper.

While threats directed at individuals or small groups can lead to punishment, First Amendment experts expressed doubt that the government has any power to stop offensive material about Islam from circulating.

“He’s just wrong,” said Floyd Abrams, one of the country’s most respected First Amendment attorneys. “The government may, indeed, play a useful and entirely constitutional role in urging people not to engage in speech that amounts to religious discrimination. But it may not, under the First Amendment, prevent or punish speech even if it may be viewed as hostile to a religion.”

“And what it most clearly may not do is to stifle political or social debate, however rambunctious or offensive some may think it is,” Abrams said.

A conservative watchdog group, Judicial Watch, accused the Obama administration of using federal law to specifically protect Muslims from criticism.

So I suppose Mr Killian wouldn’t much care for my blog.

Killian said Internet postings that violate civil rights are subject to federal jurisdiction.

“That’s what everybody needs to understand,” he said.

But be careful, sir, about that precious First Amendment.  Because when you lose the Second, you naturally lose the First.  And you, Mr Killian, are doing your best to hasten, concomitantly, the demise of the First.

Cut down from within.

Just as history has seen for many powerful nations, over the span of time.

Be very, very careful.

And you, ladies and gentlemen, be extremely protective of your First and Second.

BZ

P.S.
Because, after all, those people pictured above need to be protected more than you.

 

 Share