Obama: protecting Islam and Iran?

Posted on Monday, March 2, 2015 by BZ

Report: Obama Threatened to Shoot Down IAF Iran Strike

by Mark Langfan

The Bethlehem-based news agency Ma’an has cited a Kuwaiti newspaper report Saturday, that US President Barack Obama thwarted an Israeli military attack against Iran’s nuclear facilities in 2014 by threatening to shoot down Israeli jets before they could reach their targets in Iran.

Following Obama’s threat, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu was reportedly forced to abort the planned Iran attack.

According to Al-Jarida, the Netanyahu government took the decision to strike Iran some time in 2014 soon after Israel had discovered the United States and Iran had been involved in secret talks over Iran’s nuclear program and were about to sign an agreement in that regard behind Israel’s back.

The report claimed that an unnamed Israeli minister who has good ties with the US administration revealed the attack plan to Secretary of State John Kerry, and that Obama then threatened to shoot down the Israeli jets before they could reach their targets in Iran.

Obama was going to shoot down military jets belonging to the only stable country in the entire Middle East, those of Israel — a nation that has been a friend of the United States for many years.

Why?

Is it just me, or does this not border on insane? Why would Mr Obama stop the Israelis from defending themselves as Iran does its level best to develop nuclear programs — not for “study” or for “power,” but solely for conversion to offensive weapons?

Once developed, how long would it take for Iran to somehow “allow” one or several of those nuclear weapons to fall into the hands of ISIS or the Muslim Brotherhood or al Qaeda or Hamas or Hezbollah — either by “mistake” or purposely?

Please allow me to ask one simple question that I have yet to see the so-called Mainstream Media ask, a question no one seems willing pose:

With all the oil under its feet, why does Iran seem hell-bent upon developing nuclear power? Iran doesn’t physically need nuclear power or its programs. It could create tens or even hundreds of oil-fired energy production facilities around its nation, so that it could have guaranteed electric power damned near in perpetuity.

Yet, Iran cries that it must have nuclear programs in order to provide for its people. I call bullshit on that.

It’s an excuse, and a poor one at that. Read on:

According to the report, “Netanyahu and his commanders agreed after four nights of deliberations to task the Israeli army’s chief of staff, Benny Gantz, to prepare a qualitative operation against Iran’s nuclear program. In addition, Netanyahu and his ministers decided to do whatever they could do to thwart a possible agreement between Iran and the White House because such an agreement is, allegedly, a threat to Israel’s security.”

Check, please, the physical proximity between Iran and Israel:

The distance between the two nations is roughly 1,100 miles, with only Iraq and Jordan in between.

Israel is easily within striking distance of missiles currently possessed by Iran. Imagine arming them with nuclear warheads.

Clearly, Obama was raised by Communists and Muslims. Read this if you doubt me. There isn’t a Jew anywhere is Obama’s past; instead, his formative years were filled with Muslims in Indonesia and Communists.

The only Caucasoids he admired were Saul Alinsky (oddly enough, quantified as a “community organizer” by Wikipedia and the sole Jew that Obama admired), Bill Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven.

Relations between Israel and Barack Hussein Obama have always been rocky. I believe this is because Mr Obama sympathizes with Muslims and disdains Jews. This is in consideration of his upbringing and his education, amongst other things.

On Tuesday, Benjamin Netanyahu will speak before the US Congress, having been invited by John Boehner. The Spite House is doing everything possible to scandalize and minimize this speech.

I wonder: is it because Mr Netanyahu intends to reveal and lend credence to Obama’s plan to down Israel’s aircraft? Will Netanyahu accuse the Spite House of disallowing Israel to defend herself?

Ultimately, just what is the purpose behind Barack Hussein Obama choosing Iran over Israel in the Middle East?

And why?

Hillary Clinton corrupt: proven

Posted on Wednesday, February 25, 2015 by BZ

From the WashingtonPost.com:

Foreign governments gave millions to foundation while Clinton was at State Dept.

by Rosalind S. Helderman and Tom Hamburger

The Clinton Foundation accepted millions of dollars from seven foreign governments during Hillary Rodham Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state, including one donation that violated its ethics agreement with the Obama administration, foundation officials disclosed Wednesday.

Most of the contributions were possible because of exceptions written into the foundation’s 2008 agreement, which included limits on foreign-government donations.

The agreement, reached before Clinton’s nomination amid concerns that countries could use foundation donations to gain favor with a Clinton-led State Department, allowed governments that had previously donated money to continue making contributions at similar levels.

The new disclosures, provided in response to questions from The Washington Post, make clear that the 2008 agreement did not prohibit foreign countries with interests before the U.S. government from giving money to the charity closely linked to the secretary of state.

The “Clinton Foundation“?

Do you think you might find this information on the Clinton Foundation site today, perchance?

Uh, no. Absolutely nothing about that today.

$25 million dollars from the Saudis, whilst Hillary was Secretary of State.

Can anyone even remotely suggest a “conflict of interest” here?

In one instance, foundation officials acknowledged they should have sought approval in 2010 from the State Department ethics office, as required by the agreement for new government donors, before accepting a $500,000 donation from the Algerian government.

Algeria. Of course. Such a pro-American government in North Africa. It is 99% Islamic.

Some of the donations came from countries with complicated diplomatic, military and financial relationships with the U.S. government, including Kuwait, Qatar and Oman.

Complicated. Right. Because Kuwait, Qatar and Oman aren’t Islamic.

Hell, ISIS isn’t Islamic, per Barack Hussein Obaka.

Further, another inconvenient fact:

Rarely, if ever, has a potential commander in chief been so closely associated with an organization that has solicited financial support from foreign governments. Clinton formally joined the foundation in 2013 after leaving the State Department, and the organization was renamed the Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation.

Good for you, Chelsea. I have always advocated the inculcation of corruption of the innocents at the very earliest age. As I’ve said for years, “I’m either for less corruption or my greater ability to participate in it.” Good for you, Chelsea; you’ve started early.

The Washington Post reported last week that foreign sources, including governments, made up a third of those who have given the foundation more than $1 million over time. The Post found that the foundation, begun by former president Bill Clinton, has raised nearly $2 billion since its creation in 2001.

Good for background. Only $2 billion dollars. Meh. Except: more than PETA. More than MoveOn.org, more than any Occupy movement.

The Wall Street Journal reported last week that the foundation had accepted new foreign-government money now that he 2008 agreement has lapsed.

Oh shucky-darn. The Clinton Foundation taking advantage of loopholes?

Foreign governments had been major donors to the foundation before President Obama nominated Clinton to become secretary of state in 2009. When the foundation released a list of its donors for the first time in 2008, as a result of the agreement with the Obama administration, it disclosed, for instance, that Saudi Arabia had given between $10 million and $25 million.

Saudi Arabia contributed up to $25 million dollars to Hillary Clinton.

But then-Senator Richard G. Lugar (R-Indiana) said:

“The Clinton Foundation exists as a temptation for any foreign entity or government that believes it could curry favor through a donation,” he said then. “It also sets up potential perception problems with any action taken by the secretary of state in relation to foreign givers or their countries.”

Potential problems, anyone? Bueller?

Health care providers: ATTENTION

Posted on Wednesday, February 25, 2015 by BZ

You are about to become another commodity, like grain or fuel. And you will be traded.

And valued as property.

Get used to it. You WANTED ObamaKare, you got it.

And you’re about to get kicked to the curb for Premium Health Care.

An area for those who can actually PAY for premium health care.

Only “poor” Muslims are terrorists

Posted on Tuesday, February 24, 2015 by BZ

Wrong, Mr Obama and Ms Harf.

You are both liars of the first order. Worse yet, you are paid by American tax dollars to be liars. Your words, however, work only on the soft-of-brain. That is correct. As in the average American Leftist, Demorat, Progressive.

Their lies don’t work on people who are not only educated but have real-world experience in everyday reality. People who have jobs to do, payrolls to meet, budgets to balance, serious concerns about what new rules and regulations will diminish their ability to run their businesses and their lives.

Mr Obama said during the most recent National Prayer Breakfast:

And lied all the way. Obama can condemn the Crusades at the behest of Christians but refuses to understand and acknowledge just why the Crusades began in the first place, because of Islamic oppression. Only terrible deeds were committed in the name of Christ.

Today, if only we’d provide more jobs, ISIS and ISIL and IS and the rest of the Middle East would somehow magically stop hating the West and, more focused, Israel and the United States. And the rest of Western Culture.

That’s it. All Islam needs is more love, more hugs, more understanding, more jobs, less poverty, more capitulance.

With one teensy-weensy problem: facts from Harvard tend to get in the way:

So there you have it. Obama lied, Harf lied, what else is new?

The Imperial President speaks, therefore it must be true.

Except those with actual brains that function (this excludes the categories listed above: Demorats, Leftists, Progressives) know that Mr Obama’s regime is corrupt, built upon a foundation of opacity, falsehoods, profligate spending and philosophies that have been proven unsustainable, unworkable, and damaging to the nation.

Terrorists. Poor Islamic babies. If only they had jobs, they wouldn’t hate the West.

Unmitigated bullshit.

But we should expect this from Mr Obama. After all:

Just saying.

On the cusp of banning firearms in Fornicalia?

Posted on Monday, February 23, 2015 by BZ

Yes. One federal judge could make all the difference in the world.

From FoxNews.com:

Gun rights groups await judge’s ruling on California’s ‘microstamping’ law

by Malia Zimmerman

California’s gun laws are among the nation’s strictest, but a looming decision in a federal lawsuit could effectively ban handguns altogether in the Golden State, according to plaintiffs who want a judge to toss out a state law requiring all new handguns to be equipped with technology that “stamps” each shell casing with a traceable mark.

The problem with the “microstamping” law, which was signed into law by then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2007 but only took effect in 2013, is that it relies on an unworkable technology, according to gun manufacturers and attorneys for the Second Amendment Foundation and Calguns Foundation. If guns without the technology can’t be sold in California, and gun manufacturers can’t implement the technology, the law is, for practical purposes, a handgun ban that violates the Second Amendment, goes the argument.

Thanks Arnold, you blubbering, steroid-ridden baboon. And all with an (R) at the back of your name, as in (R)apist, for screwing over our Second Amendment.

“This is about the state trying to eliminate the handgun market,” said Alan Gura, the lead attorney in Pena v. Lindley, filed on behalf of the Second Amendment Foundation and Calguns Foundation against the Chief of the California Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms. “The evidence submitted by the manufacturers shows this is science fiction and there is not a practical way to implement the law.

It’s the same reason Ronnie Barrett refuses to sell or service his .50 caliber BMG rifles any more in California, whether they are held by private owners or law enforcement agencies. Ruger has already stopped selling semi-automatic handguns in Fornicalia.

Since the law took effect in 2013, no manufacturer has made a new firearm that complies with the requirement.Two major manufacturers, Smith & Wesson and Sturm, Ruger & Co., announced last year they would stop selling new firearms in the California market, and blamed the microstamping law. The technology has been demonstrated, but gunmakers say requirements that each new model, or even modification, must be re-tested for compliance makes the entire scheme unworkable.

When you, as a Leftist, hate guns, fear guns, and detest the thought of them in the hands of private citizens, you do your very best to eliminate them by any means possible.

This all dovetails. Why is there a push to control the internet? To silence DC pushback on various Leftist plans. Why is there a continuing and unrelenting tsunami to take guns from American citizens? Because, as with the internet, when you silence citizens you eliminate pushback. How do you guarantee the average citizen cannot “push back” against the government? You eliminate the Second Amendment.

Because when you eliminate the Second Amendment you will, by extension, help to eliminate the First Amendment.

Then you truly do have Serfs, Proles and Groundlings in the United States of America.

The Second Amendment doesn’t exist to protect hunters. If you believe that, you are a complete fool.

The Second Amendment exists to keep the individual citizen safe from the over-reaching powers of an oppressive government. And to guarantee free speech.

See anything like that recently?

Bloviating Zeppelin

Right thinking from a Left brain.

Tag Archives: Loss of Freedom