Time for Jews to leave Europe?

Pastor Martin NiemollerThis is an actual question pervading some aspects of the American Media Maggots quite recently.

From TheAtlantic.com:

Is It Time for the Jews to Leave Europe?

by Jeffrey Goldberg

For half a century, memories of the Holocaust limited anti-Semitism on the Continent. That period has ended—the recent fatal attacks in Paris and Copenhagen are merely the latest examples of rising violence against Jews. Renewed vitriol among right-wing fascists and new threats from radicalized Islamists have created a crisis, confronting Jews with an agonizing choice.

France’s 475,000 Jews represent less than 1 percent of the country’s population. Yet last year, according to the French Interior Ministry, 51 percent of all racist attacks targeted Jews. The statistics in other countries, including Great Britain, are similarly dismal. In 2014, Jews in Europe were murdered, raped, beaten, stalked, chased, harassed, spat on, and insulted for being Jewish. Sale Juif—“dirty Jew”—rang in the streets, as did “Death to the Jews,” and “Jews to the gas.”

The epithet dirty Jew, Zola wrote in “J’Accuse …!,” was the “scourge of our time.” “J’Accuse …!” was published in 1898.

The previously canonical strain of European anti-Semitism, the fascist variant, still flourishes in places. In Hungary, a leader of the right-wing Jobbik party called on the government—a government that has come under criticism for whitewashing the history of Hungary’s collaboration with the Nazis—to draw up a list of all the Jews in the country who might pose a “national-security risk.” In Greece, a recent survey found that 69 percent of adults hold anti-Semitic views, and the fascists of the country’s Golden Dawn party are open in their Jew-hatred.

Are we serious?

The question is actually being asked?  And asked again in Europe?

Do we learn nothing from history, from Pastor Niemoller?

Apparently it is not just the United States that possesses Historical Alzheimers.

So: is it time for the Jews to leave Europe?

I say in response: line up all the barbaric Muslims first.

BZ

Israel I Stand With

 

Adm. James Lyons: Islam as a threat doctrine

As I attempt to be clear about Islam, retired Admiral James “Ace” Lyons is equally clear about Islam, if not more so:

“Islam is a political movement masquerading as a religion.”

Admiral Lyons then gets down to the essential brass tacks, the tacks of which few if any have the guts to actually speak in a public setting:

“The Obama Administration has a strategy.  It’s very simple.  Any thinking American should be able to grasp it.  It’s anti-American, anti-Western, it’s pro-Islamic, it’s pro-Iranian and pro-Muslim Brotherhood.”

Civilian handlers and executives, throughout the chronicles of the United States, have historically failed to listen to their military advisers, to the detriment of the United States and, via that, the entire planet.  Admiral Lyons tells us so — as he can now reveal, many years later, the true machinations behind the scenes in past administrations.

History exists for a reason: for us to learn from it.

And historically we find that, for example, Patton was correct, Schwarzkopf was correct and, in these cases, Lyons was correct.

It remains that this nation does in fact possess Historical Alzheimers.

BZ

P.S.
Thanks to HGPSURF for the h/t.

 

“An unprecedented act of surrender”

John Bolton GlassesJohn Bolton quantified Obama’s negotiations with Iran, according to TheHill.com, as:

Bolton calls Iran deal ‘unprecedented’ surrender

by Mark Hensch

Former United Nations Ambassador John Bolton said Saturday that President Obama is negotiating “an unprecedented act of surrender” with Iran in discussions over its nuclear weapons program.
 
“This deal is fundamentally flawed,” Bolton said at the South Carolina National Security Action Summit in West Columbia, S.C. “There really is no deal I’d trust Iran with. It is a regime determined to have nuclear weapons and this deal will give it to them.”

Repeat:

“There really is no deal I’d trust Iran with. It is a regime determined to have nuclear weapons and this deal will give it to them.”

Tom Cotton was correct, Rudy Giuliani was correct, and I was correct.

Controversy erupted over an open letter Republicans sent Iran’s leadership Monday. It vowed Congress can void any deal it finds unsatisfying and was signed by 47 GOP senators.

And the forty-seven Congressmen are correct.

Bolton rebuked the president’s response as unjustified Saturday. He said the Senators were not traitors, but rather lawmakers who “stood up for the Constitution.”
“The president coddles the Iranian ayatollah and attacks his own countrymen and our closest allies over this deal,” Bolton said Saturday. “The danger we hope to avoid is now imminent. This is just one example of how the President doesn’t care about America’s national security.”

I completely concur.  I wrote why I believe Mr Obama is willing to make such terrible concessions to Iran in my post “Obama: protecting Islam and Iran.”  I said that  “relations between Israel and Barack Hussein Obama have always been rocky.  I believe this is because Mr Obama sympathizes with Muslims and disdains Jews.  This is in consideration of his upbringing and his education, amongst other things.”

Bolton said Saturday that Obama’s eagerness for a deal would give Tehran a “free pass” for nuclear arms. He said American voters should thus make national security the central issue of 2016’s presidential elections.

There is no denying this statement whatsoever; it became true in 2008 and is equally true today:

“The gravest threat to our national security sits in the Oval Office,” Bolton said. “The next two years can’t pass swiftly enough. For God’s sake, let’s not make the same mistake in 2016.”

Mr Obama is one who makes US allies an enemy, and US enemies a friend.

BZ

 

Let THIS sink in about ISIS:

ISIS Stolen American Equipment

[ISIS with captured American equipment.]

From the NYDailyNews.com:

ISIS will be in position to get nuclear weapons if allowed to consolidate power, resources, says expert

by Joseph Cirincione

The jihadists terrorizing the Middle East have seized billions in assets through stolen banks and oil fields. If left unchecked and allowed to make the right connections, they could secure the material and expertise to make a deadly weapon of mass destruction.

The risk of a terrorist attack using nuclear or chemical weapons has just gone up.

ISIS is willing to kill large numbers of innocents, and it has added three capabilities that catapult the threat beyond anything seen before: control of large, urban territories, huge amounts of cash, and a global network of recruits.

British Home Secretary Theresa May warned that if ISIS consolidates its control over the land it occupies, “We will see the world’s first truly terrorist state” with “the space to plot attacks against us.”

Here is what way too many people don’t understand about ISIS:

Its seizure of banks and oil fields gave it more than $2 billion in assets. If ISIS could make the right connection to corrupt officials in Russia or Pakistan, the group might be able to buy enough highly enriched uranium (about 50 pounds) and the technical help to build a crude nuclear device. Militants recruited from Europe or America could help smuggle it into their home nations.

And Mr Obama wants to “negotiate” with Iran about nukes, bargaining away one manner of helping to ensure ISIS doesn’t get its hands on fissile materials?  ISIS doesn’t have to possess an actual deployable weapon per se; all it has to do is acquire sufficient material to create a dirty bomb.

This is not only tactically insolvent on Mr Obama’s part, it is another in a series of capitulative moves by our Apologist In Chief, the EOTUS.

Raised by Communists and Muslims, Obaka falls back to his roots when pressed or pressured.

Mr Obama doesn’t even deserve a seat at the kid’s table during Thanksgiving.

And yet, he’s in charge of our nation.

The greatest threat to the United States of America isn’t illegal immigrants.  It isn’t the budget, It isn’t the sequester.  It isn’t the southern border.  It isn’t Vladimir Putin.  It isn’t even Islamic terror, though ISIS is getting close.

The greatest threat to the United States of America is Barack Hussein Obama.

BZ

 

Obama: still despises Israel & Netanyahu

Netanyahu Defends IsraelMr Obama still despises Israel and its Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

It’s no more complicated than this: Mr Obama despises the United States for having acquired its power base “on the backs of small brown people,” and Israel for having acquired its power base “on the backs of small brown people.”

Mr Obama will do his best to level these two nations out.  Both the US and Israel need to be knocked down a peg or ten.  Both nations acquired power in a completely unfair fashion.  Power they don’t deserve and power they need to release.

Mr Obama isn’t just refusing to meet with Benjamin Netanyahu.  He is actively advocating against Netanyahu and for his new political opponent.  Doubt me?  Click this link.

PM Netanyahu was invited to speak before the US Congress by Republicans.  Mr Obama refuses to meet with Netanyahu when this occurs.  Yet, Mr Obama will do everything he can to smooth the ruffled feathers of Iran and demands US pols not insist that further sanctions be levied against Iran.

Because, evidently, Mr Obama has such a nuanced and effective plan in place to disarm Iran and make it docile.

Oh my God.  Are Republicans possibly that stupid?

You, my dear readers, know the inherent answer to that question.

From the NYTimes.com:

Administration Official Criticizes Israeli Ambassador Over Netanyahu Visit

by Julie Hirschfeld Davis

The Obama administration, after days of mounting tension, signaled on Wednesday how angry it is with Israel that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accepted Republican leaders’ invitation to address Congress on Iran without consulting the White House. The outrage the episode has incited within President Obama’s inner circle became clear in unusually sharp criticism by a senior administration official who said that the Israeli ambassador, Ron Dermer, who helped orchestrate the invitation, had repeatedly placed Mr. Netanyahu’s political fortunes above the relationship between Israel and the United States.

And yet, Mr Obama will hold Iran in the highest regard.

And yet, Mr Obama cannot even name terrorist organizations.

The Taliban is not a “terrorist organization.”

“Sometimes they carry out tactics that are sometimes akin to terrorism.”

Are you kidding me?

BZ