This is four minutes and twenty seconds of buttery non-Leftist goodness, spoken by a local black female attorney on a Chicago TV station to the Guilty Overeducated White People (GOWP) Leftist tools — er, “hosts.”
The hosts sat transfixed and incredulous as their brainulus camshafts were simultaneously throwing lobes and smoking. Clearly, not what they were apparently expecting — a logical and well-thought-out rejoinder.
Leaked memo shows Clinton was provided questions ahead of interview
by Joe Concha
Hillary Clinton was provided the exact questions she would be asked by daytime talk show host Steve Harvey, according to a report.
The Washington Free Beacon reports that according to a leaked memo it obtained, the program sent the Clinton campaign all questions one week before the interview between Clinton and Harvey on Feb. 17.
“Steve is known to be a host who goes out of his way to make his guests feel comfortable,” two of Clinton’s aides wrote Clinton one week before the taping. “We coordinated closely with the show’s producers on the script and format of the show.”
You’ll like this, though:
Questions included were about Clinton’s granddaughter, the former secretary of State’s pizza preferences — thin crust versus deep dish — and her support for gun control policies.
“Please note that the tone of the show is generally light so even on policy questions, Steve won’t go too deep into details,” the memo read.
Translated: “Steve is going to throw fluffy snowballs to you and also provide a huge, overly-padded catcher’s mitt.” Even then, Hillary Clinton demanded everything be scripted.
Has there yet been a more plastic, inflexible, unextemporaneous, unlikable, wooden and haughty presidential candidate in recent memory? Oh wait, Kim Jong Il. But he’s dead. No wonder.
More evidence of Hillary’s campaign workers SYSTEMATICALLY breaking voter registration laws. Promoting a candidate is illegal#NeverHillarypic.twitter.com/8zc9cpAvzw
That’s odd. Ever seen individuals registering people to vote who have been outwardly soliciting Trump as a candidate, wearing Trump promotional material? Me neither. Because had they, YouTube would be rife with it, as well as the American Media Maggot lapdoggies for Hillary.
You may not know it, but promoting a specific candidate whilst attempting to register people to vote is a violation of election laws. If she were not promoting Hillary Clinton, then why did she walk away? Consciousness of guilt, ladies and gentlemen.
But wait. Let’s not stop with the Hillary Clinton voter fraud. Let’s show more, shall we?
Hillary’s campaign workers committing voter registration fraud in Nevada AGAIN – it’s illegal to promote a specific candidate!#NeverHillarypic.twitter.com/JWPd6hImYT
One can say that the Warden Arena literally burns with passion for presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton. Thanks to James Woods for the second video.
Lester Holt was incorrect when he braced — sorry, “fact-checked” — Donald Trump on “stop and frisk,” insisting that the concept is unconstitutional. In fact, Lester Holt is wrong and Trump is correct. “Stop and frisk” is not unconstitutional, as correctly delineated by Rudy Giuliani. He is correct: “Terry v. Ohio.” A court case even all Baby Cops know.
Finally, arguments can be made on both sides that either candidate “won” the first debate. But what is incontrovertible is this: given the “target-rich environment” that Hillary Rodham Clinton’s history provides, in my opinion Donald Trump took little advantage of it.
On Sunday I theorized that the election was Hillary Clinton’s to lose.
After the Monday debate, I theorize this: it is Trump’s election to lose if he continues to not listen to his advisers.
BZ
P.S.
Anyone besides me think that Hillary Clinton appeared to be drugged in some fashion?
So there I was, on the smart phone, when I clicked on a Drudge poll.
It asked: WHO WON THE FIRST PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE?
I clicked the button for Trump and clicked Vote. The screen above was my result. My vote did not count because of “suspicious voting patterns.” Apparently clicking on Donald Trump is suspicious.
OR: the site locked up because so many persons were voting.
Something must be happening, because Trump is winning 79.89% to Clinton’s 20.11%.