Does the US government consider you an “extremist” or a “potential terrorist”?

Obama ShameCourtesy of this website (thanks Jeff).

How interesting that, simultaneously, the US government is removing references to Muslim groups or interests.

The 72 types of Americans believed by our government to threaten it:

1. Those that talk about “individual liberties”

2. Those that advocate for states’ rights

3. Those that want “to make the world a better place”

4. “The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule”

5. Those that are interested in “defeating the Communists”

6. Those that believe “that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations”

7. Anyone that holds a “political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable”

8. Anyone that possesses an “intolerance toward other religions”

9. Those that “take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals”

10. “Anti-Gay”

11. “Anti-Immigrant”

12. “Anti-Muslim”

13. “The Patriot Movement”

14. “Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians”

15. Members of the Family Research Council

16. Members of the American Family Association

17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States “are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’”

18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol

19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform

20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition

21. Members of the Christian Action Network

22. Anyone that is “opposed to the New World Order”

23. Anyone that is engaged in “conspiracy theorizing”

24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21

25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps

26. Anyone that “fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations”

27. The militia movement

28. The sovereign citizen movement

29. Those that “don’t think they should have to pay taxes”

30. Anyone that “complains about bias”

31. Anyone that “believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia”

32. Anyone that “is frustrated with mainstream ideologies”

33. Anyone that “visits extremist websites/blogs”

34. Anyone that “establishes website/blog to display extremist views”

35. Anyone that “attends rallies for extremist causes”

36. Anyone that “exhibits extreme religious intolerance”

37. Anyone that “is personally connected with a grievance”

38. Anyone that “suddenly acquires weapons”

39. Anyone that “organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology”

40. “Militia or unorganized militia”

41. “General right-wing extremist”

42. Citizens that have “bumper stickers” that are patriotic or anti-U.N.

43. Those that refer to an “Army of God”

44. Those that are “fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”

45. Those that are “anti-global”

46. Those that are “suspicious of centralized federal authority”

47. Those that are “reverent of individual liberty”

48. Those that “believe in conspiracy theories”

49. Those that have “a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack”

50. Those that possess “a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”

51. Those that would “impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”

52. Those that would “insert religion into the political sphere”

53. Anyone that would “seek to politicize religion”

54. Those that have “supported political movements for autonomy”

55. Anyone that is “anti-abortion”

56. Anyone that is “anti-Catholic”

57. Anyone that is “anti-nuclear”

58. “Rightwing extremists”

59. “Returning veterans”

60. Those concerned about “illegal immigration”

61. Those that “believe in the right to bear arms”

62. Anyone that is engaged in “ammunition stockpiling”

63. Anyone that exhibits “fear of Communist regimes”

64. “Anti-abortion activists”

65. Those that are against illegal immigration

66. Those that talk about “the New World Order” in a “derogatory” manner

67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations

68. Those that are opposed “to the collection of federal income taxes”

69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr

70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag (“Don’t Tread On Me”)

71. Those that believe in “end times” prophecies

72. Evangelical Christians

[Click on the link to see the source governmental document involved.]

How many applied to you?

BZ

P.S.
Just by dint of the categorization for this post, I make myself suspect.

 

 

Ouch! Tenn. state senator presents Kathleen Sebelius with book that might come in handy

From Twitchy.com:

Tennessee State Senator Brian Kelsey presented Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius with a gift today during her visit to his state:

Kathleen Sebelius Twieet from KelseyFollowing that, the photograph is simply too priceless for words.  Please, oh please, lock onto the gesicht of Sebelius.  Enlarge for even greater grandeur.

Kathleen Sebelius Websites For DummiesSometimes Life is simply this enjoyable.

BZ

 

Kathleen Sebelius in her arrogance to America: “whatever.”

Kathleen Sebelius CUKathleen Sebelius is one quite arrogant bitch.

And that’s the best I can say of her.

From the BusinessInsider.com:

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS TO CONGRESS: ‘Whatever’

by Brett LoGiurato

It was two and a half hours into her testimony before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Wednesday when Secretary of Health and Human Services became so exasperated enough to answer repeated questions with a simple, “Whatever.”

“Exasperated.”

Let me, as pols say, “unpack that.”

Translated = tired of having to defend her steps and activities, and actually answer for decisions and actions to which she is tasked and responsible.

A mere two and a half hours into testimony.

Anyone who is a cop has been on the stand in open court for at least one to two hours, minimum.  On roughly each and every case.  You will have perhaps hundreds of cases in your career upon which you must testify.  And for which you are directly and personally answerable and responsible.

As a Homcide Bureau detective for my department, I have been on the stand not just for two days, not just four days, not just five days, but two weeks straight.

So, that Kathleen Sebelius had to actually answer a few questions for two hours and, at that point, decided to cork off into Dismissively Smarmy Mode, I say: boo fucking hoo.  My heart bleeds for you, as HHS Secretary, to the tune of a minimum of $180,000 per year.

Any of you make $180K a year?  Bueller?

“Did I hear it wrong?”

“Why aren’t you losing your health insurance?” Rep. Cory Gardner asks.  “Why are you not in the exchange?”

“I am not eligible for the exchange,” HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius replies.

FoxNews wrote:

Sebelius responded that given that she has affordable, available health insurance through her employee, she is not eligible to participate in the exchange, and it would in fact be illegal.

To applause from the chamber, Gardner said, “With all due respect Madame Secretary, I would encourage you to be just like the American people and enter the exchange.”

That was a LIE.  She is eligible.

She LIES.

And Mr Obama LIES and Jay Carney LIES and the bulk of persons in the Obama Administration LIE.

After all: “whatever.”

She has hers.  And the rest of you are Serfs, Proles and Groundlings, less than the mucus from her nostrils, the pus from her cysts.

BZ

 

Obama brain-glazingly tone-deaf, disconnected, ignorant and uninvolved regarding canceled insurance policies: “just shop around”

Right.  Just “shop around” for your healthcare.  “Dismissive, table for 300 million, please.”

You’ll be just fine after your insurance cancellation which, after all, isn’t really a cancellation but a “suggestion” or, better yet — think of it as nothing more than a transition.  A metamorphosis.  As in between the discordant pupae you are now, towards the gorgeous Obamafly you’ll be later.

Gorgeous, all beautiful, let’s just drink some green tea, go barefoot, wear billowing clothing in a hot yoga room, hold each other’s hand, sway, and voice some Gregorian chants.

But, of course, Obama says you’ll keep your health plan and your physician if you like them.  Except when you can’t as in: oh yeah, I guess I did happen to prevaricate just a bit.

Let me break that down and, as pols like to say now, “unpack it.”  Mr Obama, unpack this:  you LIED.

So, Mr Obama suggests a wondrous Plan B when confronted with his lie (and deflected by the Fellating Jay Carney): “just shop around.”

From Breitbart.com:

Obama Cancels ‘You Can Keep Your Plan’ Promise: ‘Just Shop Around’

In a speech at Boston’s Faneuil Hall on Wednesday afternoon, President Barack Obama discarded his now-infamous broken promise: “If you like your health insurance, you can keep your health insurance.” Instead, he offered a new promise: “You will be getting a better deal,” the president told health insurance consumers.

Further, get this:

He blamed insurance companies, not Obamacare, for the canceled policies:

“Now, if you had one of these substandard plans before the Affordable Care Act became law, and you really like that plan, you were able to keep it. That’s what I said when I was running for office. That was part of the promise we made. But ever since the law was passed, if insurers decided to downgrade or cancel the substandard plans, what we said under the law is that you have got to replace them with quality, comprehensive coverage because that, too, was a central premise of the Affordable Care Act from the very beginning…

So if you’re getting one of these letters [canceling your insurance policy], just shop around in the new marketplace. That’s what it’s for…”

“Substandard,” Mr Obama?  You said our plans were “substandard,” Mr Obama?  Correct me if I may be wrong, but you didn’t quantify our plans as “substandard” when you PROMISED we could keep them.  You took in, verbally, ALL of our plans again and again and again.  Let me remind you, sir:

How odd.  I didn’t hear the word SUBSTANDARD mentioned ONCE in ANY of those videos.  Did anyone else?  Bueller?

Uh, hello?  Earth to Obama?  The insurance companies are doing nothing more than obeying YOUR law.

You know: the one that Congress had to pass so they could know what it contained:

BZ

P.S.
I submit that even Kabuki Theatre couldn’t be this insane.

Kabuki Theatre

Top Democrat says those aren’t ‘cancellation notices,’ they’re ‘transitions’ into Obamacare

Surrender_Dignity_Forward_MaksimYes, ladies and gentlemen, here’s precisely what the Leftists and, more specifically, the current Demorats think of you: you’re not hurting, you’re not damaged, you haven’t been impacted in any way — you’re simply involved in a rite of passage.

It’s necessary, you see.  Like a horrible larvae to a beautiful butterly.  You’re the horrible larvae now, soon to be the beautiful Obamafly.

Top Democrat says those aren’t ‘cancellation notices,’ they’re ‘transitions’ into Obamacare

By JOEL GEHRKE

Insurance companies aren’t sending out cancellation letters, they’re helping people “transition” into Obamacare, according to a top Democrat.

“If [the companies] changed [the insurance plans] then they have to notify the people who have to have the opportunity to have another policy,” said House Ways and Means Committee ranking member Sander Levin, D-Mich.

In fact, according to Levin, the “so-called cancellation notices” merely “help people transition to a new policy.”

Right.  Those aren’t real cancellation notices on your insurance, they’re just “so-called” cancellation notices.  Your insurer truly doesn’t mean the cancellation.  It’s just a suggestion.  Like a guideline: “hey, we know you have some questions, but all we’re doing — as the insurer — is helping to nudge you a bit towards ObamaKare.”

Pretty soon, we’ll all be beautiful Obamaflies.

BZ