“Most of the guns used to commit violence here in Mexico come from the United States,” President Obama said during a speech at Mexico’s Anthropology Museum.
Unspoken was the fact that those so-called “deadly guns in Mexico” also sourced from the US government itself, via the “Fast & Furious” program under BATFE. Univision in Mexico also discovered additional information about how the US government more fully armed the Mexican drug cartels. Thank you, Mr Obaka, for your lies spewed directly upon the sovereign soil of Mexico on Friday. A refresher for us all:
As with all else on the planet, whatever ill that occurs is the responsibility and fault of the United States of America.
Yes, the US is the root cause of all gang violence in Mexico. Yes, the US is the root cause of all the gun violence in Mexico. Yes, the US is the root cause of all the poverty in Mexico. Yes, the US is the root cause of anyone in Mexico having a firearm in their possession. If Mexico wanted to stop foreign gun violence, perhaps they should build their own firearms manufacturing facilities. Then the drug cartels could take over these factories for their own ends and simply cut out the middle man.Let’s take a step back. Ultimately, what is Mr Obama doing here? I say it is this:
He is speaking directly to the new voters of the United States. He is speaking directly to the new Tit-Sucking Underclass about to be created when amnesty occurs, and when Illegal Mexicans are allowed to be seated on juries and decide criminal and civil cases involving their drug-dealing and law-violating friends.
Because, you must ask, just how will these new Mexicans vote when amnesty passes and they remain in the United States, and when Obama and the Demorats continue to provide Free Cheese? Why yes, that would be correct: Demorat.
Mr Obama was doing nothing more, on Friday in Mexico, than speaking to his newest conglomerate of voters.
More apologism, more breast-beating, more America bashing in order to pander and subjugate the country for the demographically-increasing Mexican Illegal Invader vote.
According to a pair of recent polls, for the first time since the 9/11 terrorist hijackings, Americans are more fearful their government will abuse constitutional liberties than fail to keep its citizens safe.
A Fox News survey polling a random national sample of 619 registered voters the day after the bombing found despite the tragic event, those interviewed responded very differently than following 9/11.
For the first time since a similar question was asked in May 2001, more Americans answered “no” to the question, “Would you be willing to give up some of your personal freedom in order to reduce the threat of terrorism?”
A similar poll sampling 588 adults, conducted on April 17 and 18 for the Washington Post, also discovered the change in attitude.
“Which worries you more,” the Post asked, “that the government will not go far enough to investigate terrorism because of concerns about constitutional rights, or that it will go too far in compromising constitutional rights in order to investigate terrorism?”
The poll found 48 percent of respondents worry the government will go too far, compared to 41 percent who worry it won’t go far enough.
Perhaps there’s just a glimmer of hope left for the nation? I wish I could say I were convinced of the trend.
But, as with the Leftist doctrine of the American Media Maggots, this information and the existence of these polls remains predominantly uncovered.
Because all of my readers — but unfortunately the minority of Americans — recognize that the country is already ruled by Obama’s Executive Orders Fiat.
Vice President Biden told White House allies in the gun control fight Thursday that President Obama will be announcing new executive actions on gun violence in the days after the Senate voted down a gun violence bill.
On a conference call with “stakeholders,” Biden told gun control advocates that the fight is not over and that eventual action on gun control will come. Press were not invited to the conference call; a participant provided BuzzFeed with access.
“Look I know you’re going to say that I’m just being an optimist and I’m trying to put a good face on this. But you know I’ve been around here a long time and we’ve already done, because of you, some really good things,” Biden said. “Number one, the president is already lining up some additional executive actions he’s going to be taking later this week.”
After the Newtown shootings, Obama took a number of executive actions to expand research into gun violence and other areas favored by the gun control community. He took the actions without Congressional approval, leading to outrage by some conservatives.
At one time, we used to have an actual American Press that would be absolutely SHOCKED that ANY president would rule by EO only.
Now, conspicuously absent, the American Media Maggots continue on their glorious journey of fellating Mr Obama daily and purposely killing or minimizing stories that would place their own guilt in jeopardy.
Because now, ruling by fiat is perfectly A-okay with our press in the United States.
I cannot begin to express my disgust.
But, as my readers, you knew this was only a short matter of time.
The Senate delivered a devastating blow to President Obama’s agenda to regulate guns Wednesday by defeating a bipartisan proposal to expand background checks.
It failed by a vote of 54 to 46, with five Democrats voting against it. Only four Republicans supported it.
Democratic Sens. Mark Pryor (Ark.), Max Baucus (Mont.), Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.), Mark Begich (Alaska) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) voted against it. Reid supported the measure but voted against it to preserve his ability to bring the measure up again.
GOP Sens. John McCain (Ariz.), Susan Collins (Maine), Pat Toomey (Pa.) and Mark Kirk (Ill.) voted “yes.”
Imagine. The bill was so bad that five Demorat senators actually voted against it. But fear not, because John McCain (D) voted for the bill.
What appeared to be a likely victory for the president was resoundingly defeated by the Senate as jittery Democrats facing tough reelections next year joined nearly the entire Republican conference.
Defeated and angry — and surrounded by Newtown families, former Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and Vice President Joe Biden — Obama vowed to continue the gun control fight as he castigated senators who sank the bipartisan background checks proposal. He walked to the podium with his arm around Giffords, critically wounded in the 2011 mass shooting outside a Tucson supermarket, and hugged relatives of victims of the December Newtown shooting who attended the event.
See the video above. It was, in a word, demagoguery.
And for roughly the fifth time, let me be perfectly clear with regard to my stance on gun control laws: I will not now, not ever, sacrifice my Second Amendment rights for children. Not for one child; not for a hundred. I won’t sacrifice them for me, I won’t sacrifice them for you.
Let’s be frank. Gun violence deaths predominantly occur in melanin-enhanced communities whose male youths have no regard for themselves or others, or human life in general. These shootings occur in communities where the populations are shoved into econo-box living circumstances, in urban environments. These areas are overarchingly Demorat/Leftist controlled politically. There isn’t a Republican or a Conservative within miles.
The bulk of America, via Gallup, isn’t worried about gun violence (4%). It’s mostly worried about the economy and about jobs. It is DC that is making the current Talking Points about guns, because they are taking advantage of the Useful Idiots who would so readily toss away their freedoms for a modicum — and a very poor one at that — of security.
The Obaka Administration operates only via crisis. It’s this crisis or it’s that crisis. There is no planning, only Management By Crisis. And those events portrayed as crises are mostly not. The “gun issue” is not a crisis. It is a diversion and it is a naked attempt to reduce the freedoms of citizens and an attempt to corral power and control in DC.
The bombing in Boston? That is not a crisis. More people were killed in the two neighboring counties, in one day, in vehicle accidents than at the Boston Marathon.
Yet, because of the Pussification of America, weak-kneed Americans are more than willing to swallow the pill of defeat and demand more cameras, more checks, more abrogations of our Civil Rights, in order to feel “secure.” FEEL. The operative word. Emotions, once again. But, in truth, what HAS the TSA and Homeland Security done to make us more secure? Oh yes, except to spend more billions of dollars and to reduce individual freedoms.
Your freedoms are at stake here, ladies and gentlemen.
Today, we “won” one.
But please note who voted to give away your rights.
A contingent of liberal Democrats in Congress is proposing a new federal gun control idea: mandatory liability insurance for gun owners.
When New York Rep. Carolyn Maloney introduced the legislation last month with eight other Democrats, she boasted that it is “the first bill to require liability insurance of gun buyers nationwide.”
It also calls for the federal government to impose a fine as much as $10,000 if a gun owner doesn’t have insurance on a firearm purchased after the bill goes into effect.
It doesn’t take much more than a fourth grader — yes, even a public school-educated fourth grader — to realize that this is a brain-glazingly idiotic idea.
It’s as idiotic as the rest of the gun-grabbing laws that affect only law abiding citizens. Actual citizens, actual taxpayers, will be the sole individuals hurt by this and similar laws. For one very obvious reason:
The vast, vast bulk of gun crime is committed by purposeful criminals, who have records, who have likely been in jail or prison any number of times, who have violated parole any number of times as well.
Because they are criminals. It’s what they do. It’s in their genes, it’s outlined in their job description. I know. I’ve dealt with criminals for 42 years. I know them, I sense them, I can smell them, see them, recognize them from afar.
Here’s what’s coming: your homeowners’ insurance will require a separate policy for every firearm owned. Extra money. And an accounting. To the insurance agency and then from them to the government because the government will want the information and the statistics. Then your ammunition will be limited and riders will be required as well, mandating the same things again: more cash, more regulations, more reports to your agent and thusly to the federal government.
This law and laws like it don’t hurt criminals and it won’t curb so-called “gun crime.” The mentally deranged are already out there, and many of them are already criminals because the “system” knows not how to deal with the insane and the mentally misadjusted. Those persons — at least in Fornicalia — get dumped into the criminal justice system and then spend time incarcerated in jails and prisons. They have criminal and/or violent tendencies and they commit crimes.
Therefore, only the law-abiding are penalized. Criminals couldn’t care less, and the mentally deranged lack the capacity to want to care at all.
Power and control. It’s about power and control and ideology. Leftism. Socialism.
Because, once completely disarmed, the government can do, literally, anything it wants at any time for any reason with its “citizens” who, by that point, are nothing more than Serfs and Proles and Groundlings.
Check your history.
BZ
And here’s the BIG difference: more guns in the hands of LAWFUL American citizen taxpayers — not criminals. But the Obaka Administration adamantly refuses to make that distinction, placing American gun owners into the SAME category as common criminals.
