Tag Archives: Kamala Harris

Democrats conspire to obstruct Kavanaugh hearing and pay Antifa protesters

Posted on by

And there is evidence to prove it.

Aurally, photographically and otherwise.

But first, this statement: Brett Kavanaugh will be confirmed by the Senate.

Beginning, from Breitbart.com:

Dick Durbin Admits: Democrats Plotted to Disrupt Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court Hearing

by Joel B. Pollak

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) admitted Tuesday in the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court that he and other Democrats participated in a conference call on how to disrupt the hearings.

Durbin was responding to a question by Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), who cited an NBC News tweet from earlier in the morning that reported that Senate Democrats had planned over the Labor Day weekend to use protests and interruptions.

The hearing had already been disrupted several times by protesters — led by the anti-Trump and Democrat-aligned Women’s March, which claimed credit — and several senators also interrupted proceedings with interjections.

Senator Tom Tillis from North Carolina asked:

“This is outrageous.” And then Durbin assumes full Deflection Mode.

Then, from TheGatewayPundit.com:

Schumer Plotted Kavanaugh Disruptions in Weekend Call – Including Execution of Mob Tactics

by Cristina Laila

President Trump’s Supreme Court pick Judge Brett Kavanaugh testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday morning

Democrats and screaming protesters interrupted the hearing for the first half hour.
Judge Kavanaugh has not even been sworn in yet!

It was all planned.

Democrats plotted the coordinated protest over the holiday weekend. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) led a phone call and Committee members are executing now, reported NBC’s Kasie Hunt.

Of course we know the results.

Judge Kavanaugh was heckled by screaming protesters Tuesday morning.

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) unleashed on Democrat lawmakers for requesting to delay Kavanaugh’s hearing over ‘withheld documents.’

Kavanaugh gave the Senate Judiciary Committee over 430,000 documents which is two times more than any SCOTUS nominee in US history, but this isn’t good enough for the Democrats.

This occurred the very first day of the hearings last week.

People like this should be led away if for no other reason than their shrill voices break glass and injure the eardrums of small children and animals.

Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk made some observations about the Kavanaugh protests outside the Capitol. And protesters themselves learned something significant as well: there is a difference between “free speech” on a college campus and free speech in real life. Listen to the purposeful indifference of the police regarding the protester’s umbrage.

But wait; there’s more. Here, the Daily Caller provides an inside peek at the Kavanaugh protests.

So: Antifa and other paid to protest? Naturally.

From LawAndCrime.com:

Doctors claim they saw protesters get paid to disrupt Kavanaugh hearing

by Ronn Blitzer

Judge Brett Kavanaugh‘s Supreme Court confirmation hearing was interrupted several times by protesters who shouted over Senators who were speaking, many of whom were arrested. Now, three men from Texas who were there claim that they saw some of them get paid for their actions.

Video of their comments has been circling in conservative circles, and the men were speaking with Adam Schindler, a digital strategy consultant who is a supporter of President Donald Trump. The doctors’ story has not been verified by any official body, but Schindler has shared photos that appear to back up their claim.

It gets better. Photographically.

In one image that he posted to Twitter, a woman in a black and white top can be seen with a man who appears to be handing her cash. In another photo, an individual who appears to be that same woman is being escorted out of the hearing by officers.

That photo is above. As my professors in college would say, “compare and contrast.”

Same chick, same hair, same ugly dress, getting removed from the Kavanaugh hearing. How about a confirmation photograph?

Check the cash. But why stop there? The article continues:

One of the men, Dr. Tom Schlueter, described one of these alleged transactions.

“One thing was there were people who had come along … who had a bag of money, and people would hand them a piece of paper, and then they would give them money,” he said. “So we know money was exchanged for some of the people to be here, just to protest.”

Schlueter then described instructions that these people supposedly received.

“They were actually told, we heard them say this, ‘when you go in, we want you to yell, to scream, and even possibly to get arrested.’ So that was some of the processes we saw happening,” he recalled.

Good ol’ American grassroots protests. Uh, by people who otherwise wouldn’t be there unless they knew some coin was in the offing. Here is the audio.

Then this from the GatewayPundit.com:

CONFIRMED: Organizer Vinay Krishnan Who Was Caught Paying Off Kavanaugh Protesters — Works for Soros-Linked Organization

by Jim Hoft

On Tuesday several Texas doctors attended the Kavanaugh hearing in Washington DC. After the hearing the doctors told reporter Adam Schindler that they witnessed organized activists with a bag of cash paying the rent-a-mob protesters.

So perhaps you’re wondering, “who is Vinay Krishnan”?

Vinay is an “organizer of civil disobedience” who works for a George Soros-funded group, the Center for Popular Democracy.

I’d like to end the post with this, in what is likely the most revealing thing said during the Kavanaugh hearings, spoken by young Two-Fer Kamala Harris, a rising star for Demorat consideration in the 2020 presidential election. Listen to this interchange.

“That book that you carry” is only the US Constitution. But who holds that dear? Her? Leftists? Demorats? The American Media Maggots? Of course not. Kamala Harris couldn’t be more smarmy, dismissive, alienating, snide, smug, berating, self-righteous, arrogant and plastered with what she fervently believes is her inherent intellectual superiority.

But four very important bottom lines are these:

  1. President Trump is just that: the President of the United States of America, and
  2. Neil Gorsuch was confirmed and sits on the SCOTUS bench, and
  3. Judge Brett Kavanaugh is going to get confirmed as a sitting member of SCOTUS, and
  4. I’ll wager President Trump is going to be afforded the opportunity to nominate a third SCOTUS member before the end of his first term or early in his second term.

BZ

 

 Share

Points at the Kavanaugh hearing: first day

Posted on by

First, the execrable chaos brought down upon the hearing by Leftists.

This is insanity writ large.

Who is on Chairman Grassley’s left? Correct. Senator Diane Feinstein. She is quiet. Does she let the young chicks shit the bed or is she no longer interested in standing up for true Kabuki Theater? In any case, she is conspicuously silent. Crazy like a fox?

Following that pre-planned chaos, here is the most thoughtful and cogent introductory remarks that I have ever heard at a SCOTUS nomination hearing, provided by Senator Ben Sasse of Nebraska with whom — I must admit — I sometimes vehemently disagree.

Not now.

Senator Ted Cruz weighs in:

Then South Carolina Senator Lindsay Graham weighed in:

After all this hooliganism, Brett Kavanaugh is finally allowed to speak.

And this was just the first day of the hearings.

BZ

 

 Share

Female vs female, Left vs Right

Posted on by

And don’t tell me this isn’t a female thingie because, oh hell yes, it most certainly is. It goes to claimed black female vs Caucasoid female, Leftist female vs Conservative female, haughty female vs based female. Damn. I’m out of striations.

I loved it when Kirstjen Nielsen larfs at the foppish Kamala Harris.

BZ

 

 Share

Democrats & the census: least covered story last week

Posted on by

I’ve said for some time that the end goal of Demorats is stultifyingly simple. They wish to keep DC power in perpetuity. They will do anything to achieve that end goal. Anything. Period.

That in mind, I’ll wager the story least covered the past week was one of the potentially greatest future and then everlasting significance — particularly if Demorats get their way.

From TheHill.com:

5 Dem senators ask administration not to include citizenship question on census

by Julia Manchester

Five Democratic Senators asked the Trump administration on Friday to reject a request from the Department of Justice (DOJ) to include a citizenship question on the 2020 census. 

Signatories include Democratic Sens. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.), Kamala Harris (Calif.), Tom Carper (Del.), Brian Schatz (Hawaii) and Catherine Cortez Masto (Nev.)

Make note of the names please because, after all, one of them is going to run for president as a Demorat candidate in 2020.

“The inclusion of a question on citizenship threatens to undermine the accuracy of the Census as a whole, and given this administration’s rhetoric and actions relating to immigrants and minority groups, the DOJ request is deeply troubling,” the senators wrote in a letter addressed to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross.

For once in the life of a Demorat, would you so kindly tell the truth?

The letter went on to say the question could depress census turnout due to fear the government could use the information against participants. 

“This chilling effect could lead to broad inaccuracies across the board, from how congressional districts are drawn to how government funds are distributed,” the letter reads. 

There we go. The standard Mark I Model I defense attorney retort: “chilling effect.”

See my previous statement.

“Rather than preserve civil rights, as the Justice Department claims, a question on citizenship in the decennial census would very likely hinder a full and accurate accounting of this nation’s population.”

Here’s the applicable two-word phrase: avoidance maneuver.

A spokesperson for the Census Bureau said the “request will go through the well-established process that any potential question would go through.”

Speculation had swirled in recent months that the Trump administration was planning to include an immigration-related question in the census.

That is to say, the Demorats are no longer even attempting to be remotely clever. This is nothing but a naked attempt to ensure that the United States fails to capture anything even remotely close to an accurate count of the number of illegals present.

Because after all, even one, even ten, even twenty or a hundred or a thousand or 10,000 illegals reporting accurately on the census will be more precise than otherwise and tend to factually skew the statistics that Demorats trot out every year with regard to the “minimal impact illegals have” on the nation.

I call bullshit.

Proper thinking Americans do too.

BZ

 

 Share