Facts in evidence.
BZ
Gun control truism
Tag Archives: Muslims
Western PC thought on Islam
It’s not funny unless it’s true.
BZ
Muslim coordinated attacks kill 129 in Paris, 350+ injured
Obama fiddles while the US and the world burns. He is “concerned” and “monitoring.”
Our wondrous president today declared that ISIS IS CONTAINED. From Breitbart.com:
Obama: ISIS Is Not Getting ‘Stronger,’ We Have ‘Contained’ Them
by Jeff Poor
Friday on ABC’s “Good Morning America,” President Barack Obama seemingly downplayed the threat of ISIS in an interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos that aired on Friday’s broadcast of “Good Morning America.”
Stephanopoulos asked Obama if ISIS was gaining in strength, to which Obama denied they were.
“I don’t think they’re gaining strength,” Obama responded. “What is true is that from the start, our goal has been first to contain and we have contained them. They have not gained ground in Iraq, and in Syria they’ll come in, they’ll leave, but you don’t see this systemic march by ISIL across the terrain.”
“The global war on terror is over.”
~ Barack Hussein Obama, 23 May, 2013
OUR PRESIDENT IS AN INCREDIBLE DOLT.
Isn’t timing wonderful? Just as our CIC (Coward In Chief) makes this statement, all hell explodes in Paris at the hands of ISIS and Islam. Six or seven attacks occurred in Paris, France, on Friday.
And yes, our sterling, stalwart and courageous president refuses to name Evil. As Obama said, these are nothing more than garden-variety “extremists.”
Islamic evil. Let me please repeat that: ISLAMIC EVIL.
Pipes: “Those who make all Islam their enemy not only succumb to a simplistic and essentialist illusion but they lack any mechanism to defeat it. We who focus on Islamism see World War II and the Cold War as models for subduing the third totalitarianism. We understand that radical Islam is the problem and moderate Islam is the solution. We work with anti-Islamist Muslims to vanquish a common scourge
No group has yet made claim to the attacks, but they will. Only a fool or our president would leave those attacks unattributed. Fool and Obama, one and the same. Parisians were throwing bedsheets out of their windows in order to cover the dead in the streets.
We are seeing the beginnings of an entire paradigm shift, a cultural change, in Europe, that will result in what was once known as European culture kicked to the curb.
A Jihadi Urban Army is emerging in France and in Europe. ISIS elements are already present in the US, having simply gotten their ankles most.
Is this the Religion of Peace™ versus the Religion of Evil™ ?
What video will it be this time, Mr Obama, responsible for these attacks? Were they disaffected Muslim workers ill-paid in various Paris businesses? Were they “poor,” “disenfranchised,” struggling to put food in the mouths of their children?
Or were they simply barbaric thugs destined to kill as many Westerners as possible?
A “hostage situation”? It was never a hostage situation. It was a situation destined for death.
More than 140 dead in series of terror attacks: 100 are killed after hostages are taken at theatre. Kalashnikov-wielding gunman opens fire in restaurant. Two SUICIDE bombs detonate near the Stade de France. Gunfire at shopping centre
Parisians were throwing sheets out of their windows so that the dead could be covered.
There were six attack sites. Suicide bombers blew themselves up. Gunmen took hostages in a venue. Gunmen blew themselves up and perhaps first responders.
Survivors climbed out of the concert hall on ladders. 100 people dead there alone. A mandatory curfew in effect for the first time since WWII.
The attackers shouted “Allahu Akhbar.”
Attackers detonated vests as police moved in.
200 wounded, 80 seriously in Paris.
Ah Islam, the religion of tolerance and peace.
BZ
Europe rethinks guns
This is the sound of BZ slapping his forehead.
Gosh. I wonder why?
From TheNewAmerican.com:
In Response to Massive Influx of Refugees, Europeans Seek More Guns
by Warren Mass
As The New American has reported in multiple articles, European nations are frantically trying to accommodate the thousands of immigrants fleeing to Europe from the ongoing civil war in Syria. This massive influx, which has been described as an “invasion,” has prompted many Europeans to arm themselves, fearful that the migrants will cause a rise in violent crime, according to a report published by WorldNetDaily (WND) on October 26.
However, notes the report, citing Czech and Austrian sources, obtaining a firearm in Europe can be difficult to nearly impossible, depending on gun laws in each individual country. A Czech television reporter spoke mostly about the situation in neighboring Austria, which is in the main path of migrants traveling from Greece to their most popular destination — Germany.
I’m sorry, but I have to readily admit that my first thought was: oh boo-hoo. Europeans are rethinking gun control? A tad late perhaps?
“I’m disarmed. How do I keep me and my family safe, considering my ______ government appears to be disinterested in defending me from the invading Muslim hordes?”
And yes, they are invading Muslim hordes. They’re certainly not Buddhist hordes. You’re stewing, Europe, in the Leftist mess you created. You can’t get guns now that you actually need them to defend your families?
Live with it.
The Czech reporter stated that long guns such as shotguns and rifles have been selling out in Austria, and those who haven’t already purchased one may not have an opportunity to obtain one for some time. “If anyone wants to buy a long gun in Austria right now, too bad for them,” noted the Czech newscaster. “All of them are currently sold out.”
Funny thing is, guns are selling like hotcakes in the United States as well this year — the exact opposite intention of the Obama Administration. Even better, gun and ammunition purchases have “skyrocketed” in Fornicalia — particularly since Fornicalia Lt Governmor Gavin Newsom has said he’s going to put a measure on the ballot to enact even stricter gun regulations, also mandating background checks before you can purchase a single box of ammunition.
Great idea! Let’s make criminals out of citizens and leave the real criminals themselves entirely unaffected — by letting them out of jails and prisons, minimizing property crimes (by increasing the value of a stolen item before the crime constitutes a felony) and sending drug users and dealers to rehab instead of putting them in jail. AB 109, “realignment,” is already working like a charm (not), as is Proposition 47. Meaning: the criminals are doing very well in Fornicalia, and property crimes are likewise blossoming. Heroin users aren’t stupid, after all, just drugged. They know they can steal more items before they’re charged with a felony and actually have to enter the system.
(As an aside: the effect of AB109? In Los Angeles, because of the court and jail conditions associated with overcrowding, AB 109 inmates were serving anywhere from 20 percent of their sentence — after half-time was deducted. For the most serious and repeat offenders the percentage of time served peaked at around 40 percent of a sentence for the most serious offenses. The results of both AB 109 and Prop 47? The outcome “is criminals serving very short sentences and threatening public safety.”)
But wait until you read this:
I just returned from a gun rights meeting in Belgium, and I can attest that all over Europe people now want the means to defend themselves. Self-defense is no longer a dirty word. In countries like Austria, where it is still legal to own a firearm, gun sales are at record levels. I can tell you first-hand that people in Europe now wish they had a Second Amendment.
Yes, let’s repeat that last sentence for the brain-addled and ill-educated Leftists amongst us here (I know you’re there, I get your comments and emails):
“I can tell you first-hand that people in Europe now wish they had a Second Amendment.”
Socialists and Euro-Cheesers wishing for their own Second Amendment?
Even more astonishing:
Going back to the fears generated among Europeans by the large numbers of refugees from the Middle East, it appears that such fears are well grounded. The U.K.’s Daily Mail reported last May: “Islamic State terrorists who are hell-bent on committing atrocities in Britain are being smuggled into Europe by posing as refugees trying to cross the Mediterranean.”
Those “fears are well grounded.” Muslim terrorists posing as “refugees.” Oh no! Muslims wouldn’t stoop to something as bad as that, would they? Could they?
Listen up, American Leftists:
The Daily Mail cited as its source a Libyan security advisor, Abdul Basit Haroun, who used to live in Britain. Haroun said during a BBC Radio 5 Live Investigates program:
[Terrorists] use the boats for their people who they want to send to Europe as the European police don’t know who is from IS and who is a normal refugee. The boat owners have a list of who to take but some people come suddenly and they’re told, “Take them with you.”…
They are for IS — 100 per cent.
Which is why I say again and continue to say: keep Syrian and all other Muslim “refugees” out of the United States of America. ISIS has already infiltrated via our southern border. There are ISIS elements present in the US. My federal LE sources tell me so.
I say: let Europe, who so eschewed firearms and pointed their fingers at US “gun nuts,” stew in the juices of their own making and lack of foresight.
BZ
The myth of the “moderate Muslim” in America, Pt. II
A US Muslim male in the company of his wife dressed in this fashion is not a “moderate Muslim” but, instead, someone to be watched quite carefully.
I first wrote about the myth of the so-called “moderate Muslim” here, when it was revealed by the Center For Security Policy that “of 600 Muslims living in the United States, significant minorities embrace supremacist notions that could pose a threat to America’s security and its constitutional form of government.”
But wait; those “moderate American Muslims” you’re told are good and tolerant people — and are in your community?
According to the just-released survey of Muslims, a majority (51%) agreed that “Muslims in America should have the choice of being governed according to shariah.” When that question was put to the broader U.S. population, the overwhelming majority held that shariah should not displace the U.S. Constitution (86% to 2%).
More than half (51%) of U.S. Muslims polled also believe either that they should have the choice of American or shariah courts, or that they should have their own tribunals to apply shariah. Only 39% of those polled said that Muslims in the U.S. should be subject to American courts.
Two more very important paragraphs from my first blogpost about the myth of the “moderate Muslim in America:
Even more troubling, is the fact that nearly a quarter of the Muslims polled believed that, “It is legitimate to use violence to punish those who give offense to Islam by, for example, portraying the prophet Mohammed.”
Understand this, however:
Nearly one-fifth of Muslim respondents said that the use of violence in the United States is justified in order to make shariah the law of the land in this country.
Read that again. Violence is justified is justified to ensure shariah law.
So essentially, as WND.com wrote,
Poll: Most U.S. Muslims would trade Constitution for Shariah
‘Quran should be highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion’
by Leo Hohmann
Ben Carson’s comment that he would not support a Shariah-compliant Muslim for president because Islamic law is incompatible with the U.S. Constitution led to the former brain surgeon’s roasting among media talkers and politicians of all stripes.
He has been excoriated as “anti-Muslim,” “bigoted,” even “anti-American” and unfit for office.
With the exception, as I wrote here, is that Dr Carson merely states the truth because, as indicated repeatedly, Muslims in the US embrace Shariah Law over our own US Constitution and Bill of Rights. Further, where does the Muslim concept of “taqiyah” enter into the equation? If you are unfamiliar with that term, you’d best click on the link.
Further, Leftists embrace CAIR as they embrace the ACLU. Except that the ACLU doesn’t immediately want to kill you for religious reasons — say, if you’re a Christian.. Yet.
This is important because Omar Ahmad, one founder of CAIR — and CAIR makes no bones about its representation of Muslims in the United States of America — has said, in “a conference hall packed with California Muslims in July 1998 that Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Quran … should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.” ”
CAIR denied Ahmad made the statement and said the newspaper that printed his statement retracted it, but that was proven false. In other words, Ahmad told the truth and CAIR lied.
This is another telling paragraph itself.
Ihsan Bagby of CAIR’s Washington office has said that Muslims “can never be full citizens of this country,” referring to the United States, “because there is no way we can be fully committed to the institutions and ideologies of this country,” Pipes reported in his 2006 article, “CAIR Islamists Fooling the Government.”
Islam can be conflictive in its statements, but that is dependent upon its goals at the time of the statement. There is a general Muslim word called “taqiyah” representing the notion in Islam that Muslims should never tell the truth to infidels. You and me, Western Civilization, those not believing in Islam, we are the infidels. The unclean. The ones who, like the Borg, need to be converted or killed. Muslims are not ashamed to tell you this and to make the concept clear. Google the word and check its meanings and various spellings.
Islam will frequently tell you what it is thinking and what it wants. Many Muslims in America — a majority as indicated above — believe that Shariah Law is supreme over any other form of American law. That is very clear. On the other hand, Muslims have a duty to lie to infidels.
Therefore, Ahmad through CAIR, is representative of what Muslims in the US believe. You can come to no other conclusion. CAIR is happy to make the linkage itself. They make it quite clear they wish to represent Muslims in America. As noted above, a poll already indicates that a majority of sampled Muslims hold that Shariah Law should be the law of the United States.
Yes, I am certain there are moderate Muslims in America.
Just as I believe there are Muslims in America who do not practice Islam as demanded by the most devout and true of followers of Mohammad and of the Koran.
Those are the “moderate Muslims” in America, who would not survive their practice in the Middle East. The Muslims who do not practice the Koran as strictly written. If you are a “moderate Muslim,” you’re not doing it right and you yourself may be in danger of an Islamic re-tuning.
If you point out a “moderate Muslim” to me, I’ll point out someone who cannot recite a minimum of five surahs and hasn’t been to a mosque in months or years, whose wife doesn’t wear hajib and who doesn’t not have a beard or fear Mohammad. Someone the rest of non-moderate Islam would consider too Westernized
Unless they are present in the US to blend in as they plot our infidel deaths.
There are the exceptions, you see.
Asked whether suicide bombing can be justified as a measure to defend Islam, 26 percent of American Muslims age eighteen to twenty-nine said yes. That is one quarter of the adult American Muslims under the age of thirty, and no matter how you count the number of Muslims in America (estimates vary from 2 million to 8 million), that is a lot of people.
– Ayaan Hirsi Ali
Somali-born American (formerly Dutch) activist, writer, and politician.
BZ