BREAKING: Sheriffs Refuse to Enforce Laws on Gun Control

John CookeFrom the NYTimes.com:

GREELEY, Colo. — When Sheriff John Cooke of Weld County explains in speeches why he is not enforcing the state’s new gun laws, he holds up two 30-round magazines. One, he says, he had before July 1, when the law banning the possession, sale or transfer of the large-capacity magazines went into effect. The other, he “maybe” obtained afterward.

He shuffles the magazines, which look identical, and then challenges the audience to tell the difference.

“How is a deputy or an officer supposed to know which is which?” he asks.

Colorado’s package of gun laws, enacted this year after mass shootings in Aurora, Colo., and Newtown, Conn., has been hailed as a victory by advocates of gun control. But if Sheriff Cooke and a majority of the other county sheriffs in Colorado offer any indication, the new laws — which mandate background checks for private gun transfers and outlaw magazines over 15 rounds — may prove nearly irrelevant across much of the state’s rural regions.

Some sheriffs, like Sheriff Cooke, are refusing to enforce the laws, saying that they are too vague and violate Second Amendment rights. Many more say that enforcement will be “a very low priority,” as several sheriffs put it. All but seven of the 62 elected sheriffs in Colorado signed on in May to a federal lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the statutes.

Another reason, ladies and gentlemen, that I work for a department where my head officer is elected and not appointed.  Where there are politics, of course, but more independence than with a police department answerable more directly to a political mayor or a city manager.

Further, from CSPOA:

The following sheriffs, state sheriff’s associations, and police chiefs have vowed to uphold and defend the Constitution against Obama’s unconstitutional gun control measures.  We applaud these public servants for their courage and conviction.

479 Sheriffs in all.  See the list.

I am an Oath Keeper.

Sheriffs and not Chiefs of Police are more answerable to the people they serve.

Pushback?  Let it commence.

BZ

 

 

Further: talking like a woman

For MenBuilding on my Thursday post, I provide this now from BreakPoint.org:

Talking Like a Woman

by Kim Moreland

Blurring of lines between the sexes is having an effect on some men. Scientists from the University of California have found that some men are talking like women.

I wonder if this problem is creeping up because so many boys are being raised by a single parent–namely, a mother.

And the very first comment?

Comments:

Whatever the research says, I’m very annoyed by people who make every declarative sentence sound like a question? And right or wrong, I do subtract some credibility from people who do that? For example, I’ve heard so-called experts being interviewed on radio and TV and talking like that, and I find myself being dismissive? They might be the best experts in their fields, but to me, they undercut all of that by talking that way? People who do that should be made to look at a transcript of the things they say, including proper punctuation when they sound like they are asking a question? That might show them how absurd their speech is and how aggravating it is to have to listen to them? Just saying?

A final observation:

These are the same men who, later, will be second-guessed by women as to why they won’t make decisions, why they won’t open doors, and why they don’t seem to act like men at all.

Real women want real men.  Not women camouflaged as men.

Simple as that.

BZ

 

 

Liberals want to stop men from checking out women

Women Checking Out WomenFrom DailyCaller.com:

In the progressive future, men will not be able to look at women’s bodies because that is a terrible thing to do — and science says so.

Researchers have offered a definitive report into the science of the male “objectifying gaze” in the December 2013 volume of “Sex Roles: A Journal of Research” (Volume 69, Issue 11-12, pp 557-570).

“Although objectification theory suggests that women frequently experience the objectifying gaze with many adverse consequences, there is scant research examining the nature and causes of the objectifying gaze for perceivers. The main purpose of this work was to examine the objectifying gaze toward women via eye tracking technology,” according to the abstract of “My Eyes Are Up Here: The Nature of the Objectifying Gaze Toward Women” by Sarah J. Gervais, Arianne M. Holland, and Michael D. Dodd.

In other words, attractive women get “looked at” more than unattractive women.  Boo-frakking-hoo.  The same is true for men.

Now: men “checking out” women should be illegal, Leftists believe.

  • First: the Speech Police
  • Second: the Thought Police
  • Next: the Eye Police

Sad thing: these Leftists are actually serious.

That men “objectify” women in some cases is true.  It is also true that women objectify themselves as frequently — or more.

From a UKDailyMailOnline article:

Women spend more time checking out OTHER WOMEN than they do men (and it’s their clothes, figures and hair we’re most interested in)

Ever get the feeling your boyfriend is looking at other women as you walk down the street?

Well, perhaps he’s picking up the habit from you.

Women spend more time checking out other women than they do checking out men, keen to see what ‘the opposition’ is wearing, how much cellulite they have, what their hair looks like and how thin they are, according to a new study.

Let’s also get into some stats that your local police and sheriff departments will absolutely refuse to reveal:

1. Close to half of the reported rapes to LE agencies are false;
2. Women strike men only slightly less than men strike women.  The difference exists regarding the disparity in physical size between men and women, and the fact that men predominantly refuse to report physical abuse due to such reporting perceived as being “unmasculine.”  Finally: women verbally abuse men with much greater frequency and efficacy than the reverse.

Both men and women know this.

Ask women who they’d rather their supervisor be.  And ask women if they’d like to work in an all-female environment.

I used to say when I worked Patrol that I became very tired of my utilization as the Womens’ Gestapo.  That sexist paradigm continues to exist today.

Leftists: get over yourselves.  This crap is laughable.

Another reason so few of you live in Reality.

BZ

P.S.
One salient comment from the article that bespeaks a massive amount of Leftist Truth:

This ONLY applies to straight (conservatives). Rump wranglers and fur traders can do as they always do……………..

Check the comments; there exists some funny and poignant stuff.

 

 

70% Of Calfornia’s Doctors Expected To Boycott Obamacare

ObamaCare DoctorsFrom ZeroHedge.com:

Submitted by Tyler Durden

We need some recognition that we’re doing a service to the community. But we can’t do it for free. And we can’t do it at a loss. No other business would do that,” exclaims the president of the California Medical Association.

As The Washington Examiner reports, independent insurance brokers estimate 70% of California’s 104,000 licensed doctors are boycotting the exchange. “The Covered California board says we have plenty of doctors, and they allege they have 85 percent of doctors participating, but they’ve shown no numbers,” and if a large number of doctors either balk at participating in the exchange or retire, the state’s medical system could be overwhelmed. “Enrollment doesn’t mean access, because there aren’t enough doctors to take the low rates of Medicaid,” warns one health director. “There aren’t enough primary care physicians, period.”

Via The Washington Examiner,

An estimated seven out of every 10 physicians in deep-blue California are rebelling against the state’s Obamacare health insurance exchange and won’t participate, the head of the state’s largest medical association said.

“It doesn’t surprise me that there’s a high rate of nonparticipation,” said Dr. Richard Thorp, president of the California Medical Association.

California offers one of the lowest government reimbursement rates in the country — 30 percent lower than federal Medicare payments. And reimbursement rates for some procedures are even lower.

“Some physicians have been put in the network and they were included basically without their permission,” Lisa Folberg said. She is a CMA’s vice president of medical and regulatory Policy.

“They may be listed as actually participating, but not of their own volition,”

This is a dirty little secret that is not really talked about as they promote Covered California,” Waters said. He called the exchange’s doctors list a “shell game” because “the vast majority” of his doctors are not participating

Imagine that.

But, you see, there’s a niggling little problem that no one seems to be addressing in the first place, completely absent ObakaKare.

My personal doctor, who is himself 65, said that he is retiring soon, as are a large number of physicians in Fornicalia.  He is retiring because he has become an automaton, he says, and paperwork takes a vast amount of his time.  He no longer cares for the physicians’ environment in general, and says that many of his colleagues, some much younger than himself, are “disappointed and disgusted” with the way they are treated by their administrations, by the government, by the press and sometimes by the public — which has come to believe they are overpaid and underworked elitists driving Bentleys and playing golf every day.

There will be, he says, a large sucking sound next year when doctors throughout the nation — who don’t have to — opt for either early retirement or a career change.  Or, he says, they’ll choose to work strictly for cash in a concierge fashion and totally eschew dealing with insurance.

The second problem regards nursing staff and the lack thereof.  The number of nurses and assistants are dwindling.  That includes the number of nurses who speak English (as opposed to a corrupted form of Engrish).  In the correctional aspect of my own LE department, the nurse who speaks actual decipherable English is the exception and not the rule.  Good luck on your dressing change.

Because of this, it is certain that additional demands will be made on the various classes of nurses/assistants remaining, in order to, necessarily, bypass doctors who no longer exist in sufficient quantity to perform some future tasks.  This is guaranteed.

Now add ObakaKare on top of that hot and frothing mess.

As to Fornicalia’s “Covered California,” it too is soon to be revealed as one additional hot and frothing mess.  The lies will be exposed like shit in a box from a cat with Parkinsons.

Anyone besides me believe that Governor Brown’s current 58% approval rating might be a bit tarnished in the next few weeks?

BZ

P.S.
Also, please check out the comments in the source article.

 

From lame to idiotic to stupid: “Obama calls on bartenders to host happy hours for Obamacare”

Obama - Dangerously IncompetentJust when you think that Barack Hussein Obama can’t get any more idiotic or stupid or — now — dangerous, you have the above headline.

From the WashingtonExaminer.com:

by Charlie Spiering

During today’s White House Youth Summit, President Obama called on young people to do whatever they can to promote his signature health care law — including plying their customers with cheap booze.

“If you are a bartender, have a happy hour,” Obama said as the crowd laughed. “And also probably get health insurance because a lot of people don’t have it.”

Great.  Ply the youth with booze.  Fabulous idea.

Can you imagine had GW Bush suggested a fraction of these stupid proposals?

BZ