Tag Archives: Illegal Mexicans

75% of illegal immigrants fail DMV tests, proving they can’t drive

Posted on by

Mexifornia LicensiaFrom CBSLasVegas:

DMV: Most Fail Test For Driver Authorization Card

LAS VEGAS (AP) — Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles officials have advice for immigrants seeking a driver authorization card: study.

They estimate 75 percent of applicants have failed the written test needed for the card under a new law that made the state the 11th nationally to offer driving privileges to people in the country illegally. The cards became available Thursday.

Applicants must correctly answer 80 percent of 50 questions to pass the test. They also are required to pass a driving exam to receive cards. The failure rate on the driving test was not immediately available.

And you can believe that driving test failure statistics will not be revealed because it would reflect negatively on the poor illegal immigrants themselves, tending to emphasize a terrible, terrible stereotype.

But just wait; I’m sure someone will have the grand idea that it would be unfair to not provide illegal immigrants with licenses, because they must drive to get to work at the entrance of Home Depot in order to provide milk and food for their babies, and not pay taxes.  But to get a tax refund.  Just you wait.

One note for those who may be LE officers in Fornicalia: you all readily recognize that the ethnicity — whether you wish to acknowledge it or not — with the highest per capita rate of drunk driving arrests in the state?  Hispanics.

Bring on the illegal Mexican drivers.  And stay out of the left lane.

BZ

 

 Share

Obama visits immigration activists

Posted on by

Beck's Wild Immigration QuoteFrom Politico.com:

by Lucy McCalmont

President Barack Obama and first lady Michelle Obama met informally with immigration activists on the National Mall on Friday.

They visited individuals taking part in Fast for Families to “offer their support for those who are fasting on behalf of immigration reform,” a White House official told the pool report. The Obamas spoke with the activists for about half an hour.

The immigration activists have been fasting since Nov. 12, abstaining from all food except water and “are calling for the Republican leadership in the House of Representatives to take up action on comprehensive immigration reform,” the official said.

Imagine that.  The Obama’s sympathizing with persons who not only flaunt the law but break the law.  Overtly.  Abetted by the Obamas.

Please note: the article, from Politico, featured a tab within the story labeled PHOTOS: 10 wild immigration quotes.  The above photo is from that link.

Glenn Beck saying “[Mexico] has been overtaken by lawbreakers from the bottom to the top. And now, what you’re protesting for is to have lawbreakers come here” is a “wild immigration quote.”

How sad.  The truth now becomes “wild” as per the American Media Maggots.

Here is what Mr Obama should do: if you believe that the borders should be open and there should be no such thing as an “illegal immigrant,” then change the law, sir.  But you won’t, because you are a coward and prefer not to operate in the light of day.

BZ

 

 Share

Does the US government consider you an “extremist” or a “potential terrorist”?

Posted on by

Obama ShameCourtesy of this website (thanks Jeff).

How interesting that, simultaneously, the US government is removing references to Muslim groups or interests.

The 72 types of Americans believed by our government to threaten it:

1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”

2. Those that advocate for states’ rights

3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”

4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”

5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”

6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”

7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”

8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”

9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”

10. “Anti-Gay”

11. “Anti-Immigrant”

12. “Anti-Muslim”

13. “The Patriot Movement”

14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”

15. Members of the Family Research Council

16. Members of the American Family Association

17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’”

18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol

19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform

20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition

21. Members of the Christian Action Network

22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”

23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”

24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21

25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps

26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”

27. The militia movement

28. The sovereign citizen movement

29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”

30. Anyone that “complains about bias”

31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”

32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”

33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs”

34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”

35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”

36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”

37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”

38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”

39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”

40. “Militia or unorganized militia”

41. “General right-wing extremist”

42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.

43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”

44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”

45. Those that are “anti-global”

46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”

47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”

48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”

49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”

50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”

51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”

52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”

53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”

54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”

55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”

56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”

57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”

58. “Rightwing extremists”

59. “Returning veterans”

60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”

61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”

62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”

63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”

64. “Anti-abortion activists”

65. Those that are against illegal immigration

66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner

67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations

68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”

69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr

70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)

71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies

72. Evangelical Christians

[Click on the link to see the source governmental document involved.]

How many applied to you?

BZ

P.S.
Just by dint of the categorization for this post, I make myself suspect.

 

 

 Share

Grayson’s comparison: the TEA Party to the KKK and cross burnings

Posted on by

TEA Party Grayson Cross BurningAlan Mark Grayson, the United States Representative for Florida’s 9th congressional district and a member of the Democratic Party, is quite a hateful man.

The 55-year-old Grayson, whose wife is named Lolita (apparently a tribute to Nabokov, if you can manage to paste that image into your wheelhouse), has made it clear that the TEA Party equates to the KKK and cross burnings.

From the OrlandoSentinel.com:

Grayson compares Tea Party to KKK

October 22, 2013

WASHINGTON — U.S. Rep. Alan Grayson is ruffling feathers again — this time with a fundraising appeal that compares the tea-party movement to the Ku Klux Klan.

In a campaign email sent Monday, the Orlando Democrat includes the transcript of an interview he did recently on MSNBC in which Grayson said that the politics of the government shutdown had turned many Americans away from the tea party.

Further:

“At this point, the tea party is no more popular than the Klan,” Grayson said.

The email then takes that comparison one step further by including a photograph of a burning cross with Klansmen in the background. The cross then becomes the “T” in the words “Tea Party” transposed over the picture. Below is the caption: “Now you know what the ‘T’ stands for.”

And the understanding and smoothing and licking and grooming of the Leftists goes on and on and on.

Because there is no greater an inclusive group than Leftists nationwide.

BZ

 

 

 Share

Activists Block Bus In Protest Near San Francisco Immigration Office

Posted on by

Immigrant Reform RightsFrom SFCBSLocal.com:

SAN FRANCISCO (CBS SF) — Dozens of protesters surrounded a bus believed to be filled with immigrants slated for deportation at the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services office in San Francisco, a protest organizer said Thursday.

The protesters included dozens of undocumented immigrants and immigrants’ rights advocates who rallied for the expansion of a national movement to pressure President Barack Obama to halt immigrant deportations, according to Jon Rodney, a spokesman for the California Immigrant Policy Center.

But here is the brazen paragraph:

“We are not going to wait for Congress anymore. We are not going to wait for Obama. This is a humanitarian crisis, two million people deported in 5 years,” protester Hairo Cortez told KPIX 5.

San Francisco, if you recall, is a so-called “sanctuary city.”  San Francisco’s attitude about the whole thing is exemplified here.  One interesting point from SFGate.com, however:

Sanctuary-city policy enables dangerous drivers

by Debra J. Saunders

Drew Rosenberg became a victim of San Francisco’s immigration policies on Nov. 16, 2010. The second-year law student was riding his motorcycle in rush-hour traffic when a car driven by an unlicensed driver made a left turn and hit him. That evening, Don Rosenberg of Westlake Village received the phone call every parent dreads. His precious son was dead.

Then another nightmare unfolded.

As Rosenberg investigated driver Roberto Galo‘s background, he discovered that San Francisco’s policies regarding immigrants have served as an enabler for dangerous drivers.

Road to death

Nov. 1, 2009 – San Francisco announces a policy allowing unlicensed drivers to avoid an automatic impound if a licensed driver will get their car.

June 14, 2010 – Police stop Roberto Galo, 52, for driving the wrong way on a one-way street and driving without a license. He pays a $220 fine.

Nov. 16, 2010 – Galo hits and kills Drew Rosenberg at Harrison and 16th streets.

Imagine that.  Consequences for short-sighted actions.

Further, the continuing and unrelenting demand by persons involved in criminal activity — such as entering the United States illegally — to be granted public entitlements such as free tuition, free healthcare and the numerous freedoms enjoyed by actual citizens grows and grows, unabated.  Illegal Mexicans are proving they are here for the Free Cheese and not to work honestly.

They are making demands that rights given to lawful Americans automatically apply to themselves.  And that no illegals should be deported.

I say: be truthful, United States of America.  Either remove the laws against illegal entry into the US, or enforce your laws.  At this point Mr Obama and his sycophants want it both ways.

Otherwise you are essentially requiring that people like me shall decide, independently, which laws we shall keep and which laws we shall violate, at will.

If we are not a nation of Constitutional laws, then we have no United States.

BZ

 

 

 Share