Tag Archives: Jackie Speier

Kanye West, the mentally defective token negro/white supremacist/race traitor

Posted on by

All of those terrible things above, yes, said by Leftists, Demorats and the American Media Maggots. Not one of those reprehensible utterances escaped the lips of any Republican or Conservative.

Imagine that. And it all stemmed from a meeting between rapper Kanye West and President Trump, and others, in the Oval Office this past Thursday the 11th. Let’s listen.

Kanye West, essentially, went “stream of consciousness” that day in the presence of the president, retired football great Jim Brown and a horde of reporters.

Kanye West: “If he don’t look good, we don’t look good, this is our president.”

Jim Brown: “You know why I’m here? I’m here to serve.”

Then the American Media Maggots went full tilt racist. Plus. And then some.

Don Lemon thinks Kanye is a “minstrel show.” Don Lemon thinks Kanye’s mother is “rolling over in her grave.” Don Lemon thinks Kanye should go get some mental help. Don Lemon doesn’t seem to care for white people. Which is quite odd, considering his last two boyfriends, John Byrne and Tim Malone, have both been white. Apparently Don Lemon doesn’t mind tapping white sphincters because, I suppose, they’re useful sperm repositories. Where’s the love for black men, Don Lemon? A little Caucasoid Fever, Don Lemon?

Let’s continue. Demorat Representative Jackie Speier said this about the meeting: “I felt like I was sitting in on a psychiatric visit and a commercial for Donald Trump.”

Ta-Nehisi Coates wrote in The Atlantic:

I’m Not Black, I’m Kanye

Kanye West wants freedom—white freedom.

Kanye west, a god in this time, awakened, recently, from a long public slumber to embrace Donald Trump. He hailed Trump, as a “brother,” a fellow bearer of “dragon energy,” and impugned those who objected as suppressors of “unpopular questions,” “thought police” whose tactics were “based on fear.” It was Trump, West argued, not Obama, who gave him hope that a black boy from the South Side of Chicago could be president. “Remember like when I said I was gonna run for president?,” Kanye said in an interview with the radio host Charlamagne Tha God. “I had people close to me, friends of mine, making jokes, making memes, talking shit. Now it’s like, oh, that was proven that that could have happened.”

Bad Kanye. Evil Kanye. Why are no longer a water carrier, you evil bastard? Clearly, Kanye West is a mental defective. But even worse, he’s irrelevant because of his age.

West is 40 years old, a product of the Crack era and Reaganomic Years, a man who remembers the Challenger crash and The Cosby Show before syndication. But he never fell into the bitterness of his peers. He could not be found chasing ghosts, barking at Soulja Boy, hectoring Lil Yachty, and otherwise yelling at clouds. 

Better than yelling at traffic on street corners, I suppose.

So Ta-Nahesi just concludes in that May 2018 article that, as Chris Rock says, Kanye is just “ig’nant.”

What Kanye West seeks is what Michael Jackson sought—liberation from the dictates of that we. In his visit with West, the rapper T.I. was stunned to find that West, despite his endorsement of Trump, had never heard of the travel ban. “He don’t know the things that we know because he’s removed himself from society to a point where it don’t reach him,” T.I. said. West calls his struggle the right to be a “free thinker,” and he is, indeed, championing a kind of freedom—a white freedom, freedom without consequence, freedom without criticism, freedom to be proud and ignorant; freedom to profit off a people in one moment and abandon them in the next; a Stand Your Ground freedom, freedom without responsibility, without hard memory; a Monticello without slavery, a Confederate freedom, the freedom of John C. Calhoun, not the freedom of Harriet Tubman, which calls you to risk your own; not the freedom of Nat Turner, which calls you to give even more, but a conqueror’s freedom, freedom of the strong built on antipathy or indifference to the weak, the freedom of rape buttons, pussy grabbers, and fuck you anyway, bitch; freedom of oil and invisible wars, the freedom of suburbs drawn with red lines, the white freedom of Calabasas.

Kanye isn’t a “real” black man. He isn’t down for the “struggle.” He has no idea how to keep anything “real.” She affirms this with her last words.

And so for Kanye West, I wonder what he might be, if he could find himself back into connection, back to that place where he sought not a disconnected freedom of “I,” but a black freedom that called him back—back to the bone and drum, back to Chicago, back to Home.

Here is Professor Michael Eric Dyson of Georgetown University calling Kanye West a white supremacist.

“This is white supremacy by ventriloquism. A black mouth is moving, but white racist ideals are flowing from Kanye’s mouth.” Seems pretty clear to me: Kanye West is a white supremacist. You heard it from the mouth of a racist himself. What has BZ said for years? “No one is equal until everyone is equal”?

As a Leftist troll instructed me on Twitter: “He’s off his meds.” He can’t be trusted. He’s a massive sycophant. He cannot be provided attention. But I ask: trust to do what? And for whom? And “even if,” doesn’t Kanye West “get” to have an opinion and express it in public? Further, how is it that my Leftist troll knows precisely what’s percolating about in the head of Kanye West? How does my Leftist troll know that Kanye hasn’t been taking his meds for the past month? Is my Leftist troll a psychiatrist? Are any of the LDAMM psychiatrists who diagnose? Hardly. Yet they’re the first to point and say “j’accuse.”

It’s not like black celebrities haven’t been invited to the White House before under the, ahem, “previous administration.” That was just peachy. What’s the difference between then and now? Oh yeah. Political ideology. Support for Trump. Trump is evil. People who support Trump are evil. Therefore Kanye West is evil. I get it.

Furthermore, remember: Leftists do not comport to any definition of a “mob” whatsoever. Don’t say the word. Don’t even think the word.

Candace Owens weighed in.

As did more members of #WalkAway.

As did Tucker Carlson.

Let me tell you what this was, and what you saw.

More indicia to suggest that November 6th might not go well for Demorats.

BZ

 

 Share

YOU are paying off DC sexual harassment suits

Posted on by

Just when you thought there might be some justice in terms of genuine sexual harassment, rape and assault incidents in DC — well, have I got a story for you.

Your American Taxpayer dollars are hard at work.

Against you, not for you.

From TheHill.com:

Congress owes taxpayers answers about its harassment ‘shush’ fund

by Jenny Beth Martin

Since when are members of Congress and their staffs accused of sexual harassment allowed to hush up and pay off their accusers from a secret “shush” fund full of taxpayer dollars? Since 1995, it turns out.

Congress, we all know, chooses to exempt itself from many of the same laws it foists on the rest of us. It’s a grievance I hear regularly during my travels around the country, as grassroots activists complain about this law or that regulation. “If only Congress had to live under the same laws we do, they’d get it, and they’d change it” is a common refrain.

For years, for instance, I’ve been speaking out about the illegal special exemption of Congress from ObamaCare, which allows members and staff to avoid the financial burdens they imposed on us when they passed that terrible law. If only they had to live under the law the same way the rest of us do, without benefit of taxpayer dollars to subsidize their premiums purchased fraudulently on the D.C. small business exchange, they might be more incentivized to repeal that law.

But until recently, I did not know about the “shush fund” of Congress, a fund managed by the “Office of Compliance,” which itself was created following the 1995 enactment of the Congressional Accountability Act (CAA), the first law enacted by the first Republican House in four decades.

Haven’t you ever asked yourself: just why do people spend thousands, hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars for a House or Senate seat?

Are they so devoted that they would place themselves into what normally would be considered as absolutely inextricable debt potentially in perpetuity?

The lowliest of Congressmen make $174,000 per year. Leaders make $200,000 per year or more, due to figures not up to date.

Did you ever think quid pro quo? Or ROI? You should have.

“It’s not the money, it’s the power.”
— Frank Underwood

What happened to transparency?

We, the taxpayers who have been paying for more than two decades to quietly settle literally hundreds of sexual harassment claims against members of Congress and their staffs, have a right to know which members and staffers have made use of the hush money over the years. Going forward, taxpayers should have knowledge about how that fund is used.

If Congress wants to get serious about its apparent culture of abuse, it will need to address its cover-up culture. Shush funds may serve the immediate purpose of getting alleged victims to go away, but they do little to stem the tide of sexual harassment. What Congress needs — and American taxpayers deserve — is more transparency.

And also at GatewayPundit.com:

SHOCK: $15 Million in TAXPAYER MONEY Has Been Paid Out to Settle Congressional Sexual Harassment Lawsuits

by Cristina Laila

As previously reported, Congress has a rampant sexual harassment problem. In fact the problem is so bad that female lawmakers and aides keep a ‘creep list’ of men who are notorious for lewd behavior.

As if this couldn’t get any worse, Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA) told MSNBC’s Chuck Todd Tuesday that taxpayers have paid over $15 million to settle sexual harassment lawsuits against members of Congress!

Further, from ConservativeReview.com:

Levin: GOP leaders must resign over sexual harassment in Congress

by Chris Pandolfo

Tuesday on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin discussed the day’s reports and testimonies concerning the subject of sexual harassment in Congress.

He played a clip of Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., who testified there are at least two sitting members of Congress — one Republican, one Democrat —who have engaged in sexual harassment of their own staff members.

Levin wants these sitting Congress members to be identified. He wants names named.

He also wants Speaker Paul Ryan and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to resign for their failure in leadership — keeping silent on known creeps and a known widespread problem in the institutions they lead.  

Can you imagine, folks, a job where you are treated like a king or a queen, provided with armed protection, chauffeured in cars and SUVs, provided an expense account, shown deference wherever you go and can decide which laws to obey or not because, after all, you make the law? Wouldn’t you like a job like that? One where internal review and investigations into your conduct are mostly toothless?

Wouldn’t you enjoy a job like that?

And finally: just how long must we slit our own wrists for the power mongers in DC before we rise up in righteous umbrage?

BZ 

 

 Share