New Signs of Rising Illegal Immigration into US

uni_oregon_walk_license_121026_wgWow!  Such good news!

From Breitbart.com:

By HOPE YEN
Associated Press
WASHINGTON
After dropping during the recession, the number of immigrants crossing the border illegally into the U.S. appears to be on the rise again.

The total number of immigrants living in this country unlawfully edged up from 11.3 million in 2009 to 11.7 million last year, with those from countries other than Mexico at an apparent all-time high, according to a report released Monday by Pew Research Center’s Hispanic Trends Project.

To quote Chief Dan George, my heart “soars like an eagle” with this news.

BZ

 

Immigration’s Plan B:

Mi Familia VotaMeanwhile, back at the ranch, whilst you were watching Syria and weren’t paying attention domestically — and without statutory authority:

A Plan B.

Immigration-reform activists aren’t supposed to talk publicly about a Plan B. They can’t, or won’t, answer questions from the media about what they will do if no bill passes this year to legalize the undocumented population. But as August wears on and there is no clear sense of what the House will do on immigration, some are starting to speak out.

“There are groups that are for immigration reform no matter what. Then there are groups like us, grassroots…. We have the other track,” said Adelina Nicholls, the executive director of the Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights. “The other track is Barack Obama.”

The idea behind the “other track” is to freeze the current undocumented population in place through an administrative order, give them work permits, and hope for a better deal under the next president, with the hope that he or she is a Democrat. It’s a significant gamble, but some advocates—particularly those outside of the Washington legislative bartering system—argue that it’s better than what they stand to see under the legislation being discussed now.

Many advocates have been discussing Plan B quietly for months, but they have kept a disciplined public message solely focused on supporting a comprehensive immigration bill in Congress. Even if they are uncomfortable with some of the bill’s provisions (like, say, excluding anyone who has been convicted of petty theft from legalization), advocates don’t want to appear fractured before a group of politicians who are wary about voting for anything that gives unauthorized immigrants legal status. As soon as reluctant lawmakers smell dissension in the ranks, they flee.

All Obama needs is “proof” that Congress can’t get the job done — then Obama reacts with an EO on his own, unilaterally.

Activists fear the border will be “militarized.”  And that immigrants will be driven “underground.”  Our sovereignty at literal risk, supported by foreign consulates.  Dual citizenship, tri-citizenship.  This is how you kill a nation.

Obama plans, by Executive Fiat, to legalize and normalize millions of Mexicans above and beyond the Dream Act.  The Leftists will do anything to accomplish their objectives, and they are unceasing.  If not by legislation, then by any manner in any fashion.  They are beyond resolute.  They are advocating “turning up the heat.”  The proverbial “squeaky wheel,” ladies and gentlemen.

Do you find Republicans who are likewise resolute or unceasing or unaccepting of defeat?  Who attack like steamrollers and piledrivers?

And who create websites like Mi Familia Vota, the sole goal of which is to bring as many illegal Mexicans into the United States as possible?  Not the French, not Ethiopians, not Russians, not Canadians.  Mexicans.  Who speak Spanish.  And who do not hail from Spain — though it was Spain that conquered the Indians of Mexico, which is why they speak Spanish today and not Tagalog.

Whose headlines read:

IMMIGRANT RIGHTS LEADERS TRAVEL THE ROAD TO CITIZENSHIP: VOW NOT TO TAKE ‘NO’ FOR AN ANSWER

Obama’s Executive Fiat and a SCOTUS that supports it.

I ask: how can you say you “love your country” and truly hate your Constitution?

Your Constitution and Founding Fathers provided recourse.  A convention for proposing amendments.

Article Five of the United States Constitution

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.[2]

Perhaps a reference to Mark Levin’s The Liberty Amendments.

I submit that Mr Levin possesses a logical and sane alternative to the illogical and insane path our nation is currently taking.

Tell me: how many of you recognize our country from, say, thirty years ago?

Not in terms of melanin count, but in terms of logic, common sense, law, reality, proportion and rationality.

Don’t think Leftists don’t have a strategy:

Most activists for immigration reform have been so wrapped up in getting legislation through the Senate that they haven’t had time to look up and see what’s down the road. They are doing so now. “We’re saying, ‘What if? What are the next steps? If we come to a crossroads, what are the next strategies, the next talking points?’ ” said Lizette Escobedo, communications and development director for the Latino group Mi Familia Vota. “Our groups on the ground are seeing this as a new challenge. And when you get a new challenge, you just need to turn up the heat.”

Really.

What have you heard is the GOP‘s so-called “Plan B”?

Correct: nothing.

BZ

 

 

For Friday: Whittle’s State of the Union — on firearms — 2013

From the simply-too-logical Bill Whittle:

I must apologize, up front, for the common sense and the facts and the logic.  I further apologize for not immediately sparking, lighting and ramping up the jejune flames of emotion and illogic.

Leftists would have us stop with the logic, stop with the statistics, stop with the common sense.  If something “feels” innately good, well, then, it simply must be good according to primeval emotions.

But emotions didn’t build fire, and emotions didn’t discover the wheel.  Necessity and survival did.  As did the piles and piles and piles of dead bodies required to discover these things through trial and error.

Let there be no mistake: Mr Whittle speaks for me.

And let there be no further mistake: the Fornicalia Department of Justice (DOJ), under current Governor Jerry Brown, who is a Leftist abortion-on-toast that immediately disbanded the BNE (because CNOA opposed Brown as governor) and, having fired numerous DOJ agents, is once again re-hiring 40 said personnel in order to specifically target firearms enforcement and firearms confiscation in the state.  Let my DOJ readers weigh in.

Fornicalia AG Kamala Harris is another Leftist apologist for Leftists, a despiser of law enforcement, and a sniveling jackanape-of-a-disciple of Barack Hussein Obama due to philosophy and shared melanin counts — may he ascend towards godhood.  Little g.  Kamala Harris: no death penalty for a dead SFPD officer, eh wot?  Good for you.  Time to take a stand against law enforcement.

All: prove to me that this is incorrect or improperly reported.

The Second Amendment exists to prevent tyranny.  It exists to prevent people from, at its base, government.

BZ

 

 

USDA Sets Goal to Serve 166 Million Gov’t Subsidized Meals to Kids This Summer

Feeding The Welfare BearsJust what we need: children with their own EBT cards.  Start them early, the government says.  From CNSNews.com:

(CNSNews.com)
With a record 101 million Americans receiving food aid from the federal government, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) wants more kids to be on dole for food during the summer months.

Why stop there?  Why just the summer?

“As part of its ongoing commitment to improving access to healthy food for low income children, USDA has set a goal of serving 5 million more meals to eligible children this summer,” the agency said on Aug. 1.

One of the ways the government will achieve this aim is by giving children subsidies on EBT cards. The USDA released an evaluation report on testing “new methods” to provide food to children in the summer, specifically through the Summer Electronic Benefits Transfer for Children (SEBTC) program.

“As part of its efforts to end child hunger, [the Food and Nutrition Service] FNS is studying alternative approaches to providing food assistance to children in the summer months,” the USDA said.

Last summer, 66,772 children received subsidies via an EBT card from the program, which was run in eight states and two Indian tribes. Eligible households received up to $60 per month, per child.

Excellent.  Let’s get children into the habit of relying, absolutely, on the federal government.

Why is it that you can’t lawfully feed bears in federal reserves and parks?  That’s right, because it would tend to create dependence and remove the bear’s ability to hunt for its own food.

BZ

 

 

Rachel Jeantel Explains The Difference Between ‘Nigga’ And ‘Nigger’ To Piers Morgan

Rachel JeantelAs if that needed any kind of an explanation.

From MediaIte.com:

In the third part of Piers Morgan‘s extensive, exclusive interview with Trayvon Martin‘s friend Rachel Jeantel about her testimony in the George Zimmerman trial, the host asked his guest if there was anything she wished she’d said on the stand. Jeantel answered with one word: “Nigga.”

Jeantel explained to Morgan that “the whole world say it’s a racist word” but the version of the word that she testified Martin had used in reference to Zimmerman, spelled “n-i-g-g-a” doesn’t mean what most people think it means. It doesn’t mean a “black male” as Morgan assumed, she said, but rather any kind of man, including “Chinese” for example. Morgan helpfully pointed out that that’s the version rappers use in their music.

“But nigger,” Jeantel said, stressing the “-er.,” is a “racist word.” She said “I’d advise you not to be by black people” when you say that word, Jeantel explained, “because they’re not going to have it like that.” And this is not just in her community as Morgan posited but in the entire “generation.”

Okay.  So that explains it all.

There you have it.  Nigga vs Nigger.

With one salient observation:

  • ewgrif76 A fan of the 1st Amendment a day ago

    You’re an idiot, and any white man who grew up in the “ghetto” gets it and understands why black people use “N***A” amongst themselves…Zimmerman deserved the not guilty verdict, but you also deserve a swift kick to your ignorant mouth.

And you wonder why people don’t respect blacks?  Out of the mouth of babes and the ignorant.

BZ

obamacare-cartoon-2-a