As opposed to all of the forces aligned against the very concept of Brexit itself by most every monied and arrogantly-assumptive elitist in Europe, a very critical step to the UK removing itself from the European Union begins.
Brexit trigger approved as UK parliament approves Article 50
Parliament has given its approval for Prime Minister Theresa May to start Britain’s withdrawal from the European Union, even as Scotland signalled its opposition by announcing plans for a fresh independence vote.
The House of Lords rejected a last-ditch attempt to amend a bill empowering Mrs May to begin Brexit, paving the way for it to become law as early as Tuesday.
Let me be blunt: this exists as a dagger to the heart of the Caucasoid GOWPs extant throughout the European Union whose life revolves only but about the One World Barbecue.
Just as Chuck Schumer is currently weakening America in order to provide more power to the Demorats by refusing to approve the final cabinet positions and appointments of President Trump, the Caucasoid GOWPs of the EU have done their level best to weaken Europe by trying to obstruct Brexit with all their might. Both are maliciously destructive, purposefully so.
The prime minister could then trigger Article 50 of the EU’s Lisbon Treaty at any time, starting two years of talks that will end with Britain becoming the first country to leave the bloc.
Mrs May’s spokesman sought to play down speculation that she would send her notification letter to the European Council on Tuesday, when the bill is expected to receive royal assent from the Queen.
But if independence is the issue, so it is “locally.”
But the prospect of an imminent start to Brexit was enough to push the nationalist devolved government in Scotland into calling for a new independence referendum.
For those ignorant of geography or history, let’s not forget that England is on an island, and so is Ireland. Scotland exists on the northern portion of the island. I apologize if I insult the older readers amongst us, but newer readers have no idea what is the United Kingdom.
“We want to be an independent, normal nation and that is what we have done and that is what must happen.” pic.twitter.com/vm7K9ZE1vw#BBC#SKY
For his service to country and courage in the face of overwhelming odds, Nigel Farage should be knighted.
Steve Hilton, former Senior Advisor to David Cameron, proposed a series of questions to be considered for roughly every bill or movement in any government:
Should the federal government be involved in this at all?
Is it a function of government and is it really necessary?
Should we be doing this at the federal level?
Power and accountability should be placed in the hands of persons in local communities in terms of decision-making, not larger government
Additionally, I would — as the Bloviating Zeppelin for the US — add these critical questions and qualifiers:
Is it Constitutional?
Is it fiscally prudent?
How will it be funded?
Does it add to the deficit?
Does it reduce or enhance freedoms?
Does it enhance or diminish US sovereignty and power?
I can guarantee you this: the instigation for Brexit revolves around the perceived and actual loss of control forced upon the EU client states by Brussels and, to an equal or greater degree, by Angela Merkel’s insistence that the EU be overwhelmed by Muslims who have no intention of assimilation whatsoever.
Borders
Language
Culture
You couldn’t see this coming, could you, elitists?
No. Because they couldn’t understand that, after a period of time, the proles, the serfs, the groundlings, the commoners — they sometimes come to their senses.
People think the Swedish meatball started rolling with Trump.
Wrong. The Swedish meatballs started rolling with the Muslim refugees. First, President Trump’s remarks from his recent Melbourne, Florida rally on February 20th.
“I was, like many others I believe, surprised by the comments made about Sweden this weekend,” Lofven said during a joint press conference in Stockholm with visiting Canadian Governor General David Johnston.
Trump, speaking in Florida on Saturday, said; “You look at what’s happening in Germany, you look at what’s happening last night in Sweden. Sweden, who would believe this? Sweden. They took in large numbers. They’re having problems like they never thought possible”.
Trump was referring to this documentary by Ami Horowitz about Sweden and its Muslim refugees.
The problem, of course, is that so-called “no-go zones” in Sweden are real, as opposed to assertions by the Swedish government, embarrassed as it is by its soft white underbelly revealed. They are not the “humanitarian superpower” they think they are. The Swedish government cannot admit any fault. Their moral superiority regarding multiculturalism cannot, must not, be damaged. They deny and will continue to deny because their GOWP hearts won’t allow otherwise.
The secondary problem is that Sweden then lit up with riots. But you can’t say that. And you can’t say that President Trump was correct. Or can you? Please listen to the woman in this video, as she provides a cogent explanation for all. Frankly, there is nothing better than video examples of these issues. They need to be seen and they need to be heard.
Yes, there was a “worldwide uproar” about Trump’s comments. But the comments were in fact proven true and, worse for Sweden, upheld by Swedish police officers.
A SWEDISH police officer has launched a seething attack on the country’s politically correct approach to immigration as he claimed migrants were to blame for the most serious crimes.
In a Facebook rant, Peter Springare said his post was not politically correct, but he did not care as he was soon retiring after 47 years of service.
Sweden has been hard hit to cope with unprecedented levels of crimes and incidents, as the National Criminal Investigation Service admitted last year that more than 50 areas were labelled as ‘no-go zones’ where police did not have control.
Taking to Facebook to share his frustration, Mr Springare, who works as an investigator for the Örebro police, said the lion’s share of the crimes were committed by migrants.
Even back in January of 2016, Swedish police officers stopped reporting about the ethnicity of criminal suspects for fear of being branded as racists.
Swedish police have been ordered not to release descriptions of crime suspects which include race or nationality to avoid being branded racist. A memo handed out to all officers instructs them to withhold the information from the public when reporting all routine crimes, including burglary.
From now on, crimes must be reported on the police website without mentioning basic descriptive information such as “height, skin colour, nationality and race, etc.” the memo, seen by Svenska Dagbladet (SvD), reads. According to the paper, the new regulation could be applied to everything “from minor traffic accidents to serious crimes like muggings, beatings and murder.”
The memo makes it clear that the instruction has been handed down to avoid accusations of racism, telling officers: “The police are sometimes criticised for reporting on peoples’ skin colour. We are perceived as racist. As the police are not racist, nor should be perceived as such, from now on, please apply these instructions.”
This, of course, is in-depth information you won’t find on other websites, other government reports, other cable channels. Because they don’t have the time or the inclination for it. What I do, with each post, is take an idea or a theme and then write about it logically, cogently and chronologically — as I do here.
The bottom line? Sweden’s government is trying to cover up Muslim refugee/immigrant violence because it doesn’t reflect well on Sweden’s GOWP philosophy of “all people are equal and all cultures are equal.” Guess what? They’re not.
According to Sweden, to reveal the truth about Muslim refugees/immigrants is tantamount to a Thought Crime or a Hate Crime.
Between 2012 and 2016 the murder rate climbed almost 70% in Sweden. These are official Swedish statistics. Rape between 2007 and 2015 is up almost 70% as well. In Sweden you can be imprisoned for providing an unpopular opinion. There is no such thing as the First Amendment in Sweden.
Trump Is Right: Sweden’s Embrace of Refugees Isn’t Working
by Jimmie Akesson & Mattias Karlsson
When President Trump last week raised Sweden’s problematic experience with open-door immigration, skeptics were quick to dismiss his claims. Two days later an immigrant suburb of Stockholm was racked by another riot. No one was seriously injured, though the crowd burned cars and hurled stones at police officers.
How Sweden became an example of how not to handle immigration
by Tove Lifvendahl
We’ve taken in far too many people and we’re letting them down badly – especially the children
For a British boy to be killed by a grenade attack anywhere is appalling, but for it to happen in a suburb of Gothenburg should shatter a few illusions about Sweden. Last week’s murder of eight-year-old Yuusuf Warsame fits a pattern that Swedes have come slowly to recognise over the years. He was from Birmingham, visiting relatives, and was caught up in what Swedish police believe is a gang war within the Somali community. Last year, a four-year-old girl was killed by a car bomb outside Gothenburg, another apparent victim of gang violence.
The acknowledgment of which is refused by the Swedish government. Because the truth, eventually, will out.
For years, Sweden has regarded itself as a ‘humanitarian superpower’ — making its mark on the world not by fighting wars but by offering shelter to war’s victims. Refugees have arrived here in extraordinary numbers. Over the past 15 years, some 650,000 asylum-seekers made their way to Sweden. Of the 163,000 who arrived last year, 32,000 were granted asylum. Sweden accepts more refugees in proportion to size of population than any other nation in the developed world — when it comes to offering shelter, no one does it better. But when it comes to integrating those we take in (or finding the extra housing, schools and healthcare needed for them), we don’t do so well.
Did I not specifically quantify Sweden’s idealistic vision of itself, above, as a “humanitarian superpower”? The focus then becomes more strident.
It may be news to the rest of the world, but gang warfare has been a feature of our country for years now. Stockholm has been witness to Dickensian scenes of young pickpockets and thieves playing games of cat-and-mouse with the police, who feel powerless. Until fairly recently, Sweden was admired for its progressive social policies. Today, one in seven voters supports the Sweden Democrats, a populist party until recently reviled in polite Swedish society.
The cost of accommodating our child refugees is enormous: £160 per child per day. That could be money well spent, if it worked. There are serious concerns, though, about children falling victim to predatory adults who have lied about their age. Earlier this year, a boy of 12 was raped in refugee accommodation by another refugee who claimed to be 15. A dental X-ray suggested the attacker was closer to 19. Later that month, a 22-year-old Swede (herself the daughter of immigrants) was stabbed to death by one of the refugees she was caring for — another adult claiming to be 15.
The problem with Sweden is this: the huge dichotomous conflict. The Scandinavian country received more refugees per capita than anywhere else in Europe last year. The total population of Sweden, for example, is 9.5 million. This is not far from the population of, say, New York City at 8.4 million.
1. Germany and France have the largest Muslim populations among European Union member countries. As of 2010, there were 4.8 million Muslims in Germany (5.8% of the country’s population) and 4.7 million Muslims in France (7.5%). In Europe overall, however, Russia’s population of 14 million Muslims (10%) is the largest on the continent.
2. The Muslim share of Europe’s total population has been increasing steadily. In recent decades, the Muslim share of the population throughout Europe grew about 1 percentage point a decade, from 4% in 1990 to 6% in 2010. This pattern is expected to continue through 2030, when Muslims are projected to make up 8% of Europe’s population.
3. Muslims are younger than other Europeans. In 2010, the median age of Muslims throughout Europe was 32, eight years younger than the median for all Europeans (40). By contrast, the median age of religiously unaffiliated people in Europe, including atheists, agnostics and those with no religion in particular, was 37. The median age of European Christians was 42.
How Muslim Migration Made Malmo, Sweden A Crime Capital
by Michael Qazvini
Scores of Swedes took to the streets of Malmo, a southern city in Sweden, on Monday to protest an epidemic of violence that has taken the lives of far too many young people. The last victim was 16-year-old Ahmed Obaid. He was killed last Thursday after an unidentified gunman unleashed a salvo of bullets.
“Our kids should sleep well, play at play parks, feel safe,” Housam Abbas, the victim’s cousin, said, according to the Local.
Malmo, this once quiet city, is now overrun with violence. The culture of fear is so palpable that parents are no longer comfortable sending their children out to play.
“You have to look over your shoulder when you go out at night now. I don’t let my little brother go out at night any more,” said one high school student at Monday’s protest in front of city hall. “I hope that the politicians actually view this as a serious problem and start to solve this in Malmö.”
Stand by for the truth.
After being handed a list of measures to curb the violence in the city, Justice and Migration Minister Morgan Johansson stated in a matter-of-fact tone: “We have to get rid of the weapons, we need tighter punishment so that those who are held for serious gun crime can be arrested immediately and not just be released a few days later.”
What Johansson failed to mention, however, was the fact that the bulk of the violence stems from one community.
The Muslim immigrant community has a crime problem. It’s a truism that Swedish (and European) politicians have denied in bold-faced lies and assurances to the public.
But wait. Wait.
Didn’t President Trump say that Sweden had a problem? And didn’t Sweden and other Fake News organs say it wasn’t true?
London police ignore Muslim officers’ ‘extremist views’ for fear of being labeled ‘Islamophobic’
A former female Muslim police officer has accused London’s Metropolitan police of being more worried about “political correctness” than tackling the extremist views of some Muslim officers because they fear being branded “Islamophobic.”
Speaking to the Sunday Times, Javaria Saeed, who worked for the Metropolitan police’s counterterrorism department, took exception to comments made by a Muslim constable who said that female genital mutilation was a “clean an honorable practice” that “shouldn’t be criminalized.”
Does this, dear readers, not sound familiar with regard to the US Army and Major Nidal Hasan? You know, the Muslim who shot and killed 13 persons and injured 32 on November 5th of 2009 at Ft Hood, Texas? This is the same incident that required the passing of six years before Barack Hussein Obama admitted it was an act of terrorism instead of the initial label of “workplace violence” despite the fact that, as Major Hasan shot people, he was simultaneously yelling “allahu akbar.” That, for the uninitiated, is commonly called a clue.
The background, however, was such that people knew of his anti-American sentiments, his internet postings, that he had attempted to contact al Qaeda, his emails to Anwar al-Awlaki, the fact that his business cards had “SoA(SWT)” printed on them — Soldier/Servant of Allah, and “subhanahu wa ta’ala” or “Glory to God.”
Intriguing insofar as Army chaplains themselves (Hasan was not a chaplain) could not mention God and certainly not on their business cards.
But, because Major Hasan was a Muslim his co-workers and the US Army itself held him at arms length for fear of “Islamophobic” branding. Just as with the neighbors of the Muslim San Bernardino murderers.
The 35-year-old resigned from the capital’s police force in March after she became disillusioned by “political correctness,” which resulted in a culture of “us and them” to emerge among some Muslim officers who believed themselves to be above the law.
“My experiences were that it was Muslim officers being racist towards my individual views; also in private, holding racist views against white officers, and sexist views against females,” she said, speaking to the Sunday Times. “If such views were held and expressed by white officers, they would be fired.”
Saeed was a constable in the SO15 counterterrorism division, which was set up to improve relations with the Muslim community. She also alleged that the same officer said that Muslims who had been victims of domestic violence should not go to the police, but, instead, seek resolution through sharia courts.
Islam is a cancer that requires early identification, monitoring and potential eradication. It has proven itself to be totally incongruent and incompatible with Western cultures and values.
Yet because of labeling, “profiling” or branding issues Western nations, governments and agencies quake in fear — though Muslim countries themselves could not care less what Western individuals or nations think.
Once again, the weakness of Western culture exposes its soft underbelly.
Islam laughs at our hamstrung, delicate sensibilities.
“Elections have consequences, and at the end of the day, I won.” – President Obama to House Republican Whip Eric Cantor, January 23, 2009
Yes, Mr Obama, they certainly do. You reminded America of that numerous times.
And with that, here is a partial list I have of Leftists who are not only leaving the United States but the planet as well. Can we urge them to take action on this a bit faster?
Cher: she’s going to Jupiter;
Al Sharpton: he just wants to leave;
Whoopi Goldberg: “Maybe it’s time for me to move, you know. I can afford to go.”
Bryan Cranston: “I would definitely move.”
Spike Lee: he’s gone;
Samuel L. Jackson: “If that motherfucker becomes president, I’m moving my black ass to South Africa.”
Amy Schumer: “My act will change because I will need to learn to speak Spanish. Because I will move to Spain or somewhere. It’s beyond my comprehension if Trump won.”
Barbra Streisand: she wants to go to Australia or Canada if Trump wins. Hold that thought.
Pack your bags and go, Leftists. Time’s a-wasting. Chop-chop! Stat!
Want to know what is glorious beyond comprehension? The Canadian immigration website crashed late last night. Why? From SkyNews.com:
Canada immigration website crashes as Trump clinches victory
Canada’s immigration website has crashed as Americans watched Donald Trump take the lead and then win the US election.
Searches for “move to Canada” and “immigrate to Canada” spiked on Tuesday night as election returns started favouring the Republican nominee.
The website for Citizenship and Immigration Canada was down at the same time, and has suffered several outages since.
New Zealand has also reported an increased traffic to its website for residency visas from US nationals on the eve of the vote.
Perfect. And don’t forget to take the people listed above with you, all you smarmy little elitists, because here’s what happened. The unwashed, the commoners, the proles, groundling, serfs, got tired of being looked down upon by the political “superiors” who know better than they do how to spend their money, run their lives and what to say and think.
Elections do have consequences and I shall be documenting them further in posts to come.
Obama marks Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha with call to accept refugees
by Dave Boyer
President Obama marked the Muslim holiday of Eid al-Adha Monday with a call for the U.S. to welcome refugees and immigrants.
“We are reminded of the millions of refugees around the globe who are spending this sacred holiday separated from their families, unsure of their future, but still hoping for a brighter tomorrow,” Mr. Obama said in a statement. “And as a nation, we remain committed to welcoming the stranger with empathy and an open heart — from the refugee who flees war-torn lands to the immigrant who leaves home in search of a better life.”
Yes, precisely, Mr Obama. Let us turn the United States into a carbon copy of the current European Union with its invasion of unassimilating Syrians and Muslims — most of young male fighting age. Think: ISIS. There are already 5,000 ISIS Jihadists in the EU, according to the UKDailyMail.com:
5,000 ISIS jihadists at large in the EU: Europol boss warns huge numbers of terrorists have slipped back into European capitals after being trained in Iraq and Syria
by Imogen Calderwood
Europol boss Rob Wainwright warned about the number of free jihadists
Estimated between 3,000 and 5,000 fighters have slipped back into Europe
Claimed they sneaked back after being trained by ISIS in the Middle East
Warned ‘Europe is currently facing the highest terror threat in 10 years’
The British head of Europol has warned that as many as 5,000 ISIS-trained jihadists are wandering free in Europe.
Rob Wainwright, chief of the EU’s police agency Europol, said the agency believed between 3,000 and 5,000 jihadists have been able to slip back into Europe after training with ISIS in the Middle East.
‘Europe is currently facing the highest terror threat in more than 10 years,’ Mr Wainwright told Germany’s Neue Osnabrucker Zeitung newspaper.
Why would that be? Two words, one name: Angela Merkel, the GOWP von Deutschland.
I’m just curious: why so few Christians? From CNSNews.com:
15% Over Target: 11,491 Syrian Refugees Admitted Already; 0.46% Are Christians
by Patrick Goodenough
(CNSNews.com) – With three weeks of the fiscal year to go, the Obama administration has exceeded its Syrian refugee admission target by 15 percent, with 11,491 resettled in the United States as of the beginning of this week.
Since President Obama’s goal of 10,000 Syrian refugee admissions in FY 2016 was achieved on August 29, the number continues to pick up steadily.
August ended with a new monthly record of 3,189 Syrian refugee arrivals, and a further 751 have been ushered in so far in September: 749 Sunni Muslims; two Catholic Christians.
Wait, wait wait wait wait. I think we’ve just about exceeded our quota of Christians. Time to shut that door, yes? Unfortunately, the numbers get worse.
Just 54 of the 11,491 – 0.46 percent – are Christians. They comprise 14 Catholics, six Orthodox, four Protestants, one Greek Orthodox, plus 29 refugees identifying themselves simply as “Christian” rather than by denomination or sect.
Someone is going to lose their job after having let in 54 Christians. This cannot stand.
“But wait, BZ,” you say. “There aren’t Christians coming into this country because there aren’t Christians in Syria.” That’s odd; 10% of Syria is Christian. The US is all about fairness and equality. Our police forces need to be reflective of our communities. Don’t our Syrian “refugees” need to be reflective of their population?
Not when your dealing with Leftist GOWPs and Muslims.
As opposed to all of the forces aligned against the very concept of Brexit itself by most every monied and arrogantly-assumptive elitist in Europe, a very critical step to the UK removing itself from the European Union begins.
For those ignorant of geography or history, let’s not forget that England is on an island, and so is Ireland. Scotland exists on the northern portion of the island. I apologize if I insult the older readers amongst us, but newer readers have no idea what is the United Kingdom.
What we suspected all along is revealed: the UK is GOWP-driven, and that failing philosophy now trumps the safety of London residents.
Give us your tired, your poor. Your Sharia-lovers, your Wahabbists, your young male ISIS fighters.